香江才子四星沉 詞中兒女亦風霜 俠骨一去文魂冷 筆掃江湖夢未央

Channel
PPPNEWS
@pppnewstg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,921subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001297835177 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pppnewstg |
| Created | 30 September 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pppnewstg |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 2,921 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:31 | 2,922 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 2,923 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:26 | 2,923 | first reading |
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 7 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
7,8 :警方拘捕兩名不在指定示威區的香港人,此舉引起在場人士強烈不滿並一度圍堵警車要求釋放兩名被捕人士。(14:54) 9,10,11 :在場有参予集會人士暈倒被抬到示威區後方的馬路上等待救援(16:25) 12,13,14,15 :警方封鎖來回全4線行車道,交通需臨時改道。(16:29) 7, 8: Police arrest two Hong Kongers who were outside the designated protest zone, sparking strong discontent among those present. Protesters temporarily surrounded the police vehicle, demanding the release of the arrested individuals (14:54). 9, 10, 11: A participant at …
1,2 :示威者手持印有標語及小熊維尼的紙牌 3 ,4 :警方嘗試控制示威人士在舊皇家鑄幣廠外的示威指定區內(14:12) 5,6 :示威者人數陸續增加,人群被迫出指定示威區外的馬路上(14:29) 1, 2 :The protesters held signs with slogans and images of Winnie the Pooh . 3, 4: Police attempt to control protesters within the designated protest zone outside the Old Royal Mint (14:12). 5, 6: The number of protesters continues to grow, forcing the crowd onto the roadway outside the designated protest zone (14:29…
February 8 Protest Against China’s Super Embassy at the Former Royal Mint in London (EC3N 4AB): The protest began at 2:00 PM on February 8, 2025, with turnout far exceeding expectations. Police designated a protest zone in an attempt to contain the demonstrators, but the crowd size surpassed initial estimates. At one point, protesters outside the Royal Mint were forced onto the road due to space constraints. British…
2月8日 反對中國在倫敦舊皇家鑄幣廠(EC3N 4AB)落成超級大使館的示威活動: 集會於2025年2月8日下午2時開始,参予反對活動人數遠超預期。警方劃分示威區企圖容納示威者但人數超出預算,在皇家鑄幣廠外的集會人士一度因無法容納而被迫出馬路,英國警方拘捕兩名站於示威區外馬路上的香港人,但路面堵塞情況未有改善。期間亦有参予示威人士暈倒。警方一度緊急封鎖皇家鑄幣廠對出來回行車線。高峰時期行車來回4線均受影響,警方需增加現場交通警員臨時指揮車輛改道。 PPPN 記者—鷹眼 ----------------------------------- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PPPNinternation/ IG: https://instagram.com/pppn_international Telegram: http://t.me/pppnewstg
【突發】英國反移民示威之夜 保頓(Bolton) Queen's park附近,晚上八點左右有市民聚集。網上傳聞會於該處移民律師行示威。不過現場只見到市民舉起反極右及反歧視標語,保護律師行。 期間本台記者訪問一位途人關於極右人士作出的行動有何意見,他認為極度愚蠢,因為周圍都有CCTV。 PPPN 記者—鷹眼 ----------------------------------- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PPPNinternation/ IG: https://instagram.com/pppn_international Telegram: http://t.me/pppnewstg
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @pppnewstg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,031,361 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PPPNEWS” (@pppnewstg), 2,921 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pppnewstg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.