【恪守莊嚴承諾 維持BNO及香港難民原有門檻 為所有歸英港人提供全面保護】 由於字數限制請到Instagram及Facebook 瀏覽全文。 Instagram Page: https://www.instagram.com/p/DfkQ0S5gojK/?srtk=MXVvOHQ4Z2xvNjllNQ== Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/share/1V9JoRHNrn/?mibextid=wwXIfr
![Telegram profile photo for 🇬🇧Britons In Hong Kong🇬🇧 UK/BN(O) Front [Official Channel]](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/83/832122a9ba99f2ddb09f56d66da76f71ece8d031aa837af492d46787e49657d5.jpg)
Channel
🇬🇧Britons In Hong Kong🇬🇧 UK/BN(O) Front [Official Channel]
@britonshk
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,114subscribers
+348 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001419583102 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @britonshk |
| Description | A group of British Nationals who stand with British value, BN(O) rights and Hong Kong. 英國戰線資訊及文宣 FB: @BritonsHK IG: @BritonsHK TG Channel: @BritonsHK 🌐BHK 英戰線 公海 t.me/bhk1841 本頻道發放內容為英國、香港相關資訊,內容並非必然為BHK所認同及附合其主張。 如有合適文宣或資訊分享,及 被封鎖,有其他建議可以聯絡 @windanz |
| Created | 22 August 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 46 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/britonshk |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 20:50 | 10,114 | -5 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 22:56 | 10,119 | +18 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 10:50 | 10,101 | -16 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 08:31 | 10,117 | +12 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 09:36 | 10,105 | -3 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 09:34 | 10,108 | +15 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 11:11 | 10,093 | +4 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 07:36 | 10,089 | +10 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 04:29 | 10,079 | -3 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 03:01 | 10,082 | -9 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 05:00 | 10,091 | +6 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 05:59 | 10,085 | +46 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 02:46 | 10,039 | -9 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 00:08 | 10,048 | +1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 00:59 | 10,047 | +3 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 22:59 | 10,044 | +10 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 19:57 | 10,034 | -2 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:01 | 10,036 | -15 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 18:29 | 10,051 | -15 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:29 | 10,066 | first reading |
Engagement
118 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.20%
- avg views ÷ 10,114 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 324
- 44 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.954%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 46
- of 118 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 24 of 44 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 118 (1 August 2026 – 13 November 2026) |
| Views total | 14,239 |
| Reactions total | 85 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Nov 2026, 23:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈8,780
- Videos
- ≈190
- Links
- ≈5,620
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 4m 21s
- Average length
- 1m 05s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
186 reactions across 57 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 59 | 31.7% | |
| 👍 | 39 | 21.0% | |
| 😢 | 32 | 17.2% | |
| 🤬 | 32 | 17.2% | |
| 🤣 | 17 | 9.14% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 3.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 64 of the 118 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 189 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 118 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 46 posts held from the last 30 days (2.17%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
蒲公英再致函移民及公民次官 促英國政府信守承諾,勿搬龍門! 繼11月2日政策公布當日提出關注後,蒲公英已於11月13日再致函Jo White,副本送交內政大臣。信件提出四項BN(O)永居訴求: 現行英文門檻仍為B1;政府已表明日後會提高至B2。 ① 維持B1英文;對仍須B2者,最終規則及指引均公布後至少給12個月通知期。 ② 曾如實申報刑事紀錄並獲批BN(O)嘅人士,若相關事實不變、亦無新犯罪,不應純因改例,就因同一紀錄被強制拒批永居。 ③ 永居須審視政治迫害及審訊公正;釐清2019年抗爭定罪「有利推定」是否涵蓋永居及如何落實。 ④ 交代生效日、待決申請及已住滿或接近五年人士過渡保障,釐清受養人永居安排:父母未合資格時,受養子女可否先獲永居?兒童最佳利益須獲保障。 要求內政部逐項回覆,交代規則同時間表。 📄 信件全文 Full letter https://www.patreon.com/DandelionSo…
【英國內相宣佈香港示威定罪無礙以BN(O)移英 受影響者獲「自動考慮」以LOTR入境 港人組織:成效待觀察】 報道全文:https://points-media.com/hmui 英國內政大臣馬曼婷(Shabana Mahmood)周三(11日)去信國會,公佈若任何人因爭取香港民主被定罪,致未能符合申請英國國民(海外)(BN(O))簽證的一般要求,將自動獲考慮給予特許入境許可(Leave Outside the Immigration Rules,LOTR),並可繼續從 BN(O) 途徑受惠,強調 BN(O) 計劃原意之一正是支援 2019 年的示威者。支援港人的組織「蒲公英互助網絡」表示政策屬突破,但稱「自動考慮」不代表必定批准,執行細節仍有待釐清,形容新措施的成效,仍需視乎受影響人士能否獲公平處理,以至穩定和可預期的身份保障。 英國國會人權聯合委員會主席 Alex Sobel 上月去信馬曼婷,提及前民主黨主席胡志偉早前一…
🔥《 西南部論壇:捍衛廣東話,對抗語言打壓!》 公民講場 - 英格蘭西南部論壇 Voices of Hongkongers 廣東話喺香港嘅存在空間正進一步被收窄。 由「普教中」嘅盛行,到在校語言、公共及官方場合嘅語言安排,都將廣東話推向邊緣化,呢啲唔係自然演變,而係政治打壓。 💡語言打壓從來唔止係語言問題。一種語言記載住一段歷史、一套價值觀,仲有一代人嘅生活文化。政權要消滅嘅唔止係講廣東話嘅空間,亦同時收窄緊香港人用自己嘅方式記住自己歷史同文化嘅空間。這是一種無形嘅文化滅絕! 香港講唔到,就由海外嘅我哋繼續講落去,唔好比廣東話喺我哋手上淡出,變成「上一代」嘅口音! 今次論壇請到香港語文研習平台嘅創辦人,同大家深入探討政權對廣東話嘅系統性打壓,以及喺英國生活嘅我哋,實際上可以點樣守住母語同文化傳承。 活動設交流環節,歡迎分享移民後使用廣東話嘅經驗、家庭語言傳承嘅挑戰,以及對保存香港人身份嘅睇法。活動不設門檻,歡迎所有關…
🇬🇧Britons In Hong Kong🇬🇧 UK/BN(O) Front [Official Channel] pinned a photo
【內政部覆人權聯合委員會及蒲公英|救生艇倡議取得階段性勝利】 英國內政部今日(11月11日)分別回覆國會人權聯合委員會及蒲公英,公布抗爭定罪個案的新處理安排。 🟢 內政大臣覆委員會:三項承諾 ① 有利推定 2019年抗爭相關定罪,原則上不應妨礙符合其他資格的港人受惠於BN(O)途徑。 ② 自動交部長考慮 因相關定罪未能符合適合性要求的BN(O)申請,將自動交由部長考慮批出規則外居留。 ③ 正式程序及公開指引 建立正式流程並公布指引,確保相關個案獲一致處理。 🟠 內政部覆蒲公英:仍有問題待解 蒲公英於10月20日去信Lord Collins,要求交代政治定罪的評估準則、12個月刑期觸發的強制拒簽、轉介保障及境外人道保護。今日回信仍重申現有適合性要求及部長酌情權。 有利推定及自動轉介是重要突破,但自動考慮並非自動批簽,政府亦保留因嚴重犯罪行為拒絕申請的權利。 我們將要求政府釐清兩封回信的政策表述,並繼續追問: 🔸…
❤4
【反送中7年|英內相馬曼婷回覆國會議員 確立反送中抗爭者定罪不阻礙申請 BN(O) 簽證】 英國早前傳出有多名曾因參與2019年「反送中運動」的抗爭者,申請 BN(O) 簽證因其定罪及刑期而被自動拒絕。內政大臣馬曼婷周三(11日)書面回覆國會人權聯合委員會的信中,承認不少曾參與「反送中運動」而被定罪的抗爭者本屬 BN(O) 簽證的支援對象,公佈將設立正式程序識別涉及參與2019年抗爭相關定罪的個案,確保相關定罪不會阻礙在其他方面均符合資格的人士受惠於 BN(O) 簽證路徑。 馬曼婷在回覆人權聯合委員會(Joint Committee on Human Rights)主席、工黨下議院議員 Alex Sobel 的信函中,宣佈將在《移民規則》(Immigration Rules)中,改由部長級官員自動考慮向因參與2019年抗爭被定罪的 BN(O) 簽證申請人酌情提供居留許可(leave outside the Immigrati…
🇬🇧Britons In Hong Kong🇬🇧 UK/BN(O) Front [Official Channel] pinned a photo
🇬🇧11月11日,和平紀念日(Remembrance Day)。 1918年11月11日,第一次世界大戰正式停戰。翌年,英王佐治五世確立紀念儀式,悼念在戰火中犧牲的軍民,提醒後人不要忘記戰爭帶來的傷痛與代價。 對身處英國的香港人而言,這一天或許有另一重意義。 經歷過社會變遷,親眼見證自由與制度受到衝擊,我們更明白和平不單只是沒有戰爭,也包括能夠免於恐懼地生活、自由地表達自己的想法,以及保有應有的尊嚴。 歷史不會永遠只被如實記錄,有些事情會被淡化,甚至被刻意改寫。因此,記住曾經發生過的事,本身就有它的意義。 紀念儀式總會結束,但對歷史的記憶不應隨之散去。今天我們能夠享有的自由與權利,從來都不是理所當然。 記住曾經為自由付出的人,也不要忘記我們今天仍然需要守護的價值。 Lest We Forget. 毋忘世界各地為自由而犧牲性命嘅手足。 *** ✏️如果有諗法想講,㩒入嚟一齊傾📝 🇬🇧除咗生活,一個仲會講抗爭嘅英國…
【英國調查揭消費者響應「儲糧水」呼籲 超市樽裝水及罐頭銷量急增 消毒搓手液升幅83%】 報道全文:https://points-media.com/73li 市場調查公司 Worldpanel 周二(10日)公佈新一期英國雜貨市場研究報告,期內雜貨銷售額較去年同期增長 2.2%,多項耐用品增幅顯著,如消毒搓手液銷售額在 10 月最後十天按年大增 83%、樽裝水升幅為 67%,罐頭食物升幅則為 37%。報告估計升幅與英國政府 10 月下旬推出「Be Ready」呼籲,鼓勵國民儲備最少 3 天物資有關,但稱未有恐慌性購買現象。 今次調查涵蓋的 10 月份處於英國政府內閣辦公室 10 月 22 日發表「Be Ready」呼籲前後,調查結果顯示自該天起,罐頭肉類日均銷量增長 43%,相當於每天多約 40 萬名顧客買罐頭肉,平均每人購買約 500 克,即一至兩罐。 Worldpanel 零售與消費者洞察部門主任麥凱維特(Fraser…
【Agoda訂房單寫中國台灣|中國旅客申請入台證 被要求手寫台灣主權聲明】 一張酒店訂房單,演變成兩岸政治表態風波。中國一名旅客申請入台證時,因Agoda酒店訂房單出現「中國台灣」字樣,被台灣移民署要求重新提交,並且要親筆寫下「尊重台灣為主權獨立之國家,台灣與中國互不隸屬」聲明。事件引發網民熱烈討論,事主最終決定放棄補件,移民署則援引《兩岸條例及觀光許可辦法》,指今次補件要求符合規定。 據了解,事主原本打算趁長假到台灣旅遊,周二(10日)在threads公開台灣移民署的補件通知。通知以紅字指出,事主酒店訂房單上的「中國台灣」字樣矮化台灣,要求他重新提交,另外還要親筆寫下「尊重台灣為主權獨立之國家,台灣與中國互不隸屬」,簽名及填上日期後,再上傳至「境外人士線上申辦系統」。事主帳戶前年8月開設,所在地標示為中國。 事主在貼文表示尊重各方立場,但反對官方要求旅客表達特定政治立場,才能取得入境資格,「旅個行要這樣嗎?」。他又指…
👍1
荃灣工廠、尖沙咀街巷、催淚煙、疫症之後嘅空城,以及移居海外嘅人。 #陳慧 用33篇短篇小說延續思念。 《木棉情書》寫失去,也寫「記得」;人走後城市點樣繼續留喺心入面。 《木棉情書》|陳慧 #木馬文化|#正體中文|400頁 英國預訂:https://shorturl.at/jVpQY #全英包郵 台灣預訂,付款後預計兩個月內發貨。 ISBN:9786267980019 白絨書舍|Dandelion Books UK 書籍銷售收入支持 #人權教育 及社群互助
Showing the 12 most recent of 118 posts we hold for @britonshk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@HK_Schedule · 23,2314 postsHong Kong Day 香港節
@HongKongDay126 · 1174 posts「鐘底見」倫敦港人連線
@TimeWillSee · 8074 posts英國經濟圈Channel
@ukeconomiccirclechannel · 4383 postsUK-HK 【公海】Solidarity Public Action Channel
@ukhksolidarity · 4793 postsHackney Sunday Cafe
@HackneySundayCafe · 3902 posts榮光同盟
@addhahk · 3212 posts9月8日香港人權與民主祈禱會Channel
@hk908ch · 9692 posts簽名聯署頻道!!!
@petitionchannel · 1262 postsHONGKONG 1841
@HK1841HK · 441 postHong Kong Democracy Movement
@HKDMovement · 2661 post我的流學日記 @uk 📖(放假!)
@dairyofukstudentinexile · 1671 post港援 Hong Kong Aid
@hkaiduk · 2,0851 postHKT-7
@hkt_7 · 1,0271 postBNO日程表
@ukhkcalendar · 5491 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@DandelionSolidarity · 1,14721 postsHongkongers in Britain 英國港僑協會 Channel 🇬🇧
@HongkongersUK · 4,31611 posts棱角 The Points Global
@thepointsglobal · 6,49110 posts集誌社 The Collective HK
@collectivehk · 2,9748 posts777文宣傳播稿件大合集
@hkposter777 · 22,5887 posts庭刊 HKCourtNews
@hkcourtnews · 2,0615 posts獨立媒體 inmediahk.net
@inmediahknet · 38,5423 posts曼城香港人社區中心 Manchester Hongkonger Community Centre - HKCC
@ManchesterHKCC · 1011 post法庭線 The Witness
@thewitnesshk · 12,1871 post郭子健Daniel Kwok Tsz Kin
@tsingyidan · 5551 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@HK_Schedule · 23,23114 postsScott Scout 認證哨兵消息主頻道
@scottscout · 54,7869 postsAPS Channel 🏳️ 全民自發收聲道
@APSMAGIC · 5,4183 posts「鐘底見」倫敦港人連線
@TimeWillSee · 8072 postsUK-HK 【公海】Solidarity Public Action Channel
@ukhksolidarity · 4792 posts榮光同盟
@addhahk · 3211 postHackney Sunday Cafe
@HackneySundayCafe · 3901 postHKT-7
@hkt_7 · 1,0271 post香港新聞及資訊TG廣播 HKTGB
@hktgb · 37,6761 postHong Kong Day 香港節
@HongKongDay126 · 1171 postHongKonger Unity Square 香港人團結主場
@hongkongerunitysquare · 1691 post簽名聯署頻道!!!
@petitionchannel · 1261 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 4
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 4
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@britonshk named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 5 posts, 5 November 2026 – 10 November 2026
named in 3 posts, 7 November 2026 – 10 November 2026
named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@HK_Schedule · 23,231
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 19 September 2026
@hkposter777 · 22,588
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 September 2026
@hktgb · 37,676
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 31 August 2026
@youarenotalonehk_live · 31,498
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 5 September 2026
@inmediahknet · 38,542
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 31 August 2026
@weatherjj · 42,128
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 28 August 2026
@channelchk · 23,068
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 18 September 2026
@HK_Traffic_News · 43,603
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🇬🇧Britons In Hong Kong🇬🇧 UK/BN(O) Front [Official Channel]” (@britonshk), 10,114 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/britonshk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.