Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 被捕人士關注組

Channel

被捕人士關注組

@youarenotalonehk

On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

48,379subscribers

+100 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001461057234
TypeChannel
Username@youarenotalonehk
Description報料:@Youarenotalonehk_2bot 【Court Hearing @youarenotalonehk_en】 【直播台】 @youarenotalonehk_live 【資訊部】 @youarenotalonehk_info 【搜證部】 @youarenotalonehk_evidence 【收信部】 @youarenotalonehk_mailbox
Created27 August 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/youarenotalonehk

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

48,27948,37948,3295 August 2026 — 48,279 subscribers6 August 2026 — 48,279 subscribers6 August 2026 — 48,285 subscribers7 August 2026 — 48,287 subscribers8 August 2026 — 48,317 subscribers10 August 2026 — 48,327 subscribers11 August 2026 — 48,323 subscribers12 August 2026 — 48,333 subscribers13 August 2026 — 48,338 subscribers14 August 2026 — 48,345 subscribers16 August 2026 — 48,378 subscribers17 August 2026 — 48,379 subscribers5 August 202617 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 12 days, net +100. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48,264–48,394 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 19:1648,379+1
16 Aug 2026, 15:2748,378+33
14 Aug 2026, 23:0848,345+7
13 Aug 2026, 13:0748,338+5
12 Aug 2026, 10:1448,333+10
11 Aug 2026, 13:3548,323-4
10 Aug 2026, 12:4548,327+10
8 Aug 2026, 14:4748,317+30
7 Aug 2026, 15:3548,287+2
6 Aug 2026, 17:3048,285+6
6 Aug 2026, 01:4648,279no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:0648,279first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.58%
avg views ÷ 48,379 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,730
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
29
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held29 (20 July 202617 August 2026)
Views total50,212
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 23:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
10,000
Videos
374
Links
10,400

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC328 viewsread 17 August 2026

【#上庭聲援 - 08月18日 星期二】 [旁聽須知][交通資訊] [牆內收信地址一覽表] [2026年8月份聲援預告] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 🏛 各 級 法 院 ‼️沒有已知手足案件 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

16 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC885 viewsread 17 August 2026

【#上庭聲援 - 08月17日 星期一】 [旁聽須知][交通資訊] [牆內收信地址一覽表] [2026年8月份聲援預告] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 🏛 各 級 法 院 ‼️沒有已知手足案件 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

13 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC≈1,740 viewsread 17 August 2026

【#上庭聲援 - 08月14日 星期五】 [旁聽須知][交通資訊] [牆內收信地址一覽表] [2026年8月份聲援預告] [上庭總結 2026.08.13] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 🏛 各 級 法 院 ‼️沒有已知手足案件 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

13 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC≈1,100 viewsread 17 August 2026

【#上庭總結 - 08月13日 星期四】 —————————————————— 👤P.B.(34)🛑服刑中 #更新逾期上訴許可申請 (#1118油麻地 暴動;經審訊後罪成,於2024年7月23日被判監5年。申請定罪和刑罰上訴許可於2025年4月30日被拒。) 👉🏻【直播台】 申請定罪和刑罰上訴許可再被拒,並判加監3星期。(彭偉昌上訴庭法官 楊家雄上訴庭法官 陳慶偉法官) —————————————————— 👤陳(21) #裁決 (#0908炮台山 管有攻擊性武器 管有物品意圖損壞財產) 👉🏻【直播台】 罪脫。(王證瑜裁判官) —————————————————— 🌟上述列表只包括認罪/裁決/判刑等案件,其餘上庭詳情請參看: 📌【法庭文字直播台】 📌【被捕人士資訊部】

12 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC≈1,440 viewsread 17 August 2026

【#上庭聲援 - 08月13日 星期四】 [旁聽須知][交通資訊] [牆內收信地址一覽表] [2026年8月份聲援預告] [上庭總結 2026.08.12] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 🏛高 等 法 院3樓1庭 👨🏻‍⚖️彭偉昌上訴庭法官 👨🏻‍⚖️楊家雄上訴庭法官 👨🏻‍⚖️陳慶偉法官 🕙10:00 👤P.B.(34)🛑服刑中 #更新逾期上訴許可申請 (#1118油麻地 暴動;經審訊後罪成,於2024年7月23日被判監5年。申請定罪和刑罰上訴許可於2025年4月30日被拒。) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 🏛區 域 法 院8樓27庭 👨🏻‍⚖️陳廣池法官 🕝14:30 👥吳,陳(32-34)🛑二人已還押逾9個月 #提訊 (#網上言論 #製武襲警 串謀煽惑暴動 煽惑煽惑暴動 煽惑暴動) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

12 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC811 viewsread 17 August 2026

【#上庭總結 - 08月12日 星期三】 —————————————————— 👤梁(18)🛑已還押21日 🔥#判刑 (#23條 煽動意圖 3項刑事毀壞) 👉🏻【直播台】 判感化1年6個月和罰款1500元。(蘇惠德總裁判官) —————————————————— 🌟上述列表只包括認罪/裁決/判刑等案件,其餘上庭詳情請參看: 📌【法庭文字直播台】 📌【被捕人士資訊部】

11 Aug 2026, 13:10 UTC≈1,400 viewsread 17 August 2026

【#上庭聲援 - 08月12日 星期三】 [旁聽須知][交通資訊] [牆內收信地址一覽表] [2026年8月份聲援預告] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 🏛西 九 龍 裁 判 法 院4樓1庭 👨🏻‍⚖️蘇惠德總裁判官 🕙10:00 👤梁(18)🛑已還押21日 🔥#判刑 (#23條 煽動意圖 3項刑事毀壞) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

10 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC≈1,610 viewsread 17 August 2026

【#上庭聲援 - 08月11日 星期二】 [旁聽須知][交通資訊] [牆內收信地址一覽表] [2026年8月份聲援預告] [上庭總結 2026.08.10] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 🏛高 等 法 院4樓6庭 👨🏻‍⚖️彭偉昌上訴庭法官 👨🏻‍⚖️楊家雄上訴庭法官 👨🏻‍⚖️陳慶偉法官 🕙10:00 👥伍,梁,劉,黃,林,黎(21-30)🛑六人服刑中 #不服定罪和刑罰上訴許可申請 #不服定罪逾期上訴許可申請 (#1118何文田 6項妨礙司法公正;#1118理大 暴動;經審訊後罪成,於2024年6月18日被判監5年10個月。) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 🏛區 域 法 院11樓39庭 👩🏻‍⚖️張潔宜法官 🕙10:00(不設旁聽) 👤王岸然/前民陣副召集人(71)🛑已還押逾8個月 #審訊前覆核 (第二次) (#23條 #大埔災難 發布煽動刊物 妨礙司法

10 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC948 viewsread 17 August 2026

【#上庭總結 - 08月10日 星期一】 —————————————————— 👥楊雪盈,黃碧雲,鄒家成,余慧明,何桂藍,林卓廷,吳政亨,鄭達鴻,何啟明,陳志全,梁國雄(24-64)🛑十二人服刑中 #宣布判決 (#港區國安法 #民主派初選 串謀顛覆國家政權;經審訊後罪成。申請定罪上訴許可於2026年2月23日被拒,現申請上訴至終審法院的許可證明書。) 👉🏻【直播台】 批出定罪上訴許可。(潘兆初高等法院首席法官 彭偉昌上訴庭法官 譚耀豪法官) —————————————————— 🌟上述列表只包括認罪/裁決/判刑等案件,其餘上庭詳情請參看: 📌【法庭文字直播台】 📌【被捕人士資訊部】

9 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC≈1,720 viewsread 17 August 2026

【#上庭聲援 - 08月10日 星期一】 [旁聽須知][交通資訊] [牆內收信地址一覽表] [2026年8月份聲援預告] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 🏛高 等 法 院6樓10庭 👨🏻‍⚖️潘兆初高等法院首席法官 👨🏻‍⚖️彭偉昌上訴庭法官 👨🏻‍⚖️譚耀豪法官 🕙10:00 👥楊雪盈,黃碧雲,鄒家成,余慧明,何桂藍,林卓廷,吳政亨,鄭達鴻,何啟明,陳志全,梁國雄(24-64)🛑十二人服刑中 #宣布判決 (#港區國安法 #民主派初選 串謀顛覆國家政權;經審訊後罪成,於2024年11月19日分別被判監6年6個月、6年6個月、7年9個月、6年9個月、7年、6年9個月、7年3個月、6年6個月、6年7個月、6年6個月、和6年9個月。申請定罪和刑令上訴許可於2026年2月23日被拒,現申請上訴至終審法院的許可證明書。) *庭上將不會讀出判詞,申請人亦無需出庭 - - - - - - - - - -

6 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC≈2,240 viewsread 17 August 2026

【#上庭聲援 - 08月07日 星期五】 [旁聽須知][交通資訊] [牆內收信地址一覽表] [2026年8月份聲援預告] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 🏛 各 級 法 院 ‼️沒有已知手足案件 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

5 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC≈2,370 viewsread 17 August 2026

【#上庭聲援 - 08月06日 星期四】 [旁聽須知][交通資訊] [牆內收信地址一覽表] [2026年8月份聲援預告] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 🏛 各 級 法 院 ‼️沒有已知手足案件 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @youarenotalonehk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 12,856 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 26 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“被捕人士關注組” (@youarenotalonehk), 48,379 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/youarenotalonehk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.