эфир готовится 1900 пробить: следующая остановочка на 2200

Channel
одиссея kekius maximus
@doge1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
679,326subscribers
-7,745 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001462940908 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @doge1 @grimace @odysseyfucksmarket |
| Created | 19 June 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 23 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/doge1 |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:18 | 679,326 | -196 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:33 | 679,522 | -25 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:36 | 679,547 | -1,065 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 680,612 | -69 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:22 | 680,681 | -114 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:52 | 680,795 | -816 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:21 | 681,611 | -133 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 681,744 | -288 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:51 | 682,032 | -759 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 682,791 | -63 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:51 | 682,854 | -226 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:22 | 683,080 | -865 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 683,945 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:22 | 683,945 | -194 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 684,139 | -694 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:53 | 684,833 | -309 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 685,142 | -361 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:00 | 685,503 | -217 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 685,720 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:04 | 685,720 | first reading |
Engagement
36 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.743%
- avg views ÷ 679,326 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5,050
- 36 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 36
- of 36 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 36 (31 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 181,730 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
https://youtube.com/shorts/zeyNW52tCfg?si=1mo_WptH-vg1B2y7
гоу ближе к воскресенью и повторять раз в неделю. запаситесь вопросиками
раньше я бы воскликнул «типичное снг!» и долго критиковал бы мораль сейчас только один вопрос: как туда устроиться
Гораздо интереснее, что TON Strategy умудрились всандалить на операционку $20 млн. (КАААК?!) И это, судя по документу, всего за полгода. И я напомню, что они ничего не делают вообще, кроме того, что застейкали свои TON (что делается в несколько кликов). И в итоге у них чистый убыток $3 млн. Это я молчу про то, что стоимость их активов снизилась почти в 3 раза. То есть нереализованный убыток где-то $400 млн. Забавн…
голда готовится 4400 пробить: следующая остановочка на 5к
по битку никуда не двигаемся утомительно долго: если торговая идея с пампом до 72к до конца месяца не отыграет, то будем брать фокус на том, что в наших руках и где можем на что-то влиять kekius maximus, например холдить хорошо, но ежедневно что-то делать для того чтобы холд принес плоды – куда приятнее
мб постримить?
за что так..
захуячим импульс в ночь?)
до грандиозной бычки совсем недолго: потерпите несколько дней, ребят
когда шортисты наблюдают очередную новость о том как кто-то продал овердохуя бтк/эфира по цене ниже 65/1900
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @doge1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 47,786 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@Grimace_GOD · 2,86914 postsАнатолий Шарий
@asupersharij · 1,655,0133 postsOdyssey Exchange RU
@OdysseyExchange_ru · 973 postsКрипто трейдинг Скальперский Подход
@skalllpi · 9,8263 postsANTI одиссея grimace
@ANTIodysseygrimace · 92 postsБотоводы кидалы
@Blacklist_20_23 · 2701 postCosa Nostra
@Cosa_Nostra_Grimace · 291 postCrab
@crabiks · 1,2531 postЛичный блог перца
@criptolands · 181 postNFT Warden
@Crypto_WardenNFT · 2271 postsloppy.crypto 💎
@cryptosloppy · 1,2111 postdiary
@gdeshokogda · 2131 postМировое правительство
@govww · 441 postGrimace | Отзывы
@grimace_feedback · 811 postGrimace Token
@Grimaceton · 501 postegaш.runner🎅
@howtoegash · 171 postKAKTUS MAXIMUS
@kaktusmaximus · 661 postOdyssey MC
@MCodyssey · 1,4691 postНовости Одиссеи
@odysseus_news · 311 postOdysseus Token
@odysseustoken · 2041 postСМИ Россия не Москва
@smi_rf_moskva · 2,622,3181 postThisisNOTphantom
@thisisphantom · 1821 postTime Machine
@time_machine_wtf · 2691 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@odissey · 15,449#1
@posseydon1 · 778#2
@cryptogenius · 10,691#3
@swanky_life · 1,165#4
@yocryptoru · 4,486#5
@polunintrade7 · 549,651#6
@Volandsellgrimace · 497#7
@Defiscamcheck · 48,759#8
@idoresearch · 58,292#9
@odytxs · 404#10
@givemetonru · 2,268,559#11
@kripota4 · 748,311#12
@biznest0n · 715,869#13
@TonAirDrop_ru · 1,215,813#14
@whisper_in_the_night · 1,692,981#15
@RoolzRussia · 1,136,514#16
@tlive · 1,879,229#17
@snegur · 4,916#18
@alenkaontg · 21,927#19
@sol_TOP · 40,119#20
@tradcryptos · 8,250#21
@invest_zonaa · 968,206#22
@spintrru · 657,433#23
@DeCenter · 1,963,428#24
@crypto_way_up · 620,643#25
@markettwits · 334,480#26
@fintopiochannel · 1,154,121#27
@crypto_hd · 133,301#28
@onerussia · 1,510,909#29
@rumerger · 449,748#30
@andryuninthelegend · 18,680#31
@TVS_TEAM · 38,543#32
@investkingyru · 1,858,517#33
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,351,236#34
@trade001k · 108,578#35
@ondreigoichev · 162,334#36
@padre1m · 3,816#37
@cryptoattack24 · 56,857#38
@Nat_Selection · 14,254#39
@slezisatoshi · 125,322#40
@maloletoffcrypto · 46,391#41
@CryptoZaryad · 330,242#42
@Crypto_Meteora · 334,318#43
@crypto_okop · 148,771#44
@cryptokitta · 35,021#45
@roxman · 7,884,445#46
@maycrypto · 17,514#47
@barboskich_ton · 14,957#48
@dogs · 7,510,360#49
@architecton_tech · 2,207,960#50
@GTM_TON · 902,520#51
@aipost · 740,782#52
@hayzonn · 3,054,973#53
@brainscoin · 747,624#54
@tu_crypto_news_en · 708,570#55
@hash_cats · 2,244,108#56
@blumcrypto · 15,640,039#57
@ToNmetasilense · 2,992,163#58
@notcoin · 9,200,677#59
@whalememes · 992,441#60
@ONE_Quest_sub · 3,267,195#61
@trust_empire_en · 884,665#62
@roolzGods · 1,383,419#63
@gram · 7,033,222#64
@league · 1,053,992#65
@hexnio · 2,116,237#66
@VoletCom · 541,877#67
@money · 3,274,381#68
@smska · 477,492#69
@cryptopriority · 593,757#70
@sadcatgamble · 26,850#71
@prank · 543,756#72
@yovssmash · 26,630#73
@trendingapps · 4,012,931#74
@tonlines · 460,444#75
@spintr · 665,142#76
@belevskmove · 1,144,562#77
@hamster_perviy · 96,048#78
@pocketfi · 1,904,906#79
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@rumerger · 449,748
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
@givemetonru · 2,268,559
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 7 August 2026
@spintrru · 657,433
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 August 2026
@whisper_in_the_night · 1,692,981
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 August 2026
@kripota4 · 748,311
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 August 2026
@ondreigoichev · 162,334
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 August 2026
@crypto_way_up · 620,643
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 August 2026
@RoolzRussia · 1,136,514
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 August 2026
@Ton_HYDRA_Community · 185,748
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
@tlive · 1,879,229
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 7 August 2026
@patephone_audioknigi · 403,461
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
@aipost · 740,782
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 August 2026
@CryptoZaryad · 330,242
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
@travel_dada · 399,923
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
@Crypto_Meteora · 334,318
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
@sportsdirect_eng · 411,402
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
@DeCenter · 1,963,428
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 7 August 2026
@TonAirDrop_ru · 1,215,813
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 August 2026
@whalememes · 992,441
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
@Kitonomika · 483,044
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 August 2026
@rouziicrypto · 501,108
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 August 2026
@crypto_okop · 148,771
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 August 2026
@prank · 543,756
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 August 2026
@nicegramapp · 1,673,013
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 57 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
One domainthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“одиссея kekius maximus” (@doge1), 679,326 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/doge1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.