30 Jul 2026, 23:47 UTC509 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo
「顛倒黑白，法官做錯事唔使炒，牙醫冇做錯事就要炒」香港法官多次犯錯唔使炒，可以提早退休拎退休金。但係良心牙醫行使公民權利，在721正當表達意見就要被炒。
Channel
香港民主自由資訊目錄
@hongkongindex
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8,242subscribers
-26 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001466822131 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hongkongindex |
| Description | 五大訴求，缺一不可 本頻道希望整合大量支持民主自由(黃絲)的 TG 頻道群組，方便各位手足獲得資訊和支援，增加民主自由陣營的抗爭動員能力。 我們透過 TG 建立了完善的抗爭系統。除了反送中運動，香港將來會有很多極具爭議的議題。各個頻道群組將會繼續成為抗爭的支援平台，我們的TG 抗爭系統是十分重要和可持續發展的。 我們的個人力量很小，團結起來卻可以驚天動地。自己香港自己救，香港人反抗。 |
| Created | 19 September 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hongkongindex |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 8,242 | -9 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:06 | 8,251 | -9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 8,260 | -8 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:24 | 8,268 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 8,268 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 8 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.18%
- avg views ÷ 8,242 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 509
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (8 January 2026 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 509 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 438
- Videos
- 725
- Links
- 639
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
18 May 2026, 01:32 UTC≈1,780 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo
「宏福苑火災，只有好人被捕，壞人乜事都無」 * 江祥發 - 居民代表，多次追查維修與圍標，後被拘捕不再公開發言。 * 王岸然 - 評論員，籌備民間記者會，其後因披露國安約談內容被起訴，至今仍候審。 * 鄭曦琳 - 整理火災資料庫，其後被拘捕，不再公開發言。 * 關靖豐 - 曾發起關注組與聯署，其後被開除學籍。 廉政公署形容圍標問題地下化、隱蔽化，難以追查。被居民多次質疑的民建聯黃碧嬌，至今毋須公開交代。 幾個月後，災民重返宏福苑，只剩燒黑外牆與散失遺物。 城市依然運作，但真相逐漸被掩蓋。 當追尋公義、追查真相的人不能再發聲，人心亦慢慢被焚燬。 （Thread轉載: 漂鳥樂隊 Wandervogel）（自創標題）
10 Apr 2026, 02:40 UTC≈1,660 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo
「睇寒戰不如重溫元朗721恐襲」 香港電影真係笑死人。「寒戰」係幫香港黑警洗白既電影，入面既警察靚仔、高大威猛。「元朗721」先至係佢地真面目，勾結黑幫，危害市民生命安全，極度醜惡。 香港人唔會要求電影界揭露黑警暴行，但係唔好幫手洗白黑警，幫極權做形像工程。
4 Mar 2026, 20:46 UTC≈2,250 viewsread 18 August 2026
宜家26年極權對香港人既打壓程度比起19年嚴重好多倍，只不過唔係用直接暴力形式，而係用法律手段。香港人連非政治議題，都唔容許提出反對意見，唔容許對於政府失職追究責任。（e.g. 宏福火災）。 如果網上見到五毛話「仲分黃藍？係時候放下。」，唔該幫手屌佢，提醒返香港人正在受到前所未有既壓迫，人權受到嚴重侵犯。 記住，我地唔係講緊「政治立場」，而係「基本人權、法治」。 ---------------------------------------- (Ai 重制版) 各位同路人、各位心水清的香港人： 時光荏苒，從2019年的風起雲湧到如今的2026年，歲月悄然流逝。或許在某些人的眼中，街頭的硝煙似乎已經散去，社會表面上也恢復了所謂的「平靜」。然而，我們每一個深愛這片土地的香港人都深知，這份死寂般的平靜背後，隱藏著的是何等令人窒息的壓迫。今天，我站在這裡，必須沉痛而堅定地指出一個不容掩飾的事實：2026年的今天，極權對香港人的打壓不僅…
4 Mar 2026, 13:44 UTC≈1,080 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo
「退訂、停止課金：Jfft搵政協eminleo合作」極權已經掌控所有傳統媒體（電視、電台、報紙...），唯獨不能夠控制網媒、KOL，因為佢地可以由觀眾直接課金支援，較少受到極權影響。 Jfft今日可以搵政協eminleo，聽日就可以搵阿叻陳百祥，後日就可以搵江旻憓。 香港人必須表態反對，退訂、停止課金，直至佢地道歉，否則佢地就會變成極權既PR公具，幫手洗白極權走狗。 香港人唔會要求香港KOL公開表態反對極權，但係絕對唔可以容許佢地同極權走狗合作，因為這是香港KOL對香港人最基本的尊重。
25 Feb 2026, 18:05 UTC≈1,210 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo
「見到Threads有人幫死左既黑警洗白，話佢2019當時未做差人，所以無責任、唔應該比人鬧」 佢知道警察作惡為害社會、打壓公義，點解仲要加入警隊？佢係香港人會唔知道元朗721事件、太子站831事件？咩佢唔知道2019至今黑警冇停過亂咁拉人，不斷打壓香港人既人權？ 香港人憎恨黑警係因為佢地失去良心道德、損害社會利益，衣D係做人基本價值觀、大事大非，唔好混淆成「唔同人有不同政治立場」。 黑警收住香港人既錢去打壓香港人，就要預左受到香港人既輕視和不尊重。香港人根本無方法阻止黑警暴行，我地對黑警最多構成言語上不尊重，佢地一樣絲毫無損收住高人工，但係黑警卻可以令香港人坐監入獄、前途盡失。 大家要小心有人將香港人對黑警既抵制，夾硬抹黑成「打壓不同政治立場」，我地係抵制專制極權、無法無天既極權走狗。 大家要小心網絡上幫黑警洗白既人。 ---------------------------- 「黑警洗白post」 https://w…
12 Feb 2026, 01:16 UTC≈1,210 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo
現在的香港「殺人放火金腰帶，修橋補路無屍骸」
8 Feb 2026, 14:02 UTC≈1,300 viewsread 18 August 2026
「撐香港電影？香港人有難既時候，有幾多電影明星撐香港？咁點解香港人要撐香港電影？」 （原版）https://t.me/hongkongindex/3841 過去幾十年，咁多香港演藝明星靠香港人發達，住大屋渣靚車，香港有事既時候，只有好少好少部份出聲撐香港人，出左聲既良心藝人大部分已經被極權封殺，失去香港工作演出機會。試問香港人點解仲要撐現在既香港娛樂圈？要搵錢就叫香港人撐香港電影，香港人有難既時候點解唔見有好多明星撐香港人？ 要搵錢就提「香港人」，真係笑死人，我地真係唔使撐香港娛樂圈，想睇就睇，用作品質素去判斷是否付費入場，唔好再一相情願，佢地根本唔當香港人係自己人，純粹係為錢。 (Ai 重寫版) 各位朋友、各位香港人： 今日我想同大家講一個近年愈來愈多人放喺心入面、但未必敢大聲講出口嘅問題——「撐香港電影」到底係撐緊咩？我哋又點解要撐？ 我哋成日聽到一句口號式嘅說法：「撐香港電影！」好似只要你唔入場，就係唔愛香港；…
8 Feb 2026, 02:24 UTC989 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo
「撐香港電影？香港人有難既時候，有幾多電影明星撐香港？咁點解香港人要撐香港電影？」過去幾十年，咁多香港演藝明星靠香港人發達，住大屋渣靚車，香港有事既時候，只有好少好少部份出聲撐香港人，出左聲既良心藝人大部分已經被極權封殺，失去香港工作演出機會。試問香港人點解仲要撐現在既香港娛樂圈？要搵錢就叫香港人撐香港電影，香港人有難既時候點解唔見有好多明星撐香港人？ 要搵錢就提「香港人」，真係笑死人，我地真係唔使撐香港娛樂圈，想睇就睇，用作品質素去判斷是否付費入場，唔好再一相情願，佢地根本唔當香港人係自己人，純粹係為錢。 （Ai 重寫版） https://t.me/hongkongindex/3842
18 Jan 2026, 00:15 UTC≈1,260 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo
「trump你出左post呼籲伊朗人抗爭，就有責任出兵幫伊朗人」正常情況下，出唔出兵伊朗係美國既事，美國無責任和義務。但係，trump出左post公開呼籲伊朗人「keep protesting」聲稱「help is on its way」，咁樣好多伊朗人就會信左佢。作為總統講左就要做，比假希望處於絕境既伊朗人係非常不道德。宜家好多伊朗人被大規模殺害，強烈要求trump講得出做得到，唔好再等，出兵協助伊朗人對抗暴政極權。
10 Jan 2026, 02:42 UTC≈1,620 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo
「祝福伊朗反極權運動成功«با آرزوی موفقیت جنبش ضد تمامیتخواهی ایران.»」有冇手足一樣唔夠膽接觸相關新聞，好驚見到示威抗議無效既情況重複發生，好驚見到極權成功打壓抗議運動，見到伊朗既抗議新聞好開心又好不安，見到希望又好驚失望。無論如何，«با آرزوی موفقیت جنبش ضد تمامیتخواهی ایران.» （祝福伊朗反極權運動成功）（google translate to Persian）
8 Jan 2026, 00:48 UTC≈1,210 viewsread 18 August 2026
「見到一個自稱港獨thread page既烏克蘭港人post（有過千個like），覺得內容好唔合理，刻意宣揚奇怪、扭曲既價值觀」 果post 講： （（兩位以生命向港人群體，甚至向世界證明香港有具充分行動力的戰士。比起坐後座指點政權，為求一生平安穩定的人，兩位證明香港群體入面有人會火裏火裏去，往戰火直奔。）） 無錯佢地係英勇既戰士，但係佢地唔係幫香港人反抗共產黨，根本同香港冇咩關係，有咩野值得香港人吹捧？ 自己既屋企人（香港人）比黑社會（港共）日日打到仆街，你走左出去海外，應該係幫手搵人關注自己屋企（香港）既情況，諗下點救屋企人（香港人），而唔係走去其他人既屋企（烏克蘭），幫外人搏命去打另一個黑社會（俄羅斯）。 自己屋企人日日比人打到仆街，有咩理由唔係幫自己屋企人？反而係去幫其他人既屋企？咁奇怪咁扭曲既價值觀真係值得我地宣揚？真係值得我地學習咩？ 仲有佢地講咩野（（比起坐後座指點政權，為求一生平安穩定的人）），貶低在香…
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @hongkongindex. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,493,728 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“香港民主自由資訊目錄” (@hongkongindex), 8,242 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hongkongindex.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.