bemo | TON Staking | Liquid Staking | bmTON pinned a photo

Channel
bemo | TON Staking | Liquid Staking | bmTON
@bemofinance
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
29,230subscribers
-149 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001939278742 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bemofinance |
| Description | Web: https://bemo.fi App: https://app.bemo.fi mini App: @bemo_finance_bot Chat: https://t.me/+qLsOgsmiKqMyN2Ey |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bemofinance |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 29,230 | -31 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:36 | 29,261 | -21 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:14 | 29,282 | -14 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:51 | 29,296 | -23 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:50 | 29,319 | -33 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:05 | 29,352 | -23 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:00 | 29,375 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:00 | 29,379 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 29,379 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 14 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 206
- Videos
- 5
- Links
- 244
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 7s
- Average length
- 7s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
165 reactions across 11 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 49 | 29.7% | |
| 🔥 | 40 | 24.2% | |
| 👍 | 38 | 23.0% | |
| 🏆 | 9 | 5.45% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 5.45% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 2.42% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 2.42% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 2.42% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 2.42% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 1.21% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.606% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.606% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 165reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2025 to 12 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 2
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 15 we hold a reading for · 13%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bemofinance. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2025 to 12 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
TON is becoming GRAM — and bemo is right there with it 💎 The community has spoken: with 81% voting in favor, Toncoin (TON) is being renamed to Gram (GRAM) — the original name from the TON White Paper. The change takes effect on June 15 at 12:00 PM UTC. Same token, same chain, same balances — only the name, ticker, and logo change. What this means for bemo: 🔹 Our interface and docs will be fully updated by Monday,…
👍7❤5👀4🔥2
THE WAIT IS OVER 😇 The $EVAA TGE is Officially Set for 03.10.2025. You’ve seen the numbers. You’ve seen the backing. Now it’s time to own the core of TON’s DeFi revolution 🤑 ⌨️ TGE WEBSITE ⌨️ $EVAA is the foundation of TON’s #1 lending protocol, already trusted with $118M+ deposits ATH, 300K+ wallets, and $1.4B+ volume. Holding $EVAA gives you direct advantages: 😇 Treasury Power — DAO-managed buybacks and burns…
❤19🔥9👍6😁3🤔1
Big moves in the Telegram ecosystem… 🧨 bemo is now part of ylem.studio 🧨 Meet Ylem — a Telegram-focused venture studio. The team backed by top.co & tac.build. 🍏 Ylem is building grvty.dev — the official liquid staking infra on TAC. So, next-level partnership between LST and DeFi collaborations is on the horizon. 🦋 Ylem also helps teams like morpho.org and euler.finance launch in Telegram, giving us the perfect g…
🔥13❤8👍8🏆5🤣4
BM, fam! TON believers every morning be like 👀📈 Did you check the price yet? App | Mini App | X | Telegram EN / RU | Blog
😁6💯1
We’re teaming up with the staking powerhouse @P2Pstaking to supercharge Bemo’s liquid staking on the TON blockchain! 💎 This collaboration marks an important step forward for both #bmTON and the TON DeFi ecosystem, aimed at expanding liquidity opportunities and strengthening trust and quality in the LSTs niche. The future of staking begins now. 🚀 App | Mini App | X | Telegram EN / RU | Blog
❤7👍6🔥3👏2
Live stream finished (57 minutes)
Live stream started
BM bemo fam! ☀️ Attention! 🚨 Our AMA session is postponed to Thursday (7th of August) 18:30 GMT+3 due to technical issues, sorry for the delay 🙏 App | Mini App | X | Telegram EN / RU | Blog
🤯 Staking without the lock-up Get rewards and keep your crypto liquid — so you can exit or seize new opportunities instantly! In our latest post: — How liquid staking can protect you in a downturn 🛡️ — How to “double-dip” on yield 💰 — ETH, SOL & TON case studies ✏️ 📖 Read: https://bemo.fi/blog/how-liquid-staking-helps-manage-risks-in-crypto-investments/ App | Mini App | X | Telegram EN / RU | Blog
🔥 Reminder: $stXP Season 2.0 is live on Bemo - time to boost your rewards! 🔥 We’ve launched a new farming pool on @dedust_en for the $bmTON / $TON pair. 💎 What’s in it for you: — LP fees — $stXP rewards (pre-BMO tokens) with extra farming APR 🌾 How to join: Add liquidity to the $bmTON / $TON pool on Dedust Join now and supercharge your $stXP with Bemo 💧 App | Mini App | X | Telegram EN / RU | Blog
❤5🏆4🔥2
BM! BM! This time, "Bemo Talks" is diving into the gamified side of #Web3 with @AURA_x_CAPITAL ⚡️ This one’s for the curious, the playful, and the “I-want-to-get-into-#DeFi-but-please-don’t-bore-me” crowd. 😏 AURA is turning onboarding, education, and trading into something that actually feels good to use. No walls of text, no tabs overload - just (and honestly fun) experience. 🗓 Save the date: Thursday, July 31 |…
❤2👌2👍1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @bemofinance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 265,781 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@bemofinance_rus · 9,96453 postsGram of TON
@gram · 7,033,2228 postsMemegram Community
@Fragmement · 9,8465 postsxRocket Listings
@xrocketlistings · 48,8045 postsGoalPixels News
@GoalPixels · 8,5924 postsGETON News
@geton · 11,1183 postsBored Club | Web3 community
@bored_club · 5212 postsTON_a_MANIYA🤑
@ton_a_mania · 52 postsTON Community
@toncommunitychannel · 812,5522 postsAlerts Raff
@AlertsRaff · 6891 postAqua Protocol - Borrowing on TON (EN)
@aquaprotocolxyzchannelen · 808,4561 postREP Channel
@replabs · 1,620,0081 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@bemofinance_rus · 9,9648 postsBidask Protocol
@bidask · 2,5292 postsEVAA
@evaaprotocol · 274,6932 postsAURA x Capital
@aura_x_capital · 7681 postBidask Protocol CIS
@bidask_cis · 1,7011 postDeDust.io – TON DEX
@dedust_en · 70,2241 postEVAA PROTOCOL HUB
@EvaaProtocolHub · 87,1321 postswap.coffee
@swap_coffee · 80,3611 postКонстантин Жеребцов
@zhe_kostya · 931 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@tonraffles_en · 1,338,925
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
@evaaprotocol · 274,693
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“bemo | TON Staking | Liquid Staking | bmTON” (@bemofinance), 29,230 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bemofinance.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.