Channel
@ax1vc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
19,604subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001192952641 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ax1vc |
| Description | EMEA region [🇪🇺 🇺🇦 🇬🇪]. No ads. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ax1vc |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:38 | 19,604 | +4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 19,600 | -12 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:14 | 19,612 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:51 | 19,615 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:38 | 19,619 | +13 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 19,606 | -8 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:40 | 19,614 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:30 | 19,616 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:26 | 19,616 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (16 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 89,030 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 23:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
В Q3 стали очевидны 2 вещи: 1) Consumer стартапы, прогрызающие обновленный UX под нормисов -> это будущее. См Fomo, который вывел social trading выше Pumpfun и теперь печатает $500K в день. То есть +- обходит HYPE и TRUST (top1 wallet by revenue). 2) Если все сложится под TGE на B20 standard - BASE токен имеет все шансы вытащить TVL (который уже сейчас пробивает Solana / BSC / TRON) на уровень Ethereum. Нарисовав …
Founder o1 exchange, близкий ко всему top-менеджменту сети, фактически подтверждает TGE Base токена и, скорее всего крупнейший, за всю onchain историю, airdrop + green candle show. Что абсолютно очевидно после выкатывания сразу 3 крупных апгрейдов в короткий срок: Azul / Beryl / Cobalt. Base TGE рисует одновременно: A) Приток ликвидности B) Upside стартапов сети C) Airdrop потенциал A говорит о том, что нужно зай…
Если вы все еще держите TWT в надежде на то, что $240M revenue случайно коснутся токеномики или серого ММ -> то есть CZ запустит wallet meta с ажиотажем по рынку Двойной смысл имеет держать часть в нем и часть в RNBW. -88% discount от крайнего раунда. Base, revenue, единственный живой ончейн необанк с токеном + equity нарратив. При наличии любой wallet meta части - полетит от малейшего удара по стакану. Дополнит…
В тот момент, когда эти цифры хотя бы косвенно будут касаться TWT (через ММ или LP buyback), а не азиатского оффшора = токен будет стоить 50% капитализации HYPE. 😎
-70% discount: https://launch.o1.exchange/token/0xb200000000000000000000d9dac57e31e1aceb01?chain=8453 Легкие х10 или -99% сверху. Мэм risk-reward. На платформе одновременно убрали все комиссии, в течение 24 часов включат API и скорее всего еще несколько бустов объемов. 😎
Ключевой показатель индустрии: всего 44 VC сделки за июль. • 41 rounds • 2 M&A • 1 debt financing Фактически ATL и уровень 2019 года. При этом речь про фонды и тех, кого допускают до кормушки раньше ритейла. Для ритейла венчурное поле риска теперь воистину потрясающее: 1) Нужен ли команде токен. 2) Как надолго? ATH? TOP100 CMC? 3) Какие саб договоренности имеют фонды по equity. 4) Способна ли команда отыграть на…
[update] • Rewards по OWB - live. Крайний шанс забрать discount токены перед запуском agentic части -> далее выставляйте мысленный fix выше $100M. • o1 залистили на upbit, еще пара инсайтов есть, но не будем. Фактически для Jerry - это лишний показатель. Вероятность 80%, что решатся залистить на паре азиатских перпсов. В остальном, готовьтесь к base season вокруг TGE. Паника = улучшение risk - reward. 😎
OWB —> готовность 24 hr. Перечитываем здесь и далее, ставим лимиты, собираем discount. 😎
[update] Финально: • founder o1 снова показательно докупил мусорку • сделал такой же показательный репост о том, что это единственный creator coin, который имеет power В рукаве примерно 10 джокеров и таких же шансов на то, что он вытащит Jerry выше $10M для того, чтобы собрать 99% meme-меты вокруг launchpad. Отдельно стоит заметить, что o1 сам по себе - главный DEX startup на Base по свойствам шильдиков / качеству…
Третий момент, также не менее важный. B20 launchpad показал социальный эффект. В рамках него произошел выход Brian. Founder обозначил launchpad как ключевой фокус стартапа. При этом, еще раз, ребята умеют рисовать на примере o1 token, и не существует лучшего способа привлечь гэмблу, чем показательные кейсы и свечи. Сейчас его мусорка - главный после Brian shitcoin платформы по социальному эффекту, объему торгов и …
Второй момент и не менее важный. FDV самого токена o1 Exchange - $600M. Продать OTC $2-3M токенов для того, чтобы нарисовать свой подконтрольный флагманский кейс роста мэмкоина и привлечь объемы -> revenue -> закрыть Round A = профит. Поэтому RISK - reward конкретно этой мусорки, с акцентом на первом слове, значительно лучше мэмных. 😎
[update] по b20 launchpad, лудоманам и обладателям наиболее быстрых рук. Мусорная кошка отработала, и благополучно умерла, х44 в пике. Единственный оставшийся runner - это токен менеджмента биржи: https://launch.o1.exchange/token/0xb200000000000000000000d9dac57e31e1aceb01?chain=8453 • founder публично привязал его к себе = репутация ланчпада • еще раз провозгласил основной целью текущего сезона "find a few candid…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ax1vc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@ax1vc edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 331,858 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AX1” (@ax1vc), 19,604 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ax1vc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.