Channel
@hello_blogger
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,595subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001115768930 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hello_blogger |
| Created | 21 March 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hello_blogger |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 1,595 | +7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 1,588 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:10 | 1,586 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 1,587 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:49 | 1,587 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (28 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,718 |
| Reactions total | 75 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
64 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 25 | 39.1% | |
| 👍 | 21 | 32.8% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 25.0% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 1.56% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 1.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Что может быть лучше, чем разговоры о счастье в пятницу? 🤔 У Александра Шокурова, CEO Kokoc Group (куда входит hello blogger), совсем недавно вышел подкаст с Андреем Шапенко, профессором бизнес-практики Московской школы управления Сколково. В этом выпуске вы не найдете готовых ответов — лишь вопросы, которые помогут проверить, действительно ли вы строите жизнь своей мечты? Подробнее можете прочитать по ссылке 🔗
❤1👍1🔥1
Всё еще листаете рилсы перед сном? А многие уже перешли на ветки в Threads*. Сегодня рассказали в карточках о том, что это за площадка, как начать её вести и какой контент там работает. Бегите читать, изучать и постить ветки! 🩷 Соц.сеть признана экстремистской и запрещена в РФ*
❤3👍2💘1🔥1
Рекламная кампания — один клик или множество шагов? 🌊 Организация рекламной кампании — это лестница с большииим количеством ступеней. Мы знаем, как важно пройти все этапы и собрали их для вас в чек-лист. Сохраните его, чтобы знать, как приручить такого зверя! А если хотите доверить свою кампанию экспертам, то напишите нам на почту: [email protected] 🩷
❤1👍1🔥1
Ничего личного, просто правда любим работу! 🙄 Поэтому уже больше 13 лет создаём кампании, которые приносят результат. Если вы хотите сделать с нами кампанию, интеграцию, образовательный проект или спецпроект, велкам заполнять форму по ссылке 🔗
👍5❤4🔥3
Как сделать так, чтобы интеграция попадала точно в цель? 🩶 Инфлюенсеры говорят с аудиторией на равных. А если ваш креатив не общается с аудиторией, то увеличения продаж точно не будет. В карточках мы собрали шаги, которые помогут создать успешный креатив. Но если хотите, чтобы мы помогли вам в этом важном вопросе, напишите нам на почту: [email protected] 📆
❤3👍3🔥3
Сколько книг уже прочитали из списка на лето? 🌞 Решили чуть разбавить вашу литературу и создали подборку полезных тг-каналов про маркетинг. Смотрите видео и сохраняйте список! 🩷
❤4👍2🔥2
Нашли лайфхак по увеличению показателей 😍 Но если у вас не сработало, то самое время сделать кампанию с блогерами. Для этого нужно просто заполнить форму 🗯️
❤6👍4🔥3
Про UGC-стратегию слышали? 😮 Бесконечное количество историй уже видели о том, как бренды запускают UGC без плана, а потом удивляются, почему нет желаемого результата. Поэтому мы чуть-чуть отвлекли от работы нашу Анастасию Степанову и попросили рассказать про стратегию, которую создают на нашей UGC-фабрике контента. А если хотите внедрить UGC в свой проект, пишите нам на почту: [email protected] 🩷
❤3👍3🔥2🥴1
С днём PR-специалиста! 🎈 Если бы не пиар, мир бы знал только скандалы, а не достижения. Но вы каждый день доказываете, что правду можно подать красиво, а сложное — объяснить просто. Поэтому сегодня решили поделиться с вами правилами успешного PR. Смотрите карточки и берите на заметку! 🩷
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @hello_blogger. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 743,892 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“hello blogger” (@hello_blogger), 1,595 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hello_blogger.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.