荃灣路有車輛著火,往屯門公路方向,近荃灣公園由慢線封閉改為全線封閉,經過請小心。 (1)
Channel
全港交通消息
@HK_Traffic_News
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
43,652subscribers
-642 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001125120249 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HK_Traffic_News |
| Description | 全港即時最新交通消息 https://t.me/HK_Traffic_News RTHK即時新聞 https://t.me/rthk_new_c RTHK Latest News https://t.me/rthk_new_e |
| Created | 15 October 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HK_Traffic_News |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 21:09 | 43,652 | -2 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 23:11 | 43,654 | -18 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 20:58 | 43,672 | -15 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 18:40 | 43,687 | -6 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 15:08 | 43,693 | -9 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 11:37 | 43,702 | -15 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 10:50 | 43,717 | -11 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 09:18 | 43,728 | -17 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 06:46 | 43,745 | -1 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 01:50 | 43,746 | -12 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 22:44 | 43,758 | -1 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 17:01 | 43,759 | +2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 18:09 | 43,757 | -14 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 16:26 | 43,771 | -18 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 11:19 | 43,789 | -13 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 05:48 | 43,802 | -1 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 04:48 | 43,803 | -19 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 08:01 | 43,822 | -11 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 07:47 | 43,833 | -5 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 09:56 | 43,838 | first reading |
Engagement
3,172 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 180 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.925%
- avg views ÷ 43,652 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 404
- 966 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 966
- of 3,172 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 3,172 (5 August 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 389,927 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 08:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Links
- 70
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 72 of 966 posts held from the last 30 days (7.45%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
荃灣路有車輛著火,往屯門公路方向,近荃灣公園慢線封閉,經過請小心。 (1)
荃灣路往屯門公路方向,近荃灣公園慢線有壞車阻路,經過請小心。 (2)
較早前康莊道往紅隧方向,近理工大學的交通意外已清理,龍尾:理工彎位。
康莊道往紅隧方向,近理工大學有交通意外,龍尾:接近愛民邨。
較早前告士打道往中環方向,近波斯富街的交通意外已清理,一帶車多。
較早前西隧往九龍方向,管道內快線的交通意外已清理,龍尾:干諾道中天橋近林士街。
西隧往九龍方向,管道內快線有交通意外,一帶車多。
較早前新田公路往元朗方向,近逢吉鄉的交通意外已清理,龍尾:壆圍村。
告士打道往中環方向,近波斯富街有交通意外,龍尾:銅鑼灣花園。
新田公路往元朗方向,近逢吉鄉有交通意外,龍尾:壆圍村。
較早前博愛迴旋處內的交通意外已清理,龍尾:大旗嶺村及青朗公路近逢吉鄉路。
Showing the 12 most recent of 3,172 posts we hold for @HK_Traffic_News. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@HK_Traffic_News edited 6 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 9 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 25 October 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@HKbattlelive · 11,4601 post荃葵青交通 Transport for TW & KT Channel
@TW_KC_TY_Transport_channel · 1,6701 post九西Channel
@YTM1G · 2,4031 post發夢手機維修(夢維寺)
@dreamingrepair852 · 781 post🍵✈️Info
@safetystationinfo · 22,5991 post🕯️天水圍救人小隊Channel
@tswsave · 5,7131 post荃民街坊資訊頻道
@twinfochannel · 1,7921 post點擊此處與黃大仙展開對話
@wtsraid · 3271 post元朗牛哨兵
@yuenlongox · 8,7381 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@rthk_new_c · 48,979#1
@metwarn · 24,230#2
@channelchk · 23,074#3
@nowtv_news · 42,377#4
@weatherjj · 42,174#5
@hkweathernews · 4,756#6
@TW_KC_TY_Transport_channel · 1,670#7
@windseasonhk · 10,650#8
@whocaresweather · 2,565#9
@cr881903 · 3,357#10
@hkwinds · 2,789#11
@mtrupdate · 2,833#12
@GoldRacing · 5,131#13
@lihkg_official · 12,109#14
@HKbattlelive · 11,460#15
@hongkongersecrets · 3,489#16
@localpresshk · 6,190#17
@hkindepenAsso2 · 2,385#18
@boomheadhk · 12,087#19
@universalsentinelsinblack · 11,577#20
@hktgb · 37,743#21
@hkposter777 · 22,578#22
@A20260612 · 4,022#23
@The_watcher_channel · 7,776#24
@Wearekwaitsingerchannel · 1,182#25
@hkgeotrekker · 1,102#26
@wthktgchannel · 1,413#27
@APSMAGIC · 5,333#28
@youarenotalonehk_info · 7,166#29
@csradar_news_channel · 5,030#30
@inmediahknet · 38,595#31
@hkitalk · 4,128#32
@thewitnesshk · 12,190#33
@mirotoxicfans · 7,651#34
@youarenotalonehk_live · 31,547#35
@europechinese · 7,153#36
@HongKongTyphoon · 941#37
@the_chaser_news · 7,582#38
@Ilovekeung · 6,027#39
@iam7oldaclocked · 848#40
@akabbno1 · 370#41
@ElderlyChannelHK · 7,066#42
@hk_propaganda · 1,861#43
@thepointsglobal · 6,482#44
@newmobilelife · 12,614#45
@chart_ap903 · 3,294#46
@brother125 · 9,285#47
@TWPMGO · 2,602#48
@b8888888888888888888888888888888 · 1,833#49
@britonshk · 10,117#50
@cfubigjjtips · 7,462#51
@hkconstructionbrawl · 1,525#52
@IngressChinese · 3,766#53
@janicewintogether · 1,435#54
@Dinnccc · 2,875#55
@chrisgorandchick · 985#56
@StockIntelligenceNews · 17,115#57
@collectivehk · 2,972#58
@youarenotalonehk · 48,011#59
@candyw1219 · 2,349#60
@mirrorcalendarhk · 7,533#61
@HKZCOPE · 457#62
@phonehkxyz · 1,954#63
@Luckyguyarlooooo · 9,906#64
@northstation · 5,441#65
@lampwestisme · 21,092#66
@daysinformation · 2,254#67
@iloveulobbchu · 13,340#68
@pkmgclass · 474#69
@FPLFootball · 19,284#70
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@channelchk · 23,074
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 18 September 2026
@nowtv_news · 42,377
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 29 August 2026
@rthk_new_c · 48,979
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 25 August 2026
@weatherjj · 42,174
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 28 August 2026
@metwarn · 24,230
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 16 September 2026
@hktgb · 37,743
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 31 August 2026
@hkposter777 · 22,578
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 September 2026
@youarenotalonehk_live · 31,547
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 5 September 2026
@youarenotalonehk · 48,011
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
@inmediahknet · 38,595
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 31 August 2026
@HK_Schedule · 23,156
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 19 September 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“全港交通消息” (@HK_Traffic_News), 43,652 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HK_Traffic_News.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.