俄军夜袭基辅16人遇难 泽连斯基谴责莫斯科升级冲突 乌克兰当局周四表示,俄罗斯又一夜的轰炸导致基辅及其周边地区至少16人死亡,总统沃洛迪米尔·泽连斯基指责莫斯科“投资”弹道导弹以推动局势升级。 👉 继续浏览后续:https://rfi.my/Cyin.g

Channel
RFI 华语 - 法国国际广播电台
@RFI_Cn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,123subscribers
+25 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001748423104 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RFI_Cn |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RFI_Cn |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 7,123 | +5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 7,118 | +11 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:54 | 7,107 | +3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 7,104 | +2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 7,102 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:20 | 7,099 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:18 | 7,102 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 7,098 | first reading |
Engagement
147 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.37%
- avg views ÷ 7,123 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 240
- 147 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.986%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 147
- of 147 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 88 of 147 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 147 (5 August 2026 – 20 August 2026) |
| Views total | 35,236 |
| Reactions total | 218 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
194 reactions across 72 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💩 | 42 | 21.6% | |
| 👍 | 37 | 19.1% | |
| 👏 | 16 | 8.25% | |
| ❤ | 14 | 7.22% | |
| 🙏 | 14 | 7.22% | |
| 🤣 | 13 | 6.70% | |
| 🤮 | 13 | 6.70% | |
| 🤡 | 12 | 6.19% | |
| 🤬 | 7 | 3.61% | |
| 🕊 | 4 | 2.06% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 2.06% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 1.03% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.03% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 1.03% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.03% | |
| 🥱 | 2 | 1.03% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 0.515% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.515% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.515% | |
| 🖕 | 1 | 0.515% | |
| 4 further kinds | 4 | 2.06% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 88 of the 147 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 218reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 147 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
一名中国公民承认将2万澳元藏茶叶里行贿澳洲公职人员获缓刑1年即将被驱逐 当事人朱先生向澳洲法庭表示抱歉,并称,“在我的国家,人们经常赠送此类礼物”。他被羁押26天后,获缓刑12个月,即将被驱逐出境。 👉 继续浏览后续:https://rfi.my/Cyhu.g
👍1👏1
特朗普宣布今年将与金正恩会面后 朝鲜发射了10来枚短程导弹 韩国军方周四宣布,朝鲜发射了约10枚弹道导弹。此前数小时,唐纳德·特朗普曾表示,他将于今年与朝鲜领导人金正恩会面。 👉 继续浏览后续:https://rfi.my/CyhJ.g
🤣2🤡1
中国汽车进军法国:快速扩大经销网络的商业策略 回声报(Les Échos)今天刊登了一篇文章,讨论中国汽车品牌于法国快速增设经销据点的策略。题为 “顺势而为,方为上策:中国品牌以闪电般的速度拓展汽车经销店”。 👉 继续浏览后续:https://rfi.my/CyhC.g
特朗普警告 任何支持伊朗的国家都将面临经济后果 美国总统特朗普警告称,任何向伊朗提供“任何形式的生命线”的国家都将面临经济后果。伊朗外长回应谴责“美国的经济恐怖主义威胁着全球经济和世界各国的国家主权。” 👉 继续浏览后续:https://rfi.my/CyfY.g
👍2👏1🤮1
台湾2027年度国防预算首破1兆新台币 占GDP逾3% 台湾行政院星期四(8月20日)通过2027年度中央政府总预算案,其中整体国防预算首度突破1兆新台币,达到1兆1225亿元,按行政院最新预估的2027年GDP计算,占比约3.01%,是历来首次超过GDP的3%。 👉 继续浏览后续:https://rfi.my/Cyf7.g
👍1
恒大创始人许家印被判终身监禁 中国深圳法院周四判处房地产巨头恒大集团创始人无期徒刑,并对这家象征着房地产危机的企业集团处以相当于超过20亿欧元的罚款,该危机仍在持续拖累中国经济。 👉 继续浏览后续:https://rfi.my/CyeO.g
🤡2🍌1🤔1🙏1
长和就港口争议展开国际仲裁 向巴拿马索偿逾15亿美元 长和出售中港以外全球港口业务而触发地缘政治压力丶最终由巴拿马政府撤销长和子公司在当地两个港口的经营权及接管码硕告一段落後,长和已启动国际仲裁程序,要求巴拿马就其违反投资保护条约行为破坏长和投资,赔偿超过15亿美元。 👉 继续浏览后续:https://rfi.my/Cye2.g
美国制裁国际刑事法院院长与俄罗斯做法相仿? 特朗普的美国政府对国际刑事法院的制裁步步升级,直至下令制裁该法院院长、日本籍院长赤根智子女士。最主要的理由就一个:国际刑事法院发布了针对以色列总理内塔尼亚胡的逮捕令,次要理由是该法院曾批准调查美军涉嫌在阿富汗犯下的暴行等,被指构成“对美国主权的威胁”。 👉 继续浏览后续:https://rfi.my/Cybb.g
美国药企莫德纳与默沙东研发的皮肤癌治疗疫苗试验取得突破 美国制药企业默沙东和莫德纳周三(8月19日)宣布,其实验性信使核糖核酸(mRNA)皮肤癌疫苗在最后阶段临床试验中取得积极结果。专家认为,这是治疗此类癌症的一项“重大突破”。 👉 继续浏览后续:https://rfi.my/CybK.g
👍1
法国今年高温期间死亡人数较正常水平多出7300人 法国自7月底以来持续遭遇今年第三轮热浪,其持续时间在法国有记录以来位居前列。法国卫生部门周三(8月19日)公布的临时统计显示,今年数轮高温期间的超额死亡人数已达7300人。 👉 继续浏览后续:https://rfi.my/CybI.g
特朗普宣布将与金正恩会面 并称朝鲜拥有57枚核弹 美国总统特朗普周三宣布,他将在年内会见朝鲜领导人金正恩。与此同时,应其要求,美韩周一启动的联合军演已被缩短。 👉 继续浏览后续:https://rfi.my/Cyb9.g
Showing the 12 most recent of 147 posts we hold for @RFI_Cn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 269,995 of 1,622,129entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@TwtVideoOfChina · 72,931
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RFI 华语 - 法国国际广播电台” (@RFI_Cn), 7,123 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RFI_Cn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.