Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Эмиль Панахов | SOUL💙 MIND🧠 SPIRIT🪬 | НАСЛЕДИЕ | Саморазвитие 5D Духовность Психология Мышление Спорт Душа Разум Дух

@Mind_Soul_Spirit

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,237subscribers

-22 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001195342826
TypeChannel
Username@Mind_Soul_Spirit
Created18 July 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Mind_Soul_Spirit

Growth

6,2376,2596,2486 August 2026 — 6,259 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,259 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,256 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,249 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,237 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 8 days, net -22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,234–6,262 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 10:096,237-12
10 Aug 2026, 16:176,249-7
7 Aug 2026, 16:046,256-3
6 Aug 2026, 18:156,259no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:076,259first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 2 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.99%
avg views ÷ 6,237 subscribers
Avg views / post
560
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held14 (2 July 202631 July 2026)
Views total5,604
Reactions total86
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 40s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

156 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥6541.7%
2415.4%
🙏2113.5%
💯1912.2%
👍138.33%
🔥95.77%
🕊42.56%
👏10.641%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 156reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 09:05 UTC480 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🙏3❤‍🔥2

31 Jul 2026, 09:05 UTC483 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Дорогой Эмиль! Наша поездка в Калужскую область прошла на твердую «пятерку с плюсом»! Мы успешно объединили благотворительность, духовность и творчество, и спешу поделиться главными итогами. Мы охватили 4 ключевые точки, позади два дня пути около 700км в пути. Посетили 1. Кризисный центр в д. Ветьмица: Островок спасения в географической изоляции. Здесь 30 женщин с детьми бегут от домашнего насилия. Дефицит тотальны

❤‍🔥4🙏21

29 Jul 2026, 15:47 UTC532 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Это та молодежь, которая не только верит в светлое будущее страны, но и его создает. Поколение творцов, которым не безразлична наша жизнь.

❤‍🔥21

29 Jul 2026, 15:46 UTC533 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Марию знаю лично. У кого есть отклик, поучаствуйте в добром деле!

❤‍🔥15

29 Jul 2026, 15:45 UTC541 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет! Меня зовут Мария, я учусь на кинопродюсера в Московской школе кино. Этим летом мы с моей командой снимаем дуэт короткометражных фильмов на темы семейных ценностей и любви. Сейчас нам очень нужна ваша помощь в осуществлении съемок🤍 Это не просто учебные фильмы, а истории, которые нам правда важно рассказать! Первый фильм «Суп», режиссера Василисы Будаевой, о мужчине, который пытается стать отцом ребенк

🙏12👍1

26 Jul 2026, 11:00 UTC620 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Создал канал с моими мыслями о жизни, психологии, саморазвитии и мировых ситуациях, плюс буду скидывать туда актуальные новости, мои наработки из бизнеса и видение будущего, текущей мировой ситуации, куда все идёт. Подписывайтесь, там будет много пользы и качественного контента🔥 https://t.me/emilpanakhov3 Объединяемся и развиваемся вместе!

🔥2❤‍🔥1👏1

26 Jul 2026, 08:02 UTC597 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

БЛАГО-ПОЕЗДКА И ДУХОВНОСТЬ Дорогие единомышленники и благотворители! Приглашаем в путешествие,🧳 где добрые дела сочетаются с духовным обогащением. 📅 29 июля, СРЕДА • 05:00 — Выезд из Москвы • День — Посещение нескольких учреждений, одно из них ГБУ КО СРЦН социально-реабилитационный центр «Черемушки». Передаем подарки к 1 Сентября • 18:00 — Сказочный парк Владимира Колесникова (200+ скульптур из арт-бетона) • 20:00

6🕊4🙏1

23 Jul 2026, 15:28 UTC600 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🔥На моем канале подкастов новый выпуск с астрологом Павлом Андреевым ❓Что нас ждет в ближайшие 3 года? ❓Кто управляет миром? ❓Будущее России ❓Будущее Европы ❓Какой будет мир после 2030? Эти и другие важные вопросы обсудили на подкасте в формате дискуссии. Получилось интересно! https://youtu.be/jpPqJTFYhx8?si=0btbAFmKWdnBZV3Z Не забудьте подписаться, поделиться с друзьями и оставить коммент✊🙏

👍21

23 Jul 2026, 15:28 UTC549 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Сегодня поговорим о будущем мира

❤‍🔥1

21 Jul 2026, 08:01 UTC669 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

У кого есть желание помочь детям, прикрепляю ссылку, это проверенный сайт моим волонтером https://sos-dd.ru

3🙏3

14 Jul 2026, 16:56 UTC≈1,000 views37 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Привычка реагировать негативно настолько укоренилась, что люди потеряли свое преимущество перед низшими живыми существами – сознание. Устрица тоже реагирует негативно на внешний раздражитель. Но человек, в отличие от устрицы, может сознательно и намеренно регулировать свое отношение к внешнему миру. Однако человек не пользуется этим преимуществом и отвечает агрессией на малейшее неудобство. Свою агрессивность он ошиб

💯19👍10❤‍🔥71

14 Jul 2026, 15:04 UTC940 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Сняли подкаст с Львом Клыковым, ему 92 года. Он раздал информацию космического уровня, 3 часа нон-стоп писали! Скоро на экранах!

❤‍🔥118

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Mind_Soul_Spirit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 446,983 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🅼🅴🅻🅴🅶🅰 TEAM 🇲🇽 LOVE
@MELEGATEAM · 119,481
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
Sokolovskiy
@sokolay · 110,652
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Эмиль Панахов | SOUL💙 MIND🧠 SPIRIT🪬 | НАСЛЕДИЕ | Саморазвитие 5D Духовность Психология Мышление Спорт Душа Разум Дух” (@Mind_Soul_Spirit), 6,237 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mind_Soul_Spirit.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.