₿less or less
web3-culture, advanced crypto
live (vc, art, real estate, ai and life): @monocholy
По вопросам: @monocholy_talk
youtube.com/@0xCholy
x.com/zeroxcholy
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -114. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39,330–39,478 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 04:15
39,347
-25
11 Aug 2026, 01:53
39,372
-14
9 Aug 2026, 23:31
39,386
-17
8 Aug 2026, 23:01
39,403
-12
8 Aug 2026, 00:43
39,415
-29
7 Aug 2026, 01:03
39,444
-17
6 Aug 2026, 01:48
39,461
no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:34
39,461
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 25 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.1%
avg views ÷ 39,347 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,380
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026
Posts held
18 (25 February 2026 – 26 July 2026)
Views total
17,530
Reactions total
170
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 20:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
159
Videos
28
Links
242
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
707 reactions across 15 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🦄
464
65.6%
✍
243
34.4%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 707reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
121
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 15 we hold a reading for · 73%
Most on one post
75
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptocholy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 February 2026 to 26 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
метаморфоза в фаундера и билдера - победы на первом хакатоне
последние два года я в глубоком фокусе на своём стартапе, пишу и работаю «в стол», вижу первые плоды в опыте
несмотря на то, что последние 4 года я в той или иной степени создал ряд бизнесов, учитывая что я всегда писал о глобальных нарративах, у меня всегда была высокая планка, и только сейчас я начинаю чувствовать, что по-настоящему приближаюсь к тому, …
начинаю серию build in public
делюсь опытом работы с технологией от a16zcrypto, цель - координация AI-агентов, за счет того, что они могут доверять как друг другу, так и контексту людей
удалось слегка повзаимодействовать с инженерной командой ребят, хочется подстветить эту технологию для AI-рынка
https://x.com/zeroxcholy/status/2080378493129691582
оч поможет ваша поддержка, только запостил, надо запустить ракету!
стоит внимания: фаундер убер поднял $1.7МЛРД на роботов, lead a16z
в 2009 он вместе с гэрреттом кэмпом запустил убер сам стал главным лицом и вырастил его в глобального гиганта
в 2017 инвесторы его вытеснили токсичная культура, скандалы, давление с борда - всё сложилось против него
после этого он ушёл в тень на 8 лет
в стелсе строил новую компанию
сегодня анонс: atoms поднял раунд
кофаундер а16з бен хоровиц в борд…
привет, на связи choly 求理 со статьей о перестройке сети
''Эго, лучший use-case интернета. Его больше нет.''
статья - отправная точка в в мир agentic internet
для меня это важный 'дроп', и я нашел горючее, чтобы зажесь глаза энтузиазмом, и погрузить вас в новый мир серией грядущих материалов, буду рад реакциям!
в последние два года я с головой закопался в мир 'agentic' - концепте о новых интернет-пользователях - и…
другой мой друг Вадим настолько хочет слиться с компьютером, что сделал инструмент позволяющий общаться с claude без клавиатуры и даже без произношения звуков
https://x.com/vadi_ms/status/2074565404404703681
большой прогресс
они работают со Львом с поста выше
https://alephneuro.com/blog/silent-speech
#crazylore или интересная байка из 2024
все мы видели новость и тысячи мемов о паре, которая решила обручиться на верхушке empire state building в new york
пост набрал 75М просмотров, общих охватов думаю на миллиард
в периоде листинга @dogs (лор догс тут) мы обсуждали какой можно сделать НеОбЫчНыЙ МаРкЕтИнГ
вспомнилось, что один из участников кор командый, мой друг, когда-то рассказывал что познакомился с крейзи …
проведя в блокчейн индустрии фуллтайм 6 лет, в прошлом году я отбросил «рынок» и ушел с головой в криптографию как фундаментальную технологию
и изучение и создание инфраструктуры, продуктов и пр.
и с каждым днем я все больше и больше влюблен в то, что делаю
может послужит кому-нибудь вдохновением
в эру AI барьеры познаний отсутствуют
Мой друг Лев работает над необычным стартапом. Они сканируют мозг ультразвуком.
Надеюсь он когда-то научится читать мои мысли, и отправит мое сознание покорять космос, куда-то на Юпитер.
https://x.com/alephneuro/status/2070183632132845995
бумеры купили дома за пару земляник и сдают в аренду их зумерам
зумеры могут вайбкодить, потому что AI натренирован на написанном руками коде бумеров
fair enough
повзаимодействуйте со статьей в x.com, plz 🎁
очень поможет!
выпустил статью с мыслями о влиянии AI, чего не хватает для agentic commerce
по чуть-чуть врываюсь на карту рынка международного (ai crowd)
https://x.com/zeroxcholy/status/2059998382190387586
лайки, репосты, комменты
друзья из cyber Fund запускают AI-native accelerator / residency для founders
$2M uncapped SAFE, 12 week hybrid program и сильный фокус именно на ai-native продуктах и research-driven командах
нравится сам тезис:
иногда лучшая среда для больших идей, это не очередной шумный ивент, а пространство где амбициозные люди могут спокойно билдить вместе
apply: cyber.fund
context: cyber.fund/content/monastery
🦄21✍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @cryptocholy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 100,407 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Drops Analytics @drops_analytics · 683,618 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“cryptocholy” (@cryptocholy), 39,347 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptocholy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
