Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Crypto Freemium

Channel

Crypto Freemium

@crypto_freemium

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,613subscribers

-277 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001164790686
TypeChannel
Username@crypto_freemium
DescriptionFree channels (use /free) & Elites Hub membership - @Eliteshubmembership_bot ----------- For queries contact : https://t.me/Eliteshubhelp
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/crypto_freemium

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

11,61311,89011,751.57 August 2026 — 11,890 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,890 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,889 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,878 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,875 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,867 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,858 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,843 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,835 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,811 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,806 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,800 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,793 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,785 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,795 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,809 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,806 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,805 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,800 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,801 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,805 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,808 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,806 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,809 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,797 subscribers5 September 2026 — 11,779 subscribers9 September 2026 — 11,781 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,764 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,752 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,745 subscribers16 September 2026 — 11,737 subscribers19 September 2026 — 11,732 subscribers26 September 2026 — 11,743 subscribers4 October 2026 — 11,790 subscribers8 October 2026 — 11,806 subscribers13 October 2026 — 11,787 subscribers14 October 2026 — 11,785 subscribers15 October 2026 — 11,773 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,770 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,763 subscribers20 October 2026 — 11,755 subscribers21 October 2026 — 11,742 subscribers22 October 2026 — 11,736 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,729 subscribers24 October 2026 — 11,717 subscribers26 October 2026 — 11,711 subscribers27 October 2026 — 11,703 subscribers28 October 2026 — 11,707 subscribers29 October 2026 — 11,697 subscribers30 October 2026 — 11,689 subscribers31 October 2026 — 11,677 subscribers1 November 2026 — 11,672 subscribers2 November 2026 — 11,662 subscribers3 November 2026 — 11,658 subscribers4 November 2026 — 11,651 subscribers5 November 2026 — 11,647 subscribers6 November 2026 — 11,631 subscribers7 November 2026 — 11,623 subscribers8 November 2026 — 11,614 subscribers10 November 2026 — 11,613 subscribers7 August 202610 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 95 days, net -277. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,571–11,932 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 01:3911,613-1
8 Nov 2026, 15:1911,614-9
7 Nov 2026, 08:0011,623-8
6 Nov 2026, 09:5611,631-16
5 Nov 2026, 07:1011,647-4
4 Nov 2026, 08:2011,651-7
3 Nov 2026, 09:5411,658-4
2 Nov 2026, 13:0811,662-10
1 Nov 2026, 10:4811,672-5
31 Oct 2026, 10:5411,677-12
30 Oct 2026, 09:2811,689-8
29 Oct 2026, 09:4911,697-10
28 Oct 2026, 10:3611,707+4
27 Oct 2026, 09:0611,703-8
26 Oct 2026, 08:0811,711-6
24 Oct 2026, 09:1911,717-12
23 Oct 2026, 11:4711,729-7
22 Oct 2026, 15:0811,736-6
21 Oct 2026, 11:1011,742-13
20 Oct 2026, 11:5911,755first reading

Engagement

224 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.06%
avg views ÷ 11,613 subscribers
Avg views / post
588
83 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.699%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
84
of 224 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 41 of 83 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held224 (28 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total48,802
Reactions total177
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 20:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,600
Videos
≈38
Links
≈2,630

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

534 reactions across 116 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤36568.4%
🔥7714.4%
👍356.55%
💯132.43%
👏122.25%
🥰122.25%
😎81.50%
👌40.749%
🦄40.749%
🎉30.562%
💘10.187%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 120 of the 224 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 534 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 224 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 84 posts held from the last 30 days (8.33%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 08:19 UTC442 views2 reactionsread 10 November 2026

🚩 PAID SIGNAL CHANNELS — THE MARKETING TRAP ⚠️ An awareness post about manipulative practices in the paid signals industry. We're using one channel as an example, but these patterns are far from isolated. The pressure to sell memberships often encourages selective profit reporting, excessive signals and exaggerated claims of expertise. A few impressive months in a favourable market can hide years of failures and …

❤2

10 Nov 2026, 05:56 UTC456 viewsread 10 November 2026

ETF Flows: 09 Nov 2026 Daily 🔴 Bitcoin ETFs: $201.0M net outflows 🔴 Ethereum ETFs: $184.6M net outflows 🔴 Solana ETFs: $7.7M net outflows 🔴 Hyperliquid ETFs: $2.7M net outflows Weekly (Nov 9 - Nov 9) 🔴 Bitcoin ETFs: $201.0M net outflows 🔴 Ethereum ETFs: $184.6M net outflows 🔴 Solana ETFs: $7.7M net outflows 🔴 Hyperliquid ETFs: $2.7M net outflows Monthly (Nov 2 - Nov 9) 🔴 Bitcoin ETFs: $1,482.7M net outflows 🔴 Ethe…

10 Nov 2026, 05:47 UTC420 viewsread 10 November 2026

⚪ #ETHFI/USDT · 🟢 LONG · Cancelled — TP1 hit before entry TP1 0.6400 traded before any entry filled. No position · tracking stopped · not counted as a win ⏱ 15h 18m since signal 10 Nov 05:44:54 UTC Don't worry about signals that are getting missed, we are logging and tracking everything to improve performance. By the till we see real moves our system will be adequately trained 🙌🏼 All these are part of active ML tra…

10 Nov 2026, 05:47 UTC367 viewsread 10 November 2026

#ETHFIUSDT LONG 💠 Entry 1: $0.6030 (50%) 💠 Entry 2: $0.5650 (50%) 🎯 TP1: $0.6400 🎯 TP2: $0.6800 🎯 TP3: $0.7200 ⛔ SL: 4H CLOSE BELOW $0.5480

10 Nov 2026, 05:14 UTC387 views1 reactionsread 10 November 2026

ANTHROPIC PLANS TO START TRADING THURSDAY, FRIDAY NEXT WEEK:WSJ

❤1

10 Nov 2026, 05:04 UTC395 viewsread 10 November 2026

🎯 #NIGHT/USDT · 🟢 LONG · Take-profit 1 ✅ Price 0.04180 · Profit +6.63% ⏱ 2d 14h 51m since signal · 1d 7h 12m since entry 10 Nov 05:03:39 UTC

10 Nov 2026, 03:45 UTC458 viewsread 10 November 2026

🇺🇸 US CPI WATCH - NOVEMBER 10 Yesterday's NY Fed survey showed inflation expectations remaining unchanged: • 1-Year: 3.9% • 3-Year: 3.3% • 5-Year: 3.0% Gasoline price expectations eased, while rent expectations increased, suggesting inflation pressures remain mixed. Today's CPI Expectations: • Headline: +0.3% (Previous: +0.6%) • Core: +0.2% (Previous: +0.3%) • Release: 13:30 UTC Our Take: The data slightly favo…

9 Nov 2026, 12:42 UTC571 viewsread 10 November 2026

A meaningful increase would add another inflation warning ahead of CPI. 18:00 UTC US 3-Year Treasury Auction Strong demand: → helps yields remain contained. Weak demand: → risks another yield spike. Tomorrow: 13:30 UTC 🔥 CPI 18:00 UTC US 10-Year Treasury Auction So the next 30 hours are unusually important for the BTC macro setup. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🎯 48H PLAYBOOK ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ RECOVERY PATH: 73.5-73.8…

Showing the 12 most recent of 224 posts we hold for @crypto_freemium. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@crypto_freemium edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
20 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @crypto_freemium as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
29 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
29 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
14 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Rose Challenge - 0.1BTC to 100BTC🌹
@CryptoRoseChannell · 92,352
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
Crypto Signals
@CryptoShitcoinsignals · 35,481
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 1 September 2026
Crypto Bullet OFFICIAL
@cryptobulletofficialTG · 21,721
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 5 September 2026
CRYPTO AMAN VIP (PREMIUM)
@cryptoamanclubpremium · 24,971
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 13 September 2026
Coach
@coach · 22,744
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 September 2026
Crypto Signals
@cryptosignals · 19,040
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 2 October 2026
Binance signals
@binance_futures · 24,634
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 13 September 2026
Fat Pig Signals
@fatpigsignals · 41,137
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 29 August 2026
Doctor Profit Dr Profit
@drprofitsignal · 48,616
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 25 August 2026
Wallstreet Queen Official®
@wallstreetqueenofficial · 147,837
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Coin Signals
@Coin_Signals · 71,608
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
Forex Tradings
@Forex_Tradings · 19,339
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 September 2026
King of Futures
@crypto_futures_king · 36,961
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
Dr.Profit 🚀
@Therealdrprofit · 53,738
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 August 2026
GreenCrypto 🌕
@getgreencrypto · 15,337
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 September 2026
Binance Killers Vip
@binancekillers_freesignal · 25,035
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 9 September 2026
CRYPTO RK™️
@CryptoRKsignals · 95,446
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 September 2026
Crypto Vikings (Premium signals)
@VikingsAnalyst · 36,727
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 31 August 2026
Doctor Profit VIP 🇨🇭
@DoctorProfit_Crypto · 21,546
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 22 September 2026
CryptoBullet
@cryptobullet · 72,424
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026
il Capo of Crypto TA OFFICIAL
@CryptoCapoTG_Official · 91,603
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 5 October 2026
Crypto Whale Signals
@CryptoWhaleSignaIs · 33,090
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 16 September 2026
Dr. Profit Vip 🚀
@drprofitcryptosignal · 20,428
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 20 September 2026
Binance Pumps®
@BinancePumpSignaIs · 20,590
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 25 September 2026

This channel appears in 49 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto Freemium” (@crypto_freemium), 11,613 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_freemium.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.