₿less or less
web3-culture, advanced crypto
live (vc, art, real estate, ai and life): @monocholy
По вопросам: @monocholy_talk
youtube.com/@0xCholy
x.com/zeroxcholy
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -861. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38,471–39,590 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 05:55
38,600
-56
16 Sept 2026, 00:21
38,656
-33
14 Sept 2026, 05:17
38,689
-25
12 Sept 2026, 14:01
38,714
-41
10 Sept 2026, 11:55
38,755
-57
7 Sept 2026, 05:16
38,812
-41
4 Sept 2026, 15:22
38,853
-27
3 Sept 2026, 01:36
38,880
-28
2 Sept 2026, 02:07
38,908
-26
1 Sept 2026, 04:05
38,934
-17
31 Aug 2026, 04:04
38,951
-15
30 Aug 2026, 01:58
38,966
-33
28 Aug 2026, 22:48
38,999
-13
27 Aug 2026, 20:42
39,012
-23
26 Aug 2026, 18:44
39,035
-29
25 Aug 2026, 18:56
39,064
-35
24 Aug 2026, 18:13
39,099
-42
23 Aug 2026, 03:38
39,141
-28
21 Aug 2026, 14:16
39,169
-14
20 Aug 2026, 16:13
39,183
first reading
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 25 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 92 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.7%
avg views ÷ 38,600 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,130
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.527%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 September 2026
Posts held
24 (25 February 2026 – 17 September 2026)
Views total
16,500
Reactions total
87
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 01:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
163
Videos
29
Links
248
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
2m 25s
Average length
2m 25s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
876 reactions across 21 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🦄
582
66.4%
✍
294
33.6%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 876 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2026 to 17 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
132
across the posts below
Posts paid on
16
of 21 we hold a reading for · 76%
Most on one post
75
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptocholy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 February 2026 to 17 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
привет, поделюсь важным моментом в персональной истории, сегодня анонсировали наш ангел раунд
нас поддержали 20+ фаундеров, директоров и сотрудников компаний с опытом в Blackrock, Meta, Nike, включая более привычные крипто имена: 1inch, Binance, Ethereum Foundation, Kraken, cp0x, Lens
https://x.com/rep_hq/status/2100585788392034500
у нас есть waitlist нашего мобильного приложения (если оставите заявку - поможет с …
polymarket заходит в гонку perps
мне интересно понаблюдать, т.к. у команды достаточно огромный ресурс и бренд
один из моих товарищей отвечает за рост данного направления, попробую помочь 🥚
perps в целом один из самых живучих нарративов на сегодняшний день
в рамках этого запуска есть возможность онбордить нынешних трейдеров предикшн маркета на свою сеть (perps & predictions аккаунты не слинкованы
-> большая возмо…
поздравляю Сашу, помню 5 лет назад сидели на сходке их коммьюнити и болтали про долину, и, по-моему, машинное обучение, роботов и немного ai
спустя эти 5 лет жизнь здорово приобрела обороты
очень круто видеть такую банду решающую достаточно острую проблему: как независимые модели (openai / anthropic) могли бы обмениваться «мыслями» а не словами, чтобы быть более эффективными, быстрыми и менее дорогими
мысли - числ…
Сегодня мы вышли из stealth!
Про нас написали Wired (с заголовком these russian mathematicians ахах), а еще мы опубликовали блог пост с описанием технологии. Все ссылки в этом посте, буду очень рада если сможете репостнуть и прокомментировать :)
https://x.com/aimalysheva/status/2095232794792255848
агентная коммерция: от А до Я
за восемнадцать месяцев индустрия построила всё, чтобы агент мог платить сам: mastercard проводит живые сделки в восьми странах, google отдал свой платёжный протокол туда же, где делали passkeys, mckinsey рисует $3-5ТРЛН к 2030.
а сделок нет. openai вообще выключил checkout внутри chatgpt.
разобрал, из чего состоит сейчас сегмент agentic commerce, и что это вообще такое
https://telet…
метаморфоза в фаундера и билдера - победы на первом хакатоне
последние два года я в глубоком фокусе на своём стартапе, пишу и работаю «в стол», вижу первые плоды в опыте
несмотря на то, что последние 4 года я в той или иной степени создал ряд бизнесов, учитывая что я всегда писал о глобальных нарративах, у меня всегда была высокая планка, и только сейчас я начинаю чувствовать, что по-настоящему приближаюсь к тому, …
начинаю серию build in public
делюсь опытом работы с технологией от a16zcrypto, цель - координация AI-агентов, за счет того, что они могут доверять как друг другу, так и контексту людей
удалось слегка повзаимодействовать с инженерной командой ребят, хочется подстветить эту технологию для AI-рынка
https://x.com/zeroxcholy/status/2080378493129691582
оч поможет ваша поддержка, только запостил, надо запустить ракету!
стоит внимания: фаундер убер поднял $1.7МЛРД на роботов, lead a16z
в 2009 он вместе с гэрреттом кэмпом запустил убер сам стал главным лицом и вырастил его в глобального гиганта
в 2017 инвесторы его вытеснили токсичная культура, скандалы, давление с борда - всё сложилось против него
после этого он ушёл в тень на 8 лет
в стелсе строил новую компанию
сегодня анонс: atoms поднял раунд
кофаундер а16з бен хоровиц в борд…
привет, на связи choly 求理 со статьей о перестройке сети
''Эго, лучший use-case интернета. Его больше нет.''
статья - отправная точка в в мир agentic internet
для меня это важный 'дроп', и я нашел горючее, чтобы зажесь глаза энтузиазмом, и погрузить вас в новый мир серией грядущих материалов, буду рад реакциям!
в последние два года я с головой закопался в мир 'agentic' - концепте о новых интернет-пользователях - и…
другой мой друг Вадим настолько хочет слиться с компьютером, что сделал инструмент позволяющий общаться с claude без клавиатуры и даже без произношения звуков
https://x.com/vadi_ms/status/2074565404404703681
большой прогресс
они работают со Львом с поста выше
https://alephneuro.com/blog/silent-speech
Если кто-то из подписчиков знаком с AI-native VCs (non-crypto), желательно US, dm @prakha, рейзим.
✍12🦄4
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @cryptocholy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@cryptocholy edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
28 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 26 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 31 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
CRYPTUS ACADEMY @cryptus_academy · 56,854 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 August 2026
CryptoInside @crypt0inside · 28,554 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
Павел Сычёв | $ TradeParty $ @tradeparty1337 · 56,351 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
Коненков Святослав | White Way @konenkov_official · 70,924 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
TTC | TimeToCrypto @nftTTC · 34,428 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
Gsmgarden @gsmgarden · 23,688 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 September 2026
криптапиражок @cryppi · 30,433 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 7 September 2026
САТОШИ NEWS @satoshinews · 29,478 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026
CRYPTUS MEDIA @CRYPTUS_MEDIA · 71,232 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
Trader 80/20 @tradertrend · 60,704 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026
top traders desk @toptraders0x · 25,970 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
Климченко | про криптовалюту @thevse · 35,323 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
DEFI Scam Check @Defiscamcheck · 48,614 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
CC | Крипто Вакансии @careers_crypto · 25,888 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
Криптовалюты @cryptoc · 21,626 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 September 2026
Крипта Теневика @nftup · 29,041 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
Nemoneta.COM 🍿 @ne_moneta_com · 40,148 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 August 2026
Sergey (ICO Drops) заметки @icodrops_sergey · 42,868 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
Crypto Family Public @CryptoFamilyPublic · 29,298 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
Фармер: Крипта и Схемы @byrealfarmer · 53,253 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026
IDO research @idoresearch · 57,177 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
SWOP TOKY | CRYPTO MEDIA @swoptoky · 31,527 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 5 September 2026
Tonologia @tonologia · 126,989 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
FACK BLOCK RESEARCH @fackblock · 24,897 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 September 2026
This channel appears in 62 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“cryptocholy” (@cryptocholy), 38,600 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptocholy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.