#高等法院第一庭 #譚耀豪法官 #港區國安法 🔥#判刑 黃之鋒(28) 🛑因另案服刑中,原定於 2027年1月7日出獄。 控罪:串謀勾結外國或者境外勢力危害國家安全 於2020年7月1日至2020年11月23日期間(包括首尾兩日),在香港,與羅冠聰及其他身份不詳的人一同串謀,請求外國或者境外機構、組織、人員實施對香港特別行政區或者中華人民共和國進行制裁、封鎖或者採取其他敵對行動。 背景:民主派初選 47 人案服刑中的前香港眾志秘書長黃之鋒,2025年6月6日在赤柱監獄被捕,被控《國安法》「串謀勾結外國或者境外勢力危害國家安全」罪。如沒有此控罪,原應該於2027年1月服刑完畢。 辯方代表:#陳政龍資深大律師、 #司徒子朗大律師 控方代表:#羅天瑋署理助理刑事檢控專員 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [09:31] 開庭 法官指早前被告已認罪, 並由陳資深大律師作出求情。摘要會派予傳媒。判…

Channel
法庭文字直播台
@youarenotalonehk_live
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
31,547subscribers
-1,095 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001239305819 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @youarenotalonehk_live |
| Created | 2 October 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/youarenotalonehk_live |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 14:47 | 31,547 | -18 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 12:35 | 31,565 | -5 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 11:26 | 31,570 | -9 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 12:34 | 31,579 | -25 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 09:35 | 31,604 | -7 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 06:36 | 31,611 | +1 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 04:09 | 31,610 | -19 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 02:08 | 31,629 | -1 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 03:38 | 31,630 | -27 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 02:09 | 31,657 | -13 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 04:00 | 31,670 | -6 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 03:51 | 31,676 | -24 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 00:36 | 31,700 | -16 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 02:28 | 31,716 | -4 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 01:59 | 31,720 | -27 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 23:46 | 31,747 | -6 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 22:14 | 31,753 | -24 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 15:36 | 31,777 | -12 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 11:57 | 31,789 | -17 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 13:18 | 31,806 | first reading |
Engagement
138 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 163 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.21%
- avg views ÷ 31,547 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 696
- 58 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 58
- of 138 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 138 (15 July 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 40,358 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 10:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 12 of 58 posts held from the last 30 days (20.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
【#上庭聲援 - 11月05日 星期四】 [旁聽須知][交通資訊] [2026年11月份聲援預告] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 🏛高 等 法 院3樓1庭 👨🏻⚖️譚耀豪法官 🕤09:30 👤黃之鋒(28)🛑因另案服刑中 🔥#判刑 [2/1] (#港區國安法 串謀勾結外國勢力) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
#終審法院終審法庭 #張舉能終審法院首席法官 #李義終審法院常任法官 #霍兆剛終審法院常任法官 #林文瀚終審法院常任法官 #楊偉廉終審法院非常任法官 #20221001深水埗 #終審上訴 #英語聆訊 黃(19) *已經服刑完畢 控罪: 1)侮辱國旗 2)&3) 侮辱區旗 背景:經審訊後罪成,於2023年6月14日被判入更生中心。不服定罪上訴於2025年3月31日被高等法院拒 絕。2026年3月24日終審法院批出上訴許可。 ==================== 申請人今天沒有出席,交由法律代表處理聆訊。 申請方代表: #蘇信恩大律師 今天英語聆訊內容涉及頗多法律技術層面,只能將明白部份作簡述 🔸申請方陳詞: 上訴主要依賴兩點 1)侮辱國旗及區旗元素有別於一般刑事損毁,控方需要證明有特定意圖,原審時代表律司在案件管理時有提出被告患有自閉症Autism及專注力不足過度活躍症ADHD,並呈上醫生報告,被告作供…
【#上庭聲援 - 11月04日 星期三】 [旁聽須知][交通資訊] [2026年11月份聲援預告] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 🏛終 審 法 院1樓 終 審 法 庭 👨🏻⚖️張舉能終審法院首席法官 👨🏻⚖️李義終審法院常任法官 👨🏻⚖️霍兆剛終審法院常任法官 👨🏻⚖️林文瀚終審法院常任法官 👨🏻⚖️楊偉廉終審法院非常任法官 🕙10:00 👤黃(19) #終審上訴 (#20221001深水埗 侮辱國旗 2項侮辱區旗;經審訊後罪成,於2023年6月14日被判入更生中心。不服定罪上訴於2025年3月31日被拒 。) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
【#上庭聲援 - 11月03日 星期二】 [旁聽須知][交通資訊] [2026年11月份聲援預告] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 🏛 各 級 法 院 ‼️沒有已知手足案件 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
【#上庭聲援 - 11月02日 星期一】 [旁聽須知][交通資訊] [2026年11月份聲援預告] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 🏛 各 級 法 院 ‼️沒有已知手足案件 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
【#上庭聲援 - 10月30日 星期五】 [旁聽須知][交通資訊] [2026年10月份聲援預告] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 🏛 各 級 法 院 ‼️沒有已知手足案件 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
#區域法院第三十六庭 #張潔宜法官 #23條 #大埔災難 #審訊 [14/13] 👤王岸然/前民陣副召集人(71) 🛑已還押逾10個月 控罪: 1)妨害調查危害國家安全的罪行 (維護國安法條例《簡稱23條》第88條) 被控於2025年12月3日在香港,知悉或懷疑有對危害國家安全的罪行的調查正進行,罔顧是否會妨害該項調查,而在沒有合理辯解或合法權限下,在YouTube平台披露警方該項調查的詳情。 2)明知而發布具煽動意圖的刊物 (國安法條例第24條) 被指於2025年1月3日至2025年12月6日期間,在香港,明知刊物具煽動意圖而發布該等刊物,即在YouTube平台發布陳述、相片、圖片及/或影片,具意圖: (a)引起中國公民、香港永久性居民或在特區的人,對《中華人民共和國憲法》確定的國家根本制度的憎恨或藐視,或對其離叛 (b)引起中國公民、香港永久性居民或在特區的人,對特區的憲制秩序、行政、立法或司法機關的憎恨或藐視,或對其…
#區域法院第三十六庭 #張潔宜法官 #23條 #大埔災難 #審訊 [14/13] 👤王岸然/前民陣副召集人(71) 🛑已還押逾10個月 控罪: 1)妨害調查危害國家安全的罪行 (維護國安法條例《簡稱23條》第88條) 被控於2025年12月3日在香港,知悉或懷疑有對危害國家安全的罪行的調查正進行,罔顧是否會妨害該項調查,而在沒有合理辯解或合法權限下,在YouTube平台披露警方該項調查的詳情。 2)明知而發布具煽動意圖的刊物 (國安法條例第24條) 被指於2025年1月3日至2025年12月6日期間,在香港,明知刊物具煽動意圖而發布該等刊物,即在YouTube平台發布陳述、相片、圖片及/或影片,具意圖: (a)引起中國公民、香港永久性居民或在特區的人,對《中華人民共和國憲法》確定的國家根本制度的憎恨或藐視,或對其離叛 (b)引起中國公民、香港永久性居民或在特區的人,對特區的憲制秩序、行政、立法或司法機關的憎恨或藐視,或對其…
#觀塘裁判法院第一庭 #李志豪署理主任裁判官 #20260929藍田 #20261001藍田 🔥#判刑 👤何(53) 控罪: (1)刑事損壞 被控於2026年9月29日,在藍田平田邨近啟田道平信樓外,無合理辯解而損壞屬於「藍田慶祝國慶籌備委員會」「藍田慶祝國慶籌備委員會」的9面旗幟,意圖損壞該財產或罔顧該財產是否會被損壞。 (2)刑事損壞 2026年10月1日,在藍田平田邨近啟田道平信樓外及近安田街平信樓外,無合理辯解而損壞屬於「藍田慶祝國慶籌備委員會」的7面旗幟,意圖損壞該財產或罔顧該財產是否會被損壞。 背景: 有人報警指國旗受毀,調查後附近有閉路電視拍攝到被告於10月1日凌晨,在平信樓外靠近安田街,扯下並損壞了兩面旗幟。警方在被告的住所拘捕他,並檢取了他犯案時穿著的衣物。被告警誡下稱:「係我一時手多無聊扯爛啲旗。」及「呢次都係我一時手多無聊扯爛啲旗。」。案件10月15日首次提堂,被告承認兩項控罪,須向涉案委員會成員…
【#上庭聲援 - 10月29日 星期四】 [旁聽須知][交通資訊] [2026年10月份聲援預告] [上庭總結 2026.10.28] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 🏛區 域 法 院11樓36庭 👩🏻⚖️張潔宜法官 🕙10:00 👤王岸然/前民陣副召集人(71)🛑已還押逾10個月 #續審 [14/13] (#23條 #大埔災難 發布煽動刊物 妨礙司法公正) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 🏛觀 塘 裁 判 法 院3樓1庭 👨🏻⚖️李志豪署理主任裁判官 🕤09:30 👤何(53) 🔥#判刑 (#20260929藍田 #20261001藍田 2項刑事損壞) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
#區域法院第三十六庭 #張潔宜法官 #23條 #大埔災難 #審訊 [13/13] 👤王岸然/前民陣副召集人(71) 🛑已還押逾10個月 控罪: 1)妨害調查危害國家安全的罪行 (國安法條例第88條) 被控於2025年12月3日在香港,知悉或懷疑有對危害國家安全的罪行的調查正進行,罔顧是否會妨害該項調查,而在沒有合理辯解或合法權限下,在YouTube平台披露警方該項調查的詳情。 2)明知而發布具煽動意圖的刊物 (國安法條例第24條) 被指於2025年1月3日至2025年12月6日期間,在香港,明知刊物具煽動意圖而發布該等刊物,即在YouTube平台發布陳述、相片、圖片及/或影片,具意圖: (a)引起中國公民、香港永久性居民或在特區的人,對《中華人民共和國憲法》確定的國家根本制度的憎恨或藐視,或對其離叛 (b)引起中國公民、香港永久性居民或在特區的人,對特區的憲制秩序、行政、立法或司法機關的憎恨或藐視,或對其離叛 (c)煽惑任…
Showing the 12 most recent of 138 posts we hold for @youarenotalonehk_live. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@youarenotalonehk_live edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 11 October 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@Peaceandlovehk · 2,3682 posts違反隔離令/限聚令督灰channel
@fuckoverseabitch · 1,0502 posts守護港大聯署小組頻道
@standuphkuer · 4,4302 posts民間人權陣線 Civil Human Rights Front
@CivilHumanRightsFront · 17,3081 post香港民族陣線 台灣分部
@HKNFChannel · 2,5941 post東九龍人小禮物交收區
@KowloonEastMaterials · 2141 post沙田FC資訊頻道
@STunionn · 10,9181 post7二易 老師出通告(休台)
@SportsDay727 · 5,1401 post奇蹟Channel
@helpthefightguys · 3311 post流亡手足心事台
@hongkongerintheworld · 1,8111 post[頻道] 香港人限定 資訊速遞
@hongkongpeoplechannel · 1,0721 post理大學生會 消息發佈
@poly9999999 · 5,7851 post各區突發狀況 & 良心小店資訊站
@taisindonteatteargas · 8,3851 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@youarenotalonehk · 48,01195 posts北區哨兵及資訊站
@northstation · 5,44115 posts沙田FC資訊頻道
@STunionn · 10,91813 posts違反隔離令/限聚令督灰channel
@fuckoverseabitch · 1,0504 posts7二易 老師出通告(休台)
@SportsDay727 · 5,1403 posts太古の達人
@taikoojitatyan · 2022 posts慈雲山資訊公佈
@tszwanshan · 1,0662 posts🇭🇰 肺炎疫情 本港UPDATE
@corovupdate · 211 post手joke—監禁式刑罰手足
@handjokelist · 2401 post香港法律新聞及評論
@hklegalnews · 3021 post香港民族陣線 台灣分部
@HKNFChannel · 2,5941 post香港新聞及資訊TG廣播 HKTGB
@hktgb · 37,7431 postHKU Info Channel
@hkuinfo · 5601 post每日警暴實錄
@neverforgivepopodklm · 1,2591 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@channelchk · 23,074#1
@inmediahknet · 38,595#2
@thewitnesshk · 12,190#3
@youarenotalonehk · 48,011#4
@weatherjj · 42,174#5
@youarenotalonehk_info · 7,166#6
@hkindepenAsso2 · 2,385#7
@cr881903 · 3,357#8
@windseasonhk · 10,650#9
@thepointsglobal · 6,482#10
@HK_Schedule · 23,156#11
@hkposter777 · 22,578#12
@boomheadhk · 12,087#13
@northstation · 5,441#14
@Hkersgymch · 4,071#15
@hkcourtnews · 2,056#16
@collectivehk · 2,972#17
@hk_propaganda · 1,861#18
@ElderlyChannelHK · 7,066#19
@electroniclennonwallinhk · 1,130#20
@FoonHayHor1 · 3,259#21
@ONELMBB · 3,978#22
@YTM1G · 2,403#23
@youarenotalonehk_mailbox · 4,134#24
@cnanewstw · 3,434#25
@britonshk · 10,117#26
@tswsave · 5,713#27
@lihkg_official · 12,109#28
@hkstudentintw · 762#29
@HKReaderXWriter · 792#30
@HongKongValiantSpeaks · 1,496#31
@rthk_new_c · 48,979#32
@HK_Traffic_News · 43,652#33
@hongkongersecrets · 3,489#34
@metwarn · 24,230#35
@nowtv_news · 42,377#36
@hkweathernews · 4,756#37
@the_chaser_news · 7,582#38
@hkitalk · 4,128#39
@whocaresweather · 2,565#40
@universalsentinelsinblack · 11,577#41
@A20260612 · 4,022#42
@TW_KC_TY_Transport_channel · 1,670#43
@hehesecrets · 4,397#44
@localpresshk · 6,190#45
@tytinfo · 1,014#46
@The_watcher_channel · 7,776#47
@HKZCOPE · 457#48
@rfacantonese_news · 1,518#49
@hktgb · 37,743#50
@futureronin168 · 3,756#51
@IngressBeijing · 1,203#52
@HongKongTyphoon · 941#53
@europechinese · 7,153#54
@hkwinds · 2,789#55
@HKbattlelive · 11,460#56
@APSMAGIC · 5,333#57
@IngressChinese · 3,766#58
@Balltips88 · 1,941#59
@chengpoumo · 844#60
@VoiceofCN · 13,923#61
@ZhengLiInvestChannel · 493#62
@lollytalkinternational · 809#63
@HKIAF · 687#64
@christineGASdiary · 205 (as read 5 September 2026)#65
@hkgeotrekker · 1,102#66
@voachinese · 42,187#67
@pkmgclass · 474#68
@TWPMGO · 2,602#69
@hongkongfp · 2,551#70
@primememe · 2,412#71
@newmobilelife · 12,614#72
@landiansub · 46,944#73
@NianticOfficial · 18,174#74
@IUENG · 13,325#75
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@youarenotalonehk · 48,011
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
@HK_Schedule · 23,156
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 19 September 2026
@weatherjj · 42,174
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 28 August 2026
@channelchk · 23,074
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 18 September 2026
@inmediahknet · 38,595
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 31 August 2026
@hkposter777 · 22,578
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 September 2026
@HK_Traffic_News · 43,652
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 28 August 2026
@hktgb · 37,743
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 31 August 2026
@metwarn · 24,230
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 16 September 2026
@nowtv_news · 42,377
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 29 August 2026
@rthk_new_c · 48,979
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“法庭文字直播台” (@youarenotalonehk_live), 31,547 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/youarenotalonehk_live.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.