Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Всевидящее Шоко

@vseshoko

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

25,909subscribers

+29 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001795921615
TypeChannel
Username@vseshoko
DescriptionКанал CEO Kokoc Group Александра Шокурова. О маркетинге, бизнесе и бизнесе на маркетинге. Если есть что обсудить: @shoko_team Чат здесь: @vseshoko_chat Дзен: https://vseshoko.ru/tg1uft8 Регистрация канала https://clck.ru/3GWiRA
Created25 January 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vseshoko

Growth

25,84126,08325,9626 August 2026 — 25,880 subscribers6 August 2026 — 25,880 subscribers6 August 2026 — 25,870 subscribers7 August 2026 — 25,841 subscribers8 August 2026 — 26,083 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,051 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,013 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25,971 subscribers12 August 2026 — 25,938 subscribers13 August 2026 — 25,909 subscribers25,9096 August 202613 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 7 days, net +29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,805–26,119 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 04:2425,909-29
12 Aug 2026, 01:3625,938-33
11 Aug 2026, 03:1525,971-42
10 Aug 2026, 01:3126,013-38
9 Aug 2026, 05:0226,051-32
8 Aug 2026, 06:1726,083+242
7 Aug 2026, 07:0425,841-29
6 Aug 2026, 04:5025,870-10
6 Aug 2026, 02:0225,880no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:0725,880first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 5 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.0%
avg views ÷ 25,909 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,910
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.743%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held16 (5 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total58,920
Reactions total438
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 11:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
316
Videos
66
Links
279

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
34s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

701 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
33247.4%
🔥15722.4%
👍13018.5%
💯263.71%
223.14%
👌142.00%
🎉121.71%
😢60.856%
💔20.285%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 701reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 16 we hold a reading for · 19%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vseshoko. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC≈3,990 views31 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @bs_businessPhoto

Три вопроса, которые должен задать предприниматель, прежде чем инвестировать в стартап Меня зовут Александр Шокуров @vseshoko, я СЕО Kokoc Group, инвестор и предприниматель. Хорошего продукта, растущего рынка и красивой финансовой модели недостаточно. Перед тем как вложить деньги, я последовательно отвечаю себе на три вопроса. 1️⃣ Можно ли из этого построить бизнес? Не создать работу для основателя и пары сотрудни

12👍10🔥9

12 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC≈3,980 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Хорошего продукта и большого рынка недостаточно, чтобы я инвестировал. Для Т-Бизнес секретов рассказал, какие три вопроса задаю себе перед тем, как вложиться в стартап 👇

👍2🔥1

10 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC≈4,840 views51 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥2614👍10😢1

8 Aug 2026, 14:06 UTC≈6,280 views33 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Carry trade и глобальные финансовые потоки Давненько я писал про биткоин и carry trade. Пост вызвал довольно большое количество реакций и обсуждений. Для профессионалов рынка эта тема, безусловно, не новая. Но последние пару недель происходящее всё сильнее укладывается в эту логику – и хочется поделиться наблюдениями. Уверен, многие уже читали в новостях – корейский фондовый рынок сейчас демонстрирует невероятную

👌14👍10🔥81

5 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC≈4,760 views42 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Не принимайте мои слова за истину Последние дни я нахожусь в Абакане, на исторической родине. Об этом будет отдельный пост: впечатлений и эмоций накопилось много. Но сегодня хочу поделиться другой мыслью и заодно обратиться к вам. Как выяснилось, в Абакане у меня немало подписчиков. Один из них подошёл ко мне, поделился своими мыслями, и мы успели немного поговорить. Получился интересный и содержательный разговор

20👍13🔥8💯1

2 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC≈5,580 views38 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Можно ли научиться быть счастливее? Начинаем серию подкастов о счастье с разговора с Андреем Шапенко, профессором бизнес-практики Московской школы управления Сколково. Мы привыкли относиться к счастью как к чему-то субъективному и почти неуправляемому: либо чувствуешь, либо нет. Андрей же предлагает смотреть на него как на состояние, на которое можно влиять – через ожидания, отношения, тело, мышление и ежедневные

18🔥11👍63

31 Jul 2026, 06:26 UTC≈4,920 views33 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Что нужно человеку для счастья Последние пару недель вокруг меня постоянно возникает тема счастья. Уж не знаю, запрос ли это ко вселенной, совпадение или просто случайность. Хотя на самом деле для меня эту тему ещё раньше открыл Леша Гидирим, с которым мы записывали мой первый подкаст. А за последние две недели я встретил уже человек пять, которые создают проекты вокруг темы счастья или исследуют её параллельно с о

16👍10🔥7

27 Jul 2026, 15:37 UTC≈5,160 views33 reactionsread 13 August 2026
File

Запрос на честность По данным Graphite, доля новых ИИ-статей к концу 2025 года в интернете достигла 50,9%. С тех пор цифра не растёт, но и не снижается. Kokoc Group провела исследование о том, как аудитория различает контент, созданный ИИ и созданный человеком. Делюсь цифрами: • Лучше всего аудитория считывает ИИ в видео - 77% верных ответов • Текст на втором месте - 74% • Аудио оказалось настоящей слепой зоной

🔥17112👍2😢1

24 Jul 2026, 16:01 UTC≈5,200 views49 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Судьи отпускают на свободу чаще утром, чем вечером В 2011-м разобрали больше тысячи решений израильских судей по УДО. В начале смены освобождение одобряли в 65% случаев. К концу - почти никогда. Учёные назвали это усталостью от принятия решений. В массовой культуре закрепилось выражение hungry judge effect - "эффект голодного судьи". Я это к чему? Чтобы поговорить про #замедление, конечно. Впереди выходные - врем

👍2316🔥8💔2

20 Jul 2026, 17:32 UTC≈5,360 views58 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Турнир, который выиграли маркетологи Что ж, чемпионат мира закончился – и это был один из самых резонансных турниров на моей памяти 🔥 Может, это профдеформация, но кажется, финал смотрели все или почти все. И это не баг, а фича: чемпионат точно войдёт в историю как учебник по бизнесу, маркетингу и рекламе. Нам действительно есть чему поучиться. Даже истории с VAR и отменёнными с дисквалификациями сработали в плюс

27🔥159👍7

18 Jul 2026, 15:21 UTC≈4,530 views39 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Ну что, завтра на падел? Последний год заметно чаще начал играть в падел. Нравятся динамика, командный формат и то, что в игру довольно легко войти даже без большого опыта в ракеточных видах спорта - да и в спорте в целом. Мы уже обсуждали, как всего за несколько лет вокруг падела сформировался полноценный растущий рынок. Мне кажется, это один из самых интересных спортивных феноменов последних лет. За пять лет кол

18👍12🔥7💯2

15 Jul 2026, 15:51 UTC≈4,320 views28 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Ваш сайт могут больше не открыть Cloudflare Radar фиксирует: автоматические запросы к HTML-страницам уже обошли человеческие. Интернет всё чаще читают не люди, а боты и ИИ-агенты. Про рост нейропоиска и падение трафика сайтов я уже писал. Посмотрим, как ситуация изменилась сейчас? По данным Reuters Institute Digital News Report, около 10% пользователей уже получают новости через ChatGPT и Gemini. Годом ранее было

14👍5💯4🔥4😢1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @vseshoko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 31,662 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Всевидящее Шоко” (@vseshoko), 25,909 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vseshoko.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.