Channel
@leftbullshit
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
48subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001915372252 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @leftbullshit |
| Description | Тут будет всякое: и про леваков, и про политику, и может даже про кино-вино-домино. По настроению. |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/leftbullshit |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:48 | 48 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:22 | 48 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 8 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
41 reactions across 13 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 9 | 22.0% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 17.1% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 14.6% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 12.2% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 9.76% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 4.88% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 4.88% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 4.88% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 2.44% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 2.44% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 2.44% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 2.44% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2024 to 6 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Из новостей: капитализм всё так же успешно перерабатывает антикапиталистический контент в капитал. Для тех, кто вдруг вспомнил ту самую присказку про капиталистов, которые сами продадут веревку, на которой их повесят - не обольщайтесь 🙃 https://t.me/boomers_TV/8610
❤2
Вы когда-нибудь задумывались, почему персонажу лисы в русских сказках выдали то ли прозвище, то ли отчество Патрикеевна? Я вот неожиданно для себя задумался. И вот какой ответ интересный нашёлся. Был такой литовский князь Патрикей из знаменитого рода Гедиминовичей — известный хитрец и проныра. В конце XIV века его выбрали княжеским наместником в Новгороде, приняли с большими почестями. Но вместо того, чтобы управля…
🤔4🌚1
Хороший некролог скорее не для самого актёра, а для всего проекта, который он олицетворял. Проект умер ещё раньше, и, как это ни печально, именно насильственной смертью. Виталий Наливкин - RIP 🫡 https://t.me/RedLine1917/4722
👏2
Видимо, я реально жёстко соскуфился, потому что я чёт в голосину с этого мема
😁7💘2🥴1
Ого, это мы чего-то не знали о Шнурове и его политических взглядах? Или может он сам это в себе только открывает? 🤔 В любом случае, интересно будет понаблюдать, куда его теперь понесёт. Небось скоро запишется в ряды «новых левых» и партию соответствующую откроет. Необязательно настоящую, разумеется 🙃
❤2🤣1
У наших силовиков всё ок с наркоторговцами и борделями. Они на шатание режима не претендуют 🙃 https://t.me/ostorozhno_novosti/29784
❤1
Эпоха безголовой курицы
С 2019 года прошло 5 лет. Ах как хочется вернуться, ах как хочется ворваться...
💯2
Мосгордума. Победители от КПРФ 🚩Николай Зубрилин (округ №10) 🚩Вячеслав Арбузов (округ №17) 🚩Леонид Зюганов (округ №20) «Новые люди» 🟩 Александр Даванков (округ №44) А также самовыдвиженец от ЛДПР Мария Воропаева (округ №38) и самовыдвиженец от РЖД Пётр Потапов (округ №15) Остальное — «Единая Россия» #Москва
😢2🤬1
Если вдуматься в смысл песни "Трава у дома", то это, по сути, отказ от раннесоветских иллюзий и фантазий о космосе как о будущем комфортном для человека пространстве, которое он сможет освоить и сделать "своим". Песня почти однозначно говорит: нет, Земля останется нашим единственным домом, и в первую очередь сюда нам нужно обращать свой взор и свои мысли. "А звёзды, тем не менее, чуть ближе, но всё так же холодны...…
😢2
И слышим мы о таких вещах, конечно же, только после ареста. Смелые люди эти военкоры, однако. https://t.me/ejdaily/262575
Хотя второе, конечно же, не исключает первого. Но тут важно понять, был ли реальный предлог для того, чтобы всё это закрутилось.
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @leftbullshit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 714,726 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@leftbullshit named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“потерявшийся левак” (@leftbullshit), 48 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/leftbullshit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.