Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DAKA CRYPTO

Channel

DAKA CRYPTO

@dakacrypto

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,961subscribers

-280 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001270861840
TypeChannel
Username@dakacrypto
DescriptionIN RETROSPECT, IT WAS INEVITABLE Торгуем графики, пьем водичку. По всем вопросам: @dakacryptoadmin
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held57
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/dakacrypto

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,96110,24110,1016 August 2026 — 10,241 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,234 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,228 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,224 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,223 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,220 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,215 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,211 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,206 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,205 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,204 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,206 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,200 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,191 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,187 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,189 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,187 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,190 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,191 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,186 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,187 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,181 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,177 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,166 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,160 subscribers5 September 2026 — 10,157 subscribers8 September 2026 — 10,142 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,121 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,122 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,112 subscribers16 September 2026 — 10,107 subscribers19 September 2026 — 10,100 subscribers25 September 2026 — 10,094 subscribers4 October 2026 — 10,072 subscribers8 October 2026 — 10,059 subscribers13 October 2026 — 10,050 subscribers14 October 2026 — 10,047 subscribers15 October 2026 — 10,043 subscribers17 October 2026 — 10,038 subscribers18 October 2026 — 10,037 subscribers19 October 2026 — 10,036 subscribers20 October 2026 — 10,033 subscribers21 October 2026 — 10,031 subscribers22 October 2026 — 10,026 subscribers23 October 2026 — 10,020 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,015 subscribers26 October 2026 — 10,013 subscribers27 October 2026 — 10,010 subscribers28 October 2026 — 10,009 subscribers29 October 2026 — 10,007 subscribers30 October 2026 — 10,004 subscribers31 October 2026 — 10,003 subscribers1 November 2026 — 10,002 subscribers2 November 2026 — 9,998 subscribers4 November 2026 — 9,987 subscribers8 November 2026 — 9,982 subscribers12 November 2026 — 9,961 subscribers6 August 202612 November 2026
57 measurements spanning 98 days, net -280. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,919–10,283 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 10:499,961-21
8 Nov 2026, 00:209,982-5
4 Nov 2026, 16:119,987-11
2 Nov 2026, 02:079,998-4
1 Nov 2026, 02:4610,002-1
31 Oct 2026, 06:1010,003-1
30 Oct 2026, 03:0010,004-3
29 Oct 2026, 05:3810,007-2
28 Oct 2026, 02:3810,009-1
27 Oct 2026, 04:1810,010-3
26 Oct 2026, 06:1910,013-2
25 Oct 2026, 02:5410,015-5
23 Oct 2026, 23:1710,020-6
22 Oct 2026, 20:3510,026-5
21 Oct 2026, 15:2910,031-2
20 Oct 2026, 15:1710,033-3
19 Oct 2026, 12:3610,036-1
18 Oct 2026, 11:5810,037-1
17 Oct 2026, 13:4910,038-5
15 Oct 2026, 09:5110,043first reading

Engagement

94 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.3%
avg views ÷ 9,961 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,420
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 94 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held94 (21 July 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total92,230
Reactions total1,248
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 11:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,650
Videos
≈48
Links
≈3,570

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

3,117 reactions across 89 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,16637.4%
🔥83226.7%
custom 546099408585674716638312.3%
custom 52377680869746366942327.44%
❤‍🔥932.98%
⚡742.37%
🤔692.21%
custom 5235564098736890654672.15%
🍌672.15%
🌭321.03%
🤯270.866%
custom 5458591927827962348240.77%
✍210.674%
😢150.481%
🍓80.257%
🍾70.225%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 93 of the 94 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,180 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 94 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
24
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 94 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dakacrypto. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 94 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 14 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 27 posts held from the last 30 days (3.70%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 04:44 UTC≈1,280 views8 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Чат gpt зарелизили оказывается кошелек для агентов, офигеть. Значит скоро и grok и claude выкатять тоже свои решения. Замечаете как во всем этом совсем не нужна крипта? https://x.com/chatgpt/status/2121283151729496235?a=c20S_joXOTRJnfldCnw&s=46

🤔5⚡3

14 Nov 2026, 04:14 UTC≈1,340 views29 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Sol По стопу выбило всю SOL, нормально вообще? Не щитки какието, а солану. Хорошо что часть закрыл выше 100, остальное раундтрип получается по 75. Вот это поворот, идиотство а не рынок.

custom 546099408585674716615🤔5🍌3🤯3custom 52377680869746366942🍾1

13 Nov 2026, 18:30 UTC≈1,680 views46 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Near 1d 1w update Моя основная поддержка - 3$, хотя не рассчитывал увидеть ниже 3.6$ хороший график, спуск до 3$ еще возможен, если Дженсен еще кого-нибудь трахнет завтра. Но в целом все так же хорош, жду Near в числе лидеров роста, если 1 квартал будет бычьим (пока придерживаюсь этого плана, как и летом).

🔥27custom 546099408585674716612👍4custom 52377680869746366942🍌1

12 Nov 2026, 19:59 UTC≈2,230 views88 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥46👍27custom 52377680869746366944custom 54609940858567471664🌭3❤‍🔥2😢2

11 Nov 2026, 14:41 UTC≈2,370 views19 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Срочно !!! нужен прогер в Алматы который очень хорошо разбирается в ии для бизнеса и автоматизациях, пишите в личку У кого есть желание сильно включиться в долгосрочный проект со мной - гоу @Dakacryptoadmin

🔥10👍3custom 54609940858567471663😢1custom 52377680869746366941custom 54585919278279623481

9 Nov 2026, 10:42 UTC≈3,140 views60 reactions2 Starsread 14 November 2026

Попей водички бро 💦

custom 546099408585674716629👍16🤔8custom 52377680869746366945✍1custom 54585919278279623481

8 Nov 2026, 08:14 UTC≈3,980 views43 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Sol 1w Красивый ретест, добавляю.

🔥24custom 546099408585674716611custom 52377680869746366945🌭3

7 Nov 2026, 16:27 UTC≈3,650 views24 reactionsread 14 November 2026

СРОЧНО: 🇺🇸🇨🇳 Сообщается, что США одобрили продажи чипов Nvidia $NVDA китайским компаниям с пустующими офисами и подозрительными связями.: https://x.com/watcherguru/status/2119024746201583678?a=sknDuznjH7wDVqlNkZo&s=46 Американская разведка выяснила, что генеральный директор Nvidia $NVDA Дженсен Хуанг состоял в «романтических отношениях» с китайским шпионом, сообщает FT. https://x.com/watcherguru/status/2118902136…

🍌9🔥8🤯5👍1custom 52355640987368906541

5 Nov 2026, 19:38 UTC≈3,480 views39 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Крипта падает сегодня вслед за фондой. Объясняют такой логикой инвесторов: демократы традиционно жёстче к крупному бизнесу , ИИ- и крипто - регулированию. Рынок боится, что новый Конгресс начнёт душить ИИ-строительство новыми правилами — отсюда и распродажа чипов, дата-центров, Nvidia, AMD. Плюс Маск вложил почти полмиллиарда в республиканцев, так что Tesla и SpaceX просели на ~10%. не столько обвал экономики, ск…

👍32custom 54609940858567471664custom 52377680869746366943

5 Nov 2026, 19:38 UTC≈3,270 views10 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Hodl strong

🍓8custom 52377680869746366942

4 Nov 2026, 07:45 UTC≈3,620 views48 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Вот и отскок по рынку. Надеюсь, не поддались общей панике и не продали на дне. Больше апсайд Pump Near Меньше апсайд Zec Hype

👍28custom 546099408585674716612custom 52377680869746366945🔥1🤯1😢1

2 Nov 2026, 15:11 UTC≈3,930 views96 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥53custom 546099408585674716625custom 523776808697463669413custom 52355640987368906544🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 94 posts we hold for @dakacrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Aug 2026, 14:07 UTCAnonymous Poll471 voters

Как торгуете PUMP?

  1. НЕ ТОРГУЮ PUMP68%
  2. Закрыл часть, жду коррекцию2%
  3. Закрыл полностью7%
  4. Жду коррекцию чтобы купить11%
  5. Просто держу и жду более высоких целей14%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 94 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 14 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

top traders desk
@toptraders0x · 23,801
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
AX1
@ax1vc · 20,122
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 September 2026
Pursuit4Million|Андрей Соболев
@P4M_channel · 31,756
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 September 2026
IvanovInvest
@ivanovinvest_rus · 20,034
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 September 2026
Дмитрий Щукин | Crypto Trading
@dmitry_shukin · 53,142
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 22 September 2026
Мус и Крипта
@mus_money_official · 49,220
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 3 September 2026
IVASCO | Иващенко Юрий
@yivashchenko · 28,223
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 9 September 2026
DНЕВНИКИ Крипто
@dnevniki_crypto · 32,595
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
CRYPTO | PERRY
@cryptoperry · 22,253
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 September 2026
QuantPro⚡️Trading
@QPROtrading · 23,733
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 16 September 2026
ElonMoney Trading
@elonmoneytrading · 20,875
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 23 September 2026
Трейдинг в благости - Игорь Павленко
@blagotrading · 68,247
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
Mr Mozart
@mr_mozart · 127,055
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DAKA CRYPTO” (@dakacrypto), 9,961 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dakacrypto.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.