Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Николай Жаринов 💀

@litsomel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

30,201subscribers

+132 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002054687676
TypeChannel
Username@litsomel
DescriptionЛичный канал филолога, культуролога, писателя Николая Жаринова. https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=6738ebf931a9292acd109df9&registryType=bloggersPermission По вопросам рекламы писать - https://t.me/DaniilLinkto
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/litsomel

Growth

30,06930,20130,1356 August 2026 — 30,069 subscribers6 August 2026 — 30,069 subscribers6 August 2026 — 30,092 subscribers7 August 2026 — 30,110 subscribers8 August 2026 — 30,134 subscribers9 August 2026 — 30,156 subscribers10 August 2026 — 30,167 subscribers11 August 2026 — 30,178 subscribers12 August 2026 — 30,188 subscribers13 August 2026 — 30,201 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 7 days, net +132. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,049–30,221 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 13:1730,201+13
12 Aug 2026, 11:3830,188+10
11 Aug 2026, 14:4530,178+11
10 Aug 2026, 15:3430,167+11
9 Aug 2026, 15:1430,156+22
8 Aug 2026, 15:1030,134+24
7 Aug 2026, 17:5630,110+18
6 Aug 2026, 18:3030,092+23
6 Aug 2026, 04:0030,069no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:5230,069first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.6%
avg views ÷ 30,201 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,210
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held20 (2 August 202613 August 2026)
Views total124,150
Reactions total3,171
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 02:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,420
Videos
33
Links
345

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

2,942 reactions across 18 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,65756.3%
🔥68223.2%
👍30810.5%
❤‍🔥732.48%
😁581.97%
💯571.94%
290.986%
custom 5021900732870165068220.748%
🌚150.51%
👌120.408%
🤣80.272%
😍60.204%
🤨50.17%
💔30.102%
🗿30.102%
🤔20.068%
🤪20.068%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,171reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @litsomel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC≈2,460 views38 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Завтра вечером я предлагаю вам прогуляться по городу-призраку. Так и можно назвать Москву эпохи Сталина, ведь генеральный план реконструкции города 1935 года так и не был воплощен в жизнь. Мы поговорим с вами о том, чем вдохновлялись архитекторы того времени, почему так быстро менялись стили, поговорим о домах и их жителях, особенное внимание уделим Высотке на Котельнической набережной. Не пропустите! 14.08 19:30

28🔥7❤‍🔥2💯1

13 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC≈3,090 views112 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Не так давно перечитывал я «Собачье сердце» Михаила Булгакова. Какой же удивительный это текст и как открылся он для меня, когда вернулся к нему ближе к 40 годам. О своих впечатлениях и неочевидном значении этого произведения рассказываю сегодня в ролике. Всем приятного просмотра! Ютуб - https://youtu.be/cAZ6Zd-9Elk ВК Видео - https://vkvideo.ru/video-227012884_456239126

79🔥18👌5👍4💯32🤔1

12 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC≈4,860 views200 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Говнодавы. Я был говнарем и конечно же у меня были говнодавы. Не Мартина, не Гриндера, а классические армейские говнодавы. Откуда родилась эта любовь в армейской атрибутике. Из детства. Среди кассет в доме появился альбом Любе с «Комбатом». Комбат взял штурмом детское сердце. Потом пришло увлечение Вьетнамской войной, а потом я сам вступил в армию, в армию говнарей, ибо стал заниматься историческим фехтованием и вм

125🔥36❤‍🔥19👍74🤨4😁3💯2

11 Aug 2026, 14:13 UTC≈5,370 views58 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, 20 августа в 19:00 я приглашаю вас в НЦ «Россия» на обсуждение творчества Ивана Ефремова. Поговорим с вам и о том, как отражались в произведениях писателя образы прошлого и будущего, почему его книги актуальны и сегодня. Будет очень интересная дискуссия! Не пропустите! Для участия нужно лишь зарегистрироваться по ссылке ⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://russia.ru/events/ctoby-pocitat-tema-obraz-celoveka-budushhego-v-proizve

🔥2716👍9custom 50219007328701650684💯1🤣1

10 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC≈5,740 views218 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Шузы. Ничто так не красит человека как обувь. В обуви вся сила. Это знает каждый спортсмен, военный, походник и модник. Хорошие шузы — моя страсть, и родилась она в детстве. Мне было лет 9, кажется, разбирали дома старые коробки, из одной из них отец извлек советские кеды марки «Два мяча». Батя мой филолог и мечтатель, поэтому любой рассказ превращает в легенду. Легенда о «Двух мячах» меня поразила. Отец говорил,

146👍36custom 502190073287016506818❤‍🔥10🔥5🤪2💯1

10 Aug 2026, 13:12 UTC≈5,790 views239 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Вчера купил свою мечту. Неожиданно. Пошел обедать, потом решил по Маросейке прогуляться, ну и занесли меня ноги в магазин пластинок. А там… А там пластинка с чудесной музыкой из «Амаркорда» Феллини. Кайфую, а август объявляю месяцем Амаркорда. Расскажу вам о самых дорогих моих воспоминаниях.

153🔥52👍24💯4💔3😍2🤨1

10 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC≈9,580 views54 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Когда на прошлой неделе готовился к экскурсии по Сталинской Москве, много читал про Дмитрия Чечулина, архитектора высотки на Котельнической набережной. Чечулин обожал театр, много работал над декорациями, и это видно, когда оказываешься во дворе высотке. Все тут как театральная сцена. Еще с XIX века архитектура и театр шли рука об руку. Каждое здание было как отдельный спектакль и лучше всего в Москве это видно на п

46👍8

9 Aug 2026, 12:08 UTC≈6,420 views375 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

История. Обожаю свою девушку, она удивительно хорошо умеет слышать. Услышала как-то от меня, что я хочу сделать новую экскурсию, центром которой сделаю рассказ о высотке на Котельнической набережной, и тут же купила мне замечательную книгу об этом доме. Столько там удивительных подробностей и редких фотографий. Например вот эта. Бараки, которые вы видите во дворе, это лагерный пункт, где содержались зеки и военнопл

268🔥64👍32😁6🗿3💯2

8 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC≈6,210 views118 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @punkmonkprodPhoto

В комментариях под роликом про Каббалу от Ивана Негреева очень просили, чтобы мы сняли вторую часть. Пройти мимо ваших просьб мы не могли. Поэтому смотрите продолжение рассказа! Всем отличного дня! Ютуб - https://youtu.be/zPO8NYXbwSk ВК Видео - https://vkvideo.ru/video-212264082_456239237

77👍27💯7😍4🔥3

7 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC≈6,660 views152 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня на нашем семейном канале новый выпуск! На этот раз говорим про самые отвратительные книги. Зачем они вообще нужны и почему часть из них давно считается классикой. Не пропустите! Всем приятного просмотра! Ютуб - https://youtu.be/RUerXHuwx8A ВК Видео - как обычно тупит настолько сильно, что не дает загрузить файл. Появится на сервисе, когда все наладят, но лучше смотрите выпуски на нормальных платформах.

🔥8930👍28💯3👌2

6 Aug 2026, 17:44 UTC≈7,280 views308 reactions1 Starread 14 August 2026
Photo

Грозовые курицы клюют розовые облака. Еду на лекцию про Балабанова.

🔥18956👍32😁18🤣7💯4❤‍🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC≈7,160 views150 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Не раз уже говорил о важности и пользе чтения, однако в сегодняшнем ролике решил рассмотреть вопрос о том, что происходит с мозгом человека, когда он читает художественную литературу, благо за последние 15 лет вышло немало исследований, посвященных этому вопросу. Обо всем этом в новом видео! Приятного просмотра! Ютуб - https://youtu.be/_FMc9EkF2Gc ВК Видео - https://vkvideo.ru/video-227012884_456239125

90👍30❤‍🔥21🔥8💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @litsomel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 3,486 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Николай Жаринов 💀” (@litsomel), 30,201 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/litsomel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.