https://www.instagram.com/hongkongers_in_leeds/live/18423570955132579 Live now

Channel
列斯手足連線 - 🔅公海頻道🔅
@HKgersinLeeds
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
963subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001310227474 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HKgersinLeeds |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HKgersinLeeds |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 963 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:37 | 964 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 964 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 13 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
17 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 52.9% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 17.6% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 11.8% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 5.88% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 5.88% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 5.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 13 January 2026 to 12 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
緊急‼️Urgent‼️ 參加者請注意,今日64集會地點更改為Leeds Art Gallery LS1 3AA Attention please, today’s vigil will be held at Leeds Art Gallery LS1 3AA
列斯手足連線 - 🔅公海頻道🔅 pinned «【聯署行動|香港經貿辦人員間諜罪成 |立即關閉經貿辦 】 🖊 立即簽署 : https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/765232 📢 請廣傳,推上 10 萬聯署,逼使國會辯論! 中共摧毀香港自由、違反承諾,迫使香港人流亡海外。經貿辦間諜案進一步揭示,中共假借經貿之名,行滲透之實,打壓在英港人,甚至進行間諜活動。 英國當年基於「一國兩制」,賦予香港特殊地位及待遇。但自從北京實施港區國安法後,《中英聯合聲明》早已被中共單方面撕毀,香港已失去原有承諾…»
【聯署行動|香港經貿辦人員間諜罪成 |立即關閉經貿辦 】 🖊 立即簽署 : https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/765232 📢 請廣傳,推上 10 萬聯署,逼使國會辯論! 中共摧毀香港自由、違反承諾,迫使香港人流亡海外。經貿辦間諜案進一步揭示,中共假借經貿之名,行滲透之實,打壓在英港人,甚至進行間諜活動。 英國當年基於「一國兩制」,賦予香港特殊地位及待遇。但自從北京實施港區國安法後,《中英聯合聲明》早已被中共單方面撕毀,香港已失去原有承諾嘅高度自治。既然基礎已蕩然無存,點解經貿辦外交特權仍然存在? 保衛英國,捍衛自由!政府必須立即檢討《1996年香港經貿辦法案》 ,取消特權,關閉香港經貿辦! 👉 聯署有乜用? • 10,000 聯署 → 政府必須正式回應 • 100,000 聯署 → 可推上國會辯論 • 向政府施壓,要求檢討法例、取消特權、關閉經貿辦 #關閉經…
❤1🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
列斯粵語讀戲劇場《5月35日》 Leeds Cantonese Readers Theatre - May 35th Ticketing 購票:https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/1988188046969 承蒙「六四舞台」授權演出,Trafford Hongkongers CIC 將聯同列斯手足連線於 2026 年 5 月 24 日, 在列斯 All Hallows' Church 演出《5月35日》讀戲劇場。 劇本是根據1989年天安門大屠殺中失去孩子的父母的採訪和真實生活寫成,講述一對年老夫婦垂死的願望,希望在兒子被國家謀殺的地方,舉行適當的儀式。此劇首演於2019年香港藝術中心壽臣劇院,當時為悼念六四事件30周年。 三十五年,生死兩茫茫,現在香港不可以講,我們就在海外繼續講。暴政把人簡化成數字,然後把他們消失。我們重視人,我們要念念不忘,記著這些有血有肉的存在。 日期:2026 年 …
❤1
列斯粵語讀戲劇場《5月35日》 Leeds Cantonese Readers Theatre - May 35th Ticketing 購票:https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/1988188046969 Authorised by ‘Stage 64’, Trafford Hongkongers CIC is going to collaborate with Hongkongers In Leeds to present a Cantonese Readers Theatre 'May 35th' at All Hallows' Church on 24th May 2025. It is about the June 4th Massacre in Tian'anmen Square in Beijing in 1989. No one is allowed to talk about thi…
Photo, posted without a caption
Strongly Condemn the Labour Government’s approval of the Chinese “Mega Embassy” Plan HongKongers in Leeds strongly condemns the Labour Party government for pushing ahead with the Chinese “Mega embassy” despite overwhelming opposition from local residents, Hongkongers in the UK, other communities persecuted by the Chinese Communist regime, and human-rights advocates. The proposal faced objections from the local coun…
👍2🔥2❤1💩1
嚴厲譴責工黨政府無視九次示威反對 強行通過中國超級大使館計劃 列斯手足連線嚴厲譴責工黨政府無視當地居民、在英港人,以及其他受中共打壓族群與關注人權人士嘅強烈反對,仍然強行通過興建中國超級大使館嘅決定。 事件先後經歷市議會及警方提出反對意見,加上港人九次走上街頭,社會上嘅反對聲音清晰堅定。然而,工黨政府仍然一意孤行,強行通過有關計劃。呢個決定唔單止係對民主程序嘅踐踏,更係對所有受中共打壓族群嘅徹底背叛,完全無視英國國民嘅安全同尊嚴。 呢座所謂嘅中國超級大使館,從來都唔係普通外交設施,而係一個具高度政治風險、涉及國家安全問題,並對異見社群構成實質威脅嘅象徵。可憐英國政府甘願對中共搖尾乞憐,只為首相日後訪華向北京送上一份「政治大禮」。 我哋必須重申,興建中國超級大使館存在眾多弊處: 1️⃣ 中國政府多年嚟被揭發喺海外進行跨境鎮壓、監控同滋擾異見人士。批准一座規模龐大、用途不透明嘅大使館,唔單止加劇英國居民嘅恐懼,更直接構成英國…
❤1🤡1
✨✨Beacon of Freedom 自由之光 ✨✨ 釋放黎智英 全球游擊投影行動 - 英國列斯| Free Jimmy Lai Guerrilla Projection Global Action Leeds (UK) 列斯手足連線響應「釋放黎智英 全球游擊投影行動」,喺星期日(1月11日)列斯市中心Leeds Art Gallery 外進行快閃投影行動,以聲援黎智英及一眾喺香港受政治打壓嘅手足,並呼籲市民關注香港日趨崩壞嘅政治實況及倫敦中國超級大使館嘅審批。 黎智英案剛剛喺尋日(1月12日)開始求情階段。黎智英並無喺堂上發表求情。喺中共破壞咗嘅香港法治制度下,明顯政權想以黎智英案殺一儆百,洋洋數百頁嘅判詞生安白造,只係想重判黎智英去作寒蟬效應。黎智英面對如此壓力仍能堅持,希望香港人或者所有支持民主自由嘅同路人都繼續支持佢撐落去!希望正義及早到來,還所有自由民主鬥士一個公道! HongKongers in Leeds …
❤5🍾1
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @HKgersinLeeds. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 378,928 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“列斯手足連線 - 🔅公海頻道🔅” (@HKgersinLeeds), 963 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HKgersinLeeds.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.