5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -155. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,531–5,732 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 01:16
5,554
-73
11 Aug 2026, 08:16
5,627
-78
8 Aug 2026, 06:18
5,705
-4
7 Aug 2026, 14:31
5,709
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:22
5,709
first reading
Engagement
40 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.66%
avg views ÷ 5,554 subscribers
Avg views / post
92.2
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 40 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 31 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
40 (6 August 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
3,687
Reactions total
45
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 04:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
45 reactions across 31 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👏
37
82.2%
❤
6
13.3%
👍
2
4.44%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷ 어제 업빗썸 상장한 dappOS 상당히 수상한 움직임 보이는 중 🤔
에어드랍 분배배 지갑으로 보이는
0x6d8a31aeb37824ce0c31d3564349283c0e7a080f
0x8E0c31BDee065447458e9f5d73b205bD1D442FDd 주소에서 무려 1,000만 DOS를 한 번에 받은 뒤
여러 지갑으로 1만 DOS 전후씩 계속 쪼개서 보내는 중
대략 흐름이
10M DOS => 분배 지갑 => 수많은 지갑 => 일부 바이낸스 비트겟 등 CEX
이런 식으로 움직이고 잇네용
근데 더 수상한 건 10,000 DOS 이상 받은 대형 수령 지갑 상당수가 신규 주소라는 점 ❤️
그냥 kol 물량인 척 나눠주면서 프로젝트 측과 연관된 지갑들로 물량을 분산시키고 있는 건 아닌가 의심이... 🤔
또 어제 상장하고 가…
😃Perp-Dex Day with ReboundX 루마페이지 오픈
감사하게도 많은 이스포츠 트레이딩의 오리지널격이 된 콘텐츠를 KBW에서 더욱 크게 구성하게되었습니다! 아직 공개 안 된 파트너들부터 자리잡은 "진짜" 1티어 프로젝트들과 더욱 거대하고 파격적으로 온오프라인 혜택도 준비해보았습니다!
Perpdex섹터는 RWA를 업고 더욱 커질거라고 생각 중
트레이더 라인업, 굿즈 라인업, 행사 이벤트 부스 소식은 일단 신청해두시고 확인하기!
참가 프로젝트 라인업
Variational, Lighter, Aster, Extended
??? / ??? / ??? / ??? 곧 공개
정보
일시: 2026년 9월 28일 월요일
위치: 서울 강남 · 상세 주소는 승인자에게 개별 공개
인원: 600명 (승인 전용)
Event Highlights
-스…
multi 는 야핑끝물에 진행하다가 중단 되기도 했었고
현재 진행하는 세일들중에 제일 멀쩡해보임.
판테라, 세콰이어 투자.
일단 사전 신청은 해두는 걸로.
디테일 정보는 없지만 나중에 어찌 될지 모르니.
KII도 나름 괜찮아 보이긴하는데,
이시국에 이밸류는 도저히 손이안가서 패스.
스트립은 이름부터가 엄.
옛날 엤적 2년전쯤 이태원에서 한국 밋업을 주최하긴 했었음.
💲Multipli 은 일단 세일 등록 해둠
아마 세일 조건은 커밋 시작 할 때 알려주려나본데, 일단 8월 14일까지는 등록은 해두어야 세일 참여권한은 얻으니 미리 등록해두기
작년에 플라즈마, 메가이더, 모나드 다 sonar 에서 세일했고 업비트 간 전적 (물론 갈 놈이 간 거긴함)
암튼 3일남았으니 야핑이나 에드작 한 사람들은 세일 필수등록하기
https://claim.multiplifoundation.com/
🚨 업계인 대상 Linkedin 면접 해킹 주의
1. 업계 경력자에게 링크드인으로 스카웃, 면접 제안
2. Slack 같은 앱이라며 Obsidian 으로 위장한 피싱 링크를 줌
3. 링크 클릭만으로도 설치, Mac 비밀번호 입력하게 됨
4. 새벽에 자는 시간에 지갑 4개 털림, 총 58.4만불 손실
5. 해킹자금은 쿠코인으로 송금됨
6. 해킹 자금은 3일간 동결되나 경찰 요청 없으면 3일 뒤 동결이 풀릴 예정
7. 수사 협조가 신속히 안되면 그대로 놓치는 상황
✍️ 왜 당하냐 싶겠지만 오히려 코인을 잘 아는 사람들도 당한 사례가 많습니다. Mac 사용하더라도 주의하시길
DAPPOS 스토리텔러 20위 채널이 봇으로 매크로만 돌린다고 해서 지금 채널 끝까지 올려서 확인함
채널 : @dont_listen_to_me
스토리텔러 캠페인을 목적으로 개설된 채널이며, 매크로로 글을 작성하고 점수를 올린 캠페인 보상을 다 챙겨가는 것으로 보임
애초에 확인할 생각도 없었는데, 커뮤니티 할당이 있는 캠페인에 참여하면서 채팅방 연결도 안한 채널이 있다?
여기 뭐 디스프레드 직원 채널인가요?
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @jason_nest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 983,136 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Jason's nest” (@jason_nest), 5,554 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jason_nest.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
