Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 2026香港天氣及風暴追擊 (Since 2017) 天佑香港。

Channel

2026香港天氣及風暴追擊 (Since 2017) 天佑香港。

@windseasonhk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,818subscribers

-19 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001129544982
TypeChannel
Username@windseasonhk
Description#Admin專欄 會有大量主觀見解 @happyfridayindex 每星期一次投票,極重要。 @Hongkongersecrets 會Post香港人嘅心聲。 @Freehkxmascard (係Freehk文宣總頻道) #投稿 可以PM 我哋個Bot喇! 報料: 相+時+事+地+人+物
Created10 June 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/windseasonhk

Growth

10,81810,83910,828.56 August 2026 — 10,837 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,837 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,839 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,837 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,838 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,834 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,835 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,831 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,830 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,831 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,826 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,818 subscribers6 August 202617 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 11 days, net -19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,815–10,842 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 12:0510,818-8
16 Aug 2026, 02:5810,826-5
14 Aug 2026, 12:5710,831+1
13 Aug 2026, 02:5410,830-1
12 Aug 2026, 04:3510,831-4
11 Aug 2026, 06:0410,835+1
10 Aug 2026, 03:3110,834-4
9 Aug 2026, 03:5210,838+1
8 Aug 2026, 01:0510,837-2
7 Aug 2026, 00:2010,839+2
6 Aug 2026, 02:4610,837no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:0110,837first reading

Engagement

79 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.14%
avg views ÷ 10,818 subscribers
Avg views / post
448
79 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
79
of 79 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 75 of 79 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held79 (4 August 202617 August 2026)
Views total35,364
Reactions total536
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 23:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
14,600
Videos
627
Links
32,200

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

419 reactions across 55 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5212.4%
🤡4911.7%
😁399.31%
👍327.64%
317.40%
🤣296.92%
🖕276.44%
🤮194.53%
👏163.82%
😱163.82%
🥱163.82%
😢143.34%
💩112.63%
👻102.39%
💊102.39%
👎92.15%
🤬92.15%
💯81.91%
🥴61.43%
🐳30.716%
7 further kinds133.10%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 75 of the 79 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 536reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 79 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 22:43 UTC63 viewsread 17 August 2026

14歲操普通話仔涉虐貓|職員憶男生慌張求診:手帶抓痕前言不對後語 聲稱「隻貓亂衝亂撞」惹疑 https://lih.kg/4145563 - 分享自 LIHKG 討論區

17 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC180 viewsread 17 August 2026
Forwarded from @hkoldsongs

#我們不分 #謝安琪 #最靚人妻? #Error #二零年代 https://youtu.be/lQiF_ODCFbw

14 Aug 2026, 06:55 UTC592 views2 reactionsread 17 August 2026

中國國際航空即日起用國產C919執飛北京來往烏蘭巴托航班 https://lih.kg/4144101 - 分享自 LIHKG 討論區中國國際航空即日起用國產C919執飛北京來往烏蘭巴托航班 https://lih.kg/4144101 - 分享自 LIHKG 討論區

🔥2

14 Aug 2026, 05:36 UTC587 views0 reactionsread 17 August 2026

醫療黑幕 1萬元即可買到醫生執照? 內地驚現「一條龍」假證產業鏈,記者實測翌日官網即查獲執業資格! https://lih.kg/4144214 - 分享自 LIHKG 討論區

14 Aug 2026, 04:54 UTC533 views5 reactionsread 17 August 2026

天文台首度公開黑球溫度數據 最熱天 10 個監測站均超 31 達日本最危險級別 https://lih.kg/4144200 - 分享自 LIHKG 討論區

🔥5

14 Aug 2026, 03:33 UTC532 views2 reactionsread 17 August 2026

25歲港女上網公審自己 墮胎決定掀熱議! 「多謝你搵我做媽咪,但我無資格」 https://lih.kg/4144037 - 分享自 LIHKG 討論區

👍2

14 Aug 2026, 02:55 UTC480 views8 reactionsread 17 August 2026

原來葵芳站催淚彈又七周年 https://lih.kg/4144273 - 分享自 LIHKG 討論區

😢7👍1

14 Aug 2026, 01:25 UTC459 views5 reactionsread 17 August 2026

內地過江龍來港「水土不服」 檸季fufuland全線結業 蜜雪冰城執淨5間 專家分析攻港失敗原因 https://lih.kg/4144342 - 分享自 LIHKG 討論區

💩5

14 Aug 2026, 00:48 UTC441 viewsread 17 August 2026

郭富城三代同堂遠赴獅城溫馨度假 年輕兩歲外父樣貌差成焦點 https://lih.kg/4144319 - 分享自 LIHKG 討論區

13 Aug 2026, 23:38 UTC440 views6 reactionsread 17 August 2026

美國起訴11人涉助中國公民假結婚 獲取美國居留身份 https://lih.kg/4144564 - 分享自 LIHKG 討論區

👍6

13 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC458 views9 reactionsread 17 August 2026

鄧炳強批記協「無認受性」選舉「黑箱作業」 明光社反駁:「大聲不一定有道理 不敢張揚不一定是理虧」可能是「秀才遇著兵」 https://lih.kg/4144648 - 分享自 LIHKG 討論區

😁9

12 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC483 views4 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Forwarded from @readjjb

文明在倒退,還是我們終於卸下了偽裝? 這幾年,很多人心裡都有一種揮之不去的荒謬感:世界好像越變越陌生,甚至越變越野蠻。 按理說,2020年代的科技已經發達得超乎想像,AI、太空科技日新月異。但回看現實,國際間在打最原始的陣地戰,網絡上充斥著最惡毒的公審與非黑即白的撕裂,連原本講求體面的政治人物,也開始用最粗俗的語言去煽動群眾。這種巨大的反差,讓人不禁懷疑:我們是不是正在經歷一場集體的「文明倒退」? 但如果我們把這層社會的皮肉切開,看進骨子裡,或許這根本不是倒退,而是「文明」這件外衣在巨大的壓力下,終於被扯爛了。 我們過去幾十年享受的體面、包容與理性,其實是有條件的。那是建立在冷戰後經濟全球化、物質極度充裕、且沒有大型天災人禍的黃金泡泡裡。當大家都有飯吃、前途一片光明時,要假裝成一個「文明人」並不難——我們可以大談普世價值,對異見者展現包容。 然而,過去這五年,這層精緻的糖衣被徹底剥落。世紀疫情、通脹肆虐、地緣政治失控,

👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 79 posts we hold for @windseasonhk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 21,073 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“2026香港天氣及風暴追擊 (Since 2017) 天佑香港。” (@windseasonhk), 10,818 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/windseasonhk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.