17 measurements spanning 7 days, net -62. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,652–23,732 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 04:16
23,661
-5
12 Aug 2026, 21:40
23,666
-7
12 Aug 2026, 02:22
23,673
+1
11 Aug 2026, 21:43
23,672
-11
11 Aug 2026, 04:35
23,683
-6
10 Aug 2026, 21:33
23,689
-20
10 Aug 2026, 02:11
23,709
-1
10 Aug 2026, 00:30
23,710
+10
9 Aug 2026, 02:51
23,700
+2
9 Aug 2026, 00:57
23,698
-6
8 Aug 2026, 00:13
23,704
no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:34
23,704
-12
7 Aug 2026, 00:42
23,716
no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:03
23,716
-7
6 Aug 2026, 02:03
23,723
+2
6 Aug 2026, 01:52
23,721
-2
6 Aug 2026, 01:07
23,723
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.97%
avg views ÷ 23,661 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,360
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
25 (19 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
59,004
Reactions total
1,400
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 22:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,151 reactions across 23 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
447
38.8%
🔥
360
31.3%
👍
326
28.3%
🤪
7
0.608%
🏆
4
0.348%
🤔
3
0.261%
❤🔥
2
0.174%
🕊
1
0.087%
🤝
1
0.087%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,400reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 25 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @coach. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
#BTC is still inside the same corrective Elliott Wave structure, and the bearish count is not invalidated yet.
BTC is currently around $63,384. Price is moving sideways after the previous drop, but this still looks more like a corrective pause than a confirmed reversal.
The way I’m reading it:
Wave A already gave the first strong drop.
Wave B gave the recovery bounce.
Now Wave C still has room to continue lower.
Insi…
🇺🇸 U.S. CPI DATA DUE TODAY, WHAT SHOULD MARKETS EXPECT?
Markets are pricing in 3.4% CPI.
A reading above 3.4% could weigh on Bitcoin and other risk assets, while a softer-than-expected print could revive buying momentum and support a broader market rebound.
Powered by 🥳 @Coach ✅
#PUMP
Price continues to maintain a strong recovery structure, trading inside an ascending channel with consistent higher highs and higher lows. The recent move has pushed price toward the upper boundary of the channel, where a breakout attempt could determine the next direction.
A confirmed breakout above the current resistance area could open the path toward further upside, while rejection from the channel top ma…
#BTC Update
Since the previous analysis, BTC followed the expected rejection scenario instead of reclaiming higher resistance. The rally into the $66K to $69K region was rejected, and price has now rolled over, keeping the larger bearish Elliott Wave count intact.
The current structure still suggests Wave C is in progress, with recent price action forming a lower high before continuation to the downside. As long as …
🚨 Premium Signal Alert!
Once we drop a premium signal, it’ll only be up for a short time we’ll delete it shortly after posting.
It’s strictly first come, first served. So turn on your notifications and stay sharp!
@Coach | Turn on your notifications
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @coach. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 8,779 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 24 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Whales Crypto Guide @Whalesguide · 202,290 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
The Bull @thebull_crypto · 178,895 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Rose Paid Crypto Free ™🔒 @PAIDROSE · 146,526 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Coach” (@coach), 23,661 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coach.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
