8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -89. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,557–23,672 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 21:58
23,570
-13
11 Aug 2026, 23:31
23,583
-12
11 Aug 2026, 02:33
23,595
-17
10 Aug 2026, 04:11
23,612
-15
9 Aug 2026, 01:10
23,627
-12
8 Aug 2026, 01:44
23,639
-10
7 Aug 2026, 03:10
23,649
-10
6 Aug 2026, 09:52
23,659
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 12 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈767
Videos
≈89
Links
≈1,640
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 06s
Average length
22s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,452 reactions across 19 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
3,559
47.8%
🔥
3,124
41.9%
custom 5289756243731162671
769
10.3%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,452reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 12 November 2024 to 14 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1,951
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 19 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
437
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptoperry. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 November 2024 to 14 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Инверсия ♻️
Последний удар
1. На текущей неделе постарался абстрагироваться от происходящих событий и сфокусироваться на графиках BTC и ETH. И первое, на что обратил внимание - это практически полное отсутствие реакции на начало военных действий в Персидском заливе: падение вначале и минимальный рост в последующие дни словно погрешность, но никак не Глобальные тектонические сдвиги
2. Ввиду чего делаю вывод, ч…
Кол-во обсуждений в соцсетях "альтсезона" упало до исторического минимума - данные Santiment.
P.S. Неужели мы действительно дожили до разворота и истинного тренда. До сих пор не верится, но все факторы говорят об этом 🤞
➡️ bingx.com/partner/1
С Ув. CRYPTO | PERRY
Самый Глобальный рост криптовалютного рынка может проходить не из-за чего-то, а вопреки всему (в том числе здравому смыслу)
... вспомните 2020-21 - годы Covid
➡️ bingx.com/partner/1
С Ув. CRYPTO | PERRY
Началось ...
1. Еще раз повторю: не пытайтесь на этом заработать. Деньги на чужой крови, страхах и страданиях не принесут вам хороших плодов
2. Для нападения была выбрана суббота, когда Мировые рынки закрыты.
3. Если удары продолжаться, то за первый день нападения считайте понедельник, потому как рынки должны отыграть это событие
4. Исключением будут Мирные соглашения или конец военное операции до вечера воскресе…
Израиль (США) vs Иран
Даже если произойдет военное столкновение между Израилем (США) и Ираном, а под это единомоментно сольют рынки, помните: исторически, день начала любой большой войны - был Глобальным или локальным дном по рынкам, после чего происходил значительный рост
P.S. Не пытайтесь отторговать такие движения на фьючерсах, положительный PNL на чужой крови не даст вам радости в жизни. Но и не дайте себя спуг…
Словарь на ближайший год:
We are so back
Up Only TV
Let's fucking Go
бесконечный апсайд
Lambo.. Vitalik
Diamond hands
We are not fucking selling
In crypto we trust
HODL
➡️ bingx.com/partner/1
С Ув. CRYPTO | PERRY
Широко закрытыми глаза 👁
То, что я сейчас буду объяснять - опыт, полученный временем и грандиозными потерями, но дающий возможность наблюдать объективную реальность в текущий момент, что возможно более ценно, чем те суммы потерь прошлого. У вас есть возможность не совершать ошибки, а пройти по уже пройденным маршрутам:
1. Анализ рынка:
Если вы проанализируете фундаментальные факторы и обстоятельства, то у вас сфор…
Вот такие зеленые свечи скоро будут по всем вышеперечисленным инструментам
Думайте.
➡️ bingx.com/partner/1
С Ув. CRYPTO | PERRY
👍143🔥64custom 528975624373116267132
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @cryptoperry. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 361,029 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CRYPTO | PERRY” (@cryptoperry), 23,570 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptoperry.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
