#GROK симпатичный откат на фоне роста комьюнити: https://x.com/its_phobia/status/2103959965496955039

Channel
Герман на блокчейне 🇪🇹
@blockchaingerman
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
32,945subscribers
-622 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001293287526 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @blockchaingerman |
| Description | Полезная информация о крипте Торговая группа: @german_intraday_bot Сотрудничество: @MADBiLL |
| Created | 12 February 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/blockchaingerman |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “Герман на блокчейне” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 22:41 | 32,945 | -34 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 20:02 | 32,979 | -22 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 07:20 | 33,001 | -6 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 14:38 | 33,007 | -22 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 10:58 | 33,029 | -14 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 08:59 | 33,043 | -22 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 13:37 | 33,065 | -32 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:45 | 33,097 | -44 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:53 | 33,141 | -45 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:25 | 33,186 | -33 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 33,219 | -29 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 33,248 | -11 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 33,259 | -11 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 33,270 | -5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 33,275 | -9 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:57 | 33,284 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:13 | 33,288 | -17 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:58 | 33,305 | -26 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 33,331 | -17 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:48 | 33,348 | first reading |
Engagement
256 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 88 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.10%
- avg views ÷ 32,945 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,340
- 128 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 129
- of 256 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 256 (2 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 299,441 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 08:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈10,700
- Videos
- ≈241
- Links
- ≈11,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1m 29s
- Average length
- 15s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
#CALI $7M
#GLEASON в ходе Paid меты начали штамповать токены для миллиардеров и криптопаразитов, которым эти копейки не особо нужны. Gleason - токен, направленный человеку, занимающемуся реальной благотворительностью, который сейчас на слуху. Вполне может как минимум забондиться https://x.com/wdsu/status/2103536270727094473 9qDrvA58oDyQAFKdKfE8ondUNYNkqoiivV1W1iEP3L4F
#SI на $10М+ токене волатильность как на незабондившемся шитке
e/acc и Paid для наглядности
#CALI ATH это произошло на фоне прорыва платформы https://usepaid.app/, которая направляет комиссии от торгов пампфан токенов аккаунтам твиттера через X Money. Ночью появился первый серьезный раннер на Paid - e/acc, токен поддержал адресат: https://x.com/beffjezos/status/2103676713322660017, цену загнали до $30М После этого Paid зашиллили Solana, Toly, Pump и тд. Подробнее в треде: https://x.com/lesabrefomo/status…
#SI Трамп во вторник переименует искусственный интеллект в супер интеллект. SI со StonkFun выиграл PvP DEW9dSN6QpWyNthphCpMmAbZP1Q4cEKR9xQXAri98WDP
#0xquit есть контакт
#0xquit белый хакер спас 23 тысячи NFT от хака на $5.8M, несколько минут назад он упомянул монету, комиссии от который он получает https://x.com/devwizardxbt/status/2103432902159511724 https://x.com/0xquit/status/2103568713060602288 J141JCiXKGcrhDCgWUTCL9qz7h943iCibNiLNfqZpump
#ARCHIBROWN есть контакт
#ARCHIBROWN JEANPHIL поджимает 10М, ARCHIBROWN в консолидации после первоначального пампа
#StonkBlend рабочая платформа запуска токенов на StonkFun в паре с несколькими токенизированными акциями 2Ngvnnkwrwq5u4RYV5WYKJ2wiQoEkKaVCc4LuuhYSTNK
Showing the 12 most recent of 256 posts we hold for @blockchaingerman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@mahfavaboyz · 2,0482 postsBTC Intraday
@BTCIntraday · 2,6881 postNZT-RESEARCH🧑💻
@NZT_RESEARCH · 2401 postCripto
@criptoBTC13 · 11 postодиссея kekius maximus
@doge1 · 630,2261 postГлебчик aka Fucckt 🥩
@fuckkt_web30 · 3,0931 postHaircut/MEMHAMSTRS
@haircuthamstrs · 21 postКриптология
@kripto_mozg · 141 postРедакция
@redaktionen · 251 postVendettA
@vendettanews · 541 postAirdrop activities
@wwwcryptonotes · 21 postYour AirDrop 🚀
@x100airdropp · 401 postY thoughts
@ymarketthoughts · 81 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@german_ad · 118 postsБлоги&Мониторы
@BlogsAndMonitors · 181 post🤖BurMinaTor - канал (crypto btc trade)👺
@burminator · 7861 postCrypto Official
@cryptoofficiall1 · 11 postCryptoVipTools
@cryptovip_tools · 3,9511 postВХОД РЕЗЮМЕ РЫНКА
@fdgsghe · 31 postNZT-RESEARCH🧑💻
@NZT_RESEARCH · 2401 postSlivCryptoTrade
@slivcryptotradeee · 331 postсетка @TONYACOINS
@TONYASETKA · 21 postAirdrop activities
@wwwcryptonotes · 21 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@Defiscamcheck · 48,614#1
@crypto_hd · 132,236#2
@airdrop_german · 5,113#3
@cryptonarnianews · 19,774#4
@dnevniki_crypto · 33,175#5
@workIncrypts · 33,574#6
@Slavik_investor_updates · 20,746#7
@TVS_TEAM · 37,944#8
@incrypted · 108,513#9
@icodrops_sergey · 42,868#10
@manna_money · 10,558#11
@andryuninthelegend · 18,729#12
@trade001k · 106,947#13
@michael_curve_ru · 2,959#14
@promintsecret · 19,706#15
@bullrunkids · 8,270#16
@NewBitFuture · 18,883#17
@cryptogenius · 10,438#18
@yocryptoru · 4,437#19
@CRYPTUS_MEDIA · 71,232#20
@chtototamprocryp · 9,309#21
@forklog · 92,233#22
@DannyTheTrader · 4,505#23
@BogdanGdeX · 25,977#24
@moni_talks · 24,884#25
@SaversCrypto · 9,639#26
@BTCIntraday · 2,688#27
@True_Market_Vision · 20,995#28
@edwardmorra_ru · 2,375#29
@derzko · 12,162#30
@markettwits · 336,911#31
@sol_TOP · 39,932#32
@cryptoattack24 · 56,006#33
@CryptoEarnImp · 27,966#34
@drops_daily · 21,260#35
@mr_mozart · 129,572#36
@from_syroamst · 6,629#37
@don_invest · 38,578#38
@CryptoLamer · 17,001#39
@notothemoon · 18,065#40
@WEB3_AGGREGATOR · 14,569#41
@CoinMetrika · 34,886#42
@tradcryptos · 8,240#43
@slezisatoshi · 123,780#44
@whitelist1 · 41,611#45
@defi_eth2 · 9,155#46
@bigiftrue_ru · 2,681#47
@never_broke_again_v1 · 6,419#48
@slavik_investor · 24,702#49
@cryptoskreps · 6,628#50
@Nat_Selection · 14,198#51
@bitcoin_and_crypto · 5,327#52
@swiper_money · 28,346#53
@from_alexdevps · 4,335#54
@tradertrend · 60,704#55
@P4M_channel · 32,981#56
@Gagarin_ICO · 16,016#57
@fackblock · 24,897#58
@pifagortrade · 85,344#59
@nftTTC · 34,428#60
@rombikpok · 3,176#61
@maloletoffcrypto · 45,526#62
@kripta_ne_spit · 8,729#63
@invest_zonaa · 909,960#64
@cryptophilos · 12,161#65
@tomcapital · 31,511#66
@dusha_spekuljanta · 5,983#67
@mmrktmkr · 42,229#68
@Konstantin_Kudo_Cryptology · 49,449#69
@trend_gen · 55,169#70
@BMonarch_official · 43,703#71
@maycrypto · 17,346#72
@thevse · 35,323#73
@crypto_galaxyyy · 12,235#74
@hexdrunker_reflections · 31,354#75
@cryptocholy · 38,600#76
@defigencapital · 19,781#77
@darvin_crypto_notes · 5,271#78
@MoneyBoiiiz · 18,688#79
@Still_Early · 7,593#80
@sadcatgamble · 27,956#81
@doge1 · 630,226#82
@drops_analytics · 637,666#83
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 4 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@dnevniki_crypto · 33,175
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
@RunToRam · 23,334
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 25 September 2026
@Defiscamcheck · 48,614
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
@True_Market_Vision · 20,995
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 September 2026
@crypto_telegramer · 21,037
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 25 September 2026
@elonmoneytrading · 21,447
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 23 September 2026
@trade_by_booba · 50,323
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
@coin_listing · 35,591
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 2 September 2026
@moni_talks · 24,884
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 September 2026
@icodrops_sergey · 42,868
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
@buff_10 · 60,042
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
@forklog · 92,233
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
@ax1vc · 20,693
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 September 2026
@idoresearch · 57,177
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
@blagotrading · 71,398
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
@incrypted · 108,513
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 August 2026
@crypto_hd · 132,236
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
@careers_crypto · 25,888
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
@tomcapital · 31,511
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
@otdyshiprocrypto · 22,736
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 September 2026
@toptraders0x · 25,970
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
@Slavik_investor_updates · 20,746
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 September 2026
@cryptoarsenal · 25,594
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 September 2026
@BogdanGdeX · 25,977
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 80 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Герман на блокчейне 🇪🇹” (@blockchaingerman), 32,945 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blockchaingerman.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.