Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Крипто Интеллигенция

@makecryptogreat

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

14,760subscribers

-36 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001605303230
TypeChannel
Username@makecryptogreat
Created19 December 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/makecryptogreat

Growth

14,76014,79614,7786 August 2026 — 14,796 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,796 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,795 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,783 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,777 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,776 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,775 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,768 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,764 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,760 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 7 days, net -36. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,755–14,801 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 00:2914,760-4
12 Aug 2026, 02:1214,764-4
10 Aug 2026, 23:2614,768-7
10 Aug 2026, 02:4114,775-1
9 Aug 2026, 02:2114,776-1
8 Aug 2026, 05:3814,777-6
7 Aug 2026, 08:0114,783-12
6 Aug 2026, 07:4014,795-1
6 Aug 2026, 02:2114,796no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:4814,796first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 10 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
78.4%
avg views ÷ 14,760 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,600
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.186%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026
Posts held16 (10 April 202622 July 2026)
Views total23,140
Reactions total43
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

767 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥30039.1%
20426.6%
🗿607.82%
🐳567.30%
custom 5400362079783770689455.87%
🌭364.69%
custom 5449683594425410231314.04%
🌚192.48%
🥰162.09%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 767reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 16 we hold a reading for · 31%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @makecryptogreat. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 April 2026 to 22 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Jul 2026, 08:33 UTC≈19,700 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Секрет SwissToney - трейдера №1 на Polymarket (+21M PNL) Он использует SportsRadar. SportsRadar - компания, которая формирует котировки для большинства букмекеров. Думаете, у каждого букмекера сидит команда аналитиков и вручную считает шансы на каждое событие? Нет, сейчас это отдают на аутсорс SportsRadar. Букмекер получает от SportsRadar живой поток коэффициентов через API, накидывает свою маржу сверху и рассчиты

🔥22🌚53

15 Jul 2026, 15:09 UTC≈3,440 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Defiscamcheck

Ostium взломали на $23М https://t.me/mlmonchain/1372

🥰8🌚5

21 Jun 2026, 05:46 UTC≈43,500 views111 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Как сэндвич-бота Jared развели на ~$14M Если ты в этом пространстве достаточно давно, тебя наверняка хоть раз зажимал в тиски jaredfromsubway. Без сомнений, ты о нём слышал. Сегодня его обыграли на его же поле - примерно на $14M. Jared - это сэндвич-бот (бот, который "зажимает" чужую сделку своими сделками с двух сторон, зарабатывая на сдвиге цены), и лучший в своём деле. Большинство таких ботов настроены следит

🔥8714🌭10

20 Jun 2026, 06:48 UTC≈6,070 views37 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ЗОЛОТАЯ КЛЕТКА Нашел инетерсный разбор про регулирование крипты Три процесса сошлись разом: - юридическая кодификация крипты в США (GENIUS Act + CLARITY Act) - встроенная в код возможность заморозки любого стейблкоина - переход бирж на круглосуточную торговлю - и механика «списания бумеров» в тонкой ликвидности выходного дня - стейблкоин-долларизация - USDT/USDC как новый покупатель госдолга США на сотни B Глав

🔥277🐳3

8 Jun 2026, 07:21 UTC≈22,500 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Старикам тут самое место: пенсионеры сделали иксы, которые не снились венчуру В 2019 году пенсионный фонд учителей Онтарио (OTPP) занёс примерно $300M в SpaceX. Это была вообще первая сделка их свежего венчурного подразделения. Тогда SpaceX оценивали в $33-36B, Starlink только начинал выводить спутники на орбиту, а про ИИ-бум никто ещё всерьёз не говорил. Прошло семь лет. SpaceX выходит на биржу 12 июня под тикером

19🔥10🌭2

2 Jun 2026, 09:21 UTC≈8,210 views59 reactions6 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Как на Ploymarket кидают людей на $500K Появился чувак (ник willo2), который пишет, что его кинули на $500K через Polymarket. Был контракт с вопросом: "Продаст ли MicroStrategy хоть сколько-то биткоина до 31 мая 2026?". На него натащили нешуточный объём: весь ивент - порядка 79-85M, по майскому контракту в открытых позициях висело около 54M, в споре сейчас 14-15M. И тут Сэйлор впервые с декабря 2022 года реально п

🐳3014🔥8🌚4🗿2🌭1

1 Jun 2026, 09:03 UTC≈6,290 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Бесконечный денежный чит имени Трампа На Polymarket есть рынок с гениальной простотой: "Оскорбит ли Трамп кого-нибудь публично [число]?" - и так на каждый день отдельным контрактом. Спойлер: каждый божий день закрывается на "Да". Апрель - все дни "Да". Май - все 30 дней подряд "Да". Тридцать дней непрерывных оскорблений, рынок даже не успевает засомневаться. И вот тут начинается магия. "Да" торговалось по 91-93 ц

🔥2610🐳3

28 May 2026, 11:38 UTC≈6,760 views56 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Альфа-Енот против ФБР: счёт не в пользу енота > будь Микеле Спаньоло > 36 лет, итальянец, живёшь в Швейцарии > 12 лет работаешь инженером по информационной безопасности в Google > то есть буквально тот тип человека, который должен ловить таких, как ты > у тебя есть доступ к внутреннему инструменту Google, который показывает, кого реально гуглят чаще всего > ещё до публичного отчёта Year in Search видишь: в топе D4vd

🔥33custom 540036207978377068911🐳54🌚3

11 May 2026, 12:51 UTC≈22,400 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Память выходит из тени GPU "Память - циклическая штука, все это знают, а недавний рост акций производителей памяти - очевидный пузырь." Это удобный, рефлекторный взгляд. Но те, кто его придерживается, упускают элементарный масштаб того, что ИИ делает со спросом на память. Первый намёк появился в январе этого года - стало известно, что новая платформа NVDA Rubin потребует 16 TB NAND на каждый GPU, или 1152 TB на ст

18🔥13

30 Apr 2026, 16:27 UTC≈30,000 views41 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Самый худший апрель Апрель стал самым «взламываемым» месяцом за все существование дефи. ~$635M потеряно, 28 взломов за 30 дней: 1) apr 1 - drift - $285m 2) apr 3 - silo v2 - $392k 3) apr 4 - tmm - $1.67m 4) apr 5 - denaria finance - $165k 5) apr 9 - aethir - $423k 6) apr 12 - hyperbridge - $2.5m 7) apr 12 - subquery - $60k 8) apr 13 - dango - $410k 9) apr 13 - mona - $61k 10) apr 14 - zerion - $100k 11) apr 16 - r

custom 540036207978377068921🌭9custom 54496835944254102316🔥3🌚2

30 Apr 2026, 10:30 UTC≈22,100 views45 reactionsread 12 August 2026

По поводу "пузыря" в техах Все ждут повторения доткомов. Мол, сейчас всё рухнет как в 2000-м. Давайте на цифры посмотрим. P/E у большой четвёрки сегодня: (P/E - отношение цены акции к прибыли на акцию. Грубо - сколько долларов платишь за каждый доллар годовой прибыли компании) META - 16x GOOGL - 17x AMZN - 24x MSFT - 25x А вот пик доткомов в 2000-м: Microsoft - 73x Cisco - 200x+ Yahoo - 800x Весь Nasdaq тогда т

22🔥10🌭6🗿4custom 54496835944254102313

30 Apr 2026, 07:17 UTC≈16,900 views65 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026

Я, тут скреб по субстакам и нашел интересный, но сложный пост Даю вам тлдр с ссылкой на полный, для общего понимания будет интересно =) От декретных денег к энергии: что ломается прямо сейчас Старая система держится на трёх опорах в Базеле - БМР, BCBS и GEM. Это не «банки», это юридический анклав с иммунитетом, закрытый клуб эмитентов и техкомитет, который пишет правила капитала вместо парламентов. На этой инфраст

25🔥22custom 544968359442541023110custom 54003620797837706897🌭1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @makecryptogreat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 16,371 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Крипто Интеллигенция” (@makecryptogreat), 14,760 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/makecryptogreat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.