Channel
@youarenotalonehk_info
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,166subscribers
-258 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001219251616 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @youarenotalonehk_info |
| Description | 推送同路人、被捕人士相關新聞及資訊 報料投稿至 @youarenotalonehk_infobot 後備：@youarenotalonehk_info2bot ‼️只限資訊部‼️ 【關注組】 @youarenotalonehk 【直播台】 @youarenotalonehk_live 【資訊部】 @youarenotalonehk_info 【搜證部】 @youarenotalonehk_evidence 【收信部】 @youarenotalonehk_mailbox |
| Created | 8 October 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/youarenotalonehk_info |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 06:46 | 7,166 | -10 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 04:46 | 7,176 | -3 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 13:10 | 7,179 | -11 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 20:27 | 7,190 | -9 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 21:56 | 7,199 | -11 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 15:07 | 7,210 | -10 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 15:46 | 7,220 | -8 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 19:59 | 7,228 | -8 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 11:38 | 7,236 | -18 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 07:20 | 7,254 | -18 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 02:36 | 7,272 | -38 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 09:37 | 7,310 | -11 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:40 | 7,321 | -12 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 10:00 | 7,333 | -22 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 02:37 | 7,355 | -8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 7,363 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:27 | 7,367 | -5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 7,372 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 7,374 | -7 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:44 | 7,381 | first reading |
30 posts held, back to 9 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 30 (9 March 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 2,193 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 20:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
國安處旺角拘34歲公司董事 涉輸入煽動刊物供書店出售 【有線新聞】警方國安處上午於旺角區採取執法行動，拘捕一名34歲本地男子，涉嫌違反《維護國家安全條例》第24條「輸入具煽動意圖的刊物」罪。 警方調查顯示，該名被捕男子為一間本地公司董事，涉嫌於今年10月輸入煽動書籍到本地書店出售，意圖引起公眾對中央及特區政府的憎恨、藐視或離叛情緒。警方根據法庭手令搜查該名被捕男子的住所及公司，並檢獲用作購入煽動書籍的數碼裝置、文件及其他煽動書籍。被捕人現正被扣留調查。 （原文） #20261105新聞
7.1立會暴動案｜王宗堯申終極上訴許可被拒 終院指無合理給予許可的理由 【法庭線】七一立法會暴動案 12 人被裁定罪成，分別判囚 4 年 7 個月至 6 年 10 個月。王宗堯、港大學生會前會長孫曉嵐等 7 人提出定罪和刑罰上訴，今年 3 月被上訴庭駁回。 其中判囚 6 年 2 個月的王宗堯，其後直接向終審法院申請上訴許可，由終院常任法官李義、林文瀚及非常任法官陳兆愷組成的上訴委員會，上周五（10 月 30 日）拒絕申請，指案件無合理給予上訴許可的理由。換言之，王無法再透過上訴挑戰原訟庭決定。假設王獲三分一獄中行為良好扣減，料須服刑至 2028 年 3 月。(全文) #20261102新聞 #0701立法會
無業男國慶前後藍田毀慶國慶旗幟 認兩項刑事損壞罪 准$1,000保釋至10.29判刑 【庭刊】「藍田慶祝國慶籌備委員會」於國慶前後，在藍田平田邨平信樓附近懸掛約 200面慶祝國慶旗幟，其後兩度發現共16面旗幟遭損壞。一名53歲無業男涉案被捕，被控兩項刑事損壞罪。案件今（15日）在觀塘裁判法院提堂，被告承認兩罪，須向涉案委員會成員賠款800港元，並押後至10月29日判刑。被告其間准以1,000港元保釋候判。（全文） #20261015新聞
涉於保險社交媒體刊煽動帖文 國安處拘前北區動源成員黃嘉浩及女友人 【獨立媒體】警務處國家安全處今日（8日）表示，於前日（6日）以嫌違反《維護國家安全條例》第二十四條「出於煽動意圖作出一項具煽動意圖的作為」罪，於九龍區拘捕一名38歲男子及一名38歲女子。多個媒體引述消息稱，被捕男子為前「北區動源」成員、持牌保險經紀黃嘉浩，二人涉嫌在不同社交平台上營運專頁，發布煽動他人對特區憲制秩序憎恨的帖文，同時藉此銷售保險產品圖利。 （全文） #20261008新聞
林卓廷等人被指逼刪示威者照罪脫 律政司上訴 上訴庭本周五頒判詞判決 【法庭線】2019 年 7 月「光復屯門公園」遊行後，時任立法會議員林卓廷等 3 人，被指要求他人刪去示威者照片，2023 年被裁定意圖妨礙司法公正等罪不成立。律政司以案件呈述方式就無罪及訟費裁決上訴，上訴庭今年 6 月審理，押後 6 個月內頒裁決。 司法機構網頁顯示，案件將在本周五（9 日）下判詞判決，料需時 5 分鐘。（全文） #20261006新聞 #20190706屯門
「爆炸頭」創辦人鄧浩榮被扣查近兩日後准保釋 據報涉煽動被捕 【法庭線】網媒「Boom News – 爆炸頭」鄧浩榮被扣查近兩日後，周五（2 日）凌晨約 12 時半穿著被捕時的灰色上衣步出油麻地警署。他向在場記者表示「冇嘢想講呀⋯⋯辛苦晒、辛苦晒，咁夜都等」，其後獨自步行離開。 多間傳媒早前引述消息指，警方國安處周三（9 月 30 日）早上拘捕兩人，包括鄧浩榮以及前社民連成員、牙醫李盈姿，指他們涉嫌於今年 8月 31 日在港鐵太子站外散播假訊息煽動。(全文) #20261002新聞
警國安處拘捕「爆炸頭」 指涉發布假消息煽動 【獨立媒體】警方國安處今早登門拘捕「爆炸頭」鄧浩榮，指涉發布假消息煽動。其中《星島日報》拍得鄧被押離住所的獨家圖片。 有媒體引述消息指，事件涉今年8月31日太子站外事件，今早行動拘捕包括「爆炸頭」在內的2人。（全文） #20260930新聞 #港區國安法 #爆炸頭
【初選47人案】伍健偉中秋節出獄：無一刻唔為我自己去驕傲 【獨立媒體】民主派初選47人案,案中被告被控串謀顛覆國家 政權,被判入獄5年7個月的伍健偉,他今日在中 秋節刑滿獲釋。初選案被告出獄後各有不同路向, 部分人已離開香港。伍健偉接受《獨媒》訪問時表 明會留在香港,「在適當位置幫香港進步」、「達到 夢想」:「一個自由、公義、人人都免於恐懼嘅香港。」他又分享在獄中看到一篇俄羅斯作家的文章,指該國良善的人唯一出路便是監獄:「如果用我嘅版本,一個追求真誠嘅人,佢唯一嘅歸宿亦都可能係 監獄。我呢5年7個月,有傷心,有迷惘,有憤 怒,但我無一刻唔為我自己去驕傲,因為我當年選 擇咗做一啲為香港更加好嘅事情,我有選擇去付 出,我有選擇去犧牲。我亦都可以有幸為呢個地 方,同我鍾意嘅香港人去付出呢一切。對於呢件 事,我從來無後悔過。(全文) #20260925新聞 #港區國安法 #民主派初選
蘋果國安案｜時任執總林文宗及英文版主管馮偉光不服刑期申上訴許可 排期明年1.22處理 預留3小時 暫未顯示審理法官 【庭刊】壹傳媒傳媒創辦人黎智英及3間蘋果公司，歷156天審訊，黎智英就串謀勾結外國勢力等罪被判囚20年，其餘認罪被告被判囚6年9個月至10年，其中前《蘋果日報》英文版主管馮偉光、前執行總編輯林文宗各被判囚10年，二人早前提出刑期上訴，司法機構網頁顯示，兩人的不服刑罰上訴許可申請，排期於2027年1月22日進行，料需時3小時，暫未顯示處理申請的法官。（全文） #20260909新聞 #港區國安法 #蘋果日報
支聯會煽顛罪成 高院本周五早上判刑 最高可囚10年 【法庭線】支聯會被指煽顛案，法庭將於本周五（11日）早上10時在西九龍裁判法院判刑，預計需時60分鐘，由3名《國安法》指定法官負責。案件8月底完成處理求情，官料兩周內判刑。 李卓人、何俊仁一方主張本案不及47人案嚴重，因支聯會從沒提出實際計劃，故屬「情節較輕」，刑期應在5年以下。自辯的鄒幸彤稱不會「求情」，如法庭裁定追求「結束一黨專政」是違憲及性質嚴重，她將視為「讚美」，又說會繼續為平反六四、結束專政而努力，稱此是其公開承諾，「亦都係燭光之中，對亡靈作出嘅誓言」。 （全文） #20260908新聞 #支聯會
國安處拘捕2男1女 指8.31太子站外叫喊煽動性口號 【獨立媒體】今年8月31日，有市民一如過去多年，到港鐵太子站外，今年有市民在太子站手持鮮花，有女子高喊「831有冇死過人，我哋完全唔知！」「831真相」等口號。 警方國安處表示，指有人在8月31日晚上，於港鐵太子站外手持花束站立，並叫喊具煽動性的口號，有關人士涉嫌散播假消息，以謊言攻擊香港特區政府及抹黑警隊，意圖煽動他人引起對香港特區政府及執法部門的憎恨。 國安處於9月3日在港島及九龍區採取執法行動，以涉嫌違反《維護國家安全條例》第24條，即「出於煽動意圖作出具煽動意圖的作為」罪拘捕3名涉案人，包括2名本地男子及1名本地女子，年齡介乎33至79歲。 （全文） #20260905新聞 #20260831太子 #港區國安法
政府入稟申請充公黎智英財產 排期11.30進行兩日聆訊 【法庭線】壹傳媒創辦人黎智英被裁定串謀勾結外力等 3 罪成，今年 2 月被判囚 20 年。港府早前引《國安法》及實施細則向原訟庭申請充公令，向黎至少充公 1.27 億元。案件原排期 7 月 8 日聆訊。律政司早前指，法庭已取消原訂日期。 據司法機構網頁最新顯示，案件排期 11 月 30 日處理，料進行兩日聆訊。（全文） #20260731新聞 #蘋果日報
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @youarenotalonehk_info. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“被捕人士資訊部” (@youarenotalonehk_info), 7,166 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/youarenotalonehk_info.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.