Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ruters乳透社🐻

Channel

Ruters乳透社🐻

@Ruters0615

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

25,110subscribers

-770 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001240594461
TypeChannel
Username@Ruters0615
Description官方电报频道,国安部最高通辑,专注于乳包反共鬼畜作品。 投稿: @rtspost2bot [email protected] X(原Twitter): @Ruters0615 YouTube: 小反旗&小池塘 Rumble: http://rumble.com/c/c-1401966 Spotify: Ruters乳透社 友链: @VoiceofPooh @XueXi_China
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Ruters0615

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

25,11025,88025,4956 August 202610 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 96 days, net -770. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,995–25,996 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 22:1225,110-4
9 Nov 2026, 11:0825,114-8
8 Nov 2026, 02:2925,122-22
7 Nov 2026, 02:0925,144-10
6 Nov 2026, 03:5925,154-11
5 Nov 2026, 03:1125,165-11
3 Nov 2026, 23:3625,176-7
2 Nov 2026, 23:1725,183-6
1 Nov 2026, 21:4025,189-19
31 Oct 2026, 18:1025,208-1
30 Oct 2026, 18:4925,209-9
29 Oct 2026, 20:3725,218-3
28 Oct 2026, 22:3825,221-7
27 Oct 2026, 20:4825,228-7
26 Oct 2026, 17:5825,235-15
25 Oct 2026, 16:1525,250-1
24 Oct 2026, 18:4725,251-3
23 Oct 2026, 21:1025,254-10
22 Oct 2026, 23:5925,264-14
21 Oct 2026, 22:1525,278first reading

Engagement

570 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 143 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.11%
avg views ÷ 25,110 subscribers
Avg views / post
530
190 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.945%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
190
of 570 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 111 of 190 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held570 (5 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total100,620
Reactions total553
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 09:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈13,300
Videos
≈1,690
Links
≈2,880

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
50m 57s
Average length
1m 00s

Measured directly from 51 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,653 reactions across 303 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥81549.3%
👍19211.6%
❤1408.47%
😁915.51%
🥰784.72%
🤣754.54%
🤮442.66%
👏362.18%
💩342.06%
💯171.03%
🗿171.03%
🤩160.968%
🤡130.786%
🌭120.726%
💅80.484%
😭80.484%
🫡80.484%
😨60.363%
😱60.363%
👎50.302%
13 further kinds321.94%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 318 of the 570 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,653 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 570 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 70 of 190 posts held from the last 30 days (36.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 09:37 UTC53 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

尊敬的习先生 您买的【榨精魅魔🈲超紧尿道杯】 已送达中南海老登驿站 请您凭取件码 8-9-6464领取

12 Nov 2026, 04:23 UTC271 viewsread 12 November 2026

===== 评论区 ===== Justin Poc...: 死人复活是监狱捞人,能复活薄熙来😁

11 Nov 2026, 18:02 UTC390 viewsread 12 November 2026

===== 评论区 ===== 大雄 𝓓𝓪 𝓧𝓲𝓸𝓷...: 习主席是最好的😂😂😂😂

10 Nov 2026, 14:01 UTC579 viewsread 12 November 2026

===== 评论区 ===== 習 ี近乎: 习猪的生活 吃特供,喝泉水,用进口,睡美女,定制床,定制飞机,吃虾不剥皮,开车开红旗,保镖挡子弹,老婆是歌星 習 ี近乎: 习:当你们还在为几十万彩礼发愁,不买房子没人愿意跟你结婚逼的全家掏空积蓄并且还三十年房贷时候,文工团选拔的美女已经摆在我床上了,要多少有多少,我都腻了 習 ี近乎: 真想给习写一本皇帝传记,名叫<<共和国皇帝>> 小学生总书记 习大大: [sticker] 🙋

10 Nov 2026, 14:01 UTC523 views6 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

没有!没有!没有!通过!

❤5🔥1

10 Nov 2026, 14:01 UTC494 viewsread 12 November 2026

===== 评论区 ===== 玉敏 袁: 明明是同意,不同意 習 ี近乎: 当了皇帝就只有一个烦恼,怎么让自己一直是皇帝,只要自己还是皇帝,就什么烦恼都没有

Showing the 12 most recent of 570 posts we hold for @Ruters0615. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Ruters0615 edited 117 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 November 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

学习墙国🐸
@XueXi_China · 86,381
#1
「VoP」維尼之聲 - Voice of Pooh🔊
@VoiceofPooh · 22,167
#2
【李老师不是你老师】官方电报
@lilaoshibushinilaoshi · 49,209
#3
风向旗参考快讯
@xhqcankao · 200,273
#4
LoopDNS资讯播报
@DNSPODT · 73,288
#5
电报时报
@times001 · 84,547
#6
在花🎗️科技圈
@zaihuapd · 290,142
#7
「Vop」維聲-奶茶同萌
@VoPMilkTea · 1,825
#8
知乎暴论
@mightyflame · 25,381
#9
2.5次元日常 🍉
@acgdaily · 17,329
#10
☠️三战快报☠️一级战备
@endofxi · 22,085
#11
简中互联网废物大赏
@fucku_idiot · 41,768
#12
墙国之音
@chinafounder · 14,594
#13
📣文宣中国📣
@VoiceofCN · 13,870
#14
中国梦
@CHlNA011 · 1,903
#15
推特高雅壬與菟子
@ttsmr · 1,951
#16
不明白播客
@bumingbai0 · 269
#17
维尼导航
@weinidaohang · 586
#18
敏感经济信息分享
@pelosi3 · 72,526
#19
中文圈左派观察日记
@zunshiyulu · 2,535
#20
🥗 视讯快报~密接巨变时代
@shixun160 · 22,704
#21
自由知生
@ziyouzhisheng1 · 1,568
#22
竹新社
@tnews365 · 167,192
#23
某科学的一个频道
@titan_pain · 20,849
#24
404通訊|The CCP-China Watch #资讯 #新闻 #时政 #反賊 #覺醒
@chinaupdate · 6,194
#25
美国之音
@voachinese · 42,209
#26
中国数字时代
@cdtchinesefeed · 51,932
#27
Iyouport
@iyouport · 27,612
#28
平壤卫视
@pingrangTV · 29,366
#29
中华和平革命党(CPRP)-党务公开 Chinese Peaceful Revolutionary Party
@cprpwork · 704
#30
Yummy 😋
@GodlyNews1 · 71,235
#31
支那傻事
@zhinashashi · 634
#32
VPS信号旗播报
@vps_xhq · 50,835
#33
Solidot
@solidot · 48,811
#34
中国蛤局
@zghaju · 373
#35
每日消费电子观察
@CE_Observe · 77,679
#36
柑橘味猫窝 — Citrus Channel
@HachimiCat · 5,301
#37
Project X Channel
@projectXtls · 30,549
#38
HimalayaNews
@NFSCHimalayaNews · 9,234
#39
衡水三两事
@hseznet · 1,668
#40

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

「VoP」維尼之聲 - Voice of Pooh🔊
@VoiceofPooh · 22,167
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 20 September 2026
☠️三战快报☠️一级战备
@endofxi · 22,085
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 23 September 2026
学习墙国🐸
@XueXi_China · 86,381
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 17 August 2026
【李老师不是你老师】官方电报
@lilaoshibushinilaoshi · 49,209
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 26 August 2026
美国之音
@voachinese · 42,209
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 3 September 2026
电报时报
@times001 · 84,547
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 18 August 2026
🥗 视讯快报~密接巨变时代
@shixun160 · 22,704
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 19 September 2026
777文宣傳播稿件大合集
@hkposter777 · 22,588
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 September 2026
香港新聞及資訊TG廣播 HKTGB
@hktgb · 37,676
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 31 August 2026
香港人抗共日程表文宣頻道
@HK_Schedule · 23,231
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q108801989 on Wikidata, read 8 November 2026
LabelRuters
Descriptiona channel satirising CCP leaders
X / Twitter@ruters0615
YouTubeUC57yqbfltOVBo0hMP1l-Q6w

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ruters乳透社🐻” (@Ruters0615), 25,110 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ruters0615.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.