10 measurements spanning 7 days, net -142. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,103–20,287 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 21:55
20,124
-19
12 Aug 2026, 00:55
20,143
-17
11 Aug 2026, 04:22
20,160
-16
10 Aug 2026, 07:40
20,176
-18
9 Aug 2026, 10:31
20,194
-23
8 Aug 2026, 09:11
20,217
-17
7 Aug 2026, 10:44
20,234
-15
6 Aug 2026, 08:20
20,249
-17
6 Aug 2026, 02:06
20,266
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:02
20,266
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 24 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
684
Videos
57
Links
740
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
2h 14m
Average length
44m 43s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
930 reactions across 20 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
291
31.3%
🔥
177
19.0%
❤
130
14.0%
👏
78
8.39%
🤡
62
6.67%
💯
52
5.59%
🎉
31
3.33%
😁
31
3.33%
❤🔥
14
1.51%
⚡
11
1.18%
🤩
11
1.18%
👎
10
1.08%
🤣
9
0.968%
🥰
8
0.86%
🤔
4
0.43%
🕊
3
0.323%
🤨
3
0.323%
👌
2
0.215%
🌚
1
0.108%
🌭
1
0.108%
1 further kind
1
0.108%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 930reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2025 to 25 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
464
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 20 we hold a reading for · 60%
Most on one post
291
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DeepTon. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 May 2025 to 25 August 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🎤TON of Alpha — Мануэль Штоц о стратегии TON Strategy
В новом выпуске TON of Alpha Z беседует с Мануэлем Штоцем — инвестором на $558 млн., основателем Kingsway Capital и исполнительным председателем TON Strategy. В интервью Мануэль рассказал о своём пути от Goldman Sachs и Kingsway до инвестиций в TON, о том, почему он считает TON «реальной криптовалютой для миллиардов пользователей», и почему для него Bitcoin = нов…
🖥 TON CIS Dev 1-Day Bootcamp в Санкт-Петербурге: знакомство с новым языком TOLK
30 августа в Петербурге состоится оффлайн-интенсив для разработчиков — TON CIS Dev 1-Day Bootcamp. Главное внимание будет уделено TOLK — новому языку программирования смарт-контрактов в TON.
TOLK — язык, созданный специально для TON, чтобы упростить и ускорить разработку смарт-контрактов. Он решает проблему сложности текущих инструменто…
🍆Фальстарт TF перед выходом на рынок США
TON Foundation в какой-то степени сделали фальстарт с выходом на рынок США, так как первично нужно было раскачивать и онбордить СНГ аудиторию, чего в должной степени сделано не было.
Да, проводились какие-то региональные активности, но не было чего-то вирусного и ярких кейсов с привлечением СНГ селебрити.
Достаточно вспомнить, какой эффект создают СНГ-селебрити вроде Эвелон…
🌟Max Crown назначен Президентом и CEO TON Foundation, Manuel Stotz сосредоточится на TON Strategy Co.
TON Foundation объявил о расширении полномочий Макс Крауна: теперь он занимает сразу две позиции — CEO и Президент TON Foundation. Решение принято на фоне ухода Мануэля Штоц с поста Президента совета, чтобы сосредоточиться на руководстве Verb Technology Company (скоро TON Strategy Co.) и работе над интеграцией TON в…
💰Вышло новое интервью с Мануэлем Штоцом
Мануэль Штоц, президент TON Foundation и исполнительный председатель TON Strategy Co (NASDAQ: VERB), уже почти четыре года инвестирует в TON и сегодня руководит крупнейшим цифровым фондом компании экосистемы.
В январе Verb поднял $558M через PIPE — это когда инвесторы напрямую покупают акции на Nasdaq, а средства сразу идут на скупку TON. Среди участников — Vy Capital (инвест…
🦄TON получил первого единорога. И это только начало.
The Open Platform (TOP) — команда разработчиков и операторов встроенного криптокошелька и Web3-приложений для TON и Telegram — привлек $28,5 млн в раунде Series A при оценке $1 млрд.
Раунд возглавил финтех-фонд Ribbit Capital, с участием Pantera Capital. Всего компания отдала около 5% долей без токенов. Общий объём инвестиций в TOP теперь превышает $70 млн.
Что …
💥Telegram интегрирует TON на фоне удара по Apple‑таксе
В конце июня суд не позволил Apple отменить требование судьи Ро́джерс: теперь компания не может взимать комиссии за сторонние оплаты внутри App Store и обязана разрешать ссылки на внешние покупки пока только в США, но это уже значимый шаг в борьбе с монополией эпла.
Telegram быстро реагирует и уже вчера вышло обновление с возможностью предложенных постов: любое…
💸FIVA эволюционирует — финансы внутри Telegram, как это должно быть
Проект FIVA, ранее известный своей технологией токенизации доходности на TON, выходит на новый уровень. Теперь это не просто DeFi-инфраструктура, а удобное финансовое приложение, встроенное прямо в TMA.
— До 15% годовых на USDT (в партнёрстве с EVAA)
— До 10% годовых на TON
— Простой, «банковский» интерфейс
— Полный контроль над средствами
— Сложны…
🎁Telegram Gifts — на экранах Таймс-сквера
Орги NFT.NYC включили в официальный промо-ролик Telegram Gifts и TON. В центре Нью-Йорка — на главной сцене — сегодня выступил Jack Booth, Head of IP TON.
В основном речь шла о TON как инфраструктуре для next-gen цифровых коллекций.
“Все разговоры на NFTNYC2025 сводятся к тому, что TON — это будущее цифровых коллекционных предметов…” — Martin Mässer, TON Foundation
Подарк…
Капча для ботов автоскупщиков подарков Telegram24%
Другой вариант ⬇️7%
The shares total 159%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
😎«Настоящий ИИ — это то, над чем работает мой брат Николай» — Павел Дуров
Павел дал самое масштабное интервью в своей жизни — французскому изданию Le Point. Впервые — так открыто: арест во Франции, обвинения, Telegram, Илон Маск, 100+ детей по донации, идеология, крипта, цензура, философия.
Но самое интересное — между строк. ИИ. Telegram, как и ожидалось, движется в сторону полноценной AI-инфраструктуры.
Сначала —…
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
👍73😁25🤡10🔥2⚡1🌭1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DeepTon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Капча для ботов автоскупщиков подарков Telegram24%
Другой вариант ⬇️7%
The shares total 159%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2025 to 25 August 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 105,763 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Tonstakers RU @thetonstakers_ru · 153,181 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 12 August 2026
TON Status @tonstatus · 163,186 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
EVAA @evaaprotocol · 274,693 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Deep Ton” (@DeepTon), 20,124 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DeepTon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.