報道指習近平下月23日抵達美國 翌日與特朗普會面
💩1

Channel
@nowtv_news
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
42,812subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001262173775 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nowtv_news |
| Description | 【非官方營運】由程式自動獲取並推送 Now TV 港聞、兩岸國際新聞 |
| Created | 5 August 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nowtv_news |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 42,812 | +5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:43 | 42,807 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 42,809 | +6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:27 | 42,803 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:08 | 42,806 | +5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 42,801 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:21 | 42,802 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:51 | 42,803 | -11 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:38 | 42,814 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:30 | 42,813 | -9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:00 | 42,822 | +18 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 42,804 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 42,804 | first reading |
369 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 358 of 369 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 369 (5 August 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 218,151 |
| Reactions total | 1,857 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 00:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
1,774 reactions across 340 posts, in 46 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💩 | 452 | 25.5% | |
| 🤡 | 266 | 15.0% | |
| 😁 | 87 | 4.90% | |
| 🔥 | 86 | 4.85% | |
| 🤣 | 85 | 4.79% | |
| 👍 | 76 | 4.28% | |
| 🙏 | 61 | 3.44% | |
| 🖕 | 60 | 3.38% | |
| 🐳 | 51 | 2.87% | |
| 💊 | 51 | 2.87% | |
| ❤ | 50 | 2.82% | |
| ☃ | 44 | 2.48% | |
| 🤮 | 40 | 2.25% | |
| 👎 | 33 | 1.86% | |
| 🤬 | 32 | 1.80% | |
| 🎃 | 29 | 1.63% | |
| 👏 | 29 | 1.63% | |
| 🎉 | 27 | 1.52% | |
| 😱 | 27 | 1.52% | |
| 🍌 | 18 | 1.01% | |
| 26 further kinds | 170 | 9.58% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 358 of the 369 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,857reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 369 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
報道指習近平下月23日抵達美國 翌日與特朗普會面
💩1
晨早新聞重點|據報習近平下月24日在美與特朗普會面/特朗普稱金正恩已回覆對話請求 【Now新聞台】8月18日now早晨新聞重點 【下月訪美】有報道指,國家主席習近平將在下月24日與美國總統特朗普會面,但他不會出席聯合國大會會議。 【回覆對話要求】特朗普說,北韓領袖金正恩已回應他的對話要求,又說他下令削減美韓聯合軍演規模,令局勢更加安全。 【高層離職】國際足協宣布,早前曾批評會長恩芬天奴的首席營運長拉穆爾已經離職。
🖕1
屯門小巴與私家車相撞11人傷 【Now新聞台】屯門一架專線小巴與私家車相撞,11人受傷。 紫色私家車嚴重損毀,部件脫落,玻璃碎裂。小巴右邊輕微凹陷,車頭燈被撞爛,有傷者清醒登上救護車,警員在場調查。 現場是屯門青山公路嶺南段近屯富路,警方晚上近10時接報,該專線小巴與私家車相撞,11人受傷,包括小巴上4男5女及私家車司機和乘客,全部送去屯門醫院治理。
印尼周六地震後紀念81周年國慶 【Now新聞台】印尼周六發生強烈地震後,周一紀念81周年國慶。 在首都雅加達的總統府外有不少大型表演節目,有跳傘運動員在空中展示總統普拉博沃的大型肖像以及印尼國旗。 普拉博沃之後亦親身出席升旗禮,舉國慶祝的同時,在周六發生強烈地震的東部東努沙登加拉省,搜救人員繼續在災區搜索,地震死亡人數已升至68人,當地亦遭受過千次餘震,不少失去家園的災民仍然需要住在臨時帳篷。 國家主席習近平向普拉博沃致慰問電,對遇難者表示哀悼,並向遇難者家屬與傷者致以誠摯慰問。
人權組織要求國際足協取消恩芬天奴連任會長的資格 【Now新聞台】有人權組織要求國際足協取消恩芬天奴連任會長的資格。 他們表示,國際足協規定會長最多連任3屆,恩芬天奴在2016年接替因醜聞下台的白禮達成為會長,至今已達到3個任期。國際足協曾裁定恩芬天奴在接手的任期只做了3年,不是完整的任期,所以不應計入任期限制。 該人權組織已去信投訴,指解釋不符合章程,並創下危險的先例。國際足協將於明年3月18日在摩洛哥選出下屆會長。
👍5🤣3🥱1
首七月固定投資跌6.7% 國統局指全年目標可期
💩2🤣2
Opatra London聲明 英國母公司不擁有或經營香港店舖 【Now新聞台】連鎖美容店Opatra London被客人投訴營銷手法有問題,其英國母公司表示,並不擁有或經營香港的店舖。 Opatra London發聲明表示,對於顧客有令人困擾的經歷深感遺憾並極度重視,指本港店舖由一間本地公司根據分銷協議獨立擁有及經營,因此該獨立分銷商須全權負責其員工、銷售手法、定價、客戶合約及退款等事宜。倫敦總部正直接處理此事,已要求香港分銷合作伙伴提交全面的書面說明,並已就店舖的銷售行為展開獨立審視。
🤡4
五個公營房屋單位取得登記欲成簡樸房 房屋局︰認證須經專業人士證明符標準
💩3
元朗大狗先後咬死兩狗 警方暫未找到其主人
🖕11💩4
日本千葉縣雨災|路邊仍有兩千多輛車待清理 據報有含放射物質廢液外洩 【Now新聞台】日本千葉縣日前的雨災增至10人死亡,仍然有兩人下落不明。 經歷上周四破紀錄暴雨後,千葉市內仍然有2500輛汽車因為故障無法駛走,繼續停在路邊等待清理。 另外,共同社報道,千葉市內一個放射線管理區地下室在暴雨期間水浸,導致含有放射物質的廢液外洩,相關機構強調,根據周邊地區的監測分析結果,今次洩漏並無對環境造成影響。
🙏8👏2
元朗大狗先後咬死兩狗 警方暫未找到其主人(江瓔庭報道)
🤬7
印度寺廟外人踩人事故多人死傷 疑與電線杆倒塌有關(馬子釗報道)
🙈4👎1👏1🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 369 posts we hold for @nowtv_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 13,507 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NOW 新聞” (@nowtv_news), 42,812 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nowtv_news.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.