香港人抗爭日程表文宣頻道 pinned «香港人日程表 2026年9月29日日程 ✍🏻 【聯署行動|香港經貿辦人員間諜罪成 |立即關閉經貿辦 】 聯署: petition.parliament.uk/petitions/765232 t.me/HKgersinLeeds/713 ✍🏻 聯署要求國際刑事法院調查香港政府 change.org/p/launch-icc-investigation-over-crimes-against-humanity-committed-by-hong-kong-officials 📸 全球聲援黃之鋒行動 參…»

Channel
香港人抗爭日程表文宣頻道
@HK_Schedule
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
23,100subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001383080348 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HK_Schedule |
| Description | 未來日程的詳細內容請留意Pinned message 活動報料: @hkerschedule_admin 公海: @HK_Schedule_Discussion 我們不知道這專頁還能維持多久,請同時 follow 其他平台: MeWe: mewe.com/p/hkerschedule FB: fb.com/HKerSchedule IG: instagram.com/HKerschedule Patreon: patreon.com/hkerschedule |
| Created | 12 October 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HK_Schedule |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 06:41 | 23,100 | -4 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 23,104 | +10 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 04:19 | 23,094 | +1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 23,093 | +8 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 09:40 | 23,085 | +6 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 01:21 | 23,079 | -14 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 07:20 | 23,093 | -8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:39 | 23,101 | +5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:35 | 23,096 | -32 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 23,128 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 23,134 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:42 | 23,136 | -10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:05 | 23,146 | +3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 23,143 | +2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 23,141 | +8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 23,133 | +9 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:47 | 23,124 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 23,126 | -8 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 20:37 | 23,134 | -7 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 23,141 | first reading |
Engagement
134 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.44%
- avg views ÷ 23,100 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 332
- 24 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.458%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 31
- of 134 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 24 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 134 (2 August 2026 – 28 September 2026) |
| Views total | 7,967 |
| Reactions total | 23 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Sept 2026, 08:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈13,100
- Videos
- ≈13
- Links
- ≈7,340
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
63 reactions across 42 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 42 | 66.7% | |
| ❤ | 19 | 30.2% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 3.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 134 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 134 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
香港人日程表 2026年9月29日日程 ✍🏻 【聯署行動|香港經貿辦人員間諜罪成 |立即關閉經貿辦 】 聯署: petition.parliament.uk/petitions/765232 t.me/HKgersinLeeds/713 ✍🏻 聯署要求國際刑事法院調查香港政府 change.org/p/launch-icc-investigation-over-crimes-against-humanity-committed-by-hong-kong-officials 📸 全球聲援黃之鋒行動 參與:喺所在城市地標前影一張有黃之鋒相,配上支持說話,並寫上城市及國家名稱 fb.com/share/1952VQo5r9 日程預告 🇭🇰 10月1日 香港 ⚠️高危活動⚠️ 銅鑼灣及維園「㷫」回歸 14:00 銅鑼灣及維園 fb.com/share/1J6paA83SS 💻 10月1日 網上 香港政治犯親身分享會|放學是否…
🔥2
Signed HKer Schedule Bot
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed HKer Schedule Bot
香港人抗爭日程表文宣頻道 pinned «香港人日程表 2026年9月28日日程 🖼️ 9月28日至10月31日 曼城 一個地點.兩個展覽|《蘋果日報》珍藏特展 & 細葉榕五周年特展 11:00–18:00 榕生之所 Harbour Bonham, A4 Studios, 30 Grosvenor Rd, Altrincham, Manchester, WA14 1LE 除9月28日外,逢周一休展;免費入場 instagr.am/p/DcibGTeDtsB ✍🏻 【聯署行動|香港經貿辦人員間諜罪成 |立即關閉經貿辦 】 聯署: petitio…»
香港人日程表 2026年9月28日日程 🖼️ 9月28日至10月31日 曼城 一個地點.兩個展覽|《蘋果日報》珍藏特展 & 細葉榕五周年特展 11:00–18:00 榕生之所 Harbour Bonham, A4 Studios, 30 Grosvenor Rd, Altrincham, Manchester, WA14 1LE 除9月28日外,逢周一休展;免費入場 instagr.am/p/DcibGTeDtsB ✍🏻 【聯署行動|香港經貿辦人員間諜罪成 |立即關閉經貿辦 】 聯署: petition.parliament.uk/petitions/765232 t.me/HKgersinLeeds/713 ✍🏻 聯署要求國際刑事法院調查香港政府 change.org/p/launch-icc-investigation-over-crimes-against-humanity-committed-by-hong-kon…
🔥2❤1
Signed HKer Schedule Bot
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed HKer Schedule Bot
引自 https://www.facebook.com/100093193231166/posts/990601950722904/ : 10月1日|全球滅共日(取締中共國慶) (第一波:全球滅共符號建構) Global Day to Defeat Communism 一張圖、一句話、一段歷史、一個故事。 呼籲全球滅共抗爭者自行創作並上載至互聯網: (如閣下作品希望獲得Free Hong Kong Media報導,可Signal或WhatsApp +1 236 888 6497) AI圖片 海報 短片 個人故事 歷史圖片 藝術作品 音樂 詩歌 直播 Podcast 教育文章 (如果使用AI製作圖片,參與者請標明 AI-generated / AI-assisted ) 所有作品建議加上:10月1日為全球滅共日及10月1日並非中國國慶等字句。 完成作品上載至社交平台請加上 hashtag #GlobalDayToDefeatCo…
❤1
Signed HKer Schedule Bot
引自 https://www.instagram.com/p/Ddwmb1sjFO2/ IG: @bonhamtreeaid : (Scroll down for English version) 🚨 【10.1 反共遊行|㷫佢老X!】 🚨 中共嘅威權下任何生命都受盡壓迫,中共威權黑手下亦早已唔止喺香港同中國境內肆虐,更不斷伸入英國本土!從跨國鎮壓、間諜滲透到擬建嘅超級大使館(Mega Embassy),中共嘅侵襲正嚴重威脅緊英國嘅自由、安全同民主體制。 就算本身係英國人,喺香港一樣會受到政治迫害成為政治犯。呢場對抗壓迫嘅戰役,唔單止係港人嘅事,更關乎每一個喺呢度生活嘅英國人!我哋必須團結,呼籲英國新首相向中共施壓並將在港英國公民及受壓迫嘅港人從中共嘅壓迫同侵襲之中拯救出來! 10月1日,一齊站出來,向中共壓迫講 NO!拒絕滲透,守護英國! 📌 【活動詳情】 🗓 日期:2026年10月1日 ⏰ 時間:下午 6:00出發(遊行…
❤1
Signed HKer Schedule Bot
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed HKer Schedule Bot
香港人抗爭日程表文宣頻道 pinned «香港人日程表 2026年9月27日日程 🗓️ 9月27日 伯明翰 拆解同討論:英國與香港國安法的分別|公民講場 11:00–12:30 CWU Midlands(47 Summer Ln, Birmingham B19 3TH) 報名: forms.gle/vaF1yj7KHWbFcEpn8 t.me/HongkongersUK/2241 ✍🏻 【聯署行動|香港經貿辦人員間諜罪成 |立即關閉經貿辦 】 聯署: petition.parliament.uk/petitions/765232 t.me/H…»
香港人日程表 2026年9月27日日程 🗓️ 9月27日 伯明翰 拆解同討論:英國與香港國安法的分別|公民講場 11:00–12:30 CWU Midlands(47 Summer Ln, Birmingham B19 3TH) 報名: forms.gle/vaF1yj7KHWbFcEpn8 t.me/HongkongersUK/2241 ✍🏻 【聯署行動|香港經貿辦人員間諜罪成 |立即關閉經貿辦 】 聯署: petition.parliament.uk/petitions/765232 t.me/HKgersinLeeds/713 ✍🏻 聯署要求國際刑事法院調查香港政府 change.org/p/launch-icc-investigation-over-crimes-against-humanity-committed-by-hong-kong-officials 📸 全球聲援黃之鋒行動 參與:喺所在城市地標前影一張…
❤1🔥1
Signed HKer Schedule Bot
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed HKer Schedule Bot
Showing the 12 most recent of 134 posts we hold for @HK_Schedule. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@flashlunch · 112 postsAPS Channel 🏳️ 全民自發收聲道
@APSMAGIC · 5,1341 postThe Reformer 革新者綜合教學頻道
@TheReformerHongkong · 2411 post61萬唔驚拉Channel
@abcd_123456789a · 4321 post德望反送中關注組Channel
@antielabghschannel · 1381 post葵涌邨【公海】公告欄
@kwaichungestatenewsboard · 9001 post理大反送中 PolyU AntiElab
@polyudongotoschool · 1,1841 post小西灣資訊集合平台
@siusaiwanboardcast · 2491 post南區和你拖
@southernholdwithyou · 7661 post南區文宣渠道 請廣傳🔊
@southernmansuenchannel · 4821 post天水圍哨站🛰️
@tsw8907 · 7,8101 postBNO日程表
@ukhkcalendar · 5931 post無良商店
@unconscience_shop · 2421 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@HKgersinLeeds · 96435 postsDandelion Solidarity
@DandelionSolidarity · 1,16331 postsHongkongers in Britain 英國港僑協會 Channel 🇬🇧
@HongkongersUK · 4,40228 posts被捕人士關注組
@youarenotalonehk · 48,30219 posts🇬🇧Britons In Hong Kong🇬🇧 UK/BN(O) Front [Official Channel]
@britonshk · 10,07812 postsVAHK 溫哥華手足 CHANNEL | Vancouver Activists of Hong Kong
@VanActivistsHKChannel · 1,1748 posts英國戰線 公海 2.0 🇬🇧 By Britons in Hong Kong/UK
@BHK1841 · 2,0332 posts香港人尊嚴
@hongkongerdignity · 1,4582 posts🗞📚 منتدى التاريخ والمعرفة 📚🗞
@HK_Forum · 1,1201 postAG百家乐赌场
@nottsstandwithhk · 471 postpulsehknews
@pulsehknews · 51 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@HK_Schedule named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 2 September 2026 – 3 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@VanActivistsHKChannel · 1,174#1
@hkposter777 · 22,455#2
@thewitnesshk · 12,110#3
@northstation · 5,504#4
@A20260612 · 3,689#5
@inmediahknet · 38,904#6
@youarenotalonehk_live · 32,044#7
@hongkongersecrets · 3,504#8
@britonshk · 10,078#9
@boomheadhk · 11,881#10
@thepointsglobal · 6,485#11
@hkindepenAsso2 · 2,367#12
@youarenotalonehk · 48,302#13
@channelchk · 23,283#14
@universalsentinelsinblack · 11,737#15
@HKgersinLeeds · 964#16
@windseasonhk · 10,757#17
@hongkongerdignity · 1,458#18
@Hkersgymch · 4,107#19
@ncetransport · 47,112#20
@HKNewsDigest · 5,989#21
@hkcourtnews · 1,970#22
@hongkongerintheworld · 1,862#23
@localpresshk · 6,295#24
@the_chaser_news · 7,524#25
@nowtv_news · 42,715#26
@rthk_new_c · 49,497#27
@youarenotalonehk_info · 7,310#28
@metwarn · 24,326#29
@weatherjj · 42,766#30
@The_watcher_channel · 7,895#31
@TW_KC_TY_Transport_channel · 1,670#32
@collectivehk · 2,936#33
@HongKongValiantSpeaks · 1,519#34
@HKReaderXWriter · 799#35
@DemocracyMovement · 1,552#36
@ONELMBB · 3,750#37
@whocaresweather · 2,584#38
@icable_news · 944#39
@hkweathernews · 4,766#40
@MoshangUS · 5,603#41
@zephyrsocietynyc · 1,190#42
@tnews365 · 164,549#43
@RFI_Cn · 7,381#44
@VoiceofPooh · 22,536#45
@electroniclennonwallinhk · 1,149#46
@ElderlyChannelHK · 7,153#47
@rfacantonese_news · 1,535#48
@VoiceofCN · 14,276#49
@HK_Traffic_News · 43,987#50
@FoonHayHor1 · 3,192#51
@hkgeotrekker · 1,103#52
@hkweathertips · 1,812#53
@ishr_chinese · 579#54
@XueXi_China · 87,102#55
@cwbnow · 2,506#56
@islandwest84 · 4,442#57
@hk_propaganda · 1,865#58
@bitterwinter · 1,545#59
@SBSCantonese · 1,725#60
@pppnewstg · 2,873#61
@hongkongindex · 8,123#62
@meiguozhiyin_rss · 13,512#63
@enggnc · 1,519#64
@shixun160 · 22,955#65
@voachinese · 34,696#66
@lilaoshibushinilaoshi · 48,585#67
@nytimes_cn · 1,878#68
@yimiaoshouhai · 780#69
@flarenetworkschannel · 631#70
@Ruters0615 · 25,532#71
@HKHistoryphilo · 4,308#72
@xingchen0829 · 7,436#73
@dragonsden2k · 2,486#74
@pelosi3 · 71,125#75
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@youarenotalonehk · 48,302
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
@youarenotalonehk_live · 32,044
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 5 September 2026
@hkposter777 · 22,455
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 September 2026
@appledailyhk26 · 30,034
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 7 September 2026
@weatherjj · 42,766
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 28 August 2026
@nowtv_news · 42,715
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“香港人抗爭日程表文宣頻道” (@HK_Schedule), 23,100 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HK_Schedule.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.