Channel
@TMV_info
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,818subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001518865870 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TMV_info |
| Description | Invite link: @TMV_LIST Manager: @TMV_GRACE |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TMV_info |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:31 | 4,818 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 4,822 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:51 | 4,822 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 2 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1,744 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 935 | 53.6% | |
| ✍ | 442 | 25.3% | |
| 🐳 | 214 | 12.3% | |
| ⚡ | 153 | 8.77% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,744reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 March 2025 to 20 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TMV_info. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 March 2025 to 20 March 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Каждый новый токен сегодня только и занимается тем, что ищет новое дно. Но дело далеко не в махинациях нового президента США и страшных мемкоинах, которые якобы вытянули всю ликвидность. Проблема начала зарождаться несколько лет назад и мы уже становимся свидетелями последствий пузыря, созданного венчурным капиталом. Ознакомиться – здесь @TMV_Info
✍58🔥45🐳24⚡8
Небольшое ревью по тренчам: Дня 3-4 назад будто бы было идеально. Сейчас – ну вообще не то, объемы действительно оставляют желать лучшего. В истории бинанс чейна не лезу и вам не советую, просто пересос ликвы из одного мусора в другой, здесь только играть на пампах и искать спреды. Понял я, что с SOL мемами нужно быть сейчас аккуратнее в момент, когда вышел щиток по мемчику от Илона: https://x.com/elonmusk/status…
🔥39⚡16🐳11
Nvidia проведет GTC 2025. 17-21 марта будет что-то типо эвента, где будут представлены всякие ИИ разработки. На этом фоне, может будут какие-то значимые анонсы, Хуанг например что-то выдаст, или другие участники. Может на этом фоне и агенты порастут, кто знает, будем смотреть. Удачной недели всем! @TMV_Info
🔥46✍23⚡12🐳5
Доброй ночи, друзья! Кстати, если посты и обращения начинаются с упоминанием и подвязыванием, что вы друзья и все такое - стоит еще больше напрячься, ну да не суть. В последний месяц получаем много писем с просьбой сделать индивидуальный разбор по ИИ-агентам, по портфелю, кто в какой позиции сидит и все такое. Смотрите, я думаю, мы все взрослые люди и понимаем, что пишется в интернете и уж тем более, что касается …
🔥87✍20⚡19🐳11
BTC - 83000$ Что-то там успокаивается все. Этот часовой график SPX500 в купе с плитой на 84000$ по BTC, выглядят синхронно, словно под выход куда-то выше. Ночью послушал одних товарищей из Deribit, они выдвигают следующие тезисы: - 80k it's new 50k, которые были в августе 2024 года - Когда многие как Хейс говорят про 70k, дадут ли их? - Встреча Трампа и Си в апреле и в мае нас может ждать понижение ставки - Крипт…
✍44🔥32🐳12⚡2
Кстати, эти Millennium, управляют примерно $75B через 340 торговых команд, вдумайтесь, да. А ваш товарищ с телефона может начертить технический анализ на графике, и вы будете успешнее этих 340 команд со всякими научными степенями, имхо - вы чемпионы! Февраль и март оказались тяжелыми для ряда фондов, а именно: - Citadel Securities: -1,7% в феврале / -1,7% в марте. - Millennium: -1,3% в феврале / -1,4% в марте. - …
🔥61✍25⚡16🐳1
Мясорубка во всей красе. Ставь огонек, если не потерял за эти месяца $900M. @TMV_Info
🔥119✍14🐳11⚡2
#S Хотелось бы верить, что "we are here". TVL пока встал в диапазон ~$650M, при этом спрос на #S немного приутих, после небольшого ралли в конце февраля. Кронье должен выпускать свой DEX, что, наверное, тоже может привлечь долю внимания, с потенциальной раздачей токена и так далее. Да и, наверное, рационализация в целом, зачем в конце февраля было тратить такой ресурс на маркет-мейкинг, когда все рынки стагнируют…
✍36🔥27🐳10⚡5
Надеюсь, это стадия смены рук, после которой PEPE в основном отскакивает и улетает быстрее всех. Как вы видите, Stock Market сегодня не оказывает влияние на Crypto. Если это зарождение нового тренда, что пока не подтверждено, а будет подтверждено только задним числом, то было бы славно. А то уже слишком много людей смыло за эти месяца, прям отвращение появляется в этой вашей криптовалюнте. @TMV_Info
✍37🔥33⚡14🐳8
По поводу позитивной повестки, да, она, как тот суслик, которого не видно, но он есть. Вся семья Трампов так или иначе сидит в криптовалюте, у нас есть резерв, где, как минимум, не будут продавать BTC ( чтобы было при Камале? ) и в будущем, возможно, будут покупать. У нас есть AI и новая технология, которая так или иначе готова впитывать в себя инвестиции и выдавать что-то новое, условно, тех же роботов, новые прод…
🔥47✍15⚡13🐳5
SPX500 - 5575$ Я не самый большой эксперт по всей этой экономической теории, новостям, данным и прочей взаимосвязанной структуре, я просто хочу сказать свое мнение по ощущениям. Многие в последние дни начали рефлексировать еще больше на фоне падения акций из SPX500 и уже рисовать фракталы, которые якобы вот-вот олицетворят 2008 или 2020 год, не понимая что: 2020: Covid Dump, который произошел на фоне той паники, к…
🔥36✍17🐳9⚡1
Не хочется терять джекпот, я знаю точно выпадет. За что я ни возьмусь - то ствол, он точно выстрелит. @TMV_Info
🔥33✍17🐳12⚡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @TMV_info. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 557,820 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TMV_info” (@TMV_info), 4,818 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TMV_info.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.