#高等法院第一庭 #潘兆初高等法院首席法官 #彭偉昌上訴庭法官 #譚耀豪法官 #港區國安法 #立場新聞 #不服定罪上訴許可申請 [1/2] 林紹桐(34) 控罪:串謀發布煽動刊物 經審訊後於2024年8月29日被法官郭偉健判罪成,於9月26日考慮林紹桐患罕有病、易受感染,再收監或有生命危險,判處一個可即時釋放刑期,當庭釋放。 🔸申請方代表: #馬帷騉大律師、#劉偉聰大律師、 #柯愷欣大律師 🔹答辯方代表: #劉德偉高級助理刑事檢控專員 ==================== 申請人沒有出席,委托3人大律師團隊處理。 🔸申請方陳詞 採納書面,聚焦在書面陳詞第4點2021年11月林接手任署任總編輯時審批、發佈了1篇指稱具煽動意圖的文章,即A16《中大衝突兩周年》,刋登2名中大舊生專訪,申請方爭議發佈該篇文章原記者及申請人均沒有煽動意圖。潘官關注原審裁定D2鍾沛權及D3林紹桐一共發佈11篇具煽動性文章,馬大律師指其中…

Channel
法庭文字直播台
@youarenotalonehk_live
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
32,152subscribers
-490 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001239305819 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @youarenotalonehk_live |
| Description | 比入唔到庭嘅手足睇 【Court Hearing @youarenotalonehk_en】 【關注組】 @youarenotalonehk 【資訊部】 @youarenotalonehk_info 【搜證部】 @youarenotalonehk_evidence 【收信部】 @youarenotalonehk_mailbox 在此重申此頻用作學術交流 不會為所有言行負上任何法律責任 |
| Created | 2 October 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/youarenotalonehk_live |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 16:18 | 32,152 | -28 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 07:59 | 32,180 | -41 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 05:41 | 32,221 | -3 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 16:01 | 32,224 | -33 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 21:17 | 32,257 | -37 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 13:58 | 32,294 | -29 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 06:15 | 32,323 | -21 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 21:36 | 32,344 | -5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:04 | 32,349 | -19 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:17 | 32,368 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 32,369 | -22 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:38 | 32,391 | -8 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 32,399 | -16 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 32,415 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 32,422 | -10 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 32,432 | -11 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:53 | 32,443 | -7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:33 | 32,450 | -22 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:07 | 32,472 | -10 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:57 | 32,482 | first reading |
Engagement
67 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.28%
- avg views ÷ 32,152 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,060
- 26 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 26
- of 67 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 67 (15 July 2026 – 22 September 2026) |
| Views total | 27,445 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 18:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈7
- Links
- ≈5,970
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
【#上庭聲援 - 09月22日 星期二】 [旁聽須知][交通資訊] [牆內收信地址一覽表] [2026年9月份聲援預告] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 🏛高 等 法 院3樓1庭 👨🏻⚖️潘兆初高等法院首席法官 👨🏻⚖️彭偉昌上訴庭法官 👨🏻⚖️譚耀豪法官 🕙10:00 👤林紹桐(34) #不服定罪上訴許可申請 [1/2] (#港區國安法 #立場新聞 串謀發布煽動刊物;經審訊後於2024年8月29日被判罪成。) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
#西九龍裁判法院第一庭 #蘇惠德總裁裁判官 #23條 #提堂 👩🏻楊 (61) 🛑已還押14日 控罪:明知而發布或展示具煽動意圖的刊物罪 被控於2024年3月23日至11月4日期間,在天水圍天頌苑一單位,明知刊物具煽動意圖而發布或展示該等刊物,即在大門、客廳窗戶及單位外走廊張貼旗幟及印有或帶有陳述的物品,並公開展示該等旗幟及物品,具意圖: (a)引起中國公民、香港永久性居民或在特區的人,對《中華人民共和國憲法》確定的國家根本制度的憎恨或藐視,或對其離叛; (b)引起中國公民、香港永久性居民或在特區的人,對特區的憲制秩序、行政、立法或司法機關的憎恨或藐視,或對其離叛; (c)煽惑任何人企圖不循合法途徑改變中央就特區依法制定的事項或在特區依法制定的事項;及/或 (d)引起特區不同階層居民間或中國不同地區居民間的憎恨或敵意。 ------------------------ [15:11] 開庭 被告繼續沒有律師代表。 控方…
【#上庭聲援 - 09月21日 星期一】 [旁聽須知][交通資訊] [牆內收信地址一覽表] [2026年9月份聲援預告] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 🏛西 九 龍 裁 判 法 院4樓1庭 👨🏻⚖️蘇惠德總裁判官 🕒15:00 👤楊(61)🛑已還押14日 #提堂 (#23條 發布煽動刊物) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
【#上庭聲援 - 09月18日 星期五】 [旁聽須知][交通資訊] [牆內收信地址一覽表] [2026年9月份聲援預告] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 🏛 各 級 法 院 ‼️沒有已知手足案件 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
【#上庭聲援 - 09月17日 星期四】 [旁聽須知][交通資訊] [牆內收信地址一覽表] [2026年9月份聲援預告] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 🏛 各 級 法 院 ‼️沒有已知手足案件 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
【#上庭聲援 - 09月16日 星期三】 [旁聽須知][交通資訊] [牆內收信地址一覽表] [2026年9月份聲援預告] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 🏛 各 級 法 院 ‼️沒有已知手足案件 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
【#上庭聲援 - 09月15日 星期二】 [旁聽須知][交通資訊] [牆內收信地址一覽表] [2026年9月份聲援預告] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 🏛 各 級 法 院 ‼️沒有已知手足案件 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
【#上庭聲援 - 09月14日 星期一】 [旁聽須知][交通資訊] [牆內收信地址一覽表] [2026年9月份聲援預告] [上庭總結2026.09.11] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 🏛 各 級 法 院 ‼️沒有已知手足案件 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
#西九龍裁判法院第三庭 (高等法院 ) #李運騰法官 #陳仲衡法官 #黎婉姫法官 #港區國安法 #支聯會 #判刑 D1支聯會 D2李卓人 (64) D3何俊仁 (69) D4鄒幸彤(36) 🛑李已還押逾47個月; 何已還押逾43個月; 鄒已還押逾47個月 (上述日子是根據上次求情時控方提供各人因本案還押日子推算) 控罪:煽動顛覆國家政權 D3何卓仁於2026年1月案件開審時認罪候判,D2李卓人及D4鄒幸彤不認罪受審,於8月21日聯同支聯會被法庭裁定全部罪名成立。 🔹控方代表: #副刑事檢控專員黎嘉誼 #助理刑事檢控專員張卓勤 #高級檢控官吳加悅 🔸辯方代表: D1: #林芷瑩資深大律師、#范彥璋大律師 (破產管理處聘請) D2及D3: 沈士文大律師、#梁麗幗大律師、#胡栢昌大律師、#劉樂遙大律師 D4: 親自應訊 --------------------------- [10:07] 開庭 ▶️證物處理: 只餘…
區域法院七庭 練錦鴻法官 #港區國安法 #香港民建聯 🔥#判刑 D2: 陳 (26)/ D3: 伍 (25) 🛑二人已還押逾13個月 控罪:串謀分裂國家罪 被控於2024年11月6日至2025年7月9日期間(包括首尾兩日)在香港,一同串謀和與其他人串謀,組織、策劃、實施或者參與實施旨在分裂國家、破壞國家統一行為,不論是否使用武力或者以武力相威脅,即:將香港特別行政區或者中華人民共和國其他任何部分從中華人民共和國分離出去:非法改變香港特別行政區或者中華人民共和國其他任何部分的法律地位;或將香港特別行政區或者中華人民共和國其他任何部分轉歸外國統治。 案件背景: 一個由 #姜嘉偉 成立名為「香港民主建國聯盟」(建國聯)的組織,於2024年11月在社交平台宣布成立並招募黨員;2025年2月15日,該組織成員在網上記者會上宣布行動綱領,包括滅共、光復香港、提出臨時國旗及國歌、尋求國際聲援,以及提供軍事訓練予外地香港人。7月1日回歸…
【#上庭聲援 - 09月10日 星期四】 [旁聽須知][交通資訊] [牆內收信地址一覽表] [2026年9月份聲援預告] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 🏛區 域 法 院2樓7庭 👨🏻⚖️練錦鴻法官 🕙10:00 👥陳,伍(25-26)🛑二人已還押逾13個月 🔥#判刑 (#港區國安法 #香港民建聯 串謀分裂國家) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ***** #其他案件 09:30 東區裁判法院第七庭 👤鄭嘉如 與 👤《華爾街日報》母公司 #裁決 (#新聞工作 僱主阻止或阻嚇僱員行使第21B條(1)款所授予的權利 僱主因僱員行使權利而終止其僱傭合約、懲罰或歧視該僱員)
Showing the 12 most recent of 67 posts we hold for @youarenotalonehk_live. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@youarenotalonehk_live edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 8 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@Peaceandlovehk · 2,4272 posts違反隔離令/限聚令督灰channel
@fuckoverseabitch · 1,0772 posts守護港大聯署小組頻道
@standuphkuer · 4,5252 posts民間人權陣線 Civil Human Rights Front
@CivilHumanRightsFront · 17,6471 post香港民族陣線 台灣分部
@HKNFChannel · 2,6421 post東九龍人小禮物交收區
@KowloonEastMaterials · 2161 post沙田FC資訊頻道
@STunionn · 11,1341 post7二易 老師出通告(休台)
@SportsDay727 · 5,2331 post奇蹟Channel
@helpthefightguys · 3421 post流亡手足心事台
@hongkongerintheworld · 1,8621 post[頻道] 香港人限定 資訊速遞
@hongkongpeoplechannel · 1,0801 post理大學生會 消息發佈
@poly9999999 · 5,9101 post各區突發狀況 & 良心小店資訊站
@taisindonteatteargas · 8,5521 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@youarenotalonehk · 48,34478 posts北區哨兵及資訊站
@northstation · 5,53015 posts沙田FC資訊頻道
@STunionn · 11,13413 posts違反隔離令/限聚令督灰channel
@fuckoverseabitch · 1,0774 posts7二易 老師出通告(休台)
@SportsDay727 · 5,2333 posts太古の達人
@taikoojitatyan · 2062 posts慈雲山資訊公佈
@tszwanshan · 1,0862 posts🇭🇰 肺炎疫情 本港UPDATE
@corovupdate · 211 post手joke—監禁式刑罰手足
@handjokelist · 2431 post香港法律新聞及評論
@hklegalnews · 3041 post香港民族陣線 台灣分部
@HKNFChannel · 2,6421 post香港新聞及資訊TG廣播 HKTGB
@hktgb · 38,5521 postHKU Info Channel
@hkuinfo · 5731 post每日警暴實錄
@neverforgivepopodklm · 1,2841 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@channelchk · 23,240#1
@inmediahknet · 39,025#2
@thewitnesshk · 12,110#3
@youarenotalonehk · 48,344#4
@weatherjj · 42,911#5
@youarenotalonehk_info · 7,310#6
@hkindepenAsso2 · 2,377#7
@cr881903 · 3,327#8
@windseasonhk · 10,757#9
@thepointsglobal · 6,489#10
@HK_Schedule · 23,100#11
@hkposter777 · 22,381#12
@boomheadhk · 11,881#13
@northstation · 5,530#14
@Hkersgymch · 4,033#15
@hkcourtnews · 1,960#16
@collectivehk · 2,936#17
@hk_propaganda · 1,845#18
@ElderlyChannelHK · 7,177#19
@electroniclennonwallinhk · 1,149#20
@FoonHayHor1 · 3,112#21
@ONELMBB · 3,611#22
@YTM1G · 2,389#23
@youarenotalonehk_mailbox · 4,228#24
@cnanewstw · 3,395#25
@britonshk · 10,009#26
@tswsave · 5,837#27
@lihkg_official · 12,113#28
@hkstudentintw · 774#29
@HKReaderXWriter · 803#30
@HongKongValiantSpeaks · 1,519#31
@rthk_new_c · 49,581#32
@HK_Traffic_News · 44,059#33
@hongkongersecrets · 3,513#34
@metwarn · 24,367#35
@nowtv_news · 42,741#36
@hkweathernews · 4,778#37
@the_chaser_news · 7,395#38
@hkitalk · 4,133#39
@whocaresweather · 2,588#40
@universalsentinelsinblack · 11,789#41
@A20260612 · 3,545#42
@TW_KC_TY_Transport_channel · 1,670#43
@hehesecrets · 4,434#44
@localpresshk · 6,315#45
@tytinfo · 986#46
@The_watcher_channel · 7,937#47
@HKZCOPE · 454#48
@rfacantonese_news · 1,536#49
@hktgb · 38,552#50
@futureronin168 · 3,791#51
@IngressBeijing · 1,186#52
@HongKongTyphoon · 962#53
@europechinese · 7,159#54
@hkwinds · 2,819#55
@HKbattlelive · 11,457#56
@APSMAGIC · 5,010#57
@IngressChinese · 3,582#58
@Balltips88 · 1,891#59
@chengpoumo · 855#60
@VoiceofCN · 14,359#61
@ZhengLiInvestChannel · 497#62
@lollytalkinternational · 813#63
@HKIAF · 696#64
@christineGASdiary · 205 (as read 5 September 2026)#65
@hkgeotrekker · 1,105#66
@voachinese · 34,682#67
@pkmgclass · 469#68
@TWPMGO · 2,654#69
@hongkongfp · 2,558#70
@primememe · 2,412#71
@newmobilelife · 12,616#72
@landiansub · 44,850#73
@NianticOfficial · 18,228#74
@IUENG · 13,391#75
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@youarenotalonehk · 48,344
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
@HK_Schedule · 23,100
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 19 September 2026
@weatherjj · 42,911
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 28 August 2026
@channelchk · 23,240
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 18 September 2026
@inmediahknet · 39,025
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 31 August 2026
@hkposter777 · 22,381
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 September 2026
@HK_Traffic_News · 44,059
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 28 August 2026
@hktgb · 38,552
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 31 August 2026
@metwarn · 24,367
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 16 September 2026
@nowtv_news · 42,741
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 29 August 2026
@rthk_new_c · 49,581
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“法庭文字直播台” (@youarenotalonehk_live), 32,152 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/youarenotalonehk_live.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.