Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

USSResearch

@USSResearch

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

12,462subscribers

+355 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001291528302
TypeChannel
Username@USSResearch
Created17 January 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/USSResearch

Growth

12,10712,46212,284.55 August 2026 — 12,107 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,107 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,120 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,155 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,338 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,438 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,452 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,462 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net +355. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,054–12,515 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:3712,462+10
10 Aug 2026, 23:4212,452+14
10 Aug 2026, 01:2112,438+100
8 Aug 2026, 23:5612,338+183
8 Aug 2026, 01:4312,155+35
6 Aug 2026, 22:5012,120+13
6 Aug 2026, 02:3412,107no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:3012,107first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
54.5%
avg views ÷ 12,462 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,800
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held24 (26 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total163,130
Reactions total2,235
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 00s
Average length
1m 00s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,235 reactions across 24 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍55524.8%
🔥53523.9%
52923.7%
😁33615.0%
👎964.30%
😢683.04%
😱482.15%
🤯401.79%
🤬241.07%
😭40.179%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,235reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC≈3,140 views97 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ученики советской школы магии на тренировке по квиддичу Валентин Борисов 1982 год

😁70🔥15😱84

11 Aug 2026, 13:08 UTC≈2,470 views86 reactionsread 12 August 2026

В ответ на мой пост пошла интересная линия дискуссии, к которой подключились уважаемые Павел Пряников, Дмитрий Прокофьев, Евгений Кузнецов и Александр Замятин, в связи с чем выскажу ещё несколько мыслей. 1. Непосредственно сам марксизм отдавал приоритет экономике, про это писали и классики и уже в советское время. Например, в Третьей программе КПСС было записано, что для построения коммунизма необходимо решить три з

👍5123👎8🔥3🤬1

10 Aug 2026, 15:41 UTC≈2,280 views74 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Все, думаю, слышали про «физиков и лириков»: знаменитую дискуссию, которая стала одним из символов 1960-х годов. Но мне кажется, что саму эту формулу часто понимают слишком буквально, будто между инженером и поэтом обязательно должна была проходить линия фронта. На практике советская городская культура была устроена сложнее, потому что люди, связанные с химией, машиностроением или ядерной физикой, вполне могли оказыв

🔥3423👍16👎1

8 Aug 2026, 18:44 UTC≈3,160 views49 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Думаю это интересная линия дискуссии и постараюсь оперативно подготовить свою развернутую позицию по этому вопросу

👍43👎6

8 Aug 2026, 18:41 UTC≈2,440 views51 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @tolk_tolk

Я согласен с уважаемым Евгением Кузнецовым, что СССР с научной, а не публицистической, точки зрения надо рассматривать как экономический проект. Да собственно сам марксизм – это экономическая идеология (капитализму придёт конец, когда норма прибыли опустится до 0%). https://t.me/eveningprophet/4397 (в его канале есть ещё несколько постов на эту тему) Топикстартер дискуссии – ув. историк Александр Фокин. https://t.me

👍29👎137🤬2

8 Aug 2026, 15:41 UTC≈2,670 views64 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @no_s3cr3tPhoto

Вдогонку к предыдущему посту — сатирический плакат 1984 года, высмеивавший модное упование на Бога перед экзаменами у советской молодёжи.

27😁21😢8🔥4👎2👍1🤬1

8 Aug 2026, 10:27 UTC≈3,480 views122 reactionsread 12 August 2026

В свое время Хейден Уайт в книге «Метаистория», ставшей одной из ключевых работ, подготовивших лингвистический поворот в исторической науке, предложил смотреть на исторический текст прежде всего как на особым образом организованное повествование. Анализируя способы, посредством которых историк превращает разрозненный материал прошлого в связный рассказ, Хейден Уайт выделял четыре базовых тропа — метафору, метонимию,

🔥66👍3912🤯3👎2

7 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC≈53,500 views115 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Статья Александра Вячеславовича Апанасенка посвящена довольно важному для понимания позднесоветского общества сюжету: росту интереса городской молодежи к православию в 1970-е и начале 1980-х годов, причем автор сознательно смотрит на этот процесс через документы тех структур, которые отвечали за атеистическую политику и регулярно докладывали о положении дел высшему партийному руководству. Уже в аналитической записке

🔥51👍29😢1510😁5🤯2😱2👎1

6 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC≈4,930 views128 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Для детей младшего возраста: "Он лежал на столе в красном гробу. Дверь была открыта на холод" А сейчас все 18+, 18+

🔥57😁5012😢7👍2

5 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC≈13,700 views399 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Главный плюс СССР Студенты периодически спрашивают меня о личном отношении к Советскому Союзу, и я каждый раз понимаю, что коротко ответить на этот вопрос довольно трудно. Разговор о советском прошлом слишком быстро превращается в политический тест: от тебя ждут либо разоблачения, либо защиты. В результате сама историческая сложность исчезает, а на ее месте остается знакомая схема, где СССР предстает либо утраченной

198👍83🔥63👎38🤬8😁8😱1

4 Aug 2026, 12:58 UTC≈5,130 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

📚 Представьте библиотеку, в которой каждая полка ведёт в отдельный мир. На одной — античные философы. На другой — секреты советских архивов. Чуть дальше — Средневековье, Месопотамия, Русский Север, карты исчезнувших государств, современная наука и культура. Именно так выглядит наша подборка гуманитарных Telegram-каналов. Не список ссылок, а маршрут для тех, кому интересно понимать мир немного глубже. 🎩 ЭСТЕТ — Твой

11👎3🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 18:47 UTC≈7,740 views86 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

У коллег из Рязани вышел интересный сборник документов про советскую повседневность Мы просто устали от такой жизни: советская повседневность 1950–1970-х годов в письмах граждан : сборник документов / О. Д. Попова, А. Д. Попова, П. И. Багрова, М. О. Масловский. – Киров : ООО "Издательство "Радуга-ПРЕСС", 2026. – 199 с. – ISBN 978-5-605-53979-7. Поскольку в элайбари он лежит в свободном доступени думаю коллеги не буд

45🔥22👍15🤯4

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @USSResearch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 7,654 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Наукогрядка
@fruitsoftheacademia · 139
4 posts
Хроники кремниевых долин
@chronsilva · 168
2 posts
Культура неудавшегося транзита
@failed_transition · 1,372
2 posts
Антропошкола
@AnthropoceneNow · 472
1 post
Чёрные маки Зирды
@black_zirda · 109
1 post
Братья Магамадовы
@bratmagamadov · 51
1 post
СВИДЕТЕЛЬСТВА СОЦИАЛЬНОГО
@evidence_of_social · 109
1 post
ИА "Стекломой"
@ia_steklomoy · 110,818
1 post
Котики и корона на голове Беллы Рапопорт
@kittendances · 4,423
1 post
Красная орда
@kizil_orda · 47
1 post
Алеет Восток
@MDJHX · 1,105
1 post
Азбука про меня
@me_myself_and_zzz · 33
1 post
Андрей Медведев
@MedvedevVesti · 185,028
1 post
Минченко. Исторические выписки
@MinchenkoHistory · 2,086
1 post
Деньги и песец
@moneyandpolarfox · 50,975
1 post
Новый разночинец
@newraznochinets · 3,299
1 post
Атомное Чучхе
@nucdprk · 8,395
1 post
Человек-оркестр / Дима Нарайкин
@onemanblog · 1,937
1 post
Photography&History
@photohist · 171
1 post
Rotten Kepken, синоптик
@RottenKepkenChannel · 7,429
1 post
Manufacturing the future
@staatliche_plankomission · 436
1 post
Троцкий день
@trotskyday · 277
1 post
Городские историки
@urbanhistorians · 3,858
1 post
ОНА РАЗВАЛИЛАСЬ
@ussrchaosss1 · 20,163
1 post
ЧВК ZOV Победы
@Z_VPobeda · 34
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 35 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“USSResearch” (@USSResearch), 12,462 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/USSResearch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.