Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -2,604. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 348,749–352,135 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 13:14
349,140
-398
11 Aug 2026, 14:13
349,538
-388
10 Aug 2026, 17:06
349,926
-275
9 Aug 2026, 19:53
350,201
-415
8 Aug 2026, 17:33
350,616
-369
7 Aug 2026, 20:10
350,985
-406
6 Aug 2026, 22:31
351,391
-353
6 Aug 2026, 01:37
351,744
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 30 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
119
Videos
12
Links
95
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
40,547 reactions across 17 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
21,917
54.1%
❤
9,828
24.2%
🔥
4,408
10.9%
👀
1,358
3.35%
👻
1,042
2.57%
👏
963
2.38%
🗿
337
0.831%
🥰
207
0.511%
🎃
154
0.38%
🙈
108
0.266%
🎉
64
0.158%
🆒
35
0.086%
👨💻
35
0.086%
🤓
34
0.084%
🫡
26
0.064%
☃
20
0.049%
🤝
11
0.027%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40,547reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 October 2024 to 26 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
539
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 17 we hold a reading for · 53%
Most on one post
461
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @diamoremarket. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 October 2024 to 26 November 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔷 JGTD Dubai Recap: Bringing Tokenization to the Gem Industry
We just wrapped up at the fourth edition of Jewellery, Gem & Technology Dubai — and it was intense.
Our mission was simple: educate gem dealers and private collectors about what tokenization actually means for their business.
The reality? Most conversations started with "So... like Bitcoin?"
And that's fine. That's why we showed up.
💎 What we heard from…
DIAMORE is exhibiting at JGTD Dubai, Nov 11-13
We're demonstrating how diamond tokenization works in real-time – no theory, actual gems being transformed into tradeable digital assets. This is where traditional gem trading meets blockchain innovation.
Why Dubai? Why now?
The UAE is the crossroads of global luxury trade & crypto innovation. JGTD attracts dealers, investors, and forward-thinkers from 50+ countries.
P…
🚨 Season 1 is Over! 🚨
That’s a wrap on Season 1! 🎉 All your stats—points, demo diamonds, and more have been calculated and saved. Everything carries over to the next season, so you're all set to keep climbing! ⛰
• When you log in, you’ll see a special message announcing the end of Season 1 along with your final balance.
Huge thanks for your hard work and dedication this season. 🙌 The journey continues! 💎
Stay tun…
💎✨What’s Your Secret to Farming Points? ✨💎
🔥 The race to farm points for our upcoming airdrop is heating up, and we see you coming up with some genius strategies to maximize your points earning!
Now it is the time to share your tips with the community:
🤔 Got a clever way to farm points faster?
🎯 Or maybe a daily routine that keeps you on track?
Let’s make farming more fun, rewarding, and collaborative for everyon…
💎 Don’t Sleep on Farming Points - Every Point Counts!
The more points you farm in our app, the better the rewards you will be securing in our upcoming airdrop. ✨
🔥 How to Earn Points❓
It’s simple! Harvest points regularly, complete quests, redeem the promo-codes and most importantly invite your friends to join Diamore and earn points together.
💥 Pro Tip:
- Unlock new Assistant Perks like Double Tap Power, Instan…
🎉 Gift Promo Code Alert! ❤️
🎁 Claim 50,000 points – available for 2 days! Check our X post for the code and on how to redeem your points. 🚀
We knew that some bugs had made it hard for our members to use the app in recent times. We're giving out a code of 50K points as compensation.
Happy Collecting! 💎
🚀 We're Thrilled to Share! 🃏
Starting today, we’re launching our collaboration with TON Poker! Get ready for two weeks of thrilling tournaments from November 12 to November 25, every day at 5:00 PM UTC.
🎉 Registration is FREE, and each tournament boasts a $100 prize pool!
🔗 Join us for the fun using our special link for the tournament: New link 👉 [Join Here]
Don’t miss out—mark your calendars and see you at the t…
⭐️ Exciting New Lottery Alert: Win an Exclusive NFT With VR Glasses Trait!
Join our latest raffle for a chance to win a Girls Best Friends NFT featuring the VR glasses trait! ✨
🎁 Prize: Girls’ Best Friends NFT #470
🎟 Ticket Price: 35 Telegram Stars
⭐️ Total Tickets Available: 500
👉 After the raffle, the collected funds will be randomly distributed among several holders of the NFT with the VR glasses trait! 💰
Get …
⭐️Exciting Assistant Update
Make a one-time purchase of just 250 stars and you’re all set—no renewals needed! Enjoy:
🎮 Double Tap Power: Double your tapping power! (If you currently earn 2.5 points per tap, the assistant will double that to 5 points per tap! Experience a x2 multiplier on your tapping!)
🚀 Instant Ad Skipping: Skip ads instantly (A notification will appear saying the assistant watched the AD) and ge…
⭐️ Why Regularly Collect Points in Diamore tApp? 💎
Are you tapping away in Diamore tApp? Here’s why consistent point collection is a game-changer:
1️⃣ Boost Your Airdrop: More points mean a bigger token airdrop allocation—maximize your rewards!
2️⃣ Level Up Faster: You can boost your points earnings by spending points to upgrade your levels, allowing you to farm even more points as you progress.
3️⃣ Get Exclusive…
🎉Lottery Winner Announcement!
Congratulations to our lucky winner, @Ija_Ievina! 🥳 You’ve just snagged the exclusive Girls Best Friends NFT #666 featuring the rare vampire fang trait! 🧛♂️💖 The NFT has been sent to you!
Thank you to everyone who participated in our spooky lottery. Stay tuned for more exciting events and opportunities in the future! ❤️
💎DIAMORE X METASTREET
We are super happy to announce the partnership between Diamore and Metastreet! 💎✨
Now you can lend USDT to diamond owners and earn 3-6% annually (APY). Plus, this will be a crucial part of our staking protocol, where you can stake tokenized diamonds for a 4-6% annual yield, initially boosted up to an incredible 30% APY! 💎
Want to get started❓
Check out the pool here: [Pool]
Stay tuned for mo…
❤235👍134🔥46🗿17👏5🎉4
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @diamoremarket. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 731,981 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@diamoremarket named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@ija_ievina named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
D3X: All-in-One Web3 Hub @d3x_crypto · 324,417 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
BaxCrypto @cactusbox · 349,725 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
Vertus Announcements @the_vertus · 2,261,866 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 7 August 2026
Boom: Crypto News @boomloudcoin · 1,758,838 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 7 August 2026
PinEye Community @pineye · 1,186,055 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 August 2026
GemsWall Announcement @gemswall · 1,496,568 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 August 2026
Dormint Announcements 🌙 @DormintAnnouncements · 523,744 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 August 2026
PEPE Miner Community @pepe_miner_community · 290,948 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 August 2026
TapCoins @theTapCoins · 3,124,024 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 7 August 2026
کانال خبری تایم فارم @TimeFarmNewsFarsiOfficial · 206,306 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
World of Dypians @worldofdypians · 211,193 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
FastX Network Channel @fastXNetwork · 406,456 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
Simple Wallet @smpl_app · 1,717,147 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 7 August 2026
Hodlman Crypto @inHodlman · 162,409 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
Zima Bank @zimabank · 326,401 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
Clear feed @clear_feed_media · 540,829 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 August 2026
CEDEX @cedex_io · 1,174,225 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
TRUST Community🤝 @trust_empire_en · 884,665 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
CryptoRank Analytics @cryptoranknews · 719,964 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 August 2026
MMPro Trust @mmprotrust · 761,434 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
BITTON - Engage. Earn. Scale. @bittonapp · 357,718 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
BFinance — Official Channel @bfinancepay · 1,379,189 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
Polymarket Labs|Prediction Market Signals @Polymarket_Labs · 408,684 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
Proxy MTProto | پروکسی @telmtproto · 2,520,289 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 7 August 2026
This channel appears in 325 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Diamore | Announcements” (@diamoremarket), 349,140 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/diamoremarket.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.