Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Александр Фокин USSResearch

Channel

Александр Фокин USSResearch

@USSResearch

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,600subscribers

+493 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001291528302
TypeChannel
Username@USSResearch
Created17 January 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/USSResearch

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12,10712,66012,383.55 August 2026 — 12,107 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,107 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,120 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,155 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,338 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,438 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,452 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,462 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,498 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,516 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,525 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,543 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,561 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,563 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,568 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,578 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,586 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,579 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,578 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,574 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,582 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,639 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,649 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,660 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,659 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,654 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,636 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,623 subscribers9 September 2026 — 12,652 subscribers11 September 2026 — 12,644 subscribers13 September 2026 — 12,639 subscribers14 September 2026 — 12,630 subscribers16 September 2026 — 12,608 subscribers19 September 2026 — 12,599 subscribers26 September 2026 — 12,600 subscribers12,6005 August 202626 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 51 days, net +493. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,024–12,743 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 06:5712,600+1
19 Sept 2026, 08:1912,599-9
16 Sept 2026, 23:3612,608-22
14 Sept 2026, 21:5812,630-9
13 Sept 2026, 09:0112,639-5
11 Sept 2026, 15:5612,644-8
9 Sept 2026, 01:1712,652+29
5 Sept 2026, 15:3812,623-13
3 Sept 2026, 15:5912,636-18
2 Sept 2026, 08:4312,654-5
1 Sept 2026, 08:5612,659-1
31 Aug 2026, 09:3712,660+11
30 Aug 2026, 06:1512,649+10
29 Aug 2026, 06:1712,639+57
28 Aug 2026, 02:4512,582+8
27 Aug 2026, 03:1512,574-4
26 Aug 2026, 03:0812,578-1
25 Aug 2026, 04:0312,579-7
23 Aug 2026, 23:5412,586+8
22 Aug 2026, 11:1712,578first reading

Engagement

50 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.5%
avg views ÷ 12,600 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,210
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.96%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 50 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held50 (26 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total32,100
Reactions total950
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 21:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 00s
Average length
1m 00s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,025 reactions across 50 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,14922.9%
😁1,12122.3%
🔥1,10121.9%
❤1,09221.7%
👎1793.56%
😢1653.28%
😱841.67%
🤬611.21%
🤯531.05%
😭200.398%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 50 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,025 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 11:19 UTC≈1,330 views33 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Увидел обложку новой книги, и название “The Last Purge” показалось интересным. Термин «Great Purge» используют для описания того, что в русскоязычной традиции называют Большим террором (период 1937–1938 годов). Получается, что название книги можно перевести как «Последний террор» или «Последняя чистка». Проблема возникает в том, что если в 1937 году массово фабриковали дела, то в случае с хлопковым делом все доказат…

👍24🔥8❤1

2 Sept 2026, 07:14 UTC≈1,500 views48 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Подписчик прислал мне ссылку на любопытный пост с изображением, действие которого, судя по всему, происходит в «подвалах Лубянки»: чекисты пытают заключённых, рядом стоят несколько хорошо одетых молодых женщин, наблюдающих за происходящим. Отсюда возник вполне закономерный вопрос: могли ли сотрудники советских органов в 1920-е годы привести знакомых девушек в тюрьму, чтобы показать им пытки или даже казни? Первым зд…

👍23😢16❤3👎3🔥3

1 Sept 2026, 20:50 UTC≈2,460 views166 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Сын пришел из школы и говорит отцу: Сегодня учительница рассказывала, что СССР запустил уже 287-й спутник! Отец: Не только. И промышленность, и сельское хозяйство, и всю экономику, и культуру запустили! Сын пошел в школу, рассказал учительнице, а та: Скажи отцу, что сажают не только картофель, а передачи бывают не только по радио или по телевизору..... Всех с Днем знаний!

😁134❤20😢5😱4👎3

1 Sept 2026, 09:52 UTC≈2,430 views70 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Сегодня 1 сентября, День знаний, поэтому выполняю обещание и публикую подборку небольших нишевых каналов об истории. — Orientern — @orientern. Совсем молодой канал студента-историка о связях Советского Союза и Коминтерна с революционными движениями Восточной Азии. — General in chief — @xrenosoma_channel. Ещё один совсем молодой околоисторический канал, который пока только ищет собственную форму и тематику, обращаяс…

❤32👍19🔥11👎8

31 Aug 2026, 15:19 UTC≈2,320 views60 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @roytermotele

Матвей Израилевич Лернер родился в 1909 году в Одессе. В 1930 году вступил в ВКП(б). В годы войны служил в Инженерном управлении Наркомата внешней торговли, которое занималось организацией транспортировки военной техники от союзников по ленд-лизу, был награждён медалью «За боевые заслуги». 14 апреля 1946 года он обратился к Сталину с письмом по «еврейскому вопросу» (за ссылку спасибо подписчикам): «Благодаря Советск…

👍40🔥8😁6❤5🤬1

31 Aug 2026, 12:28 UTC≈2,950 views74 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Попалось одно письмо 1946 года по поводу положения евреев в послевоенном СССР. И самое интересное не его содержание, а финальный поток риторики

😁47🔥16🤯6😢5

30 Aug 2026, 07:19 UTC≈2,630 views125 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Недавно с коллегами обсуждали одну идею и я считаю ее правильной. Если у вас есть канала на историческую тему, не обязательно про СССР, и меньше 1000 подписчиков, то напишите мне в личные сообщения и сделаю подборку нишевых каналов и расширим аудиторию и расскажем про хорошие проекты

🔥77❤24👍20👎4

29 Aug 2026, 17:07 UTC≈3,360 views142 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Страсти по Виленской не утихают и я вспомнил советский анекдот - говорит рязанское радио. Отвечаем на вопросы трудящихся. товарищ Иванов спрашивает, что такое сольфеджио. Отвечаем: тут жрать людям нечего, а он вые...ся!

😁105❤20🔥14👍2🤯1

29 Aug 2026, 07:39 UTC≈9,210 views94 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Давно прочитал у уважаемого Игоря Стася пост, связанный с презентацией книги уважаемых Александра Дуднева и Константина Гудкова, и вот только дошли руки написать свои мысли. Игорь Стась выдвинул 7 тезисов новой истории архитектуры. Сама постановка вопроса мне понятна. История архитектуры действительно не может бесконечно оставаться описанием стилей, фасадов и авторских манер. Рано или поздно приходится разговаривать…

🔥47👍32❤13😁2

28 Aug 2026, 20:45 UTC≈3,910 views138 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Сейчас из каждого утюга говорят про ИИ. А тут я открываю журнал Коммунист за 1988 года и вижу статью про искусственный интеллект Для Гермогена Поспелова искусственный интеллект интересен прежде всего как основа новой информационной технологии, способной радикально изменить характер взаимодействия человека с ЭВМ. Если традиционная компьютеризация требовала предварительно формализовать задачу и передать ее программист…

❤93👍26🔥12👎7

26 Aug 2026, 17:44 UTC≈4,870 views225 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Современный научпоп очень удачно встроился в экономику досуга: можно вечером посмотреть сериал и считать эти два часа отдыхом, а можно включить длинный разговор с историком и получить примерно тот же расслабленный режим потребления, дополненный приятным чувством собственной образованности. Я сам регулярно так делаю и хорошо знаю это ощущение, когда после полутора часов подкаста кажется, будто существенно продвинулся …

😁117👍80🔥12❤8😢4👎2😭2

26 Aug 2026, 17:44 UTC≈4,940 views230 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Последние несколько дней в культурной части русскоязычного интернета шумит скандал вокруг «Страдариума» и Анны Виленской, записавшей курс о музыке Средневековья и Возрождения. Музыковеды довольно быстро нашли там фактические ошибки и проблемы с терминологией, после чего авторы предложили специалистам записать разборы, которые можно было бы добавить к курсу. Это вызвало новую волну критики: одни предлагают курс удалит…

🔥107👍78❤25👎9😁9😢2

Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @USSResearch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Наукогрядка
@fruitsoftheacademia · 137
4 posts
Деньги и песец
@moneyandpolarfox · 50,911
3 posts
Хроники кремниевых долин
@chronsilva · 169
2 posts
Культура неудавшегося транзита
@failed_transition · 1,370
2 posts
Котики и корона на голове Беллы Рапопорт
@kittendancez · 4,490
2 posts
ОНА РАЗВАЛИЛАСЬ
@ussrchaosss1 · 20,334
2 posts
Антропошкола
@AnthropoceneNow · 465
1 post
Алеет Восток
@MDJHX · 1,093
1 post
Андрей Медведев
@MedvedevVesti · 183,029
1 post
Минченко. Исторические выписки
@MinchenkoHistory · 2,188
1 post
Rotten Kepken, синоптик
@RottenKepkenChannel · 7,478
1 post
ЧВК ZOV Победы
@Z_VPobeda · 34
1 post
Чёрные маки Зирды
@black_zirda · 108
1 post
Братья Магамадовы
@bratmagamadov · 51
1 post
Цветные стёкла
@coloured_glass · 149
1 post
СВИДЕТЕЛЬСТВА СОЦИАЛЬНОГО
@evidence_of_social · 109
1 post
Темы. Главное (ГлавМедиа)
@glavmedia · 66,576
1 post
ИА "Стекломой"
@ia_steklomoy · 109,841
1 post
Красная орда
@kizil_orda · 47
1 post
Азбука про меня
@me_myself_and_zzz · 32
1 post
Новый разночинец
@newraznochinets · 3,284
1 post
Атомное Чучхе
@nucdprk · 8,452
1 post
Человек-оркестр / Дима Нарайкин
@onemanblog · 1,924
1 post
Orientern
@orientern · 57
1 post
Photography&History
@photohist · 171
1 post
Научные конференции для историков
@russian_history_lab · 1,389
1 post
Manufacturing the future
@staatliche_plankomission · 434
1 post
Троцкий день
@trotskyday · 278
1 post
Урбанизм как смысл жизни
@ukszh1988 · 10,633
1 post
Городские историки
@urbanhistorians · 3,922
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 41 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Книжные Подборки
@knizhnye_podborki · 22,219
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 September 2026
Общество распространения полезных книг
@obrpk · 26,566
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 September 2026
Советские учебники
@sovuche · 105,414
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 August 2026
Гуманитарные конференции
@confhum · 25,812
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Александр Фокин USSResearch” (@USSResearch), 12,600 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/USSResearch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.