Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🥗 视讯快报~密接巨变时代

Channel

🥗 视讯快报~密接巨变时代

@shixun160

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

22,955subscribers

-237 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001148509969
TypeChannel
Username@shixun160
Description本频道转载国内外时事,热点回顾和精彩历史,虽媒体取材来源难免一样,我们不照搬同行频道。 注 : 武汉新冠肺炎(COVID-19)因中共隐瞒导致全中国和全球大爆发,因此这里也称它为中共病毒。 频道原则 : 普世价值 频道推荐 : @nbgzd
CreatedBetween 1 May 2016 and 31 December 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/shixun160

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@shixun16/549096 Aug 2026, 03:07 UTC@shixun160/155935 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 03:07 UTC1.00under a minute
@shixun16/549116 Aug 2026, 03:33 UTC@shixun160/155937 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 03:33 UTC1.00under a minute
@shixun16/549176 Aug 2026, 05:50 UTC@shixun160/155943 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 05:50 UTC1.00under a minute
@shixun16/549256 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTC@shixun160/155951 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTC1.00under a minute
@shixun16/550827 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC@shixun160/156055 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC1.00under a minute
@shixun16/550867 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC@shixun160/156059 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@shixun168 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@shixun16 (6–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 6 of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 13 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @shixun160 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

22,95523,19223,073.56 August 2026 — 23,192 subscribers6 August 2026 — 23,192 subscribers7 August 2026 — 23,175 subscribers8 August 2026 — 23,174 subscribers9 August 2026 — 23,158 subscribers10 August 2026 — 23,155 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23,140 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,131 subscribers13 August 2026 — 23,129 subscribers14 August 2026 — 23,110 subscribers16 August 2026 — 23,099 subscribers17 August 2026 — 23,089 subscribers18 August 2026 — 23,084 subscribers19 August 2026 — 23,082 subscribers20 August 2026 — 23,081 subscribers21 August 2026 — 23,074 subscribers22 August 2026 — 23,065 subscribers24 August 2026 — 23,045 subscribers25 August 2026 — 23,042 subscribers26 August 2026 — 23,035 subscribers27 August 2026 — 23,041 subscribers28 August 2026 — 23,043 subscribers29 August 2026 — 23,040 subscribers30 August 2026 — 23,041 subscribers31 August 2026 — 23,038 subscribers1 September 2026 — 23,033 subscribers2 September 2026 — 23,024 subscribers4 September 2026 — 23,012 subscribers6 September 2026 — 23,006 subscribers10 September 2026 — 22,984 subscribers12 September 2026 — 22,964 subscribers14 September 2026 — 22,957 subscribers15 September 2026 — 22,961 subscribers18 September 2026 — 22,955 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -237. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,919–23,228 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 07:1722,955-6
15 Sept 2026, 22:4022,961+4
14 Sept 2026, 03:4022,957-7
12 Sept 2026, 07:3822,964-20
10 Sept 2026, 01:4122,984-22
6 Sept 2026, 18:4123,006-6
4 Sept 2026, 10:1923,012-12
2 Sept 2026, 22:3523,024-9
1 Sept 2026, 18:4623,033-5
31 Aug 2026, 19:4523,038-3
30 Aug 2026, 19:3723,041+1
29 Aug 2026, 18:3723,040-3
28 Aug 2026, 21:5723,043+2
27 Aug 2026, 19:2823,041+6
26 Aug 2026, 17:0823,035-7
25 Aug 2026, 16:0323,042-3
24 Aug 2026, 15:0823,045-20
22 Aug 2026, 22:3323,065-9
21 Aug 2026, 08:5623,074-7
20 Aug 2026, 10:4523,081first reading

Engagement

971 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.06%
avg views ÷ 22,955 subscribers
Avg views / post
243
198 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.906%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
198
of 971 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 112 of 198 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held971 (6 August 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total48,081
Reactions total280
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Sept 2026, 09:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈29,900
Videos
≈120,000
Links
≈99,300

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
28h 57m
Average length
2m 04s

Measured directly from 842 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,197 reactions across 509 posts, in 49 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍30225.2%
❤19015.9%
👏857.10%
🙏625.18%
😁473.93%
🤬443.68%
🤯413.43%
😱373.09%
💩332.76%
🔥332.76%
😢332.76%
🥱332.76%
🥴312.59%
👎292.42%
😨292.42%
🖕191.59%
🤣191.59%
😡181.50%
🤮171.42%
👀110.919%
29 further kinds847.02%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 517 of the 971 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,197 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 971 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Sept 2026, 09:44 UTC13 viewsread 29 September 2026
Video

⚡️💥没病按有病做手术!医疗做到谋财害命的地步❗️ 欢迎加入 🥗 后备 ‖ 视讯快报

29 Sept 2026, 09:17 UTC69 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

【 禁闻解密 】北京千亿北极布局突然生变! 川普不费一兵一卒,从格陵兰拿到了什么?🛎 欢迎加入 🥗 视讯快报 ‖ 后备

29 Sept 2026, 09:11 UTC66 viewsread 29 September 2026
Video

鳄鱼为什么不攻击卡皮巴拉? 涨知识 🛎 加入 🥗 视讯快报 || 后备

29 Sept 2026, 09:06 UTC68 viewsread 29 September 2026
Video

都说贵州以前是片海,山顶的这些化石就是最有力的证据!🛎 加入 🥗 视讯快报 || 后备

29 Sept 2026, 09:02 UTC71 viewsread 29 September 2026
Video

欠薪潮席卷中国。 当局不解决欠薪,反而严防工人「串联」🛎 加入 🥗 视讯快报 || 后备

29 Sept 2026, 08:12 UTC102 views1 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video

没有萨布素 就没有黑龙江💫 欢迎加入 🥗 视讯快报 ‖ 后备

👍1

29 Sept 2026, 05:32 UTC249 views6 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video

【美国之声—可能2周后,伊朗现政权就一无所有了】2026年9月27日财长贝森特: 伊朗在海上只剩下1,500万桶石油了,伊朗将没有任何东西可以拿来交易了。 他们将没有任何东西可以拿来交易! 可能就在未来两周内,他们将向中共国完成最后一批石油交付。之后他们就一无所有了! 注:9月6日时贝森特说伊朗剩下可卖的石油已经很少了,还有3,000万桶石油,中共国还没有买;21天过去,只剩下了1,500万桶。🛎 欢迎加入 🥗 视讯快报 ‖ 后备

👏5🥱1

29 Sept 2026, 05:30 UTC230 viewsread 29 September 2026
Video

【美国之声—纳瓦罗:美国的稀土反制模式有效,而且已经在进行中了】2026年9月25日 川普总统贸易与制造业高级顾问 纳瓦罗: 中共把稀土当武器,是对美国和全世界的警钟。中共做稀土靠的是蛮干:没有环保法规、大量补贴、生产过程不惜牺牲人命,用最低成本产出作为核心的氧化物🛎 欢迎加入 🥗 视讯快报 ‖ 后备

29 Sept 2026, 04:23 UTC285 views1 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video

🚨 俄罗斯无人机袭击基辅科学院,一名老者从燃烧的建筑物中获救 9月28日,在俄罗斯对基辅发动袭击后,一名老者从一栋起火的建筑物中被救出。🛎 欢迎加入 🥗 视讯快报 ‖ 后备

🙏1

29 Sept 2026, 03:46 UTC283 views3 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video

大熊猫的真实战力🛎 欢迎加入 🥗 视讯快报 ‖ 后备

👍3

29 Sept 2026, 03:42 UTC276 viewsread 29 September 2026
Video

【坏消息:曼谷洪水; 好消息:你在泰国】🛎 欢迎加入 🥗 视讯快报 ‖ 后备

29 Sept 2026, 03:40 UTC272 views2 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video

尼泊尔9月底又洪灾 冧山泥21死5失踪 风暴深插暴雨破纪录 印度81死反常多9倍雨🛎 欢迎加入 🥗 视讯快报 ‖ 后备

🙏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 971 posts we hold for @shixun160. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

电报时报
@times001 · 84,754
#1
你本該知道
@nbgzd · 10,411
#2
Free•News
@NFSCHimalayaNews · 9,457
#3
学习墙国🐸
@XueXi_China · 87,102
#4
☠️三战快报☠️一级战备
@endofxi · 21,592
#5
龙潭誌异
@dragonsden2k · 2,486
#6
冲破矩阵
@RidingWaveWithQ · 6,708
#7
华人资讯|疫苗真相
@xingchen0829 · 7,436
#8
中国梦
@CHlNA011 · 1,954
#9
大马新冠逆苗频道
@Covid_my · 1,449
#10
地球正義聯盟~資料館
@EarthJusticeLeague_DataLibrary · 9,347
#11
🌐 新纪元 新闻中心
@xinjiyuan9 · 8,577
#12
华夏画报
@luojisw001 · 3,745
#13
🔵希望在线华语音频广场🔵
@xiwangzaixian · 1,729
#14
美国之音
@voachinese · 34,696
#15
🇹🇼台灣【真相大覺醒】
@Rainbow1214 · 3,143
#16
🌴新加坡狮凤凰: 浴火重生SG
@SGCovidChineseInfo · 1,692
#17
軍事頻道
@warmilitary · 4,444
#18
文婕大觉醒频道
@wenjiech · 5,075
#19
香港大覺醒
@HkGreatAwakening · 4,760
#20
山本56臺灣
@Yamamoto56Taiwan · 997
#21
🌐 朗月清風 時事資訊
@aznc4566 · 1,866
#22
自由之声🌈
@yuhegy · 3,091
#23
墙国之音
@chinafounder · 14,833
#24
影音中国(中国被禁的视频)
@TwtVideoOfChina · 75,397
#25
月读
@yuedu · 4,950
#26
军事消息
@ww3ch · 9,179
#27
📰 東亞研究所新聞部 📰
@eanrinews · 1,446
#28
Call Voter
@CallVoter · 2,306
#29
在花🎗️科技圈
@zaihuapd · 283,183
#30
人民報
@renminbao1 · 2,717
#31
竹新社
@tnews365 · 164,549
#32
方舟子
@fangshimin · 16,154
#33
禁闻网
@jinxw · 10,532
#34
政治观察
@freedom_watch · 6,582
#35
敏感经济信息分享
@pelosi3 · 71,125
#36
车速过快🚦开车娱乐搞笑沙雕
@chesgk · 5,123
#37
知乎暴论
@mightyflame · 26,081
#38
自由知生
@ziyouzhisheng1 · 1,602
#39
新唐人電視台
@NTDChinese · 2,337
#40
時事精选 🍁
@qwezz336 · 871
#41
RFI 华语 - 法国国际广播电台
@RFI_Cn · 7,381
#42
俄罗斯资讯参考频道
@JShangrong · 24,735
#43
Ruters乳透社🐻
@Ruters0615 · 25,532
#44
🌈与你同行🌈
@yunitongxing · 1,301
#45
大覺醒🔍真相搜查
@AwakenNews · 1,584
#46
寶島台灣
@Taiwannews1101218 · 3,781
#47
矩陣兔穴 Matrix Rabbit Hole
@MatrixRabbitHole1111 · 4,585
#48
真相就是希望
@falungongtelegram · 1,578
#49
Ricky Wong
@RickyWong2022 · 2,053
#50
大覺醒🔥揭密頻道
@followYHVH · 4,675
#51
西行小宝
@ruldophwest17 · 15,470
#52
Liberty Corps⚡️電子軍團
@Shadowwarrior01 · 1,309
#53
404通訊|The CCP-China Watch #资讯 #新闻 #时政 #反賊 #覺醒
@chinaupdate · 6,276
#54
风向旗参考快讯
@xhqcankao · 163,238
#55
生命智慧频道🌿🌱✨
@life_wisdom11 · 2,009
#56
支那傻事
@zhinashashi · 652
#57
好奇害死貓
@m16mkII · 6,031
#58
中华和平革命党(CPRP)-党务公开 Chinese Peaceful Revolutionary Party
@cprpwork · 729
#59
cnBeta.COM中文业界资讯站 - 总频道(精选新闻)
@cnbeta_com · 27,529
#60

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

☠️三战快报☠️一级战备
@endofxi · 21,592
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 23 September 2026
影音中国(中国被禁的视频)
@TwtVideoOfChina · 75,397
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 20 August 2026
美国之音
@voachinese · 34,696
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 3 September 2026
电报时报
@times001 · 84,754
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 18 August 2026
中国悲剧档案官方频道
@newszg_official · 161,730
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 12 August 2026
俄罗斯资讯参考频道
@JShangrong · 24,735
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 15 September 2026
Ruters乳透社🐻
@Ruters0615 · 25,532
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 14 September 2026
香港人抗爭日程表文宣頻道
@HK_Schedule · 23,100
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🥗 视讯快报~密接巨变时代” (@shixun160), 22,955 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shixun160.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.