Всё самое интересное по программированию
Разместить рекламу: @tproger_sales_bot
Правила общения: https://tprg.ru/rules
Другие каналы: @tproger_channels
Сайт: https://tprg.ru/site
VK: vk.com/tproger
Регистрация в перечне РКН: https://tprg.ru/mJwo
Created
11 March 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
18 measurements spanning 7 days, net -281. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 78,733–79,192 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 19:33
78,786
-19
12 Aug 2026, 12:15
78,805
-289
11 Aug 2026, 19:05
79,094
-5
11 Aug 2026, 12:28
79,099
-1
10 Aug 2026, 22:34
79,100
-4
10 Aug 2026, 11:48
79,104
+1
9 Aug 2026, 19:03
79,103
-3
9 Aug 2026, 14:16
79,106
-19
8 Aug 2026, 17:36
79,125
-2
8 Aug 2026, 16:38
79,127
-3
7 Aug 2026, 19:16
79,130
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:01
79,130
-9
6 Aug 2026, 21:12
79,139
+2
6 Aug 2026, 17:10
79,137
+65
6 Aug 2026, 03:20
79,072
no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:19
79,072
+5
6 Aug 2026, 01:34
79,067
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:15
79,067
first reading
Engagement
34 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.17%
avg views ÷ 78,786 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,230
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.678%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 34 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
34 (27 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
245,720
Reactions total
1,667
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,670
Videos
≈1,160
Links
≈8,250
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1,420 reactions across 30 posts, in 60 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
228
16.1%
👍
202
14.2%
😁
150
10.6%
🔥
148
10.4%
🤯
73
5.14%
👏
71
5.00%
✍
48
3.38%
💯
47
3.31%
🤝
39
2.75%
🤔
36
2.54%
💊
25
1.76%
🎉
24
1.69%
👎
22
1.55%
🥰
22
1.55%
👀
21
1.48%
🌚
20
1.41%
⚡
17
1.20%
👨💻
15
1.06%
🙈
15
1.06%
🤣
14
0.986%
40 further kinds
183
12.9%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,667reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 34 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tproger. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 34 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Почему хорошие идеи так и остаются в заметках?
«Инициатива наказуема» — знакомое выражение? Промолчал, ничего не сделал: не накажут. Предложил и ошибся: накажут почти наверняка.
Например, некоторые компании переняли у Toyota контроль качества, только наоборот. У японцев за найденный брак поощряли, а в других компаниях стали наказывать. Так и пропадает желание что-то предлагать.
В новом материале на Tproger разбира…
Хомяку дали Strava Premium, и он закрыл августовский челлендж на второй день
Физик из Утрехта хотел узнать, сколько наматывает за ночь его хомяк Молли, и начал с дешёвого велокомпьютера: там тоже магнит и датчик. Не сработало: велокомпьютер уходил в спящий режим, если колесо стояло дольше пяти минут, а Молли регулярно отлучается попить.
Итоговая сборка проще, чем кажется. Магнит на колесе проходит мимо датчика Холл…
Код никогда не был сложной частью
Этот тезис, который недавно назвали оскорблением профессии, звучит на каждой второй конференции. Мол, модели уже неплохо пишут код, куда сложнее понять, что именно писать.
С каждым днём с этим всё сложнее не согласиться. Посмотрите сами, сколько времени у вас сегодня уходит на набор кода, а сколько на выяснение, чего хочет бизнес, на согласования и на разбор чужих решений трёхлетне…
Наверное, в каждом втором резюме среди навыков есть «системное мышление». С ним не рождаются, ему учатся в процессе работы, с накоплением опыта. Оно помогает видеть картину целиком и структурировать всё, что вы делаете.
Сейчас у этого навыка появилось новое применение: с появлением ИИ-агентов умение поставить задачу и проверить результат стало ещё важнее. И ему можно научиться.
Какие ошибки часто совершают разработч…
Готовы отдать гигабайт оперативки за прогноз погоды?
Столько занимает встроенная «Погода» в Windows 11, а если полистать и позумить, аппетит доходит до 1,6 ГБ. На ноутбуке с 8 ГБ это пятая часть памяти за информацию о том, что завтра дождь.
Разгадка кроется в диспетчере задач: там висит пачка процессов Chromium. По факту «Погода» не нативное приложение, а веб-страница MSN, завёрнутая в WebView2.
Для сравнения, та …
Last call для тех, кто давно тянет с запуском своего проекта
Онлайн-магистратура МФТИ+Сколково «Технологическое предпринимательство» закрывает приём заявлений 14 августа.
TL;DR: 2 года, полностью онлайн, 8–12 часов в неделю, реальный проект с ментором, диплом МФТИ гособразца. Средний возраст студентов — 34 года.
Посмотреть лендинг программы: https://tprg.ru/Id4i
Задать вопросы и записаться на бесплатный разбор ва…
В ящике вашего стола лежит сервер, за который вы уже заплатили
Возьмём характеристики не очень старого смартфона: восемь ARM-ядер, 8 ГБ памяти, 128 ГБ флеша, свой модем и аккумулятор, работающий как ИБП без всякого ИБП. За VPS с такими параметрами вы бы платили ежемесячно, а этот уже оплачен и пылится. Особенно обидно сейчас, когда память подорожала и собирать мини-ПК под пет-проекты откровенно невыгодно.
Один разр…
RustFS на Rust обгоняет MinIO в 2,3 раза
На GitHub стремительно набирает звёзды RustFS — открытое объектное хранилище с S3-совместимым API, написанное на Rust (уже за 30 тысяч звёзд).
Если верить замерам, то он в 2,3 раза быстрее MinIO на мелких объектах. Секрет — в сборщике мусора, которого у Rust нет. MinIO написан на Go, и его сборщик периодически замирает и останавливает потоки на несколько миллисекунд. Когда о…
Чему учиться взрослому профессионалу?
Свою работу трудно оценить со стороны. Каждый день смотришь на неё одинаково и не замечаешь того же, чего не замечал вчера. Тут выручают чужие модели: короткая формулировка переворачивает привычную картину, и становится понятно, чего не хватало.
Кажется, что хороший результат говорит сам за себя. Но код, о котором никто не узнал, карьеру не двигает. Кажется, что учится тот, кто…
Агент просит разрешить npm run analyze. Вы разрешите?
Две трети разработчиков разрешают — и это самая пропускаемая атака из всех. Такие цифры дала игра, где вы под таймером одобряете или запрещаете команды ИИ-агента: 40 тысяч прогонов, 409 тысяч решений.
Закономерность вышла пугающая. Чем страшнее команда выглядит, тем надёжнее её ловят: rm -rf / пропускают 11,7% игроков. А вот cat ~/.aws/credentials, то есть кражу…
«Если вы пришли воровать мои данные — начните отсюда»
Так начинается отчёт человека, который год воевал со скраперами и в итоге выложил все свои правила фаервола целиком. Сайт у него на 1,5 млн страниц, аналитика показывала уютные 6 тысяч просмотров в неделю. Сервер за ту же неделю отдал 1,28 миллиона страниц.
Разбираясь, кто это всё читает, он нашёл метрику, которая экономит все дальнейшие споры: сколько страниц к…
Один issue на GitHub и ИИ-агент работает на атакующего
На Black Hat USA показали, что публичный issue от постороннего человека без единого права на репозиторий разворачивает кодового агента против кода, который он должен чинить. Проверяли не экзотические сборки, а конфигурации, которые вендоры поставляют по умолчанию.
У Claude Code инъекция через текст issue довела до выполнения кода на раннере, чтения произвольных…
❤22🔥9🤝6🤩4🆒4🤨3🥰3😍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @tproger. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 460,049 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@tproger named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@ternlight named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Physics.Math.Code @physics_lib · 145,853 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
XOR @xor_journal · 158,696 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
GitHub Community @github · 149,921 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
Книжное братство @flibusta · 164,093 Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Типичный программист” (@tproger), 78,786 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tproger.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.