Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

월스트릿동물학

@wallstbearcup

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

933subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003770968241
TypeChannel
Username@wallstbearcup
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/wallstbearcup

Growth

926933929.56 Aug 2026, 03:31 — 926 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 14:04 — 926 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 02:00 — 933 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 03:317 Aug 2026, 02:00
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 925–934 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 02:00933+7
6 Aug 2026, 14:04926no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:31926first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.5%
avg views ÷ 933 subscribers
Avg views / post
98.2
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held18 (6 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,768
Reactions total15
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

15 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🫡853.3%
👍426.7%
🥰213.3%
😁16.67%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC22 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @marketfeed

TIKTOK LAYS OFF 250 EMPLOYEES IN NASHVILLE OFFICE: NYT ...

6 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC36 viewsread 6 August 2026

🇨🇳 중국 이중 경제(Dual Economy)의 구조적 모순과 패권 전략 진단 미국 전략국제문제연구소(CSIS) 팟캐스트에서 경제학자 알리시아 가르시아 헤레라는 기술 패권 추구를 위한 국유 중심의 대규모 투자와 가계 소비 침체가 맞물린 중국의 '이중 경제' 구조를 집중 조명했다. 글로벌 기술 선점이라는 국가적 야망이 내수 경제의 기반을 흔드는 구조적 상충 관계가 심화하고 있다는 분석이다. ⚙️ 첨단산업의 부상과 내수·가계의 침체 중국 경제는 전기차, AI, 태양광 등 첨단 기술 분야에서 글로벌 시장 점유율을 늘려가며 눈부신 성장을 이루고 있지만, 그 이면에서는 부동산 시장 경색과 임금 정체로 가계의 실질 구매력이 급격히 떨어지고 있다. 가계의 노동 소득 비중은 미국 등 선진국의 절반 수준에 불과하며, 국가적 기술 업그레이드를 위해 가계의 고

6 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC36 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @AwakeKOR

그래도 내란범이라고 한다면 그 사람은 경계선지능의심해봐야 함

👍1

6 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC29 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @mootdaPhoto

안 웃으면 이재명 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

😁1

6 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC35 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @AwakeKORPhoto

저거 다 탄핵 반국가 세력은 누구?

🫡4

6 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC30 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @AwakeKOR

ㄴ 덕분에 트럼프가 재매이 패싱을 했고, 나토가 재매이를 무시했으며 다른 국가 블루팀들 역시도 재매이를 대통령으로 보지않습니다.

6 Aug 2026, 12:29 UTC30 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @AwakeKOR

https://www.ilyosisa.co.kr/mobile/article.html?no=257262 김태효 전 안보실 1차장의 영웅담입니다. 기자는 비판논조로 썼습니다만 좌파가 발악하면 뭐다? 옳은일입니다👍

6 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTC36 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @teamctrinePhoto

파이낸셜 타임스(FT)에 따르면, 케빈 워시 연준 의장은 향후 발표될 인플레이션 데이터가 높게 나오고 시장이 대출 비용 상승을 반영할 경우 9월에 금리를 인상할 준비가 되어 있다고 합니다.

6 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC36 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @BTCpentagon

전, 현직 임직원 18명 법카로 골프, 유흥시설, 안마시술소 1501회 출입 총 2억 1600만원 결제

6 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC679 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

책임지라는 말에 발작하는 영교씨. 인생은 발전과 전진, 승리. 그리고 책임입니다. 책임지지 않을 인생과 엮일 이유는 굳이 없는것인게죠. 출처: https://x.com/i/status/2085290693459841420

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @wallstbearcup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 141,948 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“월스트릿동물학” (@wallstbearcup), 933 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wallstbearcup.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.