we feel u 🫂 hop into @boom — learn how crypto works on real investment examples, mine, earn $BOOMcoins, and grow your crypto brain 🧠 start now. the party can wait. 💥 Join Boom 📹 Youtube 🐣 X (Twitter) 📹 Tiktok
❤1,380👍638😁308👏168🎉141🔥136😍128🤗107

Channel
@boomloudcoin
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,758,838subscribers
-16,069 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
| Telegram ID | -1002198076623 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @boomloudcoin |
| Description | Boom: Crypto Rewards The LOUDEST BOOM in your wallet! EARN NOW: t.me/boom YouTube: youtube.com/@boom_launchpad TT: tiktok.com/@boom_launchpad X: x.com/boom_launchpad |
| Created | 3 July 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/boomloudcoin |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 1,758,838 | -3,215 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:21 | 1,762,053 | -2,401 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:41 | 1,764,454 | -2,925 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:31 | 1,767,379 | -2,513 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:53 | 1,769,892 | -2,491 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:23 | 1,772,383 | -2,471 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:40 | 1,774,854 | -53 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 1,774,907 | first reading |
218 posts held, back to 3 July 2024 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 730 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 218 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
22,209 reactions across 20 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 6,808 | 30.7% | |
| ❤ | 5,586 | 25.2% | |
| 😁 | 2,180 | 9.82% | |
| 🔥 | 1,411 | 6.35% | |
| 👏 | 993 | 4.47% | |
| 🎉 | 984 | 4.43% | |
| 😍 | 886 | 3.99% | |
| 🤩 | 868 | 3.91% | |
| 🤗 | 739 | 3.33% | |
| 🥰 | 496 | 2.23% | |
| 🫡 | 420 | 1.89% | |
| 👌 | 228 | 1.03% | |
| 🆒 | 182 | 0.819% | |
| 🙏 | 129 | 0.581% | |
| 💋 | 98 | 0.441% | |
| 😇 | 96 | 0.432% | |
| 🤝 | 54 | 0.243% | |
| 😘 | 51 | 0.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 214 of the 218 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,612,828reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 218 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2024 to 3 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @boomloudcoin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 218 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 July 2024 to 3 July 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
we feel u 🫂 hop into @boom — learn how crypto works on real investment examples, mine, earn $BOOMcoins, and grow your crypto brain 🧠 start now. the party can wait. 💥 Join Boom 📹 Youtube 🐣 X (Twitter) 📹 Tiktok
❤1,380👍638😁308👏168🎉141🔥136😍128🤗107
To become a crypto pro, u don’t need TikTok — just open the @boom and learn from real investment examples inside the app. 💥 Join Boom 📹 Youtube 🐣 X (Twitter) 📹 Tiktok
👍293❤267😁142🔥109🎉89👏87🤗77🤩76
⚡️Crypto loves shortcuts. One of the most useful? NFA. You’ll see it everywhere. Wanna know what it means — and why ppl keep saying it? 👀 Check the pic and level up your crypto brain. Simple, fun, and just 3 letters long. 💥 Join Boom 📹 Youtube 🐣 X (Twitter) 📹 Tiktok
👍252❤226😁114🎉90🥰90🤗83🫡80👏79
🤔 What if I told u... everything’s already simple and clear in the Boom app? 🔹 Mine 🔹 Learn real investment stuff (with real-life examples) 🔹 Sign papers 🔹 Get $BOOMcoins 🔹 Invite friends 🔹 Get more $BOOMcoins, when invite frens No stress. Try it now 💥 Join Boom 📹 Youtube 🐣 X (Twitter) 📹 Tiktok
👍242❤235😁143🔥96🎉89😍82👏79🤩79
📚 Crypto Word Drop — what’s anon? In crypto, people don’t say “hey bro” or “friend” — they say anon. It’s short for “anonymous,” ’cause most of us don’t show our names or faces here anyway. It’s a friendly (and a bit funny) way to talk to the crow —kinda like saying “hey, silent reader.” Wanna speak the language? Join @boom and grow your crypto brain every day. 💥 Join Boom 📹 Youtube 🐣 X (Twitter) 📹 Tiktok
👍175❤146🔥35😁28🎉17🤩14👏10😍8
crypto fail time 💥 (AKA: learn from others so you don’t blow up your bags) so there was this crypto guy. he wanted to protect his ledger. so he hid it in a closet. like, really hid it. years later, he decided to check his BTC balance… …aaaand couldn’t find the wallet. turns out, he’d lost access to $500,000+ worth of bitcoin💸 forever. be smarter. come hang with us at @boom — learn to invest, mine. 💥 Join Boom 📹 …
❤190😁49👍36🤩35🙏31🥰22🔥13👏9
Smart contract audited? That means it’s totally safe, right? 🤔 Well... not exactly 🤯 Find out why in the image! 👀 And hey, if you wanna stay ahead in the crypto game, jump into Boom and level up your knowledge! 💸 💥 Join Boom 📹 Youtube 🐣 X (Twitter) 📹 Tiktok
❤257👍160😁38👏33😍21😇20🤗15🥰13
Who’s Wagecuck? 😅 What’s wagecucking? Time to find out, fam! ☝️ 💥 Join Boom 📹 Youtube 🐣 X (Twitter) 📹 Tiktok
❤185👍131🆒73😁41🎉29🔥27😍25🤩22
🚀 Yo, here’s why you should launch @boom NOW: - Test real crypto investments – figure out what’s worth it. - $BOOMcoins for that millionaire vibe 💸 - Earn just by having cool friends! Hop in, level up, and maybe you’ll be the next Boom legend! 💥 💥 Join Boom 📹 Youtube 🐣 X (Twitter) 📹 Tiktok
❤234👍116🥰112😁73👌44🔥42👏30🎉28
That missing piece is @boom 🧩 💥 Join Boom 📹 Youtube 🐣 X (Twitter) 📹 Tiktok
👍406❤215😁127🔥94🎉79😍68🤗62👏61
Crypto Slang Time! 🥄 What’s “cooking”? Spoiler: it’s not food 👉 Check the pic – we broke it down real simple. Get into crypto the fun way – only on @boom 🚀 💥 Join Boom 📹 Youtube 🐣 X (Twitter) 📹 Tiktok
👍480❤263🔥139😁110🤗97🎉85😍83👏72
🔥 Big move for Bitcoin! BTC hit the top 5 most valuable assets in the world! 🚀 With a market cap of $1.862 trillion, it’s now ahead of Alphabet (Google's parent company) at $1.859 trillion. Here’s how the top 5 look now: 1️⃣ Gold ($22.327 trillion) 2️⃣ Apple ($3 trillion) 3️⃣ Microsoft ($3.726 trillion) 4️⃣ Nvidia ($2.412 trillion) 5️⃣ Bitcoin ($1.862 trillion) 💥 This is a huge milestone for crypto! Stay ahead of …
👍375❤236😁163🔥127🤩97🤗81😍81🎉74
Showing the 12 most recent of 218 posts we hold for @boomloudcoin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 207,898 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@boomloudcoin named 20 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 662 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Boom: Crypto News” (@boomloudcoin), 1,758,838 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/boomloudcoin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.