5 measurements spanning 8 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,979–2,994 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 21:08
2,981
-4
11 Aug 2026, 02:41
2,985
-6
8 Aug 2026, 02:00
2,991
-1
7 Aug 2026, 07:30
2,992
no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:25
2,992
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 24 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 00s
Average length
1m 00s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
501 reactions across 19 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
247
49.3%
custom 5400044690290522089
75
15.0%
❤🔥
43
8.58%
custom 6093433560700553128
41
8.18%
😁
31
6.19%
👎
26
5.19%
custom 6228510140425832224
10
2.00%
🦄
9
1.80%
💊
8
1.60%
custom 6228926511735375504
4
0.798%
custom 6228670269691529374
2
0.399%
custom 6235689985714948710
2
0.399%
😈
2
0.399%
💯
1
0.2%
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 501reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 January 2026 to 20 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
17
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 19 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Gaaapsby. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 January 2026 to 20 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
KAZAN CRYPTOFORUM 2026
Уже завтра состоится один из моих любимых 2-дневных форумов про крипту и цифровые активы.
Лечу поддержать коллег выступлением на тему ЦФА/RWA. Буду выступать завтра на главной сцене в ~16:40.
Со мной разделит сцену мой товарищ — Сергей Маслов, с которым у нас есть подкаст.
Приходите поддержать нас в зрительном зале!
🤘🏽Помимо этого можно проголосовать за меня в одной из номинаций по ссылке:…
Великая ротация капитала [#Лонгрид]
Вашему вниманию 17 нетривиальных трендов и идей. Тема колоссальная и крайне важная. Великая ротация капитала, оцениваемая в $84 трлн до 2045 года (по данным Cerulli Associates), станет главным драйвером трансформации инвестиционного ландшафта.
Психология поколений, выросших в принципиально разных условиях, сформирует новые правила игры. Мне очень интересно постараться определить …
Мама, я на MTW!
Правда не том, где мы смотрели «Тачку на прокачку»…
13-15 Мая, Москва-Сити, Moscow Trading Week.
Все, кто связан с финансовыми рынками, соберутся в одном месте, в Башне Федерации. Будут спикеры из госструктур, лучшие трейдеры, управляющие хедж-фондам, брокеры, биржи, инвест блогеры и СМИ!
В рамках Московской недели трейдинга Я буду выступать 13 мая вечером (~19:00). Приготовил сочную тему по мотив…
Сколько из читаемых вами аналитиков/блогеров среди всего инфополя публично спрогнозировал ATH по битку с погрешностью в 2-3%, как это сделали мы с вами задолго свершившегося факта?
Голосуйте👇
Не припомню никого с такой точностью, кроме Грецкого24%
Еще ~1-3 человека/компаний42%
Еще ~4-10 человек/компаний6%
Более 10 читаемых мной человек/компаний предсказали такие же точные цифры3%
Абсолютное большинство предсказали исторический ATH в $126.000 по BTC25%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
😎 Падение $BTC на -52% от ATH? Пффф. Игра только начинается
Как вы знаете, в информационном пространстве, которое вы каждый день читаете, по пальцем рук пересчитать людей, которые спрогнозировали и отторговали весь цикл роста $BTC от дна $15.000 до $126.000.
Напомню, что Я публично писал о дне по битку вскоре после краха FTX (ноябрь 2022); о том, что биток будет $123.000 (на основе мат. модели в таблице) и том, что…
Сейчас в инфополе активно форсят идею медвежки и щитпостят свои прогнозы на тему глобального дна $BTC.
У меня готов пост на эту тему, но для начала предлагаю нам собрать #sentiment и узнать настрой среди подписчиков.
Важно ваше мнение и видение ситуации. Голосуйте👇🏽
Легальный наркотик [#ЯRuslan]
Не только наркотик, но и легальные 3 часа 3 раза в неделю, когда полностью отключается мозг от внешнего шума, оставляя тебя наедине с духом и железом. Обожаю.
Начинал с 80-100 кг в начале 2024… На днях делал проходку до 350кг в жиме ногами. Чувствую еще запас хода до 370-380 на 1-2 повторения в ближайшем будущем.
Разминочные
9х200кг
9х240кг
Рабочие
5х290кг
3х300кг
3х310кг
3х320кг
3х3…
Интересные промежуточные результаты голосования, кстати) Я полагал будут совершенно другие кандидаты в приоритете… кайф!
Кто еще не отдал голос — проголосуйте, важно ваше мнение. Заранее благодарю❤️
С ув.
🤘🏽Давайте вместе определимся, какая из тем более желанная для вас.
Пройдите опрос (можно выбрать несколько вариантов ответа)👇🏽
1.Fomo Sapiens — о влиянии животных инстинктов при принятии инвестиционных/торговых решений31%
2. Четвертая промышленная революция — что нас ждет в ближ. 20 лет в технологическом плане55%
3.Мои основные выводы 10 лет работы на финансовом рынке как трейдер, инвестор и венчурный капиталист36%
4. Будущее инвестиций — перераспределение богатства к более молодым поколениям от бэби-бумеров44%
5. Frontman — роль лидера в наше время. Ее +/- и надо вообще вам быть лидером в эпоху сингулярности11%
6. Крипто-венчур — ресерч последних 9 лет венчура, от запуска щитков в 2017 до ICO/IDO в 202520%
The shares total 197%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
👍13custom 54000446902905220896
Signed ЯRuslan Gretskiy
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Gaaapsby. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Сколько из читаемых вами аналитиков/блогеров среди всего инфополя публично спрогнозировал ATH по битку с погрешностью в 2-3%, как это сделали мы с вами задолго свершившегося факта?
Голосуйте👇
Не припомню никого с такой точностью, кроме Грецкого24%
Еще ~1-3 человека/компаний42%
Еще ~4-10 человек/компаний6%
Более 10 читаемых мной человек/компаний предсказали такие же точные цифры3%
Абсолютное большинство предсказали исторический ATH в $126.000 по BTC25%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🤘🏽Давайте вместе определимся, какая из тем более желанная для вас.
Пройдите опрос (можно выбрать несколько вариантов ответа)👇🏽
1.Fomo Sapiens — о влиянии животных инстинктов при принятии инвестиционных/торговых решений31%
2. Четвертая промышленная революция — что нас ждет в ближ. 20 лет в технологическом плане55%
3.Мои основные выводы 10 лет работы на финансовом рынке как трейдер, инвестор и венчурный капиталист36%
4. Будущее инвестиций — перераспределение богатства к более молодым поколениям от бэби-бумеров44%
5. Frontman — роль лидера в наше время. Ее +/- и надо вообще вам быть лидером в эпоху сингулярности11%
6. Крипто-венчур — ресерч последних 9 лет венчура, от запуска щитков в 2017 до ICO/IDO в 202520%
The shares total 197%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 January 2026 to 20 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 325,239 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Руслан Грецкий” (@Gaaapsby), 2,981 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Gaaapsby.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
