Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Coin Metrika

Channel

Coin Metrika

@CoinMetrika

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

34,324subscribers

-1,597 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001262361397
TypeChannel
Username@CoinMetrika
DescriptionОбзор биткоина и альткоинов. ICO, токеномика, индикаторы, дропы 🎬 YouTube.com/c/CoinMetrika По сотрудничеству: @metrikanec Материалы носят информационный характер и не являются финансовой рекомендацией. DYOR. Все решения и риски вы принимаете на себя.
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held65
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/CoinMetrika

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@CoinMetrika/4509 · this entry14 Jun 2026, 14:17 UTC@Coin_Metrika/192714 Jun 2026, 14:17 UTC1.00under a minute
@CoinMetrika/4515 · this entry15 Jun 2026, 16:05 UTC@Coin_Metrika/193315 Jun 2026, 16:05 UTC1.00under a minute
@CoinMetrika/4516 · this entry24 Jun 2026, 12:16 UTC@Coin_Metrika/193424 Jun 2026, 12:16 UTC1.00under a minute
@CoinMetrika/4532 · this entry27 Jul 2026, 13:04 UTC@Coin_Metrika/195027 Jul 2026, 13:04 UTC1.00under a minute
@CoinMetrika/4534 · this entry1 Aug 2026, 23:12 UTC@Coin_Metrika/19521 Aug 2026, 23:12 UTC1.00under a minute
@CoinMetrika/4519 · this entry26 Jun 2026, 15:11 UTC@Coin_Metrika/193726 Jun 2026, 15:11 UTC0.99under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Coin_Metrika9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.99under a minutethis entry (9–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 50 comparable posts for this entry, running 14 June 2026 to 8 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @CoinMetrika — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

34,32435,92135,122.56 August 202611 November 2026
65 measurements spanning 97 days, net -1,597. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,084–36,161 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 03:1134,324-14
9 Nov 2026, 14:4934,338-18
8 Nov 2026, 09:4434,356-27
7 Nov 2026, 01:2734,383-18
5 Nov 2026, 22:3634,401-14
4 Nov 2026, 19:4734,415-22
3 Nov 2026, 16:5634,437-7
2 Nov 2026, 20:1634,444-9
1 Nov 2026, 20:4934,453-6
31 Oct 2026, 17:4834,459-27
30 Oct 2026, 16:0434,486-29
29 Oct 2026, 14:0934,515-11
28 Oct 2026, 16:5934,526-21
27 Oct 2026, 17:2134,547-20
26 Oct 2026, 17:1434,567-2
25 Oct 2026, 13:3934,569-23
24 Oct 2026, 14:1634,592-5
23 Oct 2026, 15:3934,597+2
22 Oct 2026, 18:1734,595-23
21 Oct 2026, 14:1934,618first reading

Engagement

56 posts held, back to 14 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 177 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.2%
avg views ÷ 34,324 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,400
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.51%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 56 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held56 (14 June 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total159,770
Reactions total2,411
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 06:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,550
Videos
≈76
Links
≈2,600

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 22m
Average length
10m 21s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

8,800 reactions across 56 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3,66741.7%
🔥1,90121.6%
👏1,22814.0%
🎉89910.2%
❤2462.80%
custom 53235435961025920631782.02%
😱1601.82%
🤷‍♂1331.51%
❤‍🔥1201.36%
custom 52018434729773800451031.17%
🤝600.682%
👀500.568%
👻190.216%
💯140.159%
🙏100.114%
🍾60.068%
🐳30.034%
👌30.034%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,800 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 56 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CoinMetrika. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 56 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 June 2026 to 8 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (35.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 22:22 UTC≈9,540 views224 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

BTC сходил вплотную к 200D MA, как и в 2023 году на коррекции после первой фазы роста. Отличия в RSI при этом незначительные фиксируются, по которым можно предположить и заход к 200W MA. Это пока еще не ломает бычью структуру. Тем временем через 14 дней будет 135 недель после халвинга, что исторически считается хорошим местом для покупки. Отработает или нет в этот раз узнаем спустя время. Но биткоину нельзя терять 6…

👍200😱13❤‍🔥7🙏3💯1

7 Nov 2026, 22:40 UTC≈9,610 views173 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Тем временем крупные инфлы из CT не сходятся в едином мнении в прогнозе на дальнейшее движение

🎉55👍42🔥38👏32👀6

31 Oct 2026, 06:02 UTC≈12,400 views128 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

На фоне взлома Binance компания Tangem до понедельника сделала распродажу. Они сделали временный паблик промо код OWNIT на 20% дисконт. И он суммируется и с другими промокодами. Например, промик METRIKA дает 10% дисконт. Можете другой применить, если он у вас есть https://tangem.com Это не реклама. Мне за это не платят. Промик давно есть для подписчиков и дает только вам скидку. Увидел у них акцию, решил подсвет…

👍112🤷‍♂8❤‍🔥5custom 53235435961025920633

30 Oct 2026, 03:18 UTC≈13,300 views170 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

👀 Binance раскрыла первые детали взлома По предварительным данным, злоумышленники взломали ноутбук DevOps-инженера, получили доступ к сервисному контейнеру и оттуда запустили выводы. Признаков утечки приватных ключей биржа не нашла. Подробный технический отчёт обещают после завершения расследования. Ущерб теперь оценивают примерно в $6.3 млрд, а не в $5.5 млрд. Около $3 млрд уже заморожено ончейн. Все убытки Binan…

👍74🔥43🎉41😱9❤‍🔥3

29 Oct 2026, 21:41 UTC≈10,900 views142 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Родные, биржи не для hodl. 100500 раз сказано. Особенно на фоне, когда через день они сворачивались, пусть и цивильно, давая забрать средства. Но что если кто-то не даст. Что если очередной взлом. Собственно и к теме поста. Binance вынесли на круглую сумму. Тут CZ еще скромничает. Там под $5,6B украдено и токенов каких хочешь. И фундаментальные AAVE и UNI, и многообещающий ZRO, и ETH котлета и стейблов пачка. Подро…

👍122😱14🙏3custom 53235435961025920632👀1

28 Oct 2026, 13:01 UTC≈10,900 views194 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026

​⚡️Что будет с Биткоином дальше? Разбор метрик Bitcoin на графике В этом выпуске разбираем актуальную ситуацию на рынке Биткоина. Действительно ли дно уже пройдено, стоит ли ждать падения ниже $58,000 и к чему готовиться дальше? Проанализируем ключевые технические метрики: реализованную стоимость BTC, динамику глобальной ликвидности, индикатор Others/BTC и доминацию Биткоина. Также подробно разберем сигналы авторск…

🔥81👏41👍36🎉31❤‍🔥5

28 Oct 2026, 06:10 UTC≈10,000 views200 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

В тему недавнего гостевого стрима, где затрагивали мету Robinhood Chain, собрал видео выжимку из почти 2-х часового кино с отчетом о прибылях Robinhood за третий квартал 2026 года. Компактно и коротко о главном уложил в 8 минут. Разогревайтесь перед сегодняшним выпуском на ютубе в 16:00 МСК на тему рынка, где буду пояснять детально это и показывать другие метрики.

👍91🔥42🎉35👏30🤷‍♂2

27 Oct 2026, 15:47 UTC≈11,300 views206 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026
Video

🚨 Каждый раз, когда этот сигнал появлялся на графике BTC, дно уже было пройдено. И вот он снова горит. Синий треугольник на моём индикаторе Cycle Momentum горит уже некоторое время, пока трейдеры и инвесторы спорят было дно или нет. Это раннее предупреждение о том, что импульс вот-вот перейдёт в зелёную зону, и оно появляется до начала движения, а не после. Это про глобал видение, а не про условное высказывание, чт…

👍118🔥71😱8👀5custom 53235435961025920634

25 Oct 2026, 15:39 UTC≈11,200 views195 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Подкаст на троих с CragHack и Keep Calm. - рынок в коррекции - когда альтсезон нейронки и вот это всё Стрим на гостевом канале, меня позвали, кто я такой, чтобы отказываться. 19.00 стартуем тут 👇 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9ZLh2q2_gc

👍91🎉55🔥44❤‍🔥3🍾2

21 Oct 2026, 15:48 UTC≈13,200 views152 reactions2 Starsread 11 November 2026
Photo

💸 AIRDROP РАЗДАЧИ ЗА ПОСЛЕДНИЕ 6 ЛЕТ В 2026 году проекты стали более жадными. Откровенно говоря и денег с дропхантеров они стали стричь меньше. Но в мете явно наблюдается застой кто бы и что не говорил. Рассвет раздачи фри денег был в 2024 году. Напомню, тогда выходили Starknet, LayerZero, Zksync и другие. И да, они раздавали в том числе и себе некисло и эти цифры также пошли в общую статистику, однако каждый второ…

👍66👏42🔥38😱5❤‍🔥1

20 Oct 2026, 18:12 UTC≈10,900 views125 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026

Доступ к инфраструктуре некоторых сервисов и бирж продолжает блокироваться. Сегодня это Mexc, на днях был Bitget, условно завтра будет... Раньше читали инсайды, что Bitget френдли, теперь друг сменился и читаем новые инсайды про одни и те же площадки 😂 и всё от тех же инсайдеров. Столкните лбами уже инсайды, у одних Bybit не уходит, у других уходит. Свою рефку нормуль пульнуть, но разобраться в вопросе тоже бы не меш…

👍50🎉31🔥24👏16😱4

19 Oct 2026, 15:00 UTC≈9,920 views149 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🟢Эксклюзивный конкурс для Coin Metrika Community от TxFlow Обменяйтесь и делитесь призовым фондом в размере 5 000 USDC! Период кампании: с 19 октября с 07:00 по 29 октября 23:59 UTC. ➡️ Страница кампании >> Как присоединиться? 1️⃣ Нажмите [Присоединиться] и подключите кошелёк 2️⃣ Обменивайтесь перпами (захватывающие) и зарабатывайте Подходят как новые, так и существующие пользователи. Эксклюзивная награда до …

🎉47🔥39👏32👍31

Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @CoinMetrika. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@CoinMetrika edited 10 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
24 August 2026
Most recent edit
5 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @CoinMetrika as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
30 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
30 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 months
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 30 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Crypto & AI Updates | Славик инвестор
@Slavik_investor_updates · 20,559
#1
Мемуары Воркера
@promintsecret · 19,889
#2
CryptoEarn Important
@CryptoEarnImp · 27,351
#3
Славик инвестор | TwitterScore.io
@slavik_investor · 24,326
#4
Whitelist Media
@whitelist1 · 40,635
#5
Bit.Future 🚀
@NewBitFuture · 18,423
#6
Sergey (ICO Drops) заметки
@icodrops_sergey · 42,337
#7
Savers Crypto
@SaversCrypto · 9,642
#8
PROFIT DRIVE
@profit_drive · 21,387
#9
DEFI Scam Check
@Defiscamcheck · 48,110
#10
Крипта не спит
@kripta_ne_spit · 8,579
#11
БОГДАН, ГДЕ ИКСЫ?!
@BogdanGdeX · 25,460
#12
Ворк в крипте, только хардкор
@workIncrypts · 32,928
#13
ProMint
@ProMintChannel · 24,794
#14
Crypto Headlines
@crypto_hd · 131,720
#15
SWIPER
@swiper_money · 27,541
#16
ДЕТИ БУЛРАНА | Василий Суфидянов
@bullrunkids · 8,154
#17
Крипто Нарния NEWS
@cryptonarnianews · 19,490
#18
CRYPTUS MEDIA
@CRYPTUS_MEDIA · 69,693
#19
Don | Invest Blog
@don_invest · 37,413
#20
PROFIT NEWS CRYPTO
@profitcryptonews · 12,807
#21
Криптофилы
@cryptophilos · 12,071
#22
Кэпитал News
@drops_daily · 20,811
#23
web3easy
@web3easy · 13,544
#24
Crypto Hamster
@thecryptohamster · 19,454
#25
KOTOV INVEST | КРИПТОВАЛЮТА | ИНВЕСТИЦИИ
@kotov_invest · 8,021
#26
ИКСЫ. ТОП ИНВЕСТИЦИИ 💎
@IKSYcrypto · 12,148
#27
Душа Спекулянта
@dusha_spekuljanta · 5,889
#28
Crypto Fortochka
@cryptoforto · 16,210
#29
Crypto Davy
@crypto_davy · 12,434
#30
MaykanInvest
@Maykanlnvest · 17,629
#31
Savers Notes
@saversnotes · 1,797
#32
КриптоАтака 24 ⚡️
@cryptoattack24 · 55,115
#33
Incrypted
@incrypted · 106,845
#34
CryptoRank
@Crypto_Rank1 · 6,371
#35
10 gwei | Onchain 👉
@Ten_gwei · 4,518
#36
Crypto Lamer©
@CryptoLamer · 16,731
#37
ТЕМКА В СХЕМКЕ
@TVS_TEAM · 37,265
#38
Фармер: Крипта и Схемы
@byrealfarmer · 52,047
#39
САТОШИ NEWS
@satoshinews · 29,499
#40
С нуля до нуля на крипте
@notothemoon · 17,744
#41
Манна небесная
@manna_money · 10,584
#42
EAZY SCALPING (youtube)
@eazyscalping · 9,458
#43
Климченко | про криптовалюту
@thevse · 34,632
#44
Дерзкий спекулянт
@derzko · 11,931
#45
LAST_TRADE | ТРИ КИТА 🐋
@Last_Trade161 · 4,918
#46
КРИПТО ФЕРМА
@KRIPTOFERMA · 11,428
#47
LLoyD Crypto
@CryptoAmbs · 3,412
#48
moni talks [крипта]
@moni_talks · 24,502
#49
Romb
@rombikpok · 3,076
#50
Андрюнин.
@andryuninthelegend · 18,454
#51
Early Berkut
@earlyberkut · 15,028
#52
KlonDike 📓 BLOCKNOTE
@myKlonDike · 2,582
#53
Crypto Daily – биткоин, криптовалюта
@cryptodaily · 83,890
#54
СЛЕЗЫ САТОШИ
@slezisatoshi · 121,745
#55
FACK BLOCK RESEARCH
@fackblock · 25,048
#56
Keep calm
@keep_calm_official · 14,980
#57
From Sergey (ICO Drops)
@from_syroamst · 6,570
#58
Ласткинг161eth
@lastkings161 · 5,004
#59
Alleria Crypto ⚡️
@alleria_crypto · 7,354
#60
AIRDROPы RIP ☠️
@AirdropZhdun · 4,311
#61
GENESIS
@trend_gen · 54,695
#62
PROFIT MAFIA
@ProfiT_Mafia · 34,790
#63
что-то про крипту
@chtototamprocryp · 9,107
#64
невер броук эгейн
@never_broke_again_v1 · 6,404
#65
AGGREGATOR
@WEB3_AGGREGATOR · 14,378
#66
PIFAGOR TRADE
@pifagortrade · 84,573
#67
Коля флипает
@sol_TOP · 40,022
#68
Trader 80/20
@tradertrend · 60,060
#69
[still early]
@Still_Early · 7,371
#70
Каждый мог | Саликов Александр
@kazhdiy_mog · 7,874
#71
Cryptor
@cryptor_tg · 4,399
#72
Defigen Capital | Столица дефигена
@defigencapital · 19,729
#73
Ярослав sellcash
@sybilders · 7,507
#74
Darvin Notes | Meow DAO
@darvin_crypto_notes · 5,199
#75
cryptocholy
@cryptocholy · 37,719
#76
Герман на блокчейне 🇪🇹
@blockchaingerman · 32,201
#77
Crypto Galaxy
@crypto_galaxyyy · 11,935
#78
🚀 Читер в Cosmosе ⚛️
@cosmos_chiter_ru · 4,824
#79
Drop guide
@drop_guide_official · 5,493
#80
Gagarin Crypto
@Gagarin_ICO · 15,717
#81
CragHack
@craghack_crypto · 8,339
#82
Синоптик | Coin Case
@coincase · 10,800
#83
Mr Mozart
@mr_mozart · 127,219
#84
MarketTwits
@markettwits · 341,015
#85
Обзоры от Gaina
@gaincryptolox · 4,583
#86
SMART INVESTOR
@smart_investor_ru · 3,007
#87

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Crypto Hamster
@thecryptohamster · 19,454
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 September 2026
Max Zarev
@maxzarev · 24,445
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 September 2026
Crypto & AI Updates | Славик инвестор
@Slavik_investor_updates · 20,559
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 September 2026
Славик инвестор | TwitterScore.io
@slavik_investor · 24,326
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 September 2026
ProMint
@ProMintChannel · 24,794
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
БОГДАН, ГДЕ ИКСЫ?!
@BogdanGdeX · 25,460
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
Don | Invest Blog
@don_invest · 37,413
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
Whitelist Media
@whitelist1 · 40,635
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 29 August 2026
PROCENT
@procent_crypto · 21,150
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 September 2026
PROFIT DRIVE
@profit_drive · 21,387
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 September 2026
IDO research
@idoresearch · 55,869
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
Мемуары Воркера
@promintsecret · 19,889
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 30 September 2026
Климченко | про криптовалюту
@thevse · 34,632
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
CryptoEarn Important
@CryptoEarnImp · 27,351
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
SWIPER
@swiper_money · 27,541
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 9 September 2026
Sergey (ICO Drops) заметки
@icodrops_sergey · 42,337
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
CRYPTUS MEDIA
@CRYPTUS_MEDIA · 69,693
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
moni talks [крипта]
@moni_talks · 24,502
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 September 2026
Фармер: Крипта и Схемы
@byrealfarmer · 52,047
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026
Крипто Нарния NEWS
@cryptonarnianews · 19,490
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 September 2026
Кэпитал News
@drops_daily · 20,811
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 September 2026
❄️Bad Santa AI&Crypto
@BadSantaDrop · 21,658
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 September 2026
Ворк в крипте, только хардкор
@workIncrypts · 32,928
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 3 September 2026
CryptoHustle & AI
@crypthustle · 19,621
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 September 2026

This channel appears in 107 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Coin Metrika” (@CoinMetrika), 34,324 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CoinMetrika.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.