Фьючерсный трейдер 8+ лет
Master of Science in Finance at Johns Hopkins
Доступ к SELECTED - @optimus_mundus_dev_bot
Связаться с нами - @General_supportBot
Регистрация на Bybit - https://partner.bybit.com/b/6764
Created
Between 1 November 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
65 measurements spanning 97 days, net -525. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,735–13,418 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 11:48
12,814
-8
10 Nov 2026, 07:54
12,822
-6
8 Nov 2026, 19:06
12,828
-8
7 Nov 2026, 10:54
12,836
-3
6 Nov 2026, 08:37
12,839
-4
5 Nov 2026, 11:45
12,843
-4
4 Nov 2026, 12:50
12,847
-7
3 Nov 2026, 12:58
12,854
-7
2 Nov 2026, 12:40
12,861
-7
1 Nov 2026, 10:36
12,868
-2
31 Oct 2026, 10:48
12,870
-3
30 Oct 2026, 12:56
12,873
-2
29 Oct 2026, 14:38
12,875
-4
28 Oct 2026, 16:41
12,879
-3
27 Oct 2026, 17:45
12,882
-3
26 Oct 2026, 14:27
12,885
-7
25 Oct 2026, 14:51
12,892
-3
24 Oct 2026, 16:40
12,895
-3
23 Oct 2026, 18:27
12,898
-7
22 Oct 2026, 15:06
12,905
first reading
Engagement
116 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
17.7%
avg views ÷ 12,814 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,260
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 116 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held
116 (18 July 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total
76,978
Reactions total
1,310
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Nov 2026, 09:08 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,910
Videos
≈189
Links
≈735
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
4,148 reactions across 107 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
2,495
60.1%
🔥
1,121
27.0%
⚡
309
7.45%
👏
223
5.38%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 107 of the 116 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,148 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 116 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 34 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
👀 Утро
Крипторынок -5.75% за сутки, ликвидации на $1.23 млрд - почти вдвое больше чем днём ранее, из них $1.02 млрд это лонги.
Индекс страха и жадности рухнул до 13 - экстремальный страх, вчера был 20.
Капитализация рынка -3.5% за 24ч, доминирование ВТС выросло до 58.8%. За две недели крипторынок потерял $330 млрд.
❗️ На деривативах розница держит 76.4% в лонгах по ВТС и 79.1% по ЕТН против 67.9% и 65.9% у крупны…
🚨 Иск акционеров против Nvidia
Акции Nvidia упали более чем на 4% на фоне публикации Politico - издание пишет о предполагаемом романе Дженсена Хуанга с китайской шпионкой. После падения на компанию подали иск акционеры.
❗️ Для рынка это сейчас особенно чувствительно - Nvidia остаётся главным драйвером насдака, и любой удар по репутации СЕО в моменте читается рынком болезненнее, чем обычно.
Фундаментально история с…
🟡 Срез по рынку перед CPI
ВТС торгуется у $74 872, ЕТН у $2 120, SOL у $86. Но интереснее другое - совокупный открытый интерес по крипте упал до $126.82 млрд, это минимум с конца августа. Рынок активно сбрасывает плечи, а не набирает их.
За два дня ликвидировано $781 млн 8 ноября и ещё $292 млн 9 ноября, причём больше 80% из этого - лонги. ВТС в этих ликвидациях на $284 млн, ЕТН - на $461 млн. Классический делевери…
🚨 Каскад ликвидаций в крипте
За последние 10 минут рынок пролил $1,000,000,000 ликвидаций. ВТС под $74,000, ЕТН под $2,125, XRP под $1.10, SOL под $90 - падение резкое и синхронное по всем крупным активам.
❗️ Это классический принудительный делеверидж - плечи сносит каскадом, не продавцы, а биржи закрывают позиции за них. Такие резкие проливы обычно идут с перехлёстом вниз: ликвидации сами по себе создают избыточно…
👀 Итог недели
К закрытию пятницы рынок прошёл перегрузку сразу по всем фронтам. S&P 500 потерял 4.7% до 7 354, Nasdaq 100 - 4.9% до 26 990. VIX взлетел на 63.8% за неделю до 28.2 - это 99-й перцентиль года, то есть рынок закладывает почти максимальную за год нервозность. Доходности при этом пошли вниз по всей кривой - 2-летние -15 б.п. до 4.46%, 10-летние -14 б.п. до 4.84%, 30-летние -7 б.п. до 5.25%. Классический f…
❗️Кредитный рынок начинает нервничать
Спред по высокодоходным облигациям в США (ICE BofA US High Yield OAS) - 3.48 п.п. на 5 ноября.
Простыми словами - инвесторы требуют больше премии за риск, чтобы держать мусорные облигации. Это сигнал из кредитного сегмента, который обычно реагирует раньше акций - расширение спредов часто предшествует более глубоким просадкам в риск-активах, потому что отражает реальную оценку д…
👀 Срез по S&P 500
7 354 на закрытии - это -4.7% за неделю. Коррекция ощутимая, но по факту - 53-й перцентиль года, то есть рынок всего лишь вернулся в середину своего годового диапазона, а не улетел в экстремум.
❗️ Смотрим так: база (~60%) - просадка в рамках нормальной коррекции после перегретого роста, и следующие недели уйдут на поиск равновесия без обновления экстремумов волатильности. Риск-сценарий (~40%) - ес…
🟡 Индекс страха и жадности - 28
Вчера было 50, нейтрально. Сегодня - 28, зона страха. Настроение рынка развернулось буквально за сутки.
❗️ Напомню, как это вообще считается: волатильность и просадки ВТС - 25%, моментум объёмов - 25%, активность в соцмедиа - 15%, опросы - 15% (сейчас на паузе), доминация ВТС - 10%.
По методологии самих авторов индекса экстремальный страх - это не сигнал на продажу и не подтверждени…
🚨 Институционалы побежали из ВТС-ETF
В четверг спотовые ETF на ВТС и ЕТН потеряли $530 млн за день - это худший день по оттокам за последнее время. На ВТС-фонды пришлось $430 млн минуса, на ЕТН - около $100 млн, по данным SoSoValue. И это после того, как в среду фонды ещё набирали $128 млн на отскоке выше $80,000.
Лидер слива - Fidelity, FBTC отдал ~$200 млн после притока в $237 млн днём ранее - разворот почти в то…
🟡 ВТС ушёл обратно под $80,000
После утреннего отскока выше $80к ВТС снова сполз вниз - сейчас около $79,600, это +2% к вчерашнему дню, но всё ещё на $21,900 ниже, чем год назад. Причина отката простая: нефть забирает обратно часть вчерашнего падения. Brent +1.6% до $96.15, WTI до $88.64 - оба бенчмарка в среду рухнули больше чем на 8%, а теперь частично отыгрывают.
Это важно не само по себе, а через канал нефть → …
👀 Утренний бриф
ВТС вернулся выше $80,000 на фоне широкого отскока крипторынка после волатильной реакции на американские промежуточные выборы - Zcash прибавляет 12%, ЕТН и XRP тоже в плюсе.
Индекс страха и жадности подскочил до 50 (Neutral) с 34 вчера - паника схлынула буквально за сутки.
🟡 Trump Media перевела 4,259 ВТС - сумма почти совпадает с залогом под $1 млрд конвертируемых облигаций компании. Рынок явно сл…
🚨 V-образный отскок на ВТС
Ночью ВТС провалился до $75,700 на новостях о победе демократов, получивших контроль над обеими палатами Конгресса - рынок на эмоциях продал геополитику-переобувание. Но уже через несколько часов цена выше $78,300.
❗️ Интереснее сама механика отскока - трейдеры закинули $420 млн в бычьи опционные ставки прямо на проливе. Это не органический отскок спота, а конкретный денежный поток, котор…
👍40🔥10⚡2
Showing the 12 most recent of 116 posts we hold for @E_kostevich. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@E_kostevich edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
20 August 2026
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 116 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 14 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Pursuit4Million|Андрей Соболев @P4M_channel · 31,756 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 September 2026
ElonMoney Trading @elonmoneytrading · 20,875 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 23 September 2026
Trader 80/20 @tradertrend · 60,048 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026
Эра Перемен — аналитическое агентство @eraperemenfinans · 78,541 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 August 2026
GENESIS @trend_gen · 54,665 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
CryptoCommons 💎 @cryptocommonz · 20,829 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 September 2026
PIFAGOR TRADE @pifagortrade · 84,558 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
PIF TWIT @piftwit · 25,438 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 September 2026
Crypto Family Public @CryptoFamilyPublic · 28,893 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
Артём Звёздин - обучение трейдингу @uiartemzvezdin · 76,161 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026
Крипта (деньги) @Kriptamoney · 38,715 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 30 August 2026
Алиев Азиз | Трейдинг простым языком @alievtrade · 19,418 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 September 2026
Биржевой Монарх @BMonarch_official · 42,878 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
Gennady M @gen_m · 67,441 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kostevich live” (@E_kostevich), 12,814 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/E_kostevich.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.