Channel
@MoshangUS
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,548subscribers
-195 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001279990663 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MoshangUS |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 19 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MoshangUS |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Oct 2026, 12:47 | 5,548 | -8 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 06:16 | 5,556 | -13 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 07:04 | 5,569 | -26 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 16:36 | 5,595 | -8 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 10:59 | 5,603 | -36 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 15:57 | 5,639 | -2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 10:39 | 5,641 | -13 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 06:35 | 5,654 | -20 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:14 | 5,674 | -10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 5,684 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:58 | 5,691 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:57 | 5,693 | -7 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 05:28 | 5,700 | -5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 22:29 | 5,705 | -5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 5,710 | -10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 5,720 | -16 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:35 | 5,736 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:30 | 5,743 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:25 | 5,743 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
62 reactions across 19 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 38 | 61.3% | |
| ❤ | 24 | 38.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
叫他们Neocon抬举了，叫食婴族或者食穆婴族更确切。 https://x.com/voterandyfine/status/1400916571892105221 这是FL的国会议员Randy Fine（Zionist战斗机）真实的帖子，川普背书了他25年竞选盖茨辞职空出的位置。陌上PAC当时支持了为他的竞选扫街，出于对于川普总统的信任支持他背书的共和党议员，其实对Fine的底细缺乏了解。这种邪恶仇恨，绝对不是基督教为底蕴的国家提倡的。 再次重申，我们反对美共犹太黑帮，这不是generalize反犹。其实根据文章统计的数据（https://moshangusa.substack.com/p/80b ）推算，犹太资本掌握美国整体财富保守估计也有30-50% ，但是去查他们的家庭中位收入，犹太裔美国人都排不到第一，在印度裔、台湾裔之下。由此可见，犹太社区贫富不均问题，可能是所有族裔里面最突出的。换句话说，好的犹太人是被黑帮一样…
👍2
现实版特洛伊木马故事正在美国共和党内部上演，主角是川党 以前的群友在别地方遇到，现在变得面目全非，成为典型的川党人。我反驳此人时的发言，这里也备份一下。 “川党”指逢川必挺、无脑效忠川普的那些人，不包括支持共和党能够面对川普缺陷的一般支持者。 — 你现在对中共的封杀行为，只要嘻嘻痞针对的是你不爽的人，就拍手庆幸叫好，也忘记了自已被他们半封几年的经历，典型屠龙少年变恶龙，就这点出息。微信/电报川粉群呆长了的人都这种症状，你们就被一点表面现象和强大宣传机器渲染刻画的问题煽动焦虑，而不去找根源根治。捡了芝麻丢了西瓜。 其实华人川粉大部分并不保守，也根本不理解保守派和美国宪法的核心理念，基本只是因为DEI限制孩子上学就业和LGBTQ问题造成支持共和党。同时又不去了解，变性、极端女权、BLM、DEI等这些，都是犹太左为主力搞起来的真相。我文章里写了历史来龙去脉，不重复。open borders也一样，川党也不知道research改…
👍3
美国的婆罗门阶层：“穆斯林是最大威胁！” https://moshangusa.substack.com/p/80b #真相追踪 #争议话题 #时政 #犹太人 #Zionism #社区建设 备份https://x.com/moshangusa/status/2086912392538345538
👍4
反驳那些乱用圣经的Zionists 翻译：“鉴于目前的宣传攻势空前高涨，我想分享一些值得了解的信息。 如何应对常见的犹太复国主义者的辩护与论点。以下是你最常遇到的论点，以及精准、冷静的回应： 1. “耶稣是犹太人，所以你必须支持以色列” • 耶稣是加利利的以色列人，并非现代的阿什肯纳兹（Ashkenazi）犹太人。 • 他严厉批评了法利赛人（现代拉比犹太教的直接宗教前身），称他们为“魔鬼之子”（《约翰福音》8:44）和“毒蛇的种类”。 • 现代犹太教建立在《塔木德》之上，而非《旧约》。《塔木德》成书于基督之后数百年，其中包含极度反基督教的教义。 • 仅仅因为耶稣是犹太人就支持现代以色列，这就像因为耶稣说亚兰语（Aramaic）就必须支持沙特阿拉伯一样荒谬。 2. “以色列是上帝的选民，我们必须祝福他们” • 《旧约》中的盟约是有条件的。上帝多次警告以色列人，不顺服会导致盟约破裂。 • 《新约》明确指出：教会即…
👍2
极左是谁？数据说话 https://moshangusa.substack.com/p/08e #真相追踪 #极左祸国 #社区建设 #共产主义 #文化马克思主义 X备份：https://x.com/moshangusa/status/2085832475968966699
👍3
陌上美国MoshangUS pinned «白左是谁？DEI最受益群体又是哪些人？ https://telegra.ph/%E7%99%BD%E5%B7%A6%E6%98%AF%E8%B0%81DEI%E6%9C%80%E5%8F%97%E7%9B%8A%E7%BE%A4%E4%BD%93%E5%8F%88%E6%98%AF%E5%93%AA%E4%BA%9B-08-01 【摘要】如一位智慧网友评论的，“（他们）很好地利用了左右两大派系的心理弱点，中间派夹在中间也一头雾水就随风倒了。”太会发动群众斗群众了。Zionism不是宗教或者族裔概念，是…»
我们又去看了Charlie。 曾经大家献花的地方，纪念物和鲜花撤去换成了一杆国旗，🇺🇸flag永久注视并守护着不远处查理殉道的地点。 站在查理殉难瞬间所在的位置拍了视频2，就是官方说法里万恶的那颗子弹飞过来的方向。远处树后面是Losee Center，官方说法里的嫌犯就趴在楼顶那一角作案。 这地方也是民间分析里指出并且质疑动机的对象——匆匆掘地三尺、把草皮换成水泥地的现场的那一块。 还在官方发布的嫌犯跳楼的地方，拍了照。可以参照出他跳下的高度，离地距离在4.5米以上。 愿正义伸张，真凶伏法。 God bless America!✝️🇺🇸 Charlie Kirk lives on through us.❤️ https://x.com/moshangusa/status/2084874919066865900 #CharlieKirk #真相追踪 #UVU #政治暗杀
❤6
反驳犹名贵/犹命贵 先定义一下，“犹名贵”是天天反白左，但是一遇到左派是犹太人身份时候，就扣反犹的帽子试图禁言。 “犹命贵”就更厉害了，认为美国年轻人应该给以色利打战、送命。 这是在一个微信群里对他们的反驳，而那个群里这种声音不少。 犹名贵跟奥氏B侯赛因一边选上了总统、并且是连任2届，一边喊“美国是racist国家”一样，得了便宜还卖乖。 见过哪个被歧视的族裔，能取得以下成绩，并且有的可谓垄断性优势： 升学爬藤率上，是白人孩子的25倍； 十个顶级名牌大学的校长里面，占8人； 高院大法官里，几十年里都是比自己族裔人口占比高几十倍的比例，尤其稳稳占据左翼大法官比例的50-75%； 败灯的白宫staff里，30%是他们； 在败灯内阁前十名里占30%，更是占了前6位里的50%以上； 民主党国会参议员里20%是他们，而且好几个是邮寄选票之后当选，个个都收到AIPAC几百万到千万的政治捐款。 说白人被DEI造成逆向歧视、被打压，…
👍3❤1
美国教育的婆罗门阶层 昨天文章里列了MIT和哈佛的校长的情况，把其他Ivy+也查了一下，一共十所，数据如下： Yale过去35年里31年中是犹太裔校长，包括现任； 普林斯顿过去35年里2/3的校长是犹太人，包括现任校长； UPenn过去35年中29年都是犹太裔校长； 哥大相对少一些，6位正式校长里面2个是犹太裔。有意思的是，其中一个穆斯林背景的校长，在2023年因为10/7事件学生那么一抗议以色利，做了不到一年，被换成犹太裔的现在的校长； 康奈尔7位正式校长里5位犹太人，包括现任校长； 达特茅斯2 out of 5校长犹太裔，包括现任； 布朗最少，只有过一个临时校长是犹太裔；而布朗犹太学生有24%，Ivy+里最高之一； 斯坦福5位里的2位犹太校长，包括现任； 加上文章里写的哈佛、MIT，一共10大顶级名校，里面8所的现任校长都是犹太人。80%的比例！ 其中颇有几位都是借着10/7事件高校学生抗议以色利的运动…
❤2👍2
白左是谁？DEI最受益群体又是哪些人？ https://telegra.ph/%E7%99%BD%E5%B7%A6%E6%98%AF%E8%B0%81DEI%E6%9C%80%E5%8F%97%E7%9B%8A%E7%BE%A4%E4%BD%93%E5%8F%88%E6%98%AF%E5%93%AA%E4%BA%9B-08-01 【摘要】如一位智慧网友评论的，“（他们）很好地利用了左右两大派系的心理弱点，中间派夹在中间也一头雾水就随风倒了。”太会发动群众斗群众了。Zionism不是宗教或者族裔概念，是个混合了Jews和Gentiles的政治概念。透过现象看到本质，也就搞懂美国这几十年自残的政策一个接一个不歇气，两党越来越没有本质区别的根源。机会主义者本性的投机政客跟有着强大资源的Zionists联姻，在美国政治里劣币淘汰良币，逐渐形成了不断出卖美国利益、骗选民的uniparty格局，这才是草民头上的真正大山。 #Zioni…
👍2
反左必须也反Zionism，从源头治理 【编者按】把这些话说清楚，其实有压力，第一层压力就是多年政治正确的枷锁带来的心理负担。笔者能预测到至少会遇到自媒体更严重的审核这种相对最轻的困难，其他更多的麻烦，不去多想。伏尔泰说过，“假如你想知道谁控制了你，那就看看谁是你不能批评的人。（To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.）” —— 笔者一度因为大外宣反犹而忽略了以色利问题，其实跟16年看到大外宣挺川、在对美国政治了解不够深入下就积极反川一样，犯了类似的错误。大外宣什么立场都布局放人带风向，仅凭他们的站位简单地“敌人的敌人就是朋友”的逻辑，是会出错的。 在伊朗战争上，大外宣统战部布置了挺战的西行小宝、郭蚂蚁（淘猫先生、墓碑科技），同时也有反战的海阔天空、陶瑞。大外宣的花样百出，什么立场都有他们的人，打入…
👍5❤1
Trump 2028的玩笑，让人想起不退休的RBG 川普在他的自媒体根据地Truth上又发了若干条2028的帖子https://vxtwitter.com/moshangusa/status/2082192494293651667 要选2028的玩笑，他开了很多次。 其实这信息多少也透着一层看不上自己VP的意味？否则一般不应该是多夸夸VP干得好，帮他累积接班人的人脉和资源。只有不是十分满意自己的VP，才会说我要顶着83岁高龄再继续干4年。 也就在川普再度玩笑2028的这两天，政治betting market最大之一的Kalshi，第一次出现党内28年Rubio出线几率超过Vance的情况。 倒是因此想起一个真正到死不退休的人，大法官RBG。记得那时候，有说法金斯伯格是因为不满意奥巴马要指派的接班人，因此不肯退。笔者一直没想明白，奥氏B·侯赛因先森跟她都是很左的人，咋还能有内部矛盾。 RBG是犹太人，来自苏联犹太移民家庭…
👍3❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @MoshangUS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“陌上美国MoshangUS” (@MoshangUS), 5,548 subscribers as measured 19 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MoshangUS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.