Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

FOMOTEKA

@fomoteka

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,897subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001743484377
TypeChannel
Username@fomoteka
Descriptionмедиа о мемо- и мимолетной жизни 🔎 наш бот с планами на неделю — @FomotekaRobot 👣 наша тру-крайм экскурсия — @fomotruecrimebot 🖇 наш IG — https://clck.ru/3T2ZuS сотрудничество — pr@fomoteka.press
Created7 July 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fomoteka

Growth

10,89010,89710,893.56 August 2026 — 10,894 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,894 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,895 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,892 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,890 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,893 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,894 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,897 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,889–10,898 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 08:5210,897+3
11 Aug 2026, 08:2310,894+1
10 Aug 2026, 11:5410,893+3
9 Aug 2026, 13:1110,890-2
8 Aug 2026, 10:2610,892-3
7 Aug 2026, 09:5810,895+1
6 Aug 2026, 10:1510,894no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:5810,894first reading

Engagement

52 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.52%
avg views ÷ 10,897 subscribers
Avg views / post
929
52 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
52
of 52 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 51 of 52 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held52 (2 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total48,303
Reactions total1,490
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 04:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
11,800
Videos
2,390
Links
6,670

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
36s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,490 reactions across 51 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 529885907472771643527118.2%
27018.1%
🕊1419.46%
❤‍🔥1177.85%
💅1016.78%
🤡936.24%
💘734.90%
😢684.56%
🤯493.29%
custom 5328224247166834826422.82%
🍓302.01%
😁302.01%
custom 5249411477026136294281.88%
💋241.61%
🤮221.48%
🔥211.41%
👀181.21%
💔161.07%
custom 5224424151866941199151.01%
👍130.872%
8 further kinds483.22%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,490reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
26
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 52 we hold a reading for · 19%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fomoteka. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 52 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC278 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Спасибо за сегодняшнюю охоту за секретиками! Посмотрим, что могли пропустить, пока бегали по центру: 👻 Появились первые кадры с персонажами 13 сезона «Американской истории ужасов». Новые серии продолжат не только «Шабаш», но и все остальные части сериала. ❤️ Игра Marvel’s Spider-Man 3 находится в стадии разработки. А по «Колобку» когда? 🥱 В России вновь оштрафовали Google и Telegram. Первых на 7,6 млн рублей, втор

4custom 52244241518669411994custom 52494114770261362944

Signed Виктория

12 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC466 views21 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Photo

💗💗💗💗 💗💗💗💗 Ты погасила свечи, загадала желание. Чтоб в этот вечер он пришёл на FOMO КВИЗ... Что вообще происходит с инфополем в августе? Холланд и Зендея то ли поженились, то ли нет (Роналду точно да!), яблоки захватили интернет, Колобку опять что-то сулит, а мы празднуем четырехлетие на FOMOLAND! В эту пятницу, 14 августа в 19:00, встречаемся на FOMO КВИЗЕ и выясняем, кто тут главный эксперт по культурному хаосу.

custom 529885907472771643586💘5custom 52244241518669411992

12 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTC530 views29 reactions3 Starsread 13 August 2026

Уникальная опция 😏

❤‍🔥8🤮8🤪6👎3💅2🤡2

12 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTC522 views39 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤮12🤡9👎8🤯4😁4💘1custom 52988590747277164351

12 Aug 2026, 14:06 UTC631 views21 reactions3 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🩷 💗💗💗💗💗💗💗 2 билета на Signal, и чтобы нам не говорилиииии, мы будет вечно молодымииии Поняли? Газ! И до встречи 14 августа на FOMOLAND 4.0 в Ровеснике 💖❤️ Если вы нашли сертификат, напишите в комментарии 🩷

❤‍🔥11💅5👍3🤯2

12 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC628 views51 reactions3 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🩷 💗💗💗💗💗💗💗 10.000 в aaark уже ждет вас около «коробки»! 30 💖, и прячем последний лот Если вы нашли сертификат, напишите в комментарии 🩷

custom 529885907472771643535💅7❤‍🔥6👀2🆒1

12 Aug 2026, 13:25 UTC624 views20 reactions3 Starsread 13 August 2026

Пишите в комменты, если забираете призы Мы вас видим 😡

👍10❤‍🔥5custom 52244241518669411995

12 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC625 views29 reactions3 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🩷 💗💗💗💗💗💗💗 Бокс в CORSX около места, где можно съесть по чебуреку и зеленому яйцу 10 💖, и двигаемся дальше Если вы нашли сертификат, напишите в комментарии 🩷

custom 5298859074727716435207❤‍🔥2

12 Aug 2026, 13:07 UTC656 views27 reactions3 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🩷 💗💗💗💗💗💗💗 2 билета в КАРО/АРТ около места, которое недавно похоронили 10 💖, и двигаемся дальше Если вы нашли сертификат, напишите в комментарии 🩷

custom 5298859074727716435194💅4

12 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC701 views37 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Photo

🩷 💗💗💗💗💗💗💗 Дрип-бокс от YCP где-то рядом в переулках 20 💖, и открываем следующий слот Если вы нашли сертификат, напишите в комментарии 🩷

custom 529885907472771643527❤‍🔥5💅5

12 Aug 2026, 12:22 UTC786 views46 reactions3 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🩷 💗💗💗💗💗💗💗 Сертификат на 3000₽ в Escapist и дворики Китай-города 30 💖, и двигаемся дальше Если вы нашли сертификат, напишите в комментарии 🩷

custom 529885907472771643538❤‍🔥4💅4

12 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC812 views51 reactions3 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

20 💖, и мы дропаем первую локацию

custom 529885907472771643537custom 52494114770261362947❤‍🔥61

Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @fomoteka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 08:06 UTCAnonymous Quiz342 voters

Какой факт о «Кухне» — ложный?

  1. «Кухня» — самый дорогой комедийный сериал в России28%
  2. На протяжении франшизы работали более 20 сценаристов15%
  3. Каждый день на площадку привоз ли около 100 кг продуктов25%
  4. В съемках участвовали крабы, которых красили в зеленый цвет33%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 65,514 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

«Карьера» The Blueprint
@theblueprintcareer · 137,496
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 August 2026
Афиша
@afisha · 141,112
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
Москва сейчас
@mosnow · 478,925
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 August 2026
Flats for friends
@flats_for_friend · 180,605
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FOMOTEKA” (@fomoteka), 10,897 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fomoteka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.