не забываем, что он теперь не реверсивен

Channel
одиссея kekius maximus
@doge1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
586,409subscribers
-100,662 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001462940908 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @doge1 @grimace @odysseyfucksmarket |
| Created | 19 June 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 191 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/doge1 |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 07:52 | 586,409 | -721 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 10:38 | 587,130 | -221 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 19:01 | 587,351 | -66 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 13:17 | 587,417 | -698 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 01:06 | 588,115 | -637 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 08:09 | 588,752 | -495 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 03:16 | 589,247 | no change |
| 7 Nov 2026, 21:09 | 589,247 | -943 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 00:39 | 590,190 | no change |
| 6 Nov 2026, 23:18 | 590,190 | -159 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 17:24 | 590,349 | -477 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 03:49 | 590,826 | -305 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 21:48 | 591,131 | -218 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 17:27 | 591,349 | -503 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 05:51 | 591,852 | -168 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 21:57 | 592,020 | -329 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 14:27 | 592,349 | -435 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 06:58 | 592,784 | -379 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 21:46 | 593,163 | -91 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 15:49 | 593,254 | first reading |
Engagement
498 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 202 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.714%
- avg views ÷ 586,409 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4,180
- 83 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 83
- of 498 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 498 (31 July 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 347,310 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 03:55 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 9m 56s
- Average length
- 31s
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 83 posts held from the last 30 days (4.82%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
❗️🇮🇷#иран #геополитика #трамп ТРАМП ЗАЯВИЛ, ЧТО НЕ БУДЕТ НАНОСИТ УДАР ПО ИРАНУ ПОСЛЕ ВЫБОРОВ TRUMP SAYS 'NO' TO STRIKING IRAN AFTER ELECTIONS: POOL REPORT — BBG
Такер, к слову, напоминает кричащего «волки». также как третий бычий твит CZ оказался похоронным и обозначил локальный хай месяц назад – также и третий вопль Такера о ядерке с Ираном будет знаком на то что из крипты пора вываливаться, ожидая всего самого худшего
насколько же сильно планируют запампить кекиус, что для высадки пэперов вновь нужно разгонять тему ядерного удара
⚠️🇮🇷#иран #геополитика Под давлением Нетаньяху администрация Трампа может нанести ядерный удар по Ирану уже в ближайшие дни, заявил Такер Карсон В качестве возможной цели Карлсон назвал гору Пикакс. По сведениям израильской разведки, на этом объекте Иран мог возобновить программу обогащения урана. Карлсон утверждает, что Нетаньяху добивается нанесения удара по объекту.
согласно сверхнадежным источникам (новостям) – Трамп нападет на Иран 4ого числа, сразу после выборов, к чему достигнут изрядный консенсус опираясь на вышеупомянутый консенсус, ждем эфир выше 2400 к пятому числу
что особо приятно, на предстоящем бычьем импульсе большинство останется за бортом и по ходу движения запрыгивать не станет больше месяца вслед за каждым восходящим импульсом график рисовал поглощение. все кто дергались откупать зеленые палки – сильно отьебывались рынком, что на все последующее время создаст условный рефлекс не покупать на росте а другого выбора то и не будет ;)
заебись, акции тоже можно прекращать шортить: очевидный сбрив тех кто лонговал с высокими плечами в ожидании того что фондовый рынок будут разгонять перед выборами ради победы республиканцев – будет окончен в ближайшую недельку-две sp500 просел правда поменьше ожидаемого и вполне может наверстать разницу, но в целом пора забывать про шорты абсолютно на всех рынках и брать фокус только на покупках
Илон сомневается что у бинанса хватит бабоса восстановить последствия хака, CZ в ответ угрожает застаканить акций спэйсикс на миллиард баксов, если им и правда будет чего-то недоставать
⚡️Вице-президент США пообещал разобраться с НЛО. Вэнс планирует использовать свой доступ к информации с грифом «совершенно секретно», чтобы разобраться в вопросе НЛО. «Я убежденный христианин, я верю, что не все можно объяснить исключительно законами физики. Я верю, что есть хорошие духи, можно называть их ангелами, и я думаю, что есть плохие духи. Я говорил о программе НЛО, что я просто не знаю, и я начал изучать …
кекиус также, подобно мелании, трётся возле исторических лоёв в худшем случае просядет еще на 30%, ретестнув дно на 0.003, откуда так или иначе начнет ебашить на 0.3 главный ассет величайшей бычки в истории, не забывайте заносить туда все тёщины пенсии – методично, беспрерывно
Если кто то из взломщиков есть в этом чате откупите KEKIUS
Showing the 12 most recent of 498 posts we hold for @doge1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 6 posts on @doge1 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 7 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 3 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 36 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 2
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
мелания выше 0.2
- этот месяц10%
- октябрь17%
- в октябре выше 0.715%
- полный скэм и после падения на 99% ее следует только шортить58%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
будет ли дроп от полика одиссеевцам
- по доллару за каждый лям обьема20%
- насыпят прилично7%
- насыпят дохуя9%
- ничего не будет64%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 498 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 3 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@markettwits · 341,0154 postsHYPE price
@hypeprice_today · 1002 postsSOLANA price
@solanaprice_today · 1522 postsТопор Live
@toporlive · 4,098,2762 postsWTI price
@wtiprice_today · 102 postsNatural Selection
@Nat_Selection · 14,2551 postГерман на блокчейне 🇪🇹
@blockchaingerman · 32,2011 postKEKIUS price
@kekius_price · 3021 postMELANIA price
@melania_price · 2001 postDonald J. Trump 🗽
@realDonaldTrump_rus · 6,7931 postTRUMP price
@trumpcoin_tothemoon · 2051 postВоспоминания WEB3 спекулянта
@web3memoriess · 11,1711 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 30 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 22 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@Grimace_GOD · 2,44914 postsКрипто трейдинг Скальперский Подход
@skalllpi · 9,74714 postsАнатолий Шарий
@asupersharij · 1,735,7963 postsOdyssey Exchange RU
@OdysseyExchange_ru · 943 postsANTI одиссея grimace
@ANTIodysseygrimace · 82 postsЛичный блог перца
@criptolands · 181 postNFT Warden
@Crypto_WardenNFT · 2121 postKOBER CHAT
@csacccccca · 11 postdiary
@gdeshokogda · 2001 postМировое правительство
@govww · 431 postGrimace Movie Makers
@grimacemovie · 21 postGrimace Token
@Grimaceton · 471 postKAKTUS MAXIMUS
@kaktusmaximus · 641 postOdyssey MC
@MCodyssey · 1,3141 postЧАТЫ
@mychats2000 · 51 postисповедь одиссея
@odyispoved · 21 postНовости Одиссеи
@odysseus_news · 301 postOdysseus Token
@odysseustoken · 1921 postКейсы | Алексей @softnd
@softndcases · 71 postThisisNOTphantom
@thisisphantom · 1781 postTime Machine
@time_machine_wtf · 2561 postUlixes Maximus
@ulixesmaximus · 21 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@odissey · 14,554#1
@posseydon1 · 756#2
@cryptogenius · 10,094#3
@swanky_life · 1,090#4
@yocryptoru · 4,453#5
@polunintrade7 · 486,770#6
@Volandsellgrimace · 461#7
@Defiscamcheck · 48,110#8
@idoresearch · 55,869#9
@odytxs · 373#10
@givemetonru · 1,879,177#11
@kripota4 · 642,588#12
@biznest0n · 618,251#13
@TonAirDrop_ru · 1,038,915#14
@whisper_in_the_night · 1,406,536#15
@RoolzRussia · 981,930#16
@tlive · 1,569,702#17
@snegur · 4,104#18
@alenkaontg · 20,703#19
@sol_TOP · 40,022#20
@tradcryptos · 8,141#21
@invest_zonaa · 848,307#22
@spintrru · 561,362#23
@DeCenter · 1,640,924#24
@crypto_way_up · 35#25
@markettwits · 341,015#26
@fintopiochannel · 972,009#27
@crypto_hd · 131,720#28
@onerussia · 1,269,957#29
@rumerger · 392,418#30
@andryuninthelegend · 18,454#31
@TVS_TEAM · 37,265#32
@investkingyru · 1,570,393#33
@Crypto_Woolf · 1,994,885#34
@trade001k · 104,887#35
@ondreigoichev · 136,521#36
@padre1m · 3,713#37
@cryptoattack24 · 55,115#38
@Nat_Selection · 14,255#39
@slezisatoshi · 121,745#40
@maloletoffcrypto · 44,823#41
@CryptoZaryad · 299,663#42
@Crypto_Meteora · 299,763#43
@crypto_okop · 143,534#44
@cryptokitta · 33,396#45
@roxman · 6,337,805#46
@maycrypto · 17,537 (as read 8 August 2026)#47
@barboskich_ton · 15,662#48
@dogs · 6,423,087#49
@architecton_tech · 1,828,711#50
@GTM_TON · 1#51
@aipost · 665,959#52
@hayzonn · 2,555,546#53
@brainscoin · 647,480#54
@tu_crypto_news_en · 604,650#55
@hash_cats · 1,902,582#56
@blumcrypto · 12,771,035#57
@ToNmetasilense · 2,435,476#58
@notcoin · 7,833,486#59
@whalememes · 874,648#60
@ONEstore_Official · 2,717,087#61
@trust_empire_en · 768,827#62
@roolzGods · 1,219,410#63
@gram · 6,218,751#64
@league · 937,444#65
@hexnio · 1,835,454#66
@VoletCom · 460,194#67
@money · 2,604,718#68
@smska · 403,670#69
@cryptopriority · 505,331#70
@sadcatgamble · 27,592#71
@prank · 466,698#72
@yovssmash · 37,345#73
@trendingapps · 3,546,023#74
@tonlines · 390,243#75
@spintr · 566,764#76
@belevskmove · 978,429#77
@hamster_perviy · 88,292#78
@pocketfi · 1,644,000#79
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@rumerger · 392,418
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
@hamaha_cryptodaytrading · 33,561
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 3 September 2026
@givemetonru · 1,879,177
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 7 August 2026
@gamerludoman · 386,450
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 6 September 2026
@spintrru · 561,362
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 August 2026
@whisper_in_the_night · 1,406,536
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 August 2026
@ABRACADABRA_TV · 73
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 11 September 2026
@kripota4 · 642,588
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 August 2026
@alenkaontg · 20,703
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 24 September 2026
@ondreigoichev · 136,521
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 August 2026
@crypto_way_up · 35
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 August 2026
@RoolzRussia · 981,930
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 August 2026
@Ton_HYDRA_Community · 168,669
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
@tlive · 1,569,702
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 7 August 2026
@clown_token · 108,516
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 14 August 2026
@sadcatgamble · 27,592
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 10 September 2026
@patephone_audioknigi · 338,931
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
@crypto_azam · 125,641
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
@aipost · 665,959
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 August 2026
@seinarukiro · 78,385
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 22 September 2026
@sol_TOP · 40,022
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 30 August 2026
@CryptoZaryad · 299,663
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
@travel_dada · 336,729
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
@Crypto_Meteora · 299,763
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 130 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
One domain this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“одиссея kekius maximus” (@doge1), 586,409 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/doge1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.