Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Flash Lunch Channel

@flashlunch

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

12subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001487408585
TypeChannel
Username@flashlunch
DescriptionLunchtime 快閃
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 12 September 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/flashlunch

Growth

127 August 2026 — 12 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11–13 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 05:1612no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:1412first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 12 September 2020the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 December 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
663
Videos
1
Links
341

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

30 Dec 2021, 05:36 UTC42 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @youarenotalonehk

🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴 ‼️#緊急聲援 通知‼️ 🔴 今 日 🔴 🏛西 九 龍 裁 判 法 院4樓3庭 🕝14:30 👥鍾沛權,林紹桐/前《立場新聞》高層 #新案件 (#港區國安法 #立場新聞 串謀發布煽動刊物) 【今日聲援表】

5 Aug 2021, 03:51 UTC53 viewsread 12 August 2026

今日下晝黃耀明東區法院上庭 https://www.hk01.com/%E5%8D%B3%E6%99%82%E5%A8%9B%E6%A8%82/658230/%E9%BB%83%E8%80%80%E6%98%8E%E6%B6%89%E9%81%B8%E8%88%89%E8%88%9E%E5%BC%8A%E8%A2%AB%E6%8D%95%E6%9C%AC%E5%91%A8%E5%9B%9B%E6%8F%90%E5%A0%82-%E6%9B%BE%E6%96%BC8%E6%9C%882%E6%97%A5%E5%87%8C%E6%99%A8%E6%9B%B4%E6%96%B0ig

5 Aug 2021, 03:50 UTC31 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @rthk_new_c

港大禁止所有參與學生會評議會上月7日會議學生入校園 港大校委會決定,所有參與港大學生會評議會上月7日會議的學生,均被禁止進入港大校園範圍,以及使用大學設施和服務,直至另行通告。港大校委會表示,今日召開的特別會議接納研究評議會事件的專責小組報告,專責小組考慮到評議會通過上月7日的決議,有可能觸犯法律並正受警方調查,容許涉事的評議會成員繼續在校園內活動,對大學構成嚴重法律風險,亦對校內人員甚至大學的聲譽產生不良影響,由事態嚴重,必須即時採取風險管理措施。港大學生會評議會在上月7日,以30票贊成,0票反對,2票棄權 ,通過對「七一刺警案」疑兇自殺身亡,表示「深切哀悼」和「感激犧牲」的議案。事後教育局點名批評,保安局強烈譴責,指任何人宣揚或煽動恐怖活動,可能觸犯《港區國安法》,評議會7月9日凌晨召開記者會,宣佈撤回議案,幹事會鞠躬道歉和辭職。港大其後宣布,不再承認港大學生會作為獨立註冊社團在校內的角色。 2021-08-04 18:

13 Jul 2021, 05:05 UTC28 viewsread 12 August 2026

https://www.881903.com/news/local/2400169/%E7%A4%BE%E6%B0%91%E9%80%A3%E9%81%8A%E8%A1%8C%E6%82%BC%E5%BF%B5%E5%8A%89%E6%9B%89%E6%B3%A2%E9%80%9D%E4%B8%964%E5%91%A8%E5%B9%B4

4 Jun 2021, 01:51 UTC28 viewsread 12 August 2026

六四32年,支聯會副主席鄒幸彤今日早上(4日)被警方拘捕,涉嫌宣傳或公告未經批准集結。 由於《香港國安法》實施,今年連續第二年悼念六四維園晚會不獲批准舉行,支聯會同時宣佈臨時關閉六四展覽館。今日踏入六四,支聯會副主席鄒幸彤以「個人名義」表示在「六四」當日「守這已有32年的約定」。警方表明,任何人即使以個人名義出席或煽惑他人參與也涉嫌犯法。今早約7時,鄒幸彤在辦公室所在大廈外被警方拘捕。 https://hk.appledaily.com/breaking/20210604/PR56FWFURVDCFNIQOWXBQB3VDA/

4 Jun 2021, 01:51 UTC21 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @hkstandstrong_promoPhoto

「因種種的原故,我們或許無法明言,但我們毋忘歷史。」 追思亡者彌撒 2021年6月4日 晚上8時正 【港島區】 聖十字架堂(西灣河聖十字徑1號) 【九龍區】 聖文德堂(慈雲山蒲岡村道89號) 聖方濟各堂(石硤尾街58號) 聖安德肋堂(坑口常寧路11號) 【新界區】 贖世主堂(屯門鄉事會路2號) 聖本篤堂(沙田崗背街7號) 葛達二聖堂(荃灣德華街37-41號) 資料來源:香港天主教正義和平委員會 #六四 #六四彌撒

4 Jun 2021, 01:51 UTC19 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @stpoliticismPhoto

【六四街站及放映會】 悼念,我們沒有義務但有這個權利。 政權嘗試將屠殺人民的歷史抹去,嚴止以傳統方式提起六四,大量部署於維園及各區,將自由進一步收窄。 就六四行動,不是出於一種愛國情懷,而是針對政權之罪,向大眾訴諸政權無底線的暴力。「政權反對的,我們就要擁護」,而他們,明言害怕遍地開花。 我們亦會設置街站,呼籲香港人以史為鑑,志守吾土,歡迎大家前往與我們交流。 日期:2021.06.04 時間:1900-2100 地點:旺角商務書局對出空地

20 Nov 2020, 15:29 UTC39 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @HK_SchedulePhoto

#21Nov 今日11月21日 (六) 日程 721元朗恐襲事件至今經已十六個月 , 唯有持續堅持宣傳才能不被政府扭曲警黑勾結的事實 , 雖然元朗並沒有搞手舉行活動 , 但相信亦會有手足到場毋忘活動 , 但請注意安全😢🙏另外黨安署高調調查中大遊行活動 , 在此希望曾參與手足優先處理能被辦認的衣物包括面具及衣服等 , 另外請其他手足亦請多報哨及留意狗隻動向 , 最後武漢肺炎確診數目持續上升 , 請大家亦要做好個人防疫措施😷 ——————————————— 1⃣全日 #SAVE12 challenge 2⃣全日 721誰主真相一年零四個月 - 快閃文宣全港開花 3⃣全日 元朗恐襲第十六個月 - #39MRUNFOR721和理跑 4⃣09:00 狙擊勞顧會美孚民間票站 5⃣11:00 荔枝角黃色市集《港野》 6⃣16:00 油麻地戶外瑜伽班 7⃣21:00 旺角mma 班

16 Nov 2020, 08:02 UTC30 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @HK_SchedulePhoto

#16Nov 今日11月16日 (一) 日程 武漢肺炎確診數目有上升趨勢 , 雖然奶共政府收緊限聚令 , 但在多宗輸入及源頭不明個案下 , 仍如期推行免14日強制檢疫規定 , 明顯至香港人性命不理而達到自己的政治任務😡希望大家要保持個人防疫之餘 , 亦要宣傳奶共政府抗疫不力 , 另外早前德國聯署已收到消息指已達到召開聽證會門欖並將會排期輪侯招開 , 所以希望手足們亦要堅持及宣傳各種聯署💪 ——————————————— 1⃣全日 #SAVE12 challenge 2⃣11:00 【毋忘守城歷史 聲援被捕義士 — 聯書院學生會「中大保衛戰」一週年歷史回顧活動】 3⃣19:00 [狙擊勞顧會]投票五區街站 ——————————————— 🏛每日亦有被捕手足上庭 , 大家有時間可以幫忙送車及聲援👉被捕人士關注組👈

8 Oct 2020, 02:51 UTC31 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @hkposter777Photo

手足受到恐嚇都喪推德國聯署!香港人舊年無懼風吹雨打都去遊行,而家唔係怕咗一個德文嘅聯署呀嘛?! 聯署傳送門 is.gd/6jnGRD 依家 https://act4hk.com/petition 整埋中文portal比你,一隻德文都唔洗識,你地班人冇藉口啦卦! (喺act4hk註冊後,會收到email,activate咗,咁再去act4hk按個『聯署』就搞掂) 滑鼠娘娘籲聯署制裁中共 遭恐嚇籲停止行動:否則不能返港 News: https://v.gd/uuzTP3 #Germany #德國 #國際戰線 #聯署 #聯署教學 #聯署師 #制裁 #天下圍共

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @flashlunch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,262,350 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Flash Lunch Channel” (@flashlunch), 12 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/flashlunch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.