迪拜航空遇襲機長出最後一道力打開駕駛艙門 保住機上逾百性命獲譽為印度之光(楊潔儀報道)
👏2

Channel
@nowtv_news
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
42,715subscribers
-89 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001262173775 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nowtv_news |
| Description | 【非官方營運】由程式自動獲取並推送 Now TV 港聞、兩岸國際新聞 |
| Created | 5 August 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nowtv_news |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 15:20 | 42,715 | -26 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:19 | 42,741 | +3 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:20 | 42,738 | +8 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:17 | 42,730 | -4 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 15:56 | 42,734 | -7 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 02:00 | 42,741 | -12 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 22:37 | 42,753 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:48 | 42,755 | -14 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:47 | 42,769 | -7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:18 | 42,776 | +6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 42,770 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:07 | 42,777 | +16 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 42,761 | -22 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:24 | 42,783 | -10 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 42,793 | +21 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 42,772 | -15 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:08 | 42,787 | -19 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:35 | 42,806 | -11 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:27 | 42,817 | +35 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:28 | 42,782 | first reading |
1,713 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 108 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 772 of 807 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,713 (5 August 2026 – 2 October 2026) |
| Views total | 458,673 |
| Reactions total | 3,420 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Oct 2026, 12:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
4,213 reactions across 952 posts, in 50 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💩 | 1,348 | 32.0% | |
| 🤡 | 949 | 22.5% | |
| 👍 | 310 | 7.36% | |
| 🤣 | 293 | 6.95% | |
| 💊 | 132 | 3.13% | |
| 😁 | 113 | 2.68% | |
| 🐳 | 99 | 2.35% | |
| ❤ | 96 | 2.28% | |
| 👎 | 89 | 2.11% | |
| 🔥 | 81 | 1.92% | |
| 🖕 | 73 | 1.73% | |
| 😴 | 73 | 1.73% | |
| 👏 | 72 | 1.71% | |
| 🙏 | 52 | 1.23% | |
| 😢 | 46 | 1.09% | |
| ☃ | 43 | 1.02% | |
| 🤮 | 41 | 0.973% | |
| 🎉 | 34 | 0.807% | |
| 🕊 | 32 | 0.76% | |
| 🤬 | 32 | 0.76% | |
| 30 further kinds | 205 | 4.87% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 956 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,213 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 28 August 2026 to 2 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
迪拜航空遇襲機長出最後一道力打開駕駛艙門 保住機上逾百性命獲譽為印度之光(楊潔儀報道)
👏2
就高鐵香港段延誤及超支 港鐵向政府支付22.5億元
💩1
林超英談斜槓人生 支持「躺平」:但生活要有內容唔係就「撼頭埋牆」
💩1
灣仔美食|意籍甜點師主理 !灣仔全新甜點概念店「Sugar Daddy」 自家製Gelato/意式忌廉包/牛角包
😁1
外傭規定最低工資增至每月5220元 膳食津貼維持不變 【Now新聞台】外傭規定最低工資上調2.35%,增至每月5220元。 外傭現時規定最低工資是每月5100元,調整後加至每月5220元,而新的規定最低工資將適用星期六起簽訂的所有外傭合約。 政府發言人說,今年的檢討按照既定機制,全面考慮一籃子社會及經濟因素,包括香港過去一年的整體經濟表現、勞工市場狀況、外傭僱主的負擔能力及外傭的基本生活需要;而僱主提供的膳食津貼則維持不變,每月至少要1236元。
👎2🤣2💩1
警方拘一男子涉刑事毀壞 蓄意破壞慶祝國慶旗幟 【Now新聞台】警方拘捕一名男子涉嫌刑事毀壞,蓄意破壞慶祝國慶的旗幟。 警方接報指,觀塘平田邨有7面慶祝國慶的旗幟被破壞。經調查後拘捕一名53歲本地男子,其後再發現他同時涉及另一宗在9月29日於平田邨破壞慶祝國慶旗幟的案件。他被控兩項刑事毀壞罪,案件將會在下月15日於觀塘裁判法院提堂。
💩1🔥1
旅監局會就內地團涉臨時加插購物行程展開調查 強調若有違規定必懲處
💩1
短池游泳世界盃 何詩蓓女子50米破亞洲紀錄獲銀牌 【Now新聞台】阿塞拜疆舉行的短池游泳世界盃,港隊的何詩蓓於女子50米自由泳打破亞洲紀錄取得銀牌。 完成亞運的何詩蓓於首日女子50米自由泳,決賽游出23秒48,打破自己5年前游出的亞洲紀錄,取得一面銀牌。 一連三站的世界盃,阿塞拜疆是頭一站,之後兩站是烏茲別克和哈薩克,是年底於北京舉行的世界短池游泳錦標賽的外圍賽。
❤3👍1
影評及推介|Netflix最新真實案件改編電影《大學炸彈客》 從少年視角看人如何變成連環殺手/原創劇情多餘有說教意味(內含劇透)
🤡2
特朗普展開中期選舉全美拉票行程 警告若失國會控制權將被民主黨彈劾(莊國禮報道)
👍2
蔡天鳳碎屍案|鄺球父子預購絞肉機大湯煲鐵錘等工具 控方形容精心策劃(李昌峻報道)
👍2
特朗普《時代》雜誌專訪:與習近平會晤「非常好」 謝鋒:習近平訪美具里程碑意義
🤡2🤣2
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,713 posts we hold for @nowtv_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NOW 新聞” (@nowtv_news), 42,715 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nowtv_news.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.