Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Эра Перемен — аналитическое агентство

Channel

Эра Перемен — аналитическое агентство

@eraperemenfinans

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

76,837subscribers

+91 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001507605936
TypeChannel
Username@eraperemenfinans
DescriptionВ "Эра Перемен — аналитическое агентство" наша миссия — предоставлять профессиональную аналитику для бизнеса и крупных игроков рынка, делая ее доступной частным инвесторам. Наши социальные сети: https://eraperemen.info/nashi-soczseti/
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/eraperemenfinans

Growth

76,72876,83776,782.56 August 2026 — 76,746 subscribers6 August 2026 — 76,744 subscribers7 August 2026 — 76,777 subscribers8 August 2026 — 76,793 subscribers9 August 2026 — 76,801 subscribers10 August 2026 — 76,791 subscribers11 August 2026 — 76,745 subscribers12 August 2026 — 76,741 subscribers13 August 2026 — 76,728 subscribers15 August 2026 — 76,805 subscribers16 August 2026 — 76,837 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net +91. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 76,712–76,853 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 16:0776,837+32
15 Aug 2026, 00:3876,805+77
13 Aug 2026, 15:0776,728-13
12 Aug 2026, 14:3476,741-4
11 Aug 2026, 14:4276,745-46
10 Aug 2026, 13:4376,791-10
9 Aug 2026, 16:3476,801+8
8 Aug 2026, 14:0176,793+16
7 Aug 2026, 14:4076,777+33
6 Aug 2026, 12:5076,744-2
6 Aug 2026, 10:0376,746first reading

Engagement

54 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.4%
avg views ÷ 76,837 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,400
54 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.869%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
54
of 54 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held54 (30 July 202618 August 2026)
Views total722,818
Reactions total6,283
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,630
Videos
44
Links
4,040

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

6,283 reactions across 54 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,62025.8%
1,46223.3%
🔥67110.7%
💯6109.71%
🤔3535.62%
👌3004.77%
😢2123.37%
😎1963.12%
🤝1702.71%
1332.12%
🗿861.37%
🤯861.37%
❤‍🔥711.13%
👏631.00%
🙏460.732%
😨430.684%
🤷‍♂380.605%
😱350.557%
🫡350.557%
😐340.541%
3 further kinds190.302%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,283reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
53
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 54 we hold a reading for · 26%
Most on one post
20
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @eraperemenfinans. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 54 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 18 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 10:40 UTC728 views1 reactionsread 18 August 2026

💥Главные темы дня • Аналитика по ключевым направлениям рынка • 18.08.2026 ### SK hynix — рекордная прибыль и откат к основанию «шеи» Рекордная прибыль и партнёрство с Nvidia вывели SK hynix в центр внимания. Но после бурного роста бумага дважды возвращалась к важному уровню. Что дальше? https://eraperemen.info/481856 ### Walmart — планирует технологическое будущее Walmart продолжает развивать технологическое напр

👍1

18 Aug 2026, 08:42 UTC≈4,060 views38 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Что делать прямо сейчас? В условиях постоянных макроэкономических и геополитических сдвигов это самый частый вопрос. Ответ прагматичен: нужно непрерывно отслеживать ситуацию и оперативно реагировать на изменения. Проект «Эра Перемен» — это не просто набор аналитических статей. По сути, это ваша постоянная подписка на персонального советника. Это всеобъемлющий конструкт, благодаря которому у вас всегда есть экспертн

👍267🤝4💯1

18 Aug 2026, 06:39 UTC≈6,100 views88 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍44💯16🤔147🤝4🗿2🙏1

17 Aug 2026, 11:25 UTC≈8,800 views31 reactionsread 18 August 2026

💥Главные темы дня • Аналитика по ключевым направлениям рынка • 17.08.2026 ### Freedom Holding Corporation — В ловушке обстоятельств Freedom Holding работает сразу в нескольких финансовых направлениях. Но какие факторы сейчас определяют движение его котировки? https://eraperemen.info/freedom-holding-corporation-v-lovushke-obstoyatelstv-2 ### USD/JPY — Ситуация выходит из-под контроля USD/JPY показывает динамику до

👍226😱2❤‍🔥1

17 Aug 2026, 08:39 UTC≈9,370 views517 reactions2 Starsread 18 August 2026

Когда меня в очередной раз спрашивают: «Почему ты не живешь в России?», люди ждут привычного ответа. Ждут, что я начну ругать власть, систему, лично Путина. Но давайте смотреть правде в глаза. Иллюзия того, что во всем виноват один человек на самом верху, — это просто удобная ложь, чтобы снять с себя ответственность. Из России меня выгнал не Путин. Из России меня выгнал русский народ. Удушающая среда и трусливое молч

💯281👍8950😢30🤔19🔥17👏10🗿10

17 Aug 2026, 05:46 UTC≈9,760 views175 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Эта неделя стала для меня самой решающей за последний год. Я выпустил два главных прогноза по рынкам, мировой политике и грядущим финансовым потрясениям. В них я собрал выводы всей своей работы за последние несколько лет и открыто показал, как сам планирую действовать в следующие пять лет: как распределять капитал, чего ждать от рынков, где искать возможности на обвале и по каким признакам определять изменение глоб

👍864224🔥12🙏6😱3❤‍🔥2

16 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC≈10,700 views82 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Уважаемые читатели, Мы продолжаем развивать инфраструктуру «Эры Перемен», чтобы оперативно делиться с вами аналитикой и важными рыночными инсайдами. Сейчас наша ближайшая цель — разблокировать функцию Stories (Историй) в Telegram. Это позволит нам публиковать быстрые комментарии по сделкам, срочным новостям и локальным движениям рынка в удобном формате, не перегружая основную ленту канала. Для перехода на первый уров

47👌26🔥5🤷‍♂2👍1😱1

16 Aug 2026, 10:57 UTC≈10,500 views234 reactionsread 18 August 2026

🔻 Уважаемые клиенты и зрители! Мы обновляем график выхода наших видеоматериалов. Теперь наши обзоры будут выходить два раза в неделю — по пятницам и воскресеньям. ⚙️ Что вас ждет в воскресных выпусках? В конце недели мы будем публиковать свежий дайджест ключевых экономических, финансовых и корпоративных новостей. *Главная цель этого формата — дать вам возможность заранее подготовиться к открытию рынков и уверенно

🔥14242👍39🤝7🗿2❤‍🔥1👌1

16 Aug 2026, 06:53 UTC≈10,700 views129 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Это не проходной материал. От этой информации может зависеть ваш следующий год Друзья, обратите особое внимание: мы опубликовали большой аналитический обзор «Смерть автономности: как глобальный кризис распределения становится локальным». Это не очередная политическая статья и не кликбейт. Вы поймёте это сразу, как только откроете материал. 📊 В этот прогноз вложен серьёзный аналитический резерв: мы изучили цепочки

68👍21🔥18👌63❤‍🔥3🤯3😢3

15 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC≈11,400 views85 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Мы живем в эпоху, где старые правила безопасности стали ловушкой 🎯 Общество учит быть удобными, предсказуемыми и ждать своей очереди. Но реальность, скрытая за информационным шумом, работает иначе: мир не вознаграждает тех, кто ждет. Он подчиняется тем, кто создает структуру. Наша миссия Проект «Эра Перемен» существует не для развлечения. Для этого есть бесконечная лента новостей, задача которой — удерживать вниман

46👍21👌12🤝4💯1🗿1

15 Aug 2026, 06:45 UTC≈11,700 views144 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Я ставлю на этот сценарий все свои деньги — не одной сделкой и не с плечом, а выстраивая вокруг него управление всем капиталом. Семь месяцев я собирал факты и сводил в одну карту доллар, госдолг США, S&P 500, золото, нефть, РТС и политику ФРС. Внутри — реалистичные, стрессовые и экстремальные цели, конкретные зоны покупок и сигналы отмены сценария. Это квинтэссенция моей стратегии до 2029 года. Если покупать у нас

80❤‍🔥23👍21🙏10🔥6🤷‍♂4

15 Aug 2026, 01:15 UTC≈12,400 views410 reactions3 Starsread 18 August 2026

Слёзы, желчь и новый ГУЛАГ: почему общество получает ровно то, что заказывало Сегодня из каждого угла доносится коллективный стон. Люди жалуются на падающий уровень жизни, заблокированные активы, инфляцию и вопиющую «несправедливость». Послушать эти разговоры — так вокруг сплошь невинные жертвы, которых злой рок и плохие политики затащили в историческую мясорубку против их воли. Ах, бедные, обманутые граждане, как же

💯197👍10849🤔19👏7🗿76👌6

Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @eraperemenfinans. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 683,779 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

СЛЕЗЫ САТОШИ
@slezisatoshi · 125,183
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
PIFAGOR TRADE
@pifagortrade · 85,787
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Эра Перемен — аналитическое агентство” (@eraperemenfinans), 76,837 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eraperemenfinans.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.