Предприниматель Игорь Демидов. Co-Founder @nowagency (#2 ивент агентств РФ, 100 наград) и @teammateagency (#1 диджитал агентств РФ, 30 наград).
Предпринимательство и лайфстайл.
Вопросы и реклама: @itswowornever
РКН: https://clck.ru/3SZSWQ
Created
Between 1 March 2023 and 30 November 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net +516. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41,296–42,009 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 06:16
41,927
+87
14 Aug 2026, 17:16
41,840
+163
13 Aug 2026, 10:34
41,677
+123
12 Aug 2026, 09:08
41,554
+122
11 Aug 2026, 06:41
41,432
+44
10 Aug 2026, 04:32
41,388
+10
9 Aug 2026, 02:21
41,378
-8
8 Aug 2026, 05:11
41,386
-28
7 Aug 2026, 07:24
41,414
+18
6 Aug 2026, 08:00
41,396
-15
6 Aug 2026, 03:22
41,411
first reading
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
34.3%
avg views ÷ 41,927 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,400
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held
28 (30 July 2026 – 17 August 2026)
Views total
402,450
Reactions total
4,509
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
17 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,300
Videos
≈482
Links
≈627
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 31s
Average length
23s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,141 reactions across 26 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,406
34.0%
🔥
1,278
30.9%
👍
690
16.7%
❤🔥
226
5.46%
😢
133
3.21%
💯
108
2.61%
🤣
106
2.56%
🥰
90
2.17%
👏
62
1.50%
🤩
11
0.266%
👌
8
0.193%
⚡
7
0.169%
😁
6
0.145%
🤝
5
0.121%
custom 5224497187785810495
2
0.048%
🙏
2
0.048%
😍
1
0.024%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,509reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 28 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @justdemidovit. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🍋🍋🍋🍋🍋🍋🍋🍋
Агентству N:OW в этом году десять лет. А началось всё с татуировки.
Задолго до агентства мы с Аней разговаривали о простой вещи: единственное время, в котором вообще можно что-то сделать, которое важно, самый лучший момент — это сейчас. Не когда появятся деньги, не когда рынок станет понятнее. Сейчас. Аня придумала символ: слово «сейчас» по-английски, набранное цифрами электронных часов. Я придумал сделать…
В плохом состоянии невозможно принимать качественные решения.
Можно принимать быстрые, можно привычные, можно те, что снимают тревогу прямо сейчас. Качественные точно нет. А в моей работе решение стоит денег: тендер, найм, партнёрства.
Последние годы я довольно фокусно обращаю внимание на собственное состояние, понял что мне дает и забирает энергию и стараюсь работать с этим.
Бизнес не бывает в порядке, если ты не…
Всем привет из Алматы!
Прилетели с женой на концерт Канье Уэста. Сегодня успели посмотреть новый музей современного искусства, зайти в несколько винтажек и прогуляться по городу. В городе сегодня тотальный блек аут и выключили почти везде электричество, что-то случилось, но что не известно.
Мы как люди из ивентов сразу стали думать что делают организаторы такого коупного события, но уверен, что концерт состоится и …
27 августа в Доме культуры «ГЭС-2» пройдёт ТОК, конференция от Точка Банк для предпринимателей. Приглашаю вас и сам планирую там быть.
Тема года — «Решения под напряжением».
Попадание стопроцентное, я считаю. Расходы растут, рынок меняется, привычные инструменты перестают работать. Это год пересмотра всего, что мы делали, и год, в котором видно, кто чего стоит. Разговор будет не про мотивацию, а про решения, которые…
Сколько стоит минута темноты?
Продолжаю разбирать экономику больших событий. Обычно здесь фестивали, турниры и форумы, но в этот раз — событие, у которого нет билетов, организатора и очевидного ценника.
Вчера часть планеты смотрела в небо: над Гренландией, Исландией и севером Испании прошло полное солнечное затмение, первое над материковой Испанией с 1905 года.
Я решил посчитать, сколько оно стоит.
Коротко о само…
Планета К-30 в Дзене 🪩
Питерская клубная сцена последние пару лет держится на «Планете К-30», и у неё появилось своё медиа.
Теперь «Планета К-30» это не только фестиваль, но и полноценный медиахаб, где заработала Студия Дзена , где можно найти всё самое актуальное о вечеринках в Питере: бэкстейджи, интервью с артистами, лайвы резидентов, анонсы вечеринок.
По сути площадка сама стала редакцией про то, что происходи…
Лечу в Казахстан на концерт Канье Уэста.
В пятницу летим с женой на концерт мистера Ye, который выступает в Алматы 15 августа. Очень хочется посмотреть его сетап и шоу с планетой, который я также разбирал в канале.
Потом обязательно поделюсь своими впечатлениями и фото/видео
Люблю Алматы. У нас 4 года там компания и периодически там бываю, очень нравится этот зелёный город, нравятся люди, природа, рестораны.
Если…
Одна из самых недооценённых вещей в управлении: похвала.
Мы все умеем давать обратную связь, когда что-то пошло не так. Разбор, выводы, план. А вот сказать человеку «ты сделал круто» почему-то сложнее.
Кажется, что зарплата и так всё говорит за нас.
Не говорит. Люди уходят не только из-за денег. Уходят, когда их вклад никто не замечает. В агентском бизнесе, где продукт делают люди и только люди, это чувствуется ос…
Запускаю новую рубрику «Где прибыль?»
Мне нравится разбираться в экономике событий и компаний, за последние месяцы сделал 13 таких разборов.
Мне нравится копаться в цифрах и понимать, как устроены деньги внутри. Делал это для себя, и решил сделать отдельную рубрику и делиться, посмотрим как вам понравится и зайдет.
Каждую неделю буду брать 3-5 компаний и несколько цифр по каждой: выручка, чистая прибыль и маржинал…
🔥106❤🔥37❤8🥰6💯5👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @justdemidovit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,191 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Демидов сейчас” (@justdemidovit), 41,927 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/justdemidovit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.