Channel
@narnia_important
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,297subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001410478189 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @narnia_important |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/narnia_important |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:12 | 2,297 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:54 | 2,298 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 2,299 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:09 | 2,299 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
В США разрабатывают правило, по которому мелкие платежи в стейблкоинах до $200 не будут облагаться налогом, как обычные покупки. А налоги с майнинга хотят платить не сразу, а только когда полученный доход реально продаётся или выводится в деньги.
Там новостной драйвер цены, с 19 до 25 декабря активно голосование UNIfication о сжигании 100М $UNI (10% сапплая) и направлении части комиссий протокола на дальнейший выкуп и сжигание монет.
Все успели обновить подписку? https://ru.tradingview.com/black-friday/?share_your_love=aliaksei011
YZi Labs запускает фонд Builder Fund на $1 млрд для поддержки разработчиков в экосистеме BNB https://x.com/yzilabs/status/1975822909307560092
S&P запустил индекс Digital Markets 50, который отслеживает 15 криптовалют и 35 акций криптокомпаний https://www.barrons.com/articles/new-crypto-index-digital-markets-50-92099f69
✴️#крипто #обзор Топ сети по валовой прибыли в мае 2025 г — данные Cryptorank
💥✴️🇺🇸#ipo #CRCL #крипто Акции эмитента стейблкоина USDC компании CIRCLE выросли на 168% в дебютный день торгов и потом еще +5% на постмаркете IPO прошло по $31
Биржа Gemini тайно подала заявку на IPO еще один крупный игрок выходит на IPO
Генеральный директор Tether Паоло Ардоино заявил, что если Tether станет публичной, ее оценка достигнет 515 миллиардов долларов, что сделает ее 19-й по величине компанией в мире, обогнав Costco и Coca-Cola. Хотя эта цифра впечатляет, он отметил, что она может быть немного консервативной, учитывая текущие и растущие запасы Tether в биткоинах и золоте. Тем не менее, Tether стремится оставаться скромной и по-настоящему …
EOS опять проводит ребрендинг и меняет название на Vaulta. Проект переключает фокус на Web3-банкинг. Переход включает в себя обмен токенами и запуск банковской консультативной группы.
🇺🇸 Arkham: Актуальный баланс правительства США = 198,109 BTC ($17,4B). Ранее: - крипторезерв - подборка мнений Crypto Headlines
😮 Интервью с Сэмом Бэнкманом-Фридом на русском языке! (англ. версия) Crypto Headlines
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @narnia_important. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
📊 Пик рынка уже позади и в этот раз — без привычного сезона альткоинов?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 November 2024 to 21 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Нарния важное” (@narnia_important), 2,297 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/narnia_important.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.