Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

不能說的老人台 ElderlyChannelHK

@ElderlyChannelHK

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,286subscribers

-17 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001394112680
TypeChannel
Username@ElderlyChannelHK
Created5 May 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ElderlyChannelHK

Growth

7,2867,3037,294.56 August 2026 — 7,303 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,300 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,289 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,286 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,283–7,306 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 03:487,286-3
10 Aug 2026, 04:587,289-11
7 Aug 2026, 00:087,300-3
6 Aug 2026, 07:027,303first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 November 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

841 reactions across 20 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁17520.8%
🤣13415.9%
😢10812.8%
9711.5%
🥰698.20%
💩566.66%
😱485.71%
🤡414.88%
👍293.45%
🔥242.85%
🤔192.26%
😭91.07%
🤪70.832%
🤯60.713%
🤷‍♀60.713%
👏40.476%
😈40.476%
👎30.357%
👻10.119%
🫡10.119%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 841reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 November 2024 to 2 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Dec 2025, 10:03 UTC≈4,770 views51 reactionsread 12 August 2026

宏福苑月頭借出去拍反圍標,月尾就大火,何其諷刺 //宏福苑業主立案法團於2025年11月8日發出通告,指ViuTV劇組向法團申請租用拍攝,當中涉及屋苑公眾地方及4個單位,而拍攝日期在本年11月中旬至明年1月中旬。發帖的網民表示暫時未知是那一齣劇,但有人表示可能是張繼聰和周秀娜主演的《小業主戰線》劇集內容是講述小業主反抗法團圍標,以劇集反映現實問題。//

😢49🔥2

2 Dec 2025, 09:50 UTC≈4,530 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

劇集《小業主戰線》向宏福苑借場實景拍攝?劇情講述小業主反抗法團圍標 https://lih.kg/mPBnKT #1 回覆 - 分享自 LIHKG 討論區

🔥81💩1

29 Nov 2025, 02:46 UTC≈3,950 views81 reactionsread 12 August 2026

除咗災民同殉職消防員,提提大家,好多新聞媒體都係艱苦地營運緊,需要大家支持 呢場係接力賽,救熄咗場火,就要靠記者同大家不斷跟進事件,避免悲劇再生 有多餘財力嘅話可以支持下佢哋

81

21 Jul 2025, 10:45 UTC≈6,920 views59 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

曾志偉及鐘鎮濤就與黃明志合照發出嚴正聲明 - 分享自 LIHKG 討論區 https://lih.kg/3965772

😁41🤡8💩5😈4👎1

5 Jul 2025, 05:00 UTC≈6,670 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026

網傳TVB劇庫存告急 僅一劇正在拍攝中? 網民: 寧願播倉底劇都唔好播外購劇 //網上消息指,現時TVB自家劇只得《新聞女王2》正在開工,另外《玫瑰戰爭》與《璀璨之城》就在籌備當中,但除此之外就欠缺新作。有網民指:「去年高層突然說要重質不重量,結果直接把十幾部劇砍了,有些劇連演員都官宣了,最後說沒就沒了,現在庫存裏能播的自製劇不到15部」,又指:「最尷尬的是,有些劇拍完兩三年了,一直壓著不敢播」。 Yahoo已就事件向TVB查詢,截至現時未收到回覆。//

😁374👻1

17 Jun 2025, 11:26 UTC≈6,440 views73 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

《中年好聲音》歌手拎產品獻唱 車婉婉台上突兀撓紙巾盒 - 分享自 LIHKG 討論區 https://lih.kg/3946218 TVB真係越做越幽默

🤣51💩16😁32🥰1

27 Mar 2025, 04:56 UTC≈8,130 views59 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

大家點睇TVB 又蝕4.9億? https://lih.kg/mwxyxT #1 回覆 - 分享自 LIHKG 討論區

🥰45👍121🤣1

17 Mar 2025, 11:47 UTC≈7,270 views44 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

消委會又要俾人法律追究

😁29🤪7🤷‍♀6👍1🤔1

12 Feb 2025, 01:46 UTC≈7,650 views53 reactionsread 12 August 2026

孫仔孫女讀清華啫,又冇話個女都要讀清華😉😉

😁35🤣16💩2

12 Feb 2025, 01:46 UTC≈7,860 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

HK01:前TVB藝人李國麟 揚言孫仔孫女必讀清華 但年花幾十萬送女兒英國留學 https://lih.kg/msPnOT #1 回覆 - 分享自 LIHKG 討論區

💩24🤯61

29 Jan 2025, 02:55 UTC≈6,630 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

大學宿舍14人晚膳後屙嘔 曾食大家樂盆菜 疑製作過程生熟交叉污染 https://lih.kg/mrHukT #1 回覆 - 分享自 LIHKG 討論區

😱23🤣6

11 Jan 2025, 04:06 UTC≈6,070 views72 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

邵家臻離世 佔中入獄後關注囚權 囚友感激在獄中爭取福利- 分享自 LIHKG 討論區 https://lih.kg/3854862

😢59😭9💩2🫡1😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ElderlyChannelHK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 739,457 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“不能說的老人台 ElderlyChannelHK” (@ElderlyChannelHK), 7,286 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ElderlyChannelHK.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.