alexdevps отписался от J0E007
😁26😐2🤡1

Channel
@from_alexdevps
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,400subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001315159263 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @from_alexdevps |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 May 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/from_alexdevps |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:12 | 4,400 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:30 | 4,405 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:20 | 4,405 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
153 reactions across 14 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 38 | 24.8% | |
| 🤡 | 38 | 24.8% | |
| 👍 | 26 | 17.0% | |
| ❤ | 13 | 8.50% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 6.54% | |
| 👀 | 8 | 5.23% | |
| 😭 | 7 | 4.58% | |
| 💩 | 4 | 2.61% | |
| 😐 | 2 | 1.31% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.654% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.654% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.654% | |
| 😴 | 1 | 0.654% | |
| 🙈 | 1 | 0.654% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.654% | |
| 🥱 | 1 | 0.654% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 153reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 December 2024 to 24 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
alexdevps отписался от J0E007
😁26😐2🤡1
#admin список каналов: @from_aeyakovenko + X @from_aradchenko1 + X @from_elonmusk + X @from_ivangbi @from_paulcr2009 @from_electroXt @from_YourFriendCL @from_KTMudak @from_syroamst без Шкафа Талеба @from_alexdevps + X @from_Dynch @from_icodrops пересылка от @syroamst @electroXt @a1mighty @ironcrane @mokruekrosu без Шкафа Талеба From PoNs пересылка из закрытых PoN чатов (надо иметь PON NFT) @from_xmen чат для предло…
😭7❤4👍3
alexdevps подписался на Joselito
👀8✍1😴1🙈1
Когда я делился своими чувствами и видением Ubisoft, я ожидал, что это займет не менее квартала. В итоге это заняло неделю и теперь все основные проекты передаются в 1 компанию и продаются китайской Tencent, официально 25%, но мы все понимаем. Легенда F🫡 alexdevps
❤5
Достижение Cursor в достижении ARR в $100 млн быстрее, чем у любой предыдущей компании, с 1 до 100 млн за 12 месяцев. Поздравляем команду, это отличный результат! Одно из лучших приложений за последние годы, которое производит эффект «вау». #cursor 👏 alexdevps
Неизвестно, смогут ли братья Руссо обеспечить тот же уровень качества в фильме «Мстители: Судный день», поскольку их предыдущий фильм «Электронное государство» не оправдал ожиданий и имел бюджет почти в 500 миллионов долларов. alexdevps
👎1🤣1
Мы живем в мире, где стулья получают больше просмотров, чем 99% загруженных видео или даже фильмов категории C. 😀 alexdevps
😁1
Завтра решится судьба огромной компании Ubisoft. Ubisoft подарила нам такие игры, как FarCry, Prince of Persia и Splinter Cell. Если количество игроков в Assassin's Creed Shadows упадет ниже 200 тыс., то ситуация выглядит мрачной. alexdevps
🤡15
Новая неделя, новый убийственный Курсор - Аугмент. Хайп есть, инвестиции есть. Сейчас они начнут множиться как грибы 🌧️🍄. #augmentcode #cursorai alexdevps
🔥5
Началось! Тред подтвержден. После суперуспешного запуска #CursorAI все подхватили этот тренд. Главные конкуренты — #Windsurf от Codeium и #Trae от ByteDance (TikTok). На LinkedIn люди начали указывать Cursor как навык в своих резюме.😆 alexdevps
🤡4😁4👍1
Cursor AI, программирую уже несколько дней и не могу оторваться, даже не хочется переходить на другие IDE. Это настолько гениальная штука, что непонятно, чем ребята из Jetbrains занимались последнее десятилетие. #cursorai #jetbrains alexdevps
👍10🤡5❤3
#Cursor, я просто поражен! Это одна из лучших вещей в разработке за многие годы. Cursor AI понимает не только глубокое сложное автодополнение, но и погружается в контекст вашего проекта, предлагая фрагменты кода, которые вы хотели написать. Это 10 из 10. ВАУ! alexdevps
🤡13👍6🔥2👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @from_alexdevps. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 898,054 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@from_alexdevps named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“From A⃣lex Dev” (@from_alexdevps), 4,400 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/from_alexdevps.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.