===== 评论区 ===== Toby: 仆人的恩情还不完😭🙌

Channel
Ruters乳透社🐻
@Ruters0615
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
25,532subscribers
-348 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001240594461 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Ruters0615 |
| Description | 官方电报频道,国安部最高通辑,专注于乳包反共鬼畜作品。 投稿: @rtspost2bot [email protected] X(原Twitter): @Ruters0615 YouTube: 小反旗&小池塘 Rumble: http://rumble.com/c/c-1401966 Spotify: Ruters乳透社 友链: @VoiceofPooh @XueXi_China |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Ruters0615 |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 09:41 | 25,532 | -57 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 05:20 | 25,589 | -11 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:54 | 25,600 | -10 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:21 | 25,610 | -14 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 21:00 | 25,624 | -16 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 10:41 | 25,640 | -11 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 00:20 | 25,651 | -19 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:37 | 25,670 | -5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:38 | 25,675 | -6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:42 | 25,681 | -10 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:44 | 25,691 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:23 | 25,697 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 25,704 | -8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:36 | 25,712 | +3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 25,709 | +3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 25,706 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:09 | 25,711 | -9 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:19 | 25,720 | -15 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 25,735 | -14 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:22 | 25,749 | first reading |
Engagement
284 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.00%
- avg views ÷ 25,532 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 510
- 82 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.00%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 83
- of 284 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 40 of 82 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 284 (5 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 41,779 |
| Reactions total | 221 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 10:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈13,200
- Videos
- ≈1,660
- Links
- ≈2,830
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 19m 38s
- Average length
- 51s
Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
786 reactions across 142 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 471 | 59.9% | |
| 🤣 | 62 | 7.89% | |
| 😁 | 55 | 7.00% | |
| ❤ | 48 | 6.11% | |
| 🥰 | 39 | 4.96% | |
| 🗿 | 14 | 1.78% | |
| 🤡 | 13 | 1.65% | |
| 🌭 | 12 | 1.53% | |
| 👏 | 12 | 1.53% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 1.40% | |
| 🤮 | 11 | 1.40% | |
| 😭 | 8 | 1.02% | |
| 💩 | 6 | 0.763% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 0.636% | |
| 🤬 | 5 | 0.636% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 0.382% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 0.382% | |
| 🫡 | 3 | 0.382% | |
| 🙈 | 2 | 0.254% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.127% | |
| 2 further kinds | 2 | 0.254% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 153 of the 284 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 786 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 284 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
震撼美国!震惊全世界! 毛泽东和阿雷奇诺竟然有那么多的共同点!
🔥5
===== 评论区 ===== Yan Gu: 习主席已经决定:引进十万美国大洋屌操粉蛆们的婊子妈
Photo, posted without a caption
===== 评论区 ===== Yan Gu: 优惠十块钱行不行? 玉敏 袁: 抠图换背景加个手枪
有人在华为手机店里冲塔乳包
🫡3
===== 评论区 ===== 玉敏 袁: 一个弹弓就够了 有个花姐弹弓的远距离打中南海国徽百发百中 玉敏 袁: 哔哩哔哩搜花姐弹弓,出现的用户就是 玉敏 袁: tg://webproxy?server=tg.noos.eu.cc&secret=80664137832346567966628550109410
Video, posted without a caption
🔥1
===== 评论区 =====
群贤毕至,少长咸集
😁14🔥3👍1
===== 评论区 ===== core: 不是我刚准备做的怎么被抢先了 玉敏 袁: https://h5.cctvnews.cctv.com/szdh2023/index.html Yin3R: (➤core) 用啥ai做?国内的ai应该不行吧 core: (➤Yin3R) 可以啊 ,国内的ai模型好多都开源的 ,你本地部署就可以 minimax h3,还有阿里 的wan 2.2 都是非常不错的开源模型 ,你上传到 别的服务器上当然没法过审 EsL: 什么时候上传到油管 Dali Li: 什么湘西老粽子
❤2
根本没有这样的毛泽东🤚😭✋
🔥5😍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 284 posts we hold for @Ruters0615. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Ruters0615 edited 54 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 27 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@XueXi_China · 87,102#1
@VoiceofPooh · 22,612#2
@lilaoshibushinilaoshi · 48,585#3
@xhqcankao · 163,238#4
@DNSPODT · 72,064#5
@times001 · 84,754#6
@zaihuapd · 283,183#7
@VoPMilkTea · 1,853#8
@mightyflame · 26,081#9
@acgdaily · 16,665#10
@endofxi · 21,592#11
@fucku_idiot · 40,459#12
@chinafounder · 14,833#13
@VoiceofCN · 14,276#14
@CHlNA011 · 1,954#15
@ttsmr · 1,992#16
@bumingbai0 · 278 (as read 14 September 2026)#17
@weinidaohang · 600#18
@pelosi3 · 71,125#19
@zunshiyulu · 2,546#20
@shixun160 · 22,955#21
@ziyouzhisheng1 · 1,595#22
@tnews365 · 164,267#23
@titan_pain · 20,773#24
@chinaupdate · 6,274#25
@voachinese · 34,696#26
@cdtchinesefeed · 44,158#27
@iyouport · 27,814#28
@pingrangTV · 29,178#29
@cprpwork · 729#30
@GodlyNews1 · 69,298#31
@zhinashashi · 652#32
@vps_xhq · 49,725#33
@solidot · 47,568#34
@zghaju · 384#35
@CE_Observe · 75,036#36
@HachimiCat · 5,376#37
@projectXtls · 29,942#38
@NFSCHimalayaNews · 9,457#39
@hseznet · 1,683#40
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@VoiceofPooh · 22,612
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 20 September 2026
@endofxi · 21,592
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 23 September 2026
@XueXi_China · 87,102
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 17 August 2026
@lilaoshibushinilaoshi · 48,585
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 26 August 2026
@voachinese · 34,696
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 3 September 2026
@times001 · 84,754
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 18 August 2026
@shixun160 · 22,955
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 19 September 2026
@hkposter777 · 22,381
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 September 2026
@hktgb · 38,552
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 31 August 2026
@HK_Schedule · 23,100
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 19 September 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Ruters |
|---|---|
| Description | a channel satirising CCP leaders |
| X / Twitter | @ruters0615 |
| YouTube | UC57yqbfltOVBo0hMP1l-Q6w |
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ruters乳透社🐻” (@Ruters0615), 25,532 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ruters0615.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.