Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Кэпитал News

@drops_daily

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

20,635subscribers

-72 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001474241580
TypeChannel
Username@drops_daily
Created31 March 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/drops_daily

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “Drops Daily — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

20,63520,70720,6716 August 2026 — 20,707 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,693 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,684 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,680 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,674 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,655 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,645 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,635 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -72. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,624–20,718 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 06:0420,635-10
12 Aug 2026, 05:4720,645-10
11 Aug 2026, 02:3320,655-19
10 Aug 2026, 02:1420,674-6
9 Aug 2026, 00:5320,680-4
7 Aug 2026, 23:4620,684-9
7 Aug 2026, 00:3720,693-14
6 Aug 2026, 08:3120,707first reading

Engagement

70 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.1%
avg views ÷ 20,635 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,290
70 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.704%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
70
of 70 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held70 (5 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total160,560
Reactions total1,130
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 23:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
15s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

914 reactions across 58 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁45049.2%
👍20322.2%
🤯687.44%
535.80%
🔥535.80%
🤔333.61%
😢202.19%
👎90.985%
😱80.875%
🥰80.875%
👏60.656%
🎉30.328%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 70 of the 70 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,130reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 70 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC≈1,230 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🫁 Goldman Sachs договорился о покупке Neos Investments на сумму до $2,25 млрд Сделка даст одному из крупнейших игроков традиционных финансов сразу три ETF, ориентированных на получение дохода от криптоактивов. В портфель Goldman перейдут: • Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) • Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) • Ethereum High Income ETF (NEHI) Важный нюанс: эти фонды не покупают BTC и ETH напрямую. Они получают эк

🤔3🤯1😁1

12 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC≈1,670 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

👩‍🍳 The Information: Hyperliquid ищет пути вывести перпы на рынок США Платформа до сих пор гео-блокирует пользователей США из-за регуляторных рисков. Hyperliquid Policy Center ведёт переговоры с CFTC, чтобы выработать рабочий фреймворк именно для ончейн-децентрализованных перпов. В мае CFTC уже разрешила первые регулируемые perpetual futures в США (например, на Kalshi) и смягчила маршрутизацию через зарубежные площ

👍43🔥2😁2

12 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC≈1,690 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇸 США: вышли данные по инфляции (CPI) за июль ИПЦ г/г: 3,4% (прогноз 3,4%, пред. 3,5%) ИПЦ м/м: 0,1% (прогноз 0,1%, пред. -0,4%) Базовый ИПЦ г/г: 2,5% (прогноз 2,5%, пред. 2,6%) Базовый ИПЦ м/м: 0,2% (прогноз 0,2%, пред. 0,0%) BTC показывает волатильность на фоне новости Кэпитал News

😁3🔥2👍1

12 Aug 2026, 11:24 UTC≈1,830 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

😄 Wintermute вложит $1 млрд в AI-инфраструктуру, чтобы выйти на традиционные рынки Криптомаркетмейкер планирует за пять лет вложить около $1 млрд в высокочастотный трейдинг и AI-дата-центры, чтобы диверсифицироваться в трейдинг акциями, сырьём и валютой - в стиле Jane Street и Citadel Securities. CEO Евгений Гаевой признаёт: конкурировать с игроками, десятилетиями оттачивавшими технологии под эти рынки, можно тольк

😁6👍31👎1🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC≈1,760 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔹 Fidelity добавит стейкинг и квартальные выплаты в свой ETH-ETF объёмом $898 млн Фонд FETH сможет застейкать до 100% эфира, оставляя часть для выкупов паёв. Возможность появилась после разъяснения IRS, которое разрешает крипто-трастам стейкать активы без потери налоговых льгот. Fidelity присоединяется к Grayscale и 21Shares, которые уже сделали это раньше - BlackRock выбрал другой путь и запустил отдельный продукт

👍5🤯2🔥1😁1

12 Aug 2026, 08:07 UTC≈1,840 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

👻 Притоки и оттоки капитала из ETF за вчерашний день 🔼BTC ETF: +$4 890 000 🔽ETH ETF: -$1 760 000 Финпотоки в американских спотовых ETF за вчерашний день (11 августа). Кэпитал News

👍31🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 05:13 UTC≈2,070 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🇨🇳 Китай заставил Meta (запрещена в РФ) отменить сделку на $2 млрд по покупке Manus В декабре Meta объявила о покупке Manus - разработчика универсальных AI-агентов, основанного в Китае в 2022 году, но позже переехавшего в Сингапур. Сделка почти сразу привлекла внимание властей и в Пекине, и в Вашингтоне. В апреле Госкомитет по развитию и реформам Китая обязал стороны её расторгнуть - за нарушение правил иностранных

👍53🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 05:05 UTC≈1,940 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🇰🇷 Temasek впервые инвестирует в Samsung и SK Hynix Сингапурский суверенный фонд впервые вложился в акции корейского рынка. По данным источников, Temasek считает сегмент памяти в AI-цепочке самым недооценённым. Во втором квартале Temasek активно вкладывался в полупроводники, дата-центры, облака и разработчиков AI-моделей. Цель - поднять долю AI-инвестиций в портфеле с 6% до 15% за пять лет. По отчётности 13F на ко

🤔4😁21🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 05:02 UTC≈1,790 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔸 Binance намекнула на соцприложение для трейдинга, чтобы конкурировать с FOMO Биржа опубликовала тизер с подписью «Soon». По слухам, речь о запуске социального приложения для трейдинга, как FOMO. Кэпитал News

😁7👍1🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 04:57 UTC≈1,770 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚩 Harmony подверглась атаке: хакеры выпустили 4 млрд ONE (26% саплая) Атака прошла через "пустые блоки" - через них злоумышленник несанкционированно выпустил 4 млрд токенов $ONE, это 26% от всего предложения. Около 2,8 млрд токенов уже успели вывести на биржи, из-за чего цена ONE обвалилась. По данным аналитика Juiceberg, эндпоинт totalSupply при этом скрывает реальную эмиссию - со стороны баланс токена выглядит но

😁72👍2👎1

12 Aug 2026, 04:45 UTC≈1,670 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🗣 Трамп рассматривает новые налоговые льготы на фоне падения рейтингов перед промежуточными выборами У республиканцев две идеи: привязать налог на прирост капитала к инфляции и поднять необлагаемый порог прибыли с продажи дома с $500 000 до $2 млн. Советники Трампа предложения поддерживают, но официально Белый дом их не подтвердил. Нужно одобрение конгресса - быстро не пройдёт. Критики уже отмечают: главную выгоду

😁9🔥1🤯1

12 Aug 2026, 04:17 UTC≈1,700 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

😳 Upbit залистит Prom (PROM) Prom - это L2, построенный на Polygon CDK в формате модульного ZK-EVM. В моменте +70% Кэпитал News

🔥21😢1

Showing the 12 most recent of 70 posts we hold for @drops_daily. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 35,054 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ондрей Гойчев (DFW Bals)
@ondreigoichev · 162,334
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 August 2026
Drops Analytics
@drops_analytics · 683,618
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
MarketTwits
@markettwits · 334,480
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Кэпитал News” (@drops_daily), 20,635 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drops_daily.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.