Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

TD Strategy in Crypto

@TD_in_crypto

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,347subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001242890135
TypeChannel
Username@TD_in_crypto
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TD_in_crypto

Growth

2,3472,3552,3516 August 2026 — 2,355 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,355 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,350 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,347 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,346–2,356 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 15:052,347-3
9 Aug 2026, 19:512,350-5
6 Aug 2026, 09:322,355no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:292,355first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
49.4%
avg views ÷ 2,347 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,160
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held20 (17 April 202627 July 2026)
Views total1,160
Reactions total34
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

467 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍32369.2%
🔥6814.6%
🤷‍♂214.50%
194.07%
😁173.64%
👏143.00%
🥰51.07%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 467reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 April 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TD_in_crypto. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 April 2026 to 27 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 14:47 UTC≈1,160 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#btc 1d 27.07.26 за месяц ничего не изменилось, 66400 зеркальный уровень, выше него идем вверх, если не пройдем, то идем искать новое дно, как минимум на 60к и с большой вероятностью на 51-53к. Но пока мы выше 62500 основной сценарий вверх. https://www.tradingview.com/x/bezxGQL5/

👍25👏3😁3🔥21

3 Jul 2026, 09:55 UTC≈1,830 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#btc 1d 03.07.26 https://www.tradingview.com/x/jPcjobZY/

🔥14👍7🤷‍♂3😁1

25 Jun 2026, 08:27 UTCviews —

TD Strategy in Crypto pinned «#btc1! 1d 25.06.26 #cme взгляд сверху с перспективой 6-8 месяцев картина выглядит следующим образом. https://www.tradingview.com/x/tL1QP4Ov/ Бычий сценарий: • сформировалась дневная бычья дивергенция; • минимум пришёлся практически на зону −50% маржинальных…»

25 Jun 2026, 08:26 UTC≈1,490 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#btc1! 1d 25.06.26 #cme взгляд сверху с перспективой 6-8 месяцев картина выглядит следующим образом. https://www.tradingview.com/x/tL1QP4Ov/ Бычий сценарий: • сформировалась дневная бычья дивергенция; • минимум пришёлся практически на зону −50% маржинальных требований CME от локального максимума 67,4k; • появилась длинная нижняя тень дневной свечи и рынок пытается вернуться внутрь восходящего канала. Но говорить об

👍27🔥5👏31

25 Jun 2026, 06:39 UTC994 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#btc 1d 24.06.26 Давно не было такого на битке, повышенная волатильность и смена приоритетов в течении нескольких часов. В случае возврата в канал по итогу дня, пробой можно будет считать ложным и отработали минус 50% маржинальных требований на сме, длинная тень внизу в 1700 пунктов заявка на возврат к бычьему сценарию, сейчас важно закрепимся выше 62500 или нет, но окончательная отмена 55к у нас выше 65500

👍18🤷‍♂4🔥2

24 Jun 2026, 19:01 UTC≈1,260 views28 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

#btc 24.06.26 Провалились ниже указанных 61200 (первый черный уровень на графике), приоритет определился, идем сначала на 55-56к с большой вероятностью дойти до 50к. Отмена снижения выше 62500

👍241👏1🔥1😁1

22 Jun 2026, 14:04 UTC≈1,140 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#btc 1d 22.06.26 особых изменений нет, закрепление выше зоны 64200-65000 отменяет спуск на 55-56к https://www.tradingview.com/x/MkLmex0r/

👍19🔥4👏2🤷‍♂1🥰1

15 Jun 2026, 11:50 UTC≈1,820 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#btc 1d 15.06.26 https://www.tradingview.com/x/URtiaMMW/

🔥16👍10👏3🤷‍♂2

13 Jun 2026, 13:39 UTC≈1,750 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#btc 1d 13.06.26 Напомню, что практика гэпов больше не актуальна, на сме ордера на выходных исполняются https://www.tradingview.com/x/Xkghflj9/

👍23👏1🔥1

5 Jun 2026, 19:49 UTC≈1,820 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

05.06.26 биток переписал годовой минимум, проткнул психологические 60к

  1. Дно +- где то рядом, можно ждать в ближайшие дни разворот28%
  2. Это не конец, надо посмотреть на 50к как минимум46%
  3. Пофигу, жую попкорн30%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

5 Jun 2026, 07:37 UTC≈1,640 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#btc 1d 05.06.26 55к отменяются выше 64к https://www.tradingview.com/x/LNAIKhOQ/

👍14🤷‍♂4🔥2😁2

3 Jun 2026, 10:54 UTC≈1,480 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Hermes Exchange - лучшие условия для всех операций с криптой на рынке: ➡️ Ввод/вывод крипты в любых парах, сетях и валютах ➡️ Доставка налички курьером по вашему адресу ➡️ Моментальный выпуск виртуальных карт с привязкой к Apple Pay/Google Pay ➡️ Оплата иностранных счетов/инвойсов, в том числе покупка авто/недвиги за рубежом ➡️Межбанковские переводы, SWIFT и SEPA ➡️ Сопровождение ВЭД для любых бизнесов ➡️ Рабо

4😁2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TD_in_crypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Jun 2026, 19:49 UTCAnonymous Poll404 voters

05.06.26 биток переписал годовой минимум, проткнул психологические 60к

  1. Дно +- где то рядом, можно ждать в ближайшие дни разворот28%
  2. Это не конец, надо посмотреть на 50к как минимум46%
  3. Пофигу, жую попкорн30%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

20 May 2026, 15:31 UTCFinal Results194 voters

таймфреймы месяц и старше

  1. Смотрю регулярно52%
  2. Смотрю очень редко41%
  3. Не смотрю никогда11%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 April 2026 to 27 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,048,495 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TD Strategy in Crypto” (@TD_in_crypto), 2,347 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TD_in_crypto.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.